SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

97%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 pairs with an NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 in a desktop configuration that ranks at the 73rd percentile overall. This combination pairs a top-tier 24-core Arrow Lake processor with a professional-grade mobile GPU chip, creating a unique balance of high computational throughput and specialized rendering capabilities. The data shows a CPU that excels in multi-threaded workloads while the GPU, despite its embedded-class designation, brings substantial Ada Lovelace features to the table.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285?

A: The CPU features 24 cores and 24 threads, meaning it runs without hyperthreading. This is an Arrow Lake-S design from Intel's Core Ultra Series 2, built on a 3 nm TSMC process.

Q: How does the CPU's average benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 75,488. It sits within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 (75,738) and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D (75,716), and is essentially tied with the AMD EPYC 8224P (75,582) at a -0.1% delta.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth and bus configuration for this CPU?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, making it suitable for error-sensitive workloads.

Q: What are the key specifications of the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation GPU?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. It features 9,728 shading units, 304 tensor cores, and 76 RT cores, with a boost clock of 1680 MHz.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The CPU scores 6,909 points in Cinebench R23 single-core. This places it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, indicating very strong per-thread performance.

Q: Does the build have measured FPS data for games?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All gaming performance discussion must be framed as estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The GPU sits at the 50th percentile, indicating it is an average performer relative to the entire GPU database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed.

Benchmark Performance

The core processor benchmark data reveals a CPU that is positioned at the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 75,488. This places it in extremely close competition with several AMD EPYC and Ryzen PRO processors, with deltas of only -0.3% to 0.2%. In multi-threaded Cinebench tests, the CPU demonstrates its strength: 49,345 points in R23, 20,556 in R20, and 4,933 in R15. These scores show a processor that scales well with heavy thread counts, which is expected from a 24-core design.

Single-core performance is equally impressive, with the CPU achieving 6,909 points in Cinebench R23 single-core and 2,901 in R20 single-core. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,881 reinforces this picture of strong per-core efficiency. The 95th percentile ranking means this CPU outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database, making it a high-tier choice for both productivity and gaming.

The GPU presents a more ambiguous picture. With a percentile ranking of 50, it sits exactly in the middle of all GPUs, yet its architecture suggests specialized capabilities. The GPU has no benchmark scores listed and no nearest rivals, making direct performance comparisons impossible. Its FP32 performance of 32.69 TFLOPS and texture rate of 510.7 GTexel/s indicate a capable compute unit, but the 50th percentile ranking tempers expectations for raw gaming dominance.

The combined picture from the 73rd percentile overall build rank suggests a system that is greater than the sum of its GPU's mid-tier ranking. The CPU's top-tier performance lifts the entire build, while the GPU provides adequate, but not exceptional, graphics throughput. This configuration appears optimized for CPU-heavy workloads where the GPU serves as a supporting accelerator rather than the primary driver.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the 95th percentile CPU and 50th percentile GPU creates a significant performance gap. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as data compression (602,121 PassMark score) or integer math (164,869), the processor will operate without constraint. However, in GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering, the GPU's mid-tier ranking will likely become the limiting factor.

The CPU's massive multi-threading capability, evidenced by a PassMark multithread score of 56,602, means it can feed data to the GPU faster than the GPU can process it in many cases. This imbalance suggests that workloads which rely heavily on physics calculations, AI inference, or complex simulations will see the CPU waiting on GPU results. The PassMark physics score of 3,598 further indicates strong CPU-side physics processing that could outpace GPU rendering in real-time applications.

The memory configuration also plays a role in this balance. The CPU's 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth and dual-channel DDR5 support are moderate for a high-end desktop, potentially limiting data transfer rates in memory-intensive applications. The GPU's 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is substantially higher, meaning the GPU has access to its own memory pool at much faster speeds than the CPU can access system memory. This asymmetry can create bottlenecks in workloads that require frequent data exchange between CPU and GPU.

For FPS scaling, the data suggests that lower resolutions will be more CPU-limited, as the 24-core processor can maintain high frame rates in less GPU-intensive scenarios. At higher resolutions, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking will cap performance, making the GPU the definitive bottleneck in modern gaming titles. The lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates based on the percentile gap and architectural characteristics.

Who Should Build It

The 95th percentile CPU ranking makes this build ideal for professionals who need maximum processor performance. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 24 cores and 24 threads, particularly given the PassMark data encryption score of 46,949 which indicates strong cryptographic throughput. Data scientists and researchers working with large datasets will find the 602,121 compression score and 194,988 floating-point math score valuable for complex calculations.

Content creators working with video editing software will appreciate the multi-threaded rendering capabilities, though they should note the GPU's mid-tier ranking may slow GPU-accelerated effects. Students in computer science or engineering programs will find the CPU's single-thread performance (4,881 PassMark single-thread) sufficient for everyday coding tasks, while the 24 cores provide headroom for parallel computing coursework.

Small business workstations running virtualization or database workloads will benefit from the ECC memory support and the CPU's 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 76 RT cores make this a viable option for architectural visualization or product design, where ray-traced previews are essential. However, gamers seeking high-refresh competitive play at 1080p will be better served by a more powerful GPU, given the current GPU's 50th percentile position.

The build's desktop class designation and 73rd overall percentile suggest it is a high-end workstation rather than a gaming rig. The CPU's 65 W TDP is remarkably low for a 24-core processor, making this an efficient choice for office environments where power consumption is a concern. The production status of both components is active, ensuring ongoing driver and software support.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is a 24-core, 24-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically the Arrow Lake-S design. It operates at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boosts up to 5.60 GHz, built on a 3 nm TSMC process with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. This process node advantage contributes to its modest 65 W TDP, a remarkable figure for a processor with this core count.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports the high multi-threaded throughput seen in benchmarks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49,345 demonstrates excellent scaling, while the R15 multi-core score of 4,933 shows consistent performance across different test versions.

Single-thread performance is equally notable, with the CPU achieving 6,909 in Cinebench R23 single-core. This places it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, confirming that the architecture does not sacrifice per-core efficiency for core count. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,881 and floating-point math score of 194,988 further validate this balance.

The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability and a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. This memory bandwidth is adequate for most workloads but may be a limiting factor in memory-intensive applications given the high core count. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 CPU lanes provides ample bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU offers basic display output, though the dedicated GPU in this build will handle rendering tasks. The launch MSRP is $579.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is a specialized GPU based on the AD103 chip, built on a 5 nm TSMC process with 45,900 million transistors. Despite its "Embedded" designation and IGP slot width, it is a full-featured Ada Lovelace architecture GPU with 9,728 shading units, 304 tensor cores, and 76 RT cores. This hardware configuration supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a substantial amount of VRAM for professional workloads, enabling large model training or high-resolution texture rendering. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz with an effective 18 Gbps data rate. The GPU has a base clock of 930 MHz and a boost clock of 1680 MHz.

Compute performance is rated at 32.69 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1), indicating strong general-purpose compute capability. The pixel rate is 188.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s, suggesting it can handle complex shading workloads. The 304 tensor cores provide AI acceleration capabilities, while the 76 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs is surprising given these specifications. This ranking may reflect the embedded-class positioning rather than raw performance, as embedded GPUs are often optimized for power efficiency and thermal constraints rather than peak performance. The 150 W TDP is modest for a GPU with this feature set, and the lack of power connectors suggests it draws power from the system bus. The predecessor is Ampere-MW and successor is Blackwell-MW, indicating this is a mid-generation professional solution.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 processors. This socket supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The platform's ECC memory support is a distinct advantage for professional workstations, allowing error-free operation in data-critical environments.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is a generation behind the CPU's Gen 5 capability. This is not a significant bottleneck for current workloads, as the GPU's 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is independent of the PCIe link speed. The GPU's 150 W TDP is well within the capabilities of most power supplies, though the system's total power draw depends on the PSU chosen. The suggested PSU is null, so no specific wattage guidance is provided in the data.

For a sensible next upgrade, the CPU platform offers limited headroom since the Core Ultra 9 285 is already the top-tier part in the Ultra 9 generation. The GPU, however, presents a clear upgrade path. Moving to a more powerful desktop-class GPU with a higher percentile ranking would balance the system, as the 50th percentile GPU is currently the limiting factor for gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering. The 16 GB VRAM is generous, but a GPU with higher FP32 throughput would better complement the CPU's compute capabilities.

The 65 W CPU TDP and 150 W GPU TDP combine for a relatively power-efficient system, leaving substantial PSU headroom for additional storage or expansion cards. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU can support the fastest current NVMe drives, while the GPU's PCIe 4.0 interface is backward compatible. The platform's active production status ensures long-term availability of replacement parts and BIOS updates.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 9 285, a 24-core Arrow Lake desktop processor, with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2, a professional embedded GPU. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile ranking is 73rd overall. This places the system in the upper tier of all builds, though not in the top echelon.

The CPU is the clear star of this configuration, with its 95th percentile ranking and robust multi-threaded performance. The GPU, at the 50th percentile, is the weaker link, but its Ada Lovelace features and 16 GB VRAM provide a solid foundation for professional applications. The overall tier of this build is high-end workstation, with the CPU doing the heavy lifting for compute-intensive tasks and the GPU handling specialized acceleration.

The discrepancy between the CPU and GPU percentiles is notable. A 95th percentile CPU paired with a 50th percentile GPU is an unusual combination, suggesting this build was designed for workloads that are primarily CPU-bound. The 73rd overall percentile reflects this imbalance, as the GPU drags down the combined ranking despite the CPU's excellence. For users who prioritize processor performance over graphics, this is a sensible pairing.

The architecture choices are consistent: both components are from active production lines, and the platform supports modern standards like DDR5 and PCIe Gen 5. The absence of measured FPS data makes gaming performance speculative, but the benchmark scores suggest this is a capable productivity system rather than a gaming powerhouse.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile rankings. This section should be read as an analytical projection, not a report of tested results.

Based on the CPU's 95th percentile ranking and the GPU's 50th percentile ranking, gaming performance will vary significantly by resolution and title. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (6,909 in Cinebench R23 single-core) and high core count can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound games. The 24 cores and 5.60 GHz boost clock provide ample headroom for modern game engines that utilize multiple threads.

At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck. The 50th percentile GPU ranking indicates it will struggle to maintain high frame rates at these resolutions in demanding titles. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for most games, and the 576.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high texture quality, but the raw compute throughput of 32.69 TFLOPS may not be enough for maximum settings at 4K.

The GPU's 76 RT cores enable ray tracing, but performance in ray-traced titles will be constrained by the mid-tier positioning. Competitive esports titles at 1080p with low settings could achieve high frame rates, but triple-A games at high settings will likely see sub-optimal performance. The lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates, but the percentile gap strongly suggests the GPU limits gaming potential.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's 95th percentile ranking supports high frame rates at 1080p in CPU-bound titles, with the 6,909 Cinebench R23 single-core score indicating strong per-thread performance. However, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking will cap frame rates at higher resolutions, making this a poor choice for 1440p or 4K high-refresh gaming.

Streaming: The 24-core CPU has ample headroom for encoding and streaming simultaneously, with the 602,121 PassMark data compression score indicating efficient processing of video data. The GPU's 304 tensor cores could assist with AI-based streaming enhancements, though the overall GPU performance may limit simultaneous gaming and streaming at high settings.

Video Editing: The 194,988 PassMark floating-point math score and 49,345 Cinebench R23 multi-core score make this a capable system for rendering and exporting video. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM supports large timelines and effects, but the 50th percentile ranking means GPU-accelerated effects will be slower than with a higher-tier desktop GPU.

3D Rendering: The CPU's multi-threaded performance is excellent for CPU-based rendering, with the 45,357 PassMark extended instructions score indicating strong SIMD throughput. The GPU's 76 RT cores support hardware ray tracing, and the 32.69 TFLOPS compute performance provides acceleration for GPU-based renderers, though the mid-tier ranking will slow complex scenes.

Software Development: The 24 cores and 24 threads provide excellent parallel compilation performance, and the 46,949 PassMark data encryption score supports secure development workflows. The single-thread performance of 4,881 PassMark ensures responsive IDE and tooling interaction, making this an ideal developer workstation.

Student and Office Work: The 65 W TDP makes this an energy-efficient system for academic environments, and the ECC memory support ensures data integrity for research projects. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a fallback display output, while the CPU's high single-thread score of 6,909 in Cinebench R23 single-core makes everyday tasks like web browsing and document editing exceptionally responsive.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds