SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

80%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

76,155 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

3,596 Benchmark Score

Top 20% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation represent a flagship laptop pairing, yet the benchmark data reveals a stark contrast between the CPU’s elite status and the GPU’s modest standing. The CPU sits in the 95th percentile of all processors, while the GPU languishes in the 21st percentile of all graphics cards, a disparity that defines this platform as a compute-centric workstation rather than a gaming powerhouse. This analysis relies exclusively on the provided data, and it must be noted that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all performance discussions are therefore estimated from the benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation is built on the AD103 chip using a 5 nm process from TSMC, packing 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. Clock speeds are set at a base of 1425 MHz and a boost of 2115 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz, or 18 Gbps effective. The memory configuration is substantial for mobile standards, offering capacity and bandwidth that suit large datasets and high-resolution textures.

The compute layout includes 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. Ray tracing is handled by 76 dedicated RT cores, while 304 tensor cores accelerate AI workloads. The pixel rate is 236.9 GPixel/s, and the texture rate reaches 643.0 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 41.15 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, the latter at a 1:1 ratio. This symmetry indicates that the GPU does not rely on reduced precision for accelerated throughput, which is typical for professional-grade compute tasks requiring consistent precision across formats.

The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern rendering pipelines and forward-looking features. The GPU’s power envelope is a 120 W TDP, and it uses no external power connectors, drawing all power through the motherboard. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which provides ample bandwidth for data transfer between the CPU and GPU.

In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark, the GPU scores 3596. This score places it in the 21st percentile of all GPUs, a relatively low position. The nearest rivals are telling: the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 scores 3594 (a 0.1% delta), the GT 735M scores 3616 (-0.6%), the GTX 1050 scores 3629 (-0.9%), and the AMD Radeon HD 6770 scores 3649 (-1.5%). These comparisons show that the RTX 5000 Mobile’s Steel Nomad score is essentially on par with much older, entry-level desktop GPUs, despite its modern architecture and 16 GB VRAM. For rendering, this means that while the GPU can handle large scenes due to its memory capacity, its raw computational throughput in this specific test is not competitive with contemporary high-end parts. The 21st percentile ranking suggests that for rasterized or ray-traced workloads measured by Steel Nomad, the GPU will be a limiting factor compared to the CPU’s capabilities.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU delivers a suite of strong benchmark results. In Cinebench R15, it scores 5656.5 in multi-core and 323.5 in single-core. Cinebench R20 results are 20236 multi-core and 2856 single-core. Cinebench R23 shows 36429.5 multi-core and 2187.5 single-core. PassMark tests further illustrate the CPU’s breadth: data compression scores 631885, data encryption 48567, extended instructions 49148, find prime numbers 460, floating-point math 194998, integer math 155076, multithread 56902, physics 3476, random string sorting 77196, and single-thread 4618. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 76155, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs.

The GPU’s sole benchmark score is 3596 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which places it in the 21st percentile of all GPUs. The average benchmark score for the GPU is also 3596, as this is the only data point.

The combined picture is one of extreme imbalance. The CPU’s 95th percentile ranking indicates top-tier performance among all processors, rivaling and slightly exceeding several AMD parts. The nearest CPU rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with an average score of 76212 (-0.1% delta), the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P at 76492 (-0.4%), the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX at 76513 (-0.5%), and the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D at 75779 (0.5%). The Intel chip is within a fraction of a percent of these parts, showing it is squarely in the high-end desktop and workstation class, despite being a mobile processor.

In contrast, the GPU’s 21st percentile ranking places it far below the median, with rivals that are decades old. The combined percentile for the build is 58, which reflects the average of these two disparate components. The data shows that this pairing is not optimized for graphics-heavy tasks; instead, it is a configuration where the CPU dominates and the GPU is a secondary consideration, likely aimed at compute workloads that rely more on processor cores than graphics rendering.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX is a 24-core, 24-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically Arrow Lake-HX. It is manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC, with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 2.80 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.50 GHz. The TDP is 55 W, which is modest for a 24-core part, suggesting efficient power management. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, which is a feature often found in workstation-class platforms. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are provided by Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. The processor is unlocked, meaning the multiplier can be adjusted, and it is currently in active production.

Benchmark scores indicate exceptional multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36429.5 is particularly strong, reflecting the 24 cores’ ability to handle heavily parallel workloads. The single-core score of 2187.5 is also solid, indicating good per-thread performance from the high boost clock. PassMark scores reinforce this: multithread score is 56902, floating-point math is 194998, integer math is 155076, and data compression is 631885. These numbers suggest the CPU excels at tasks such as video encoding, 3D rendering, scientific simulations, and database operations that can utilize all cores.

The 95th percentile ranking confirms that the 285HX is among the best CPUs available, regardless of form factor. Its nearest rivals are all high-core-count AMD parts, and the performance deltas are minimal, ranging from -0.5% to 0.5%. This means that for real workloads, the 285HX will perform on par with or slightly better than those competing chips, making it a top choice for mobile workstations where CPU compute is the primary requirement.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 2114 socket, which is a soldered mobile socket, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense. The memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, and ECC memory is supported, which is a boon for data integrity in professional workloads. The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is adequate for the CPU’s needs, though it is not class-leading.

PCIe support is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing high-speed connectivity for NVMe SSDs and other peripherals. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is a generation older than the CPU’s native Gen 5, but the bandwidth is still sufficient for the RTX 5000 Mobile’s capabilities.

The TDP for the CPU is 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 120 W. There is no suggested PSU value provided, and the GPU uses no external power connectors, indicating it is powered entirely through the motherboard. This means the system’s power delivery is integrated into the laptop’s design, and there is no user-serviceable PSU headroom to consider. The lack of a suggested PSU and the IGP slot width for the GPU suggest this is a laptop design where power is managed by the system manufacturer.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform is limited by the soldered nature of the components. The CPU cannot be replaced, and the GPU is also likely soldered. The most practical upgrade path is to increase memory capacity, as DDR5 is supported and ECC is available. Adding more RAM or faster DDR5 modules could improve performance in memory-bandwidth-sensitive tasks. Storage upgrades via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes are also possible, allowing for faster NVMe SSDs. Beyond that, the platform is closed, and any future performance gains would require a full system replacement.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile rank of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 58, which reflects the average of the CPU’s 95th percentile and the GPU’s 21st percentile.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel CPU has an average benchmark score of 76155, while the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D has an average score of 75779, giving the Intel part a 0.5% advantage.

Q: What is the GPU’s score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation scores 3596 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU?

A: The CPU has a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s with dual-channel DDR5 support.

Q: What is the process node and transistor count for the GPU?

A: The GPU is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC, with 45,900 million transistors.

Q: Is the CPU’s multiplier unlocked?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX has an unlocked multiplier.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 21st percentile ranking, with a Steel Nomad score of 3596, indicates that this pairing is not suited for high-refresh gaming. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 2187.5 in Cinebench R23 could drive frame generation, but the GPU is a bottleneck, likely limiting performance to levels far below what competitive gamers expect.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 cores and high multi-thread scores, such as 36429.5 in Cinebench R23, provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming simultaneously. The GPU’s tensor cores and 41.15 TFLOPS FP16 could assist with AI-based encoding, but the overall graphics performance is too low for demanding game streaming.

Video editing: The CPU excels here, with a multithread PassMark score of 56902 and floating-point math of 194998, which speed up rendering and effects. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is useful for holding large timelines and effects, but its low compute score means GPU-accelerated exports will be slow compared to higher-tier graphics cards.

3D rendering: The CPU is the star, with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20236 that will handle CPU-based rendering efficiently. The GPU’s RT cores and tensor cores are present, but its 21st percentile ranking suggests that GPU-accelerated rendering will be mediocre, making this a CPU-first rendering machine.

Software development: The CPU’s high integer math score of 155076 and data compression score of 631885 indicate strong performance for compilation and code processing. The GPU is largely irrelevant for this workload, so the 285HX’s 95th percentile ranking makes this an excellent development platform.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-core score of 4618 in PassMark ensures snappy responsiveness for everyday tasks, while the 24 cores provide future-proofing for parallel workloads. The GPU is overkill for office tasks, but its 16 GB VRAM could be used for light CAD or data visualization, though its low score means it is not a primary asset here.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is targeted at professionals who prioritize CPU compute over graphics. Gamers at any resolution will be disappointed by the GPU’s 21st percentile ranking, which is on par with the GTX 1050 and GT 545. Content creators focusing on CPU-heavy tasks like video encoding or software development will benefit from the 95th percentile CPU, which outpaces or matches the Ryzen 9 8945HX and Threadripper PRO 9945WX. Developers will appreciate the 24 cores and ECC memory support for reliable, parallel workloads. Students and small business users in fields like engineering or data analysis, where CPU performance is critical, will find the 285HX capable, but they should not expect graphics-intensive applications to run well. This is not a gaming laptop; it is a mobile workstation for compute-centric use cases.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: laptop) comprising the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX and the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation. The CPU is a 24-core Arrow Lake-HX part in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace part in the 21st percentile. The overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 58, places this system in the mid-range for a laptop, but the individual components are at opposite ends of the spectrum. It is a high-end CPU paired with a low-end GPU, making it a specialist tool rather than a balanced general-purpose machine.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a severe imbalance between the two components. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 76155 places it in the 95th percentile, while the GPU’s score of 3596 places it in the 21st percentile. In CPU-bound workloads, such as Cinebench R23 multi-core at 36429.5 or PassMark multithread at 56902, the 285HX will perform exceptionally, with no bottleneck from the GPU. However, in GPU-bound workloads, the RTX 5000 Mobile’s Steel Nomad score of 3596 will be the limiting factor, capping performance at levels comparable to the GTX 1050. The CPU is not the bottleneck in any scenario; the GPU is the clear constraint for graphics-intensive tasks. For rendering, the CPU can deliver 3D scene computations quickly, but the GPU will struggle to keep up in final frame output. The FPS scaling, estimated from these scores, would show high frame rates in CPU-limited games but very low rates in GPU-limited titles. This is a configuration where the CPU should be used for heavy compute and the GPU treated as a supplementary accelerator for light graphics or display output only.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds