SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

76,155 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

19,049 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a laptop pairing of Intel’s top-tier Arrow Lake-HX mobile processor with NVIDIA’s entry-level Ada Lovelace GPU. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores, not from direct game testing. The data shows a CPU that ranks in the 95th percentile against all processors and a GPU that sits in the 63rd percentile, creating a system with extreme compute headroom but modest graphics throughput.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile. The FACT PACK’s `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures here are estimates derived from the GPU’s benchmark scores, particularly the PassMark G3D score of 14423 and the GPU’s 63rd percentile ranking.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the RTX 4050 Mobile’s 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 192.0 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest it can handle esports titles and older AAA games at smooth framerates. The GPU’s PassMark DirectX 12 score of 61 and DirectX 11 score of 130 indicate that modern API-heavy titles will run, but the 6 GB GDDR6 VRAM on a 96-bit bus will limit texture quality and resolution scaling. Expect 60+ FPS in competitive shooters like Valorant or CS2, but more demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Alan Wake 2 will likely drop below 60 FPS at ultra presets.

At 1440p, the picture becomes tighter. The GPU’s 84.24 GPixel/s pixel rate and 140.4 GTexel/s texture rate are modest for this resolution. The RTX 4050 Mobile’s 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores enable DLSS and ray tracing, but the low shader count (2560) and memory bandwidth (192.0 GB/s) mean that enabling these features will require turning down other settings. Estimated 1440p ultra performance: 30-50 FPS in AAA titles, with DLSS Quality mode recovering 10-15% performance. For high-refresh 1440p gaming, the GPU is the clear bottleneck.

At 4K, the RTX 4050 Mobile is not a viable option for ultra settings. The 6 GB VRAM will overflow in many modern titles, and the 96-bit bus will choke on 4K textures. Estimated 4K ultra framerates: 15-25 FPS in most games, with esports titles reaching 30-40 FPS. DLSS Performance mode could push some lighter titles to 60 FPS, but the experience will be inconsistent. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2187.5 is more than sufficient for high-FPS CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU cannot deliver the frames to match it.

For lower settings, the story improves. At 1080p medium, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 14423 places it alongside desktop GPUs like the AMD Radeon RX 6600 (deltaPct 0.1%), which is a competent 1080p performer. Estimated 1080p medium framerates: 70-100 FPS in most AAA titles, 120+ FPS in esports. This pairing is best suited for 1080p gaming with adjusted settings rather than high-resolution ultra presets.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4618 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2187.5 ensure that frame pacing and physics calculations will not bottleneck a 144Hz display. However, the RTX 4050 Mobile’s 63rd percentile and 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 limit the GPU from sustaining high frame rates in demanding titles. For 1080p esports and light AAA gaming, the system can hit 100+ FPS, but 144Hz ultra is out of reach in most modern games.

Streaming: The GPU’s 80 tensor cores and Ada Lovelace architecture include dedicated NVENC hardware, though the FACT PACK does not list encoder specs. The CPU’s impressive multi-core scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core: 36429.5) mean software encoding is also feasible without impacting game performance significantly. The PassMark data encryption score of 48567 shows strong throughput for stream encryption tasks. This pairing can handle 1080p60 streaming while gaming, but the GPU’s 6 GB VRAM may limit simultaneous game quality and encoding buffers.

Video editing: The CPU excels here. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36429.5 places it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, and the PassMark floating-point math score of 194998 indicates strong number-crunching for effects and color grading. The GPU’s 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 and 80 tensor cores accelerate timeline rendering and AI-assisted tools in editors like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The 6 GB VRAM is the limiting factor for large 4K projects, but 1080p and light 4K editing will be smooth.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 24 cores and 24 threads (no hyperthreading) deliver a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20236, which is excellent for CPU-based rendering. The GPU’s 2560 shading units and 48 ROPs provide moderate GPU-accelerated rendering performance, with the PassMark GPU compute score of 5947 indicating mid-range capabilities. For Blender or Octane, the CPU can handle most scenes, while the GPU offers a secondary acceleration path. Expect long render times for complex scenes due to the GPU’s entry-level positioning.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 155076 and data compression score of 631885 are outstanding for compilation and code analysis. The 36 MB L3 cache and 3 MB per-core L2 cache reduce latency for frequent data access. The GPU is largely irrelevant here except for shader compilation or ML workloads, where its 80 tensor cores provide modest acceleration. This is a developer’s dream CPU paired with a serviceable but unremarkable GPU.

Student and office work: Overkill in the CPU department but adequate in the GPU. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU handles basic display output, though the discrete GPU will take over for most tasks. The CPU’s 55 W TDP and dual-channel DDR5 memory support (102.4 GB/s bandwidth) make it efficient for prolonged productivity. The GPU’s 63rd percentile ensures smooth 4K video playback and light photo editing, but the system is far more powerful than typical office workflows require.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 76155, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX, scores 76212, a deltaPct of -0.1%, meaning the Intel part is essentially tied with that competitor. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D scores 75779, a deltaPct of 0.5%, so the Intel chip is 0.5% ahead of that flagship desktop part. The data shows a CPU that trades blows with the best available, including the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (76513, deltaPct -0.5%).

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 19049, placing it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6600, scores 19036, a deltaPct of 0.1%, meaning the RTX 4050 Mobile is 0.1% faster than that desktop card. The NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation scores 18954, a deltaPct of 0.5%, so the mobile GPU is 0.5% ahead of that workstation part. The NVIDIA Tesla K20m scores 19089, a deltaPct of -0.2%, meaning the RTX 4050 Mobile is 0.2% slower than that older compute card.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 79, indicating a system that outperforms 79% of all tested CPU+GPU combinations. The gap between the CPU’s 95th percentile and the GPU’s 63rd percentile is stark. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36429.5 is roughly 16.7 times its single-core score of 2187.5, showing massive multi-threaded scaling. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 14423 versus its PassMark GPU compute score of 5947 shows that rasterization is significantly stronger than compute workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX has 24 cores and 24 threads, meaning no hyperthreading is enabled.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing and DLSS?

A: Yes, the RTX 4050 Mobile has 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores, which support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4 APIs.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its memory bus width?

A: The GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The CPU has a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Q: Is the CPU’s memory support ECC?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory and uses dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: How does the GPU compare to a desktop Radeon RX 6600?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 19049, which is 0.1% higher than the RX 6600’s 19036.

Q: What process node is the CPU built on?

A: The CPU uses a 3 nm process from TSMC, while the GPU uses a 5 nm process from the same foundry.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX is a 24-core, 24-thread processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically Arrow Lake-HX. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 3 nm process, with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 2.80 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.50 GHz. The 55 W TDP is modest for a 24-core mobile part, indicating efficient power management. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s and ECC support. It uses the Intel BGA 2114 socket and includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a multi-core monster. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36429.5 is 16.7 times the single-core score of 2187.5, showing excellent scaling across all 24 cores. The PassMark multithread score of 56902 and integer math score of 155076 confirm strong parallel performance. The L3 cache is 36 MB shared, with 3 MB per core for L2 and 192 KB per core for L1, providing ample fast memory for workloads that fit in cache. The PassMark data compression score of 631885 is particularly notable, suggesting strong performance in archiving and database tasks.

The CPU’s 95th percentile ranking places it among the fastest processors available. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX, scores 76212, a deltaPct of -0.1%, meaning the Intel part is 0.1% slower than that competitor. However, it is 0.5% faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D (75779) and 0.5% slower than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (76513). The data shows a CPU that is statistically tied with the best desktop and mobile parts, making it a top-tier choice for CPU-heavy workloads. The PassMark single-thread score of 4618 is also strong, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD107 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. It has 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The base clock is 1455 MHz, with a boost clock of 1755 MHz. Memory is 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, providing 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 16 Gbps effective speed. The GPU has 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores, enabling hardware ray tracing and AI acceleration. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The 50 W TDP is low, and the GPU uses no external power connectors, indicating an integrated form factor (IGP).

The GPU’s FP32 performance is 8.986 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). The pixel rate is 84.24 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 140.4 GTexel/s. These numbers place the GPU in the entry-level mobile segment. The PassMark G3D score of 14423 is its strongest benchmark, while DirectX 12 and DirectX 11 scores are 61 and 130, respectively. The GPU compute score of 5947 shows that compute workloads are weaker than rasterization. The 63rd percentile ranking means it outperforms 63% of all GPUs, but it is far from the top tier.

The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6600, scores 19036, a deltaPct of 0.1%, meaning the RTX 4050 Mobile is 0.1% faster than that desktop card. The NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation scores 18954, a deltaPct of 0.5%, so the mobile GPU is 0.5% ahead. However, the NVIDIA Tesla K20m scores 19089, a deltaPct of -0.2%, meaning the RTX 4050 Mobile is 0.2% slower than that older compute card. The data indicates a GPU that matches a mid-range desktop GPU from a previous generation, but with lower power draw and smaller memory footprint. For rendering, the 6 GB VRAM is the primary constraint, limiting texture sizes and scene complexity.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 79 hides a significant imbalance. The CPU sits in the 95th percentile, while the GPU is in the 63rd percentile. This creates a system where the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor in any workload, while the GPU will frequently hold back performance. In gaming, the RTX 4050 Mobile’s 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth are the primary constraints. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2187.5 and PassMark single-thread score of 4618 ensure that frame generation and physics calculations will not bottleneck the GPU in most titles. The FPS scaling will be GPU-bound at all resolutions above 1080p.

In CPU-heavy workloads like video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the GPU becomes less relevant. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36429.5 and PassMark multithread score of 56902 dominate these tasks. The GPU’s PassMark GPU compute score of 5947 is modest, so GPU-accelerated rendering will be slower than CPU-based rendering for most scenes. The GPU can assist with AI-driven effects via its 80 tensor cores, but the 6 GB VRAM limits the size of models that can be loaded.

For streaming, the balance shifts. The CPU can handle software encoding with its 24 cores, while the GPU’s tensor cores support NVENC (though not specified in the FACT PACK). The CPU’s PassMark data encryption score of 48567 shows strong throughput for stream encryption. The bottleneck here is likely the GPU’s memory bandwidth, which must handle both game rendering and encoding buffers. At 1080p, the system can balance both, but at higher resolutions, the GPU will struggle.

The data shows a classic high-CPU/low-GPU pairing. The CPU’s 95th percentile versus the GPU’s 63rd percentile means that in any workload that uses both components, the GPU will saturate first. For pure CPU tasks, the system is top-tier; for pure GPU tasks, it is mid-range. This imbalance is acceptable for productivity-focused users but limiting for gamers targeting high resolutions or maximum settings.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile. The CPU is Intel’s flagship mobile part from the Core Ultra Series 2, using the Arrow Lake-HX architecture. It is a 24-core, 24-thread processor with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz and a 55 W TDP. The GPU is NVIDIA’s entry-level mobile part from the GeForce 40-series, using the AD107 chip with 2560 shading units and 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus.

The combined percentile is 79, meaning this pairing outperforms 79% of all tested systems. The CPU’s 95th percentile and GPU’s 63rd percentile create a system that is exceptional for CPU-bound workloads but only average for GPU-bound ones. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 76155 is nearly four times the GPU’s average score of 19049, underscoring the disparity. The CPU is a top-tier mobile processor, competing with the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX (deltaPct -0.1%) and the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D (deltaPct 0.5%). The GPU is a mid-range mobile part, matching the AMD Radeon RX 6600 (deltaPct 0.1%) and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation (deltaPct 0.5%).

This pairing represents a workstation-class CPU combined with an entry-level gaming GPU. It is suitable for professionals who need heavy compute power for rendering, compilation, or scientific workloads, but it is not designed for high-end gaming. The 55 W CPU and 50 W GPU indicate a power-efficient laptop that can sustain long workloads without thermal throttling, though the FACT PACK does not provide thermal data. The system uses DDR5 memory with ECC support, making it suitable for data integrity-critical applications.

Who Should Build It

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX with RTX 4050 Mobile is ideal for users who need maximum CPU performance in a laptop. Software developers will benefit from the CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 155076 and data compression score of 631885, which accelerate compilation and code analysis. The 36 MB L3 cache and 24 cores handle parallel build systems efficiently. The GPU is sufficient for UI rendering and light ML workloads via its 80 tensor cores.

Content creators working with 1080p or light 4K video will find the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36429.5 excellent for timeline rendering and encoding. The GPU’s 6 GB VRAM limits heavy 4K effects, but the 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 acceleration helps with GPU-accelerated filters. For 3D artists, the CPU’s 24 cores provide fast CPU rendering, while the GPU’s 2560 shading units offer moderate GPU rendering. The PassMark floating-point math score of 194998 shows strong numerical processing for simulations.

Students and office workers will find the system overpowered for their needs, but the CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4618 ensures snappy application launches and smooth multitasking. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU can handle basic display tasks, reducing the load on the discrete GPU. Small business workstations running databases or financial models will benefit from the CPU’s data encryption score of 48567 and ECC memory support.

Gamers should target 1080p with adjusted settings. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 14423 places it on par with the AMD Radeon RX 6600, which is a capable 1080p card. Esports titles will run at high frame rates, and older AAA games can hit 60+ FPS on medium settings. The CPU’s high single-thread performance ensures consistent frame times, but the GPU’s 63rd percentile means 4K and high-refresh 1440p gaming are out of reach. This build is not for gamers seeking maximum visual fidelity; it is for professionals who need a top-tier CPU with a capable but not exceptional GPU.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds