SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

76,155 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh: Mobile Workstation Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's top-tier Arrow Lake-HX mobile processor with NVIDIA's Turing-based Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh GPU, creating a laptop configuration that ranks in the 73rd percentile overall against all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU alone sits in the 95th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands squarely in the 50th percentile, indicating a substantial performance asymmetry that shapes every workload profile. The system targets professional mobile workstations where CPU throughput dominates, but the GPU's mid-pack positioning constrains graphics-intensive tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 50th percentile standing suggests modest 1080p gaming capability, with the CPU's 95th percentile ensuring no processor bottleneck at lower resolutions. Frame rates in competitive titles will be limited by the RTX 3000's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 336.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, making high-refresh 144Hz play feasible only in less demanding e-sports titles at reduced settings. The 24-core CPU's 36,429.5 Cinebench R23 multi-core score guarantees headroom, but the GPU's mid-range position caps sustained high-FPS output.

Streaming: The CPU's 48,567 Passmark data encryption score and 194,998 floating-point math score provide ample overhead for software encoding. The 24 threads handle simultaneous game capture, encoding, and broadcast workloads without contention, while the GPU's 240 tensor cores can offload AI-enhanced encoding tasks. The 6 GB GDDR6 VRAM limits high-bitrate streaming at elevated resolutions, but the overall configuration supports single-PC streaming at 1080p.

Video editing: Multi-core performance excels here — the 36,429.5 Cinebench R23 score and 20236 Cinebench R20 multi-core result drive fast timeline rendering and export. The GPU's 1920 shading units and 64 ROPs accelerate effects and color grading, though 6 GB VRAM constrains 4K timelines with heavy effects stacks. The 10.60 TFLOPS FP16 throughput aids GPU-accelerated previews, while the CPU's 155,076 integer math score handles codec encoding efficiently.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering is the system's strongest suit, with the 24-core/24-thread configuration producing 5656.5 in Cinebench R15 multi-core and 631,885 in Passmark data compression. GPU rendering via CUDA cores benefits from 5.299 TFLOPS FP32, but the RTX 3000's 50th percentile placement means render times lag dedicated workstation GPUs. The 30 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing acceleration, though the Turing architecture's older design limits ray tracing performance relative to newer options.

Software development: The 24 threads and 36 MB of L3 cache handle parallel compilation, while the 4618 Passmark single-thread score ensures responsive IDE interaction. The 48,567 data encryption score accelerates secure development workflows, and the 49148 extended instructions score benefits vectorized code. The 102.4 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth supports large codebases and virtualized environments.

Student and office work: The CPU's 95th percentile ranking makes this overkill for document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The 323.5 Cinebench R15 single-core and 2187.5 R23 single-core scores deliver instant application responsiveness. Office workloads will never approach the 55W TDP limits, making this configuration far more capable than needed for typical academic and administrative tasks.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh employs the TU106 chip on TSMC's 12 nm process, containing 10,800 million transistors across a 445 mm² die. The 6 GB GDDR6 memory operates at 1750 MHz with a 192-bit bus, producing 336.0 GB/s bandwidth — adequate for 1080p professional visualization but limiting for large textures or high-resolution viewports. The 945 MHz base and 1380 MHz boost clocks deliver 5.299 TFLOPS FP32, 10.60 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), 88.32 GPixel/s pixel fill, and 165.6 GTexel/s texture throughput.

The 1920 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 64 ROPs define a mid-range mobile GPU profile. The 30 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, while 240 tensor cores enable AI-accelerated features like DLSS and denoising. The GPU's 50th percentile placement across all GPUs reflects its position as a capable but not exceptional mobile workstation part. DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API support ensure compatibility with modern professional applications.

The 80W TDP and MXM module form factor suit larger mobile workstations. The PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, while a generation behind the CPU's Gen 5 support, provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU's 336.0 GB/s memory subsystem. With end-of-life production status and a 2019 release date, this GPU represents mature technology that trades peak performance for established driver stability in professional ISV-certified applications.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 76,155 places it in the 95th percentile of all processors. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX at 76,212 (−0.1% delta), AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P at 76,492 (−0.4%), AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX at 76,513 (−0.5%), and AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D at 75,779 (+0.5%). This tight cluster — all within 0.5% — indicates the Core Ultra 9 285HX sits at parity with the fastest desktop and mobile CPUs available, making its 95th percentile ranking well-earned.

Specific CPU benchmarks show exceptional multi-threaded capability: 36,429.5 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 20236 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and 5656.5 in Cinebench R15 multi-core. Single-core results of 2187.5 (R23), 2856 (R20), and 323.5 (R15) demonstrate competitive single-thread performance. Passmark tests reveal 56,902 multi-thread, 4618 single-thread, 194,998 floating-point, and 155,076 integer math scores.

The GPU presents a starkly different picture. With no benchmark scores recorded and a 50th percentile ranking, the RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh offers mid-pack graphics performance. The combined system percentile of 73 reflects this imbalance: the CPU drags the overall ranking upward while the GPU anchors it in the middle. The data shows a configuration optimized for CPU-bound workloads, with the GPU serving as a capable but not class-leading companion.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the 95th percentile CPU and 50th percentile GPU creates a clear bottleneck profile. CPU-bound workloads — rendering, compilation, data processing — will exploit the processor's full potential, with the GPU rarely limiting throughput. The 0.5% delta to the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D shows the CPU can match the fastest desktop processors, meaning any performance ceiling in mixed workloads originates from the GPU.

Conversely, GPU-bound tasks will see the CPU largely idle while the RTX 3000's 50th percentile performance becomes the limiting factor. Gaming at 1080p with high settings will typically be GPU-limited; the CPU's 2187.5 single-core R23 score ensures frame delivery isn't processor-constrained, but the GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 throughput caps achievable frame rates. The 336.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 6 GB VRAM further constrain high-detail gaming at higher resolutions.

The 73rd combined percentile indicates the pairing underperforms the sum of its parts — a system with a 95th percentile CPU and 50th percentile GPU might naively be expected to land near the 72.5th percentile if components contributed equally. The actual 73rd percentile suggests the CPU compensates for the GPU's mid-pack standing, but the configuration cannot reach the upper echelons of gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX features 24 cores and 24 threads — no hyperthreading — across Arrow Lake-HX architecture built on TSMC's 3 nm process. The die contains 17,800 million transistors in a 243 mm² package, with base and boost clocks of 2.80 GHz and 5.50 GHz respectively. The 55W TDP enables sustained multi-core performance in mobile chassis, while the unlocked multiplier allows enthusiast tuning.

Cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3. The 102.4 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth, with ECC support, serves professional workloads requiring data integrity. Intel BGA 2114 socket and PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes provide modern connectivity. Integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 EU offers display output and basic acceleration, complementing the discrete GPU.

Benchmark results confirm the CPU's flagship status. The 36,429.5 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 631,885 Passmark data compression result indicate exceptional throughput for heavily threaded applications. The 48,567 data encryption and 49,148 extended instructions scores benefit security and scientific workloads. The 460 find prime numbers score — while low in absolute terms — reflects the Passmark test's sensitivity to single-core integer performance, where the 4618 single-thread score provides context. The 3 nm process enables this performance within the 55W TDP, making the 285HX a compelling choice for thin-and-light workstations.

Who Should Build It

Professional content creators working with CPU-intensive rendering pipelines will find the 24-core configuration ideal. The 36,429.5 R23 score accelerates final-frame rendering, while the GPU's 6 GB VRAM handles moderate GPU acceleration. Developers compiling large codebases benefit from 24 threads and 36 MB L3 cache, with the 49,148 extended instructions score aiding vectorized workloads.

Students and office workers in engineering, data science, or finance programs will find the CPU's 95th percentile performance future-proof, though the GPU's 50th percentile may require external GPU solutions for advanced graphics coursework. Small business workstations running virtualization, database, or analysis workloads leverage the 24 threads and ECC memory support.

Gamers seeking high-refresh 1080p play will find the GPU adequate for e-sports titles but limiting for AAA games at maximum settings. The CPU's 2187.5 R23 single-core score ensures no processor bottleneck, but the 5.299 TFLOPS GPU throughput caps performance. Content creators who game occasionally will appreciate the CPU headroom for streaming and recording.

Mobile workstation users requiring ISV-certified graphics for CAD, simulation, or scientific visualization will value the Quadro RTX 3000's professional driver support, even with its mid-pack performance. The 80W TDP and MXM form factor suit larger laptops, while the CPU's 95th percentile enables heavy compute workloads without external processing.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. All frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and component percentiles.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest approximately 60-80 FPS in esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, dropping to 30-50 FPS in demanding AAA games such as Cyberpunk 2077 or Red Dead Redemption 2. The 6 GB VRAM handles 1080p textures comfortably, though ray tracing effects will significantly impact performance despite the 30 RT cores.

At 1440p, the GPU's 50th percentile placement becomes more limiting, with estimated 40-60 FPS in optimized titles and 25-40 FPS in GPU-intensive games. The 1920 shading units and 64 ROPs provide adequate pixel throughput for 1440p at medium settings, but ultra settings will strain the 336.0 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU's 95th percentile ensures frame pacing remains consistent, with no processor-induced stutter.

At 4K, the configuration is GPU-bound in virtually all titles. The 6 GB VRAM and 192-bit bus severely constrain high-resolution textures, with estimated 20-35 FPS at ultra settings in demanding games. Lowering settings to medium or high improves playability to 35-50 FPS, but the GPU's mid-range positioning makes 4K gaming a marginal experience. The 88.32 GPixel/s fill rate and 165.6 GTexel/s texture rate are insufficient for consistent 4K60 in modern titles.

Build Overview

This laptop configuration pairs Intel's flagship 24-core Arrow Lake-HX processor with NVIDIA's Turing-based Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh GPU. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking establishes it as one of the fastest mobile processors available, while the GPU's 50th percentile places it at the median of all graphics cards. The combined 73rd percentile reflects a system optimized for CPU-bound professional workloads rather than gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks.

The Core Ultra 9 285HX delivers desktop-class multi-threaded performance — its 36,429.5 R23 score and 0.5% delta to the Ryzen 9 9950X3D demonstrate parity with the best desktop CPUs. The RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh, meanwhile, offers established Turing architecture with 1920 CUDA cores, 30 RT cores, and 240 tensor cores, but its 2019 design and 6 GB VRAM limit modern graphics workloads.

The 3 nm CPU process and 12 nm GPU process highlight a generational gap within the system. The CPU's TSMC 3 nm node and 17,800 million transistors contrast with the GPU's TSMC 12 nm node and 10,800 million transistors. This asymmetry defines the system's character: a powerhouse processor constrained by a mid-range graphics component, suitable for compute-heavy tasks where the GPU plays a supporting role.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core Ultra 9 285HX compare to its closest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 76,155 places it within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D (75,779, +0.5% delta), AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX (76,212, −0.1%), AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P (76,492, −0.4%), and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (76,513, −0.5%). This places it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh sits in the 50th percentile of all GPUs, with a boost clock of 1380 MHz, 1920 shading units, and 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. Its 6 GB GDDR6 memory provides 336.0 GB/s bandwidth across a 192-bit bus.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX supports ECC memory, with dual-channel DDR5 memory providing 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. This makes the configuration suitable for professional workloads requiring data integrity.

Q: What is the combined system performance percentile?

A: The combined CPU+GPU configuration ranks in the 73rd percentile of all system pairings, reflecting the CPU's 95th percentile dominating the GPU's 50th percentile in the overall performance calculation.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285HX supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU-only), while the GPU interfaces via PCIe 3.0 x16. This generational difference may affect data transfer rates for GPU-intensive workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's production status and architecture?

A: The RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh uses the TU106 chip on Turing architecture (12 nm, TSMC), containing 10,800 million transistors across a 445 mm² die. It is end-of-life production status with a 2019 release date.

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU have?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285HX has 24 cores and 24 threads (no hyperthreading), with 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3 cache. It boosts to 5.50 GHz with a base clock of 2.80 GHz.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel BGA 2114 socket is soldered, meaning CPU upgrades require a full system replacement. Memory upgrades are possible via the dual-channel DDR5 interface, which supports ECC and provides 102.4 GB/s bandwidth — increasing capacity from standard configurations is feasible. The PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes offers headroom for future NVMe storage upgrades, though the GPU's PCIe 3.0 x16 interface limits graphics bandwidth improvements.

The GPU's MXM module form factor theoretically allows replacement, but the 80W TDP and end-of-life production status limit available upgrade options. The 55W CPU TDP and 80W GPU TDP combine for a 135W total thermal envelope, leaving modest headroom for additional components. The suggested PSU is not specified, but the combined TDP suggests a 200W+ power adapter for sustained load.

The CPU's unlocked multiplier enables overclocking within thermal limits, potentially improving the already strong 95th percentile performance. The 3 nm process and 17,800 million transistors provide efficiency headroom, while the GPU's 12 nm process runs hotter relative to performance. A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as the CPU's 0.5% delta to the Ryzen 9 9950X3D confirms it remains at the performance frontier. However, the BGA socket and MXM form factor limit substantial upgrades without full system replacement, making this configuration a fixed-performance platform where the CPU's headroom exceeds the GPU's capabilities.