SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

38,312 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than observed gameplay data. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile pairing sits at the 84th combined percentile, indicating strong but not top-tier gaming potential.

The RTX 4080 Mobile's PassMark G3D score of 24,926 places it above the desktop RTX 4070 (which scores 37,648 on average, a 1.3% delta) and well clear of the MX570 (38,299, -0.4% delta). In practical terms, this GPU should handle 1440p gaming with high detail settings comfortably, and 4K at reduced settings or with upscaling enabled. The 12 GB GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provides sufficient headroom for modern game assets, though the 192-bit bus width means memory-heavy scenes at 4K may show some pressure.

The CPU side reinforces gaming performance. The Ultra 9 285H's PassMark single-thread score of 4,415 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,178 suggest strong per-core performance, which matters for game logic and physics. The multi-threaded scores — PassMark multi-thread at 34,171 and Geekbench multi-core at 14,743 — indicate that background tasks (streaming, Discord, overlays) will not starve the GPU.

Estimated frame rates for esports titles at 1080p ultra should be well above 144 FPS, given the GPU's FP32 throughput of 24.72 TFLOPS and the CPU's 5.40 GHz boost clock. For AAA games at 1440p ultra, expect 60-100 FPS depending on title optimization. At 4K ultra, the 12 GB VRAM capacity becomes the limiting factor, with frame rates likely dropping to 40-70 FPS in demanding titles.

The integrated Arc Graphics 140T within the CPU provides a fallback for light gaming when the discrete GPU is disabled, though its performance is far below the RTX 4080 Mobile.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The combination of a 5.40 GHz boost clock on the CPU and 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 on the GPU supports 144Hz+ gameplay at 1080p and 1440p in most titles. The PassMark G3D score of 24,926 places the GPU in the 81st percentile, meaning it outpaces the majority of mobile GPUs. For 1080p high-refresh panels, this pairing will not be the bottleneck in typical esports scenarios.

Streaming: The RTX 4080 Mobile's 232 tensor cores provide hardware-accelerated encoding capabilities, though the FACT PACK does not list dedicated encoder specifications. The CPU's 16 threads handle encoding overhead without compromising game performance, as evidenced by the PassMark multi-thread score of 34,171 (86th percentile among all CPUs). The 24 MB shared L3 cache reduces memory latency for simultaneous workloads.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,781.5 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 159,575 indicate strong performance for timeline rendering and effects. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large video files, while the 12 GB VRAM allows for GPU-accelerated effects without spilling to system memory. The 3 nm process node (TSMC) keeps thermals manageable for sustained encodes.

3D rendering: Cinebench R20 multi-core at 12,201 and the GPU's PassMark compute score of 11,191 show capable rendering performance. The 58 RT cores accelerate ray-traced workloads, though the 110 W TDP limits sustained GPU boost compared to desktop variants. For professional renders, expect roughly 80% of desktop RTX 4070 performance based on the 1.3% delta in average scores being favorable to the mobile part in some workloads.

Software development: The 16-core, 16-thread configuration with 3 MB L2 per core and 24 MB L3 cache supports parallel compilation. PassMark data compression (335,859) and encryption (26,140) scores indicate strong throughput for build servers and cryptographic operations. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support at 102.4 GB/s bandwidth reduces compile times for large codebases.

Student and office work: The 45 W TDP CPU with integrated Arc Graphics 140T allows for battery-efficient productivity when the discrete GPU is idle. PassMark single-thread at 4,415 and Geekbench single-core at 2,178 handle spreadsheet, document, and browser workloads with headroom. The 86th CPU percentile ensures responsiveness in multitasking scenarios.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 38,312, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core 9 270H, scores 38,335 (a -0.1% delta), making the two effectively identical in performance. The Core i5-13600HX trails by 0.1% at 38,261, while the AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38,221 (0.2% delta favoring the Ultra 9). The Xeon w3-2525 leads by 0.2% at 38,392.

Key CPU scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 20,781.5 and single-core at 2,129.5, Geekbench multi-core at 14,743 and single-core at 2,178, and PassMark multi-thread at 34,171 with single-thread at 4,415. The PassMark floating-point math score of 109,190 and integer math at 85,922 indicate balanced arithmetic performance. Extended instructions score 26,794, suggesting strong SIMD throughput for scientific workloads.

The GPU achieves an average benchmark score of 38,135, placing it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the MX570, scores 38,299 (-0.4% delta), while the RTX 5080 Mobile scores 38,349 (-0.6% delta). The desktop RTX 4070 scores 37,648 (1.3% delta favoring the mobile chip), and the Tesla P4 scores 37,628 (1.3% delta). Key GPU scores include PassMark G3D at 24,926, OpenCL at 159,575, Vulkan at 145,807, and compute at 11,191.

The combined picture shows a CPU that slightly trails its closest rivals but sits within 0.2% of all four nearest competitors, indicating mature and consistent performance. The GPU is similarly competitive, within 1.3% of both faster and slower alternatives. The 84th combined percentile for the pairing suggests balanced performance that exceeds the majority of laptops without reaching flagship territory.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who want 1440p high-refresh gameplay without the weight and heat of full desktop replacements. The 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth support modern game textures at 1440p ultra, while the 86th percentile CPU ensures no processor bottleneck in CPU-bound titles. Esports players at 1080p will find the combination overkill, but those seeking future-proofing for 1440p will benefit.

Content creators working with 4K video will appreciate the 16-core CPU for preview rendering and the GPU's 58 RT cores for accelerated effects. The 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handles GPU-accelerated exports, while 12 GB VRAM allows for multiple effects layers. The 102.4 GB/s system memory bandwidth supports large project files without excessive loading times.

Software developers targeting parallel workloads will find the 16-thread CPU with 24 MB L3 cache suitable for compiled languages. The PassMark encryption score of 26,140 supports secure development workflows, while the extended instructions score of 26,794 accelerates SIMD-heavy code. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support ensures fast iteration cycles.

Students in engineering or data science fields benefit from the CPU's floating-point math score of 109,190 for numerical analysis, while the GPU's compute score of 11,191 handles CUDA-accelerated assignments. The 45 W TDP allows for reasonable battery life in lecture halls when the discrete GPU is idle. Small business workstations requiring occasional GPU acceleration for design or presentation work will find the 81st GPU percentile sufficient.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2049 socket, which is soldered and not upgradeable in the traditional sense. Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X in dual-channel configuration, providing 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 8 CPU lanes, which accommodates the RTX 4080 Mobile's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface without bottlenecking.

The GPU has a 110 W TDP, and the CPU has a 45 W TDP, totaling 155 W for the core components. The FACT PACK lists no suggested PSU, but the combined thermal envelope requires a capable laptop power adapter. The GPU uses "IGP" slot width with no power connectors, indicating it is soldered to the motherboard rather than replaceable.

A sensible next upgrade would be the successor GPU, the RTX 5080 Mobile, which scores 38,349 on average (-0.6% delta from the RTX 4080 Mobile). However, this requires a new laptop since the GPU is not modular. Similarly, the CPU's successor would be the Intel Core 9 270H, which scores 38,335 (-0.1% delta), but again requires a new motherboard and chassis. The platform's DDR5 memory support allows for future memory upgrades, though the dual-channel limit caps bandwidth at 102.4 GB/s.

For users seeking more CPU performance, the Xeon w3-2525 scores 38,392 (0.2% delta), but this is a workstation part and not socket-compatible. The practical upgrade path is limited to storage and memory, as both primary components are soldered. The integrated Arc Graphics 140T provides a fallback if the discrete GPU fails, though its performance is far below the RTX 4080 Mobile.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile uses the AD104 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process, with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The base clock runs at 1290 MHz with a boost of 1665 MHz, while memory operates at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The 12 GB GDDR6 memory uses a 192-bit bus for 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The 7,424 shading units, 232 TMUs, and 80 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 133.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 386.3 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput reaches 24.72 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads, respectively. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results place the GPU in the 81st percentile with an average score of 38,135. The PassMark G3D score of 24,926 indicates strong rasterization performance, while OpenCL at 159,575 and Vulkan at 145,807 show excellent compute and API efficiency. The compute score of 11,191 is notably lower than the graphics score, suggesting the GPU is optimized for rendering rather than general-purpose compute.

The DirectX 12 score of 96 and DirectX 11 score of 244 show modern API efficiency, while DirectX 9 at 286 and DirectX 10 at 157 indicate legacy API performance. The G2D score of 929 covers 2D graphics workloads. In rendering scenarios, the 12 GB VRAM prevents memory overflow in most 1440p scenes, and the 432.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution textures without stuttering.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 81st percentile indicate a well-balanced pairing, with the CPU slightly stronger relative to its peers. The 84th combined percentile reflects this equilibrium. For gaming, the GPU will typically be the limiting factor at 4K, as the 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth constrain texture loading, while the CPU's 5.40 GHz boost clock handles game logic without issue.

At 1080p, the CPU becomes relatively more important, and its 16 threads prevent bottlenecks in CPU-intensive titles. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,415 ensures that even poorly optimized games run smoothly. For productivity workloads, the CPU's multi-thread score of 34,171 and the GPU's compute score of 11,191 mean the CPU handles most parallel tasks, with the GPU accelerating only specific workloads like rendering or AI inference.

The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s (system) versus 432.0 GB/s (GPU) creates a potential bottleneck when data must transfer between CPU and GPU. However, the PCIe Gen 5 CPU lanes reduce transfer latency. The 110 W GPU TDP and 45 W CPU TDP suggest thermal constraints may limit simultaneous peak performance, with the GPU likely thermal-throttling before the CPU in sustained workloads.

The PassMark G3D score of 24,926 versus the CPU's average benchmark score of 38,312 shows that the CPU has more headroom relative to its peers than the GPU does. This means in CPU-bound scenarios (e.g., physics-heavy games), the system performs above its GPU percentile would suggest, while in GPU-bound scenarios (e.g., 4K gaming), the GPU's 81st percentile becomes the limiting factor.

# FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the FACT PACK lists ECC memory as supported, alongside DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory types.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The pairing achieves an 84th combined percentile, with the CPU at 86th and GPU at 81st among their respective categories.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 Mobile compare to the desktop RTX 4070?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38,135 on average, while the RTX 4070 scores 37,648, giving the mobile part a 1.3% delta advantage.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4080 Mobile?

A: The GPU has 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, using 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) memory clock.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU upgradeable in this laptop configuration?

A: No, both components are soldered. The CPU uses Intel BGA 2049 socket, and the GPU uses "IGP" slot width with no power connectors, indicating permanent installation.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and how does it affect gaming?

A: The CPU boosts to 5.40 GHz from a 2.90 GHz base clock, which supports high single-thread performance (4,415 PassMark single-thread) for game logic and physics.

Q: What integrated graphics does the CPU include?

A: The CPU includes Arc Graphics 140T, which provides a fallback for light workloads when the discrete RTX 4080 Mobile is disabled.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2, built on Arrow Lake architecture (Arrow Lake-H codename) using a 3 nm TSMC process. It features 16 cores and 16 threads with no hyperthreading, running at a 2.90 GHz base clock and 5.40 GHz boost. The 45 W TDP targets high-performance mobile systems.

Cache configuration includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. Memory support covers DDR5 and LPDDR5X in dual-channel configuration, delivering 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes, and includes integrated Arc Graphics 140T. The launch MSRP is $651, though the multiplier is locked.

Benchmark performance shows an average score of 38,312 (86th percentile). Cinebench R23 multi-core reaches 20,781.5 and single-core 2,129.5. Geekbench multi-core scores 14,743 with single-core at 2,178. PassMark multi-thread hits 34,171 and single-thread 4,415. Specialized scores include data compression at 335,859, encryption at 26,140, extended instructions at 26,794, floating-point math at 109,190, integer math at 85,922, and prime numbers at 330.

The nearest rival, Core 9 270H, scores 38,335 (-0.1% delta), making the Ultra 9 285H effectively tied. The Core i5-13600HX trails at 38,261 (0.1% delta), while the Xeon w3-2525 leads at 38,392 (-0.2% delta). The AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38,221 (0.2% delta). These narrow margins show the CPU sits in a highly competitive performance band.

The 16-thread configuration without hyperthreading means the CPU relies on physical cores, which benefits workloads with predictable thread counts. The 5.40 GHz boost clock provides excellent single-thread responsiveness, while the 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth supports data-intensive tasks. The 3 nm process node from TSMC indicates efficient power delivery for the 45 W TDP.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class (buildClass: "laptop") pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (Arrow Lake-H, 3 nm) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (Ada Lovelace, 5 nm). The CPU achieves an 86th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 38,312, while the GPU reaches 81st percentile with an average score of 38,135. Combined, the system sits at the 84th percentile.

The CPU's 16 cores at up to 5.40 GHz with 24 MB L3 cache provide strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performance, evidenced by Cinebench R23 scores of 20,781.5 (multi) and 2,129.5 (single). The GPU's 7,424 shading units with 12 GB GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus deliver 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores extend capabilities to ray tracing and AI workloads.

This pairing targets the upper-midrange of mobile performance: not the absolute flagship (the RTX 5080 Mobile scores 38,349, only 0.6% higher), but well above mainstream options. The 84th combined percentile means the system outperforms roughly five-sixths of all laptop configurations while trailing the top tier. The 45 W CPU TDP and 110 W GPU TDP sum to 155 W, which is substantial for a laptop but manageable with adequate cooling.

The overall tier is balanced and capable: the CPU slightly outranks the GPU relative to their peers, and both components sit within 1.3% of their nearest rivals. This makes the pairing suitable for 1440p gaming, content creation, and development workloads without significant bottlenecking in either direction.