SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

76,155 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

27,435 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile form a laptop-class pairing (buildClass: laptop) with a combined percentile of 84 across all tested systems. The CPU sits at the 95th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 73rd percentile among all GPUs, making this a processor-heavy configuration in which the 24-core Core Ultra 9 285HX is the standout component. The data set contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming and frame-rate discussion later in this analysis is estimated from benchmark scores rather than derived from game-specific measurements.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming is the most natural fit for this pairing. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4618 and its 95th percentile position indicate excellent per-core performance, while the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 19587 and 73rd percentile position provide enough graphics headroom for high-refresh play in less demanding scenes. Because no measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU/GPU combination, the high-refresh verdict is based on the gap between CPU and GPU percentiles: the CPU is unlikely to be the limiting factor, so the GPU’s 73rd percentile becomes the practical ceiling.

Streaming is supported by the CPU’s heavy multi-threaded resources rather than by any measured streaming workload in the data. The Core Ultra 9 285HX scores 56902 in PassMark multithread and 36429.5 in Cinebench R23 multicore, both of which suggest there is enough parallel headroom to run a game and a streaming pipeline at the same time. The GPU’s 144 tensor cores and 36 RT cores are additional compute resources that could assist media workloads, though the pack does not quantify encoding performance.

Video editing workloads align well with the CPU’s balanced mix of integer and floating-point performance. PassMark integer math scores 155076, floating-point math scores 194998, and data compression scores 631885. These results point to strong performance for timeline operations, codec processing, and file handling. The 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer on the RTX 4070 Mobile may be a constraint for very large compositing projects, but for standard editing work the measured CPU scores are all well above the 50th percentile.

3D rendering benefits from both the 24-core CPU and the GPU’s compute capabilities. The CPU’s Cinebench R15 multicore score of 5656.5 and R20 multicore score of 20236 show strong sustained all-core throughput. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 109197 and Vulkan score of 108367 indicate that GPU-accelerated rendering is also viable. The GPU’s PassMark compute score of 8399 is lower relative to its G3D graphics score of 19587, so render workloads that lean heavily on CUDA-like compute will be more modest than pure raster workloads.

Software development is a strong use case because compilation, encryption, and instruction-heavy code all benefit from the CPU’s feature set. PassMark data encryption scores 48567 and extended instructions scores 49148, which are useful signals for build pipelines and cryptography. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with ECC (eccMemory: true), making it suitable for development workstations where data integrity matters. The single-thread score of 4618 also helps with interactive editing, debugging, and code analysis.

Student and office work is easily handled by this hardware, though it is overkill for basic document editing. The same single-thread score of 4618 that supports gaming also drives responsive everyday applications. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a backup display solution, while the CPU’s dual-channel DDR5 memory bus with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth gives the platform more than enough memory throughput for office multitasking. The main point is that this platform targets demanding professional scenarios, not just light productivity.

Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 9 285HX delivers strong CPU benchmark results across multiple test suites. In Cinebench R15, it scores 5656.5 multicore and 323.5 singlecore. In R20, it scores 20236 multicore and 2856 singlecore. In R23, it scores 36429.5 multicore and 2187.5 singlecore. PassMark multithread reports 56902, while PassMark single-thread reports 4618, with a duplicate single-thread result of 4618 also present in the pack.

The RTX 4070 Mobile’s benchmark results are more modest by comparison. It scores 19587 in PassMark G3D and 8399 in PassMark GPU compute. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan results are 109197 and 108367, respectively. The GPU’s percentileVsAllGpus value is 73, meaning it outperforms 73% of all GPUs in the database. The CPU’s percentileVsAllCpus is 95, meaning it outperforms 95% of all CPUs. The combined percentile for this laptop pairing is 84.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 76155. Its nearestRivals list shows that it is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX at a delta of -0.1, the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P at -0.4, and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX at -0.5. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D is 0.5% above it according to the same list. This places the Core Ultra 9 285HX squarely in flagship mobile CPU territory, with no meaningful performance gap to the nearest desktop and workstation processors in the database.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 27435. Its nearestRivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT at a delta of 0, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 at -0.5, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell at 1.1, and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 at -1.5. The picture is clear: the GPU is a strong mainstream part, but it is not in the same elite class as the CPU. The combined benchmark picture is one of a laptop with overwhelming CPU headroom and merely solid GPU performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 2114 socket, which is a ball-grid array package rather than a socketed desktop package. This means the Core Ultra 9 285HX is soldered to the motherboard, so swapping the CPU for another model is not a realistic upgrade path. The memory support is dual-channel DDR5, with a measured memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and the CPU supports ECC memory. A sensible memory-focused upgrade is to populate both dual-channel channels with the fastest DDR5 modules the laptop supports, though the pack does not list a maximum capacity.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself. That gives the platform access to very fast expansion and storage bandwidth. For a laptop, the most practical upgrade is likely storage: using the available PCIe Gen 5 lanes for a high-speed SSD would take advantage of the same CPU bandwidth that already positions the 285HX above most rivals. There is no mention of a second M.2 slot or drive bay in the pack, so the exact installable storage configuration depends on the laptop chassis.

The GPU is a mobile part with slotWidth reported as IGP and no power connectors listed. This suggests it is integrated into the laptop board and cannot be upgraded as a discrete module. The GPU TDP is 115 W, and the CPU TDP is 55 W. No suggestedPsu value is listed in the pack, so there is no official PSU wattage recommendation to report. Because this is a laptop, the power delivery and cooling system are fixed at purchase; a user cannot meaningfully change the PSU headroom beyond what the manufacturer built.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform, therefore, is not a CPU or GPU swap. Instead, memory and storage are the most likely user-accessible upgrade paths, especially because the CPU already carries top-tier benchmark scores. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes on the CPU are the standout expansion feature, so the best forward-looking upgrade is one that exploits those lanes rather than attempting to improve the already strong compute core.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between CPU and GPU is lopsided. The CPU’s percentileVsAllCpus is 95, the GPU’s percentileVsAllGpus is 73, and the combined percentile is 84. The combined percentile is pulled down by the GPU, which means that in GPU-bound tasks the system will not perform as far above the database average as the CPU alone would suggest.

For gaming, the CPU’s 95th percentile and single-thread score of 4618 indicate that the processor can feed a high frame rate. The GPU’s 73rd percentile is the more likely limiting factor in graphically demanding scenarios. Because there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination, there is no direct FPS scaling evidence in the pack. The percentile gap is the clearest quantitative signal: the CPU is near the top of the database, while the GPU is only three-quarters of the way up, so the GPU should be the primary bottleneck in most gaming workloads.

For productivity, the bottleneck moves toward memory and storage. The CPU’s multi-thread scores are extremely high, and the GPU is less involved in pure text editing, spreadsheet work, or code compilation. PassMark multithread score 56902 and Cinebench R23 multicore score 36429.5 suggest that CPU-bound production workloads will scale well across the 24 cores. The dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is adequate but not exceptional; memory bandwidth could become a bottleneck in large rendering or data analysis tasks that stream significant amounts of data.

For GPU compute workloads, the balance is reversed. The RTX 4070 Mobile’s PassMark GPU compute score of 8399 is much lower than its G3D score of 19587, so the GPU is better at raster graphics than at raw compute. The CPU will not bottleneck compute tasks that use the GPU, but the GPU’s own compute throughput will set the ceiling. This is a machine that can do many things well, but users should expect the GPU to limit the highest-end gaming and compute scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile uses the AD106 chip on the Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 22,900 million transistors and a die size of 188 mm². It has 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, 48 ROPs, 36 RT cores, and 144 tensor cores. The base clock is 1395 MHz, the boost clock is 1695 MHz, and memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a moderate bandwidth figure for a mobile GPU in the 73rd percentile. Textures are handled at 244.1 GTexel/s, and pixels at 81.36 GPixel/s. FP32 throughput is 15.62 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 15.62 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. These raw throughput numbers explain why the GPU’s G3D score of 19587 places it only at the 73rd percentile: it is competitive, but not elite.

The RT cores and tensor cores make the GPU capable of hardware-accelerated ray tracing and tensor operations. The 36 RT cores are a meaningful feature for ray-traced games, and the 144 tensor cores are useful for DLSS-style AI acceleration, though the pack does not include DLSS-specific benchmarks. The GPU also reports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 support, which covers modern graphics API requirements.

The benchmark scores show a mixed profile. PassMark G3D at 19587 is strong for rasterization, while PassMark GPU compute at 8399 is considerably lower. Geekbench OpenCL at 109197 and Vulkan at 108367 show that the GPU is capable of general-purpose compute, but the low compute-to-graphics ratio means rendering workloads will be more balanced than pure compute workloads. The GPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, has a delta of 0, so the RTX 4070 Mobile can be considered effectively tied with that desktop GPU in the database’s aggregate score. It is also only 0.5% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 in aggregate score, despite the RTX 3090 having a much larger memory bus in the wider market.

Who Should Build It

This laptop platform suits gamers who prioritize high CPU performance and want a GPU that can handle mainstream high-refresh gaming. The CPU’s 95th percentile and PassMark single-thread score of 4618 make it excellent for high-frame-rate gaming, while the GPU’s 73rd percentile and G3D score of 19587 put it above the majority of GPUs. Gamers who play moderate settings or prefer high frame rates in less demanding titles will find the CPU has headroom to spare.

Content creators, especially video editors and 3D artists, should consider this machine because of the CPU’s exceptional multi-threaded results. Cinebench R23 multicore 36429.5 and PassMark multithread 56902 are strong indicators for rendering, encoding, and export workloads. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and OpenCL score of 109197 help with GPU-accelerated effects, but the CPU is the star for long render tasks.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s integer math score of 155076, extended instructions score of 49148, and data encryption score of 48567. These numbers point to strong compilation throughput and cryptographic throughput. The CPU’s support for ECC memory is a notable feature for a development workstation, since it suggests a higher level of data reliability than typical consumer mobile CPUs.

Students and office workers do not need this much performance, but they will not be held back by it. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4618 keeps everyday applications responsive, while the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a backup GPU path. Small business workstations that run single-threaded productivity suites plus occasional CPU-heavy batch processing would benefit from the core count and high single-thread speed.

The machine is not ideal for users who need raw GPU compute above all else, since the GPU’s PassMark compute score is 8399 and its percentile is only 73. But for users who need a strong CPU for development, content creation, and multi-threaded productivity, with a GPU that can still carry modern games and GPU-accelerated rendering, this pairing is well matched.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 and uses the Arrow Lake architecture with the codename Arrow Lake-HX. It is manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC, with 17,800 million transistors on a die size of 243 mm². It has 24 cores and 24 threads, which means there is one thread per core. The base clock is 2.80 GHz, and the boost clock is 5.50 GHz. The TDP is rated at 55 W.

The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth and ECC memory support. It uses the Intel BGA 2114 socket and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU only. The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. The multiplier is unlocked, and the part number is SRVFJ.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a flagship mobile CPU. PassMark single-thread scores of 4618 and 4618 confirm strong single-core performance. PassMark multithread scores 56902, which is very high for a laptop processor. Cinebench R23 multicore scores 36429.5, while Cinebench R20 multicore scores 20236 and R15 multicore scores 5656.5. These results indicate that the CPU can handle both lightly threaded applications and heavily parallel workloads without breaking a sweat.

The CPU’s 95th percentile position is supported by its nearestRivals data. It is within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX, AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P, AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX, and AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D in aggregate average score. This is a remarkable result for a mobile part, as it places the 285HX alongside desktop and workstation CPUs in the database.

For real workloads, the strong single-thread score means fast application startup and responsive interactive software. The high multi-thread score means video encoding, 3D rendering, and data processing tasks will use the 24 cores effectively. The L3 cache of 36 MB shared across all cores is ample for most mobile workloads, and the dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is sufficient for feeding the CPU’s many cores.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX support ECC memory?

A: Yes. The CPU’s memorySupport is DDR5, and the eccMemory field is true.

Q: What is the socket type for this CPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX uses Intel BGA 2114, which is a ball-grid array mobile package.

Q: How much video memory does the RTX 4070 Mobile have?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes. The RTX 4070 Mobile has 36 RT cores, 144 tensor cores, and is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture. It also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact CPU/GPU combination?

A: No. The measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty and dataIsMeasured is false, so all FPS statements are estimates drawn from benchmark scores.

Q: How close is the Core Ultra 9 285HX to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The nearest rivals are within 0.5%: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX at -0.1, AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P at -0.4, AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX at -0.5, and AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D at 0.5.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this laptop pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 84, with the CPU at the 95th percentile and the GPU at the 73rd percentile.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile. The measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Consequently, the following FPS discussion should be treated as an estimate based on the benchmark scores and percentile data, not as a recorded result.

The most useful gaming signal is the CPU-to-GPU percentile split. The CPU’s 95th percentile and PassMark single-thread score of 4618 mean that it should be able to drive high frame rates in CPU-sensitive scenarios. The GPU’s 73rd percentile and PassMark G3D score of 19587 mean that it will be the limiting factor in most graphically demanding games. The combined percentile of 84 suggests that the total system is above average for gaming, but not at the level of the CPU alone.

The GPU’s nearestRivals data provides an additional estimate anchor. The RTX 4070 Mobile has a delta of 0 compared to the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, so estimated frame rates in GPU-bound scenarios should be similar to that GPU. It is also reported at -0.5% relative to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, meaning in the database’s aggregate score it is nearly a match for that desktop GPU as well. These comparisons are based on aggregate benchmark scores, not game-specific FPS, so individual titles may vary.

The 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are the main memory constraints. Games that require very large texture pools may exceed the 8 GB frame buffer, and the 128-bit memory bus is narrower than what the desktop RTX 3090-class GPUs use. For less demanding competitive titles, the CPU’s high single-thread score and the GPU’s strong G3D score suggest high-refresh performance. For visually heavy titles, the GPU’s 73rd percentile position will be the more conservative estimate.

In summary, the gaming performance of this exact pairing is estimated to be strong overall, with the CPU providing excellent frame pacing and the GPU providing solid raster performance. The lack of measured FPS data means these conclusions should be read as estimates based on the benchmark evidence, not as verified results.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds