SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 paired with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is a desktop configuration that ranks in the 73rd percentile overall, placing it above the majority of assembled systems. However, this pairing is defined by a stark imbalance: the CPU is a top-tier performer sitting in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the exact median (50th percentile) of all GPUs. The data indicates a system where the processor is the dominant component, and the graphics card is the limiting factor for any workload that leans on GPU acceleration.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data paints a clear picture of where this system’s strengths and limitations lie. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 achieves an average benchmark score of 75,488, placing it in the 95th percentile among all CPUs. In contrast, the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has no recorded benchmark scores, an average score of zero, and sits in the 50th percentile of all GPUs. This is a significant discrepancy; the CPU is a top-tier part, while the GPU is a mid-pack performer.

Because the CPU is so far ahead of the GPU in relative performance, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in almost any graphics-intensive workload. The CPU has the headroom to feed frames far faster than the GPU can render them, meaning that in gaming scenarios, the frame rate will be dictated by the graphics card’s output. The CPU’s massive multi-threaded throughput, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945, is unlikely to be fully utilized in a standard gaming scenario; the GPU will saturate first.

The reverse is true for non-graphics workloads. In tasks like data compression, the CPU’s Passmark score of 602,121 shows immense processing power, and the GPU is largely irrelevant. The system’s performance in these scenarios is almost entirely dependent on the CPU, meaning the GPU will sit idle while the processor handles the workload. The data suggests a system that is exceptionally well-balanced for CPU-intensive workstation tasks, but poorly balanced for GPU-accelerated rendering or high-end gaming, where the GPU will consistently cap performance.

The absence of measured FPS data for this exact combination means any frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6,909, is strong enough to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most titles. However, the GPU’s mid-range percentile ranking suggests it will be the limiting factor in achieving high frame rates at higher resolutions or with demanding graphical settings. The system’s combined percentile of 73 reflects this compromise: the CPU pulls the overall score up, but the GPU prevents it from reaching the top tier.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark performance is exceptional. In Cinebench R23, it scores 48,945 in multi-core and 6,909 in single-core tests. These figures place it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. The average benchmark score of 75,488 places it in close competition with several AMD EPYC server processors, such as the EPYC 8224P (75,582) and the EPYC 4545P (75,373), with delta percentages of -0.1% and +0.2% respectively. This indicates the Ultra 9 285 is performing at a level comparable to enterprise-class silicon in aggregate workloads.

The GPU, however, presents a challenge for analysis. The FACT PACK lists no benchmark scores for the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation. Its average benchmark score is zero, and its percentile rank is 50, which is the median. While this could mean it is an average performer, the lack of data makes it impossible to confirm specific performance levels. The hardware specifications, such as 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 9,728 shading units, suggest a capable part, but the benchmark data does not substantiate this.

When combining the two, the overall picture is one of a high-performing CPU paired with a mid-tier GPU. The CPU’s scores in Passmark are particularly strong: a multi-thread score of 56,602 and a floating-point math score of 194,988. These numbers demonstrate a processor that excels in compute-heavy tasks. The GPU’s specifications, including a boost clock of 1,680 MHz and a memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s, are respectable, but without benchmark scores, its real-world performance cannot be validated. The combined percentile of 73 suggests that this system outperforms 73% of all tracked builds, a figure that is almost entirely buoyed by the CPU’s elite standing.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ultra 9 285 has an average benchmark score of 75,488. This is nearly identical to the AMD EPYC 8224P, which scores 75,582 (a 0.1% difference), and the AMD EPYC 4545P, which scores 75,373 (a 0.2% difference). It is effectively tied with these server-class chips in aggregate performance.

Q: Is the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation a high-performance GPU?

A: The data is inconclusive. The GPU has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs, which is the median. Its specifications, such as a 1,680 MHz boost clock and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, are substantial, but its actual performance ranking cannot be determined from the available data.

Q: Will this system bottleneck in gaming?

A: Yes, the GPU is the likely bottleneck. The CPU is in the 95th percentile, while the GPU is in the 50th percentile. In gaming, the GPU will likely be the limiting factor, preventing the CPU from reaching its full potential frame-pushing capability.

Q: What is the CPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a total bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation and server platforms.

Q: Does the CPU support PCIe 5.0?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. This offers high-bandwidth connectivity for the latest storage devices and expansion cards.

Q: What is the thermal design power of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has a TDP of 65 watts. This is a relatively low power draw for a 24-core processor, suggesting high efficiency.

Q: Does the GPU have dedicated ray tracing hardware?

A: Yes, the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation includes 76 RT cores and 304 Tensor cores, which are designed to accelerate ray tracing and AI-based workloads.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this system will be limited by the GPU. The CPU’s single-core score of 6,909 in Cinebench R23 is more than sufficient to keep up with the GPU’s output, but the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking means it will not be able to push frame rates to the extreme levels that the CPU is capable of supporting. Gamers will likely need to lower graphical settings or resolution to achieve high refresh rates.

Streaming is a mixed bag. The CPU’s 24 cores and 24 threads, paired with its strong multi-threaded Passmark score of 56,602, provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The GPU, however, may struggle to maintain high frame rates in-game while also handling the rendering load, making the CPU’s encoding capabilities a crucial asset for this workload.

Video editing will benefit greatly from the CPU’s power. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20,556 and the Passmark integer math score of 164,869 indicate excellent performance for timeline processing and effects rendering. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM is useful for previewing effects, but its mid-range performance may slow down final exports that rely heavily on GPU acceleration.

3D rendering is heavily dependent on the GPU, and this is where the system’s weakness lies. The RTX 5000’s FP32 performance of 32.69 TFLOPS is decent, but without benchmark scores, its real-world render times are unknown. The CPU will handle scene preparation and physics calculations admirably, but the final render will be bottlenecked by the GPU’s mid-range standing.

Software development is a strong suit for this build. The CPU’s high single-threaded score of 4,881 in Passmark single-thread tests ensures snappy compilation and responsive IDEs. The multi-core performance will significantly reduce build times for large projects, making this a productive environment for developers.

For student and office work, this system is overkill but effective. The CPU’s 95th percentile performance will handle any productivity suite, spreadsheet, or document with ease. The system’s efficiency, with a 65W CPU TDP, also suggests it will run cool and quiet, making it a pleasant, if expensive, machine for everyday tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture. It is manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. It features a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and a 36 MB shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores confirm its high-end status. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945 is a strong indicator of its ability to handle heavily threaded workloads, such as video encoding and 3D scene rendering. The single-core score of 6,909 in the same test indicates excellent responsiveness for everyday tasks and gaming. The Passmark tests show a similar story: a multi-thread score of 56,602 and a single-thread score of 4,881. The floating-point math score of 194,988 is particularly high, suggesting it is well-suited for scientific and engineering simulations that rely on heavy mathematical computation.

The CPU’s nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score are all AMD EPYC server processors. This is significant because it demonstrates that the Ultra 9 285 is performing at a level comparable to enterprise-grade parts in aggregate compute tasks. However, this comparison is based on average scores across a suite of tests, and the Ultra 9 285 may excel in specific workloads that the EPYC chips do not, and vice versa. The CPU’s architecture, with its 24 cores and no hyper-threading, is optimized for raw throughput rather than thread duplication.

The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s and ECC support. This, combined with its 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, makes it a suitable platform for a high-performance workstation. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides basic display output and is not intended for gaming or compute-intensive graphics tasks. The processor has a TDP of 65 watts, which is remarkably efficient for its core count and performance level.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is a mobile workstation GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture. It uses the AD103 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. It has a base clock of 930 MHz and a boost clock of 1,680 MHz.

The GPU is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. It has 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. It also includes 76 RT cores and 304 Tensor cores. This hardware configuration suggests it is designed for professional applications that require ray tracing and AI-accelerated features. The FP32 performance is rated at 32.69 TFLOPS, which is a measure of its raw compute power.

Despite these impressive specifications, the GPU has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs. This means that while its hardware is robust, its actual performance relative to other graphics cards is unknown. The lack of data makes it difficult to assess its standing in the market. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern software APIs.

The GPU’s power draw is listed at 120 W, and it is designed as an IGP (Integrated Graphics Processor) with a slot width of IGP, meaning it is intended to be soldered onto a board rather than installed in a standard PCIe slot. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning they vary based on the specific laptop or mobile workstation it is integrated into. The predecessor to this chip is Ampere-MW, and its successor is Blackwell-MW.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is tailored for professionals who prioritize CPU performance above all else. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285, with its 95th percentile ranking, is a powerhouse for tasks like software compilation, scientific computing, and complex data analysis. Developers and engineers working on large codebases will see significant reductions in build times, as indicated by the CPU’s high multi-threaded Passmark score of 56,602.

Content creators who work primarily with the CPU, such as video editors using software encoders or audio producers, will find this system to be highly capable. The CPU’s strong performance in Cinebench R23 multi-core (48,945) and Passmark floating-point math (194,988) indicates it can handle complex timelines and effects without breaking a sweat. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM is a bonus for previewing high-resolution video, though its mid-range performance may slow down GPU-accelerated exports.

Students and office workers will find this system to be far more powerful than they need, but it will handle any task with ease. The CPU’s single-threaded performance of 4,881 in Passmark ensures a responsive desktop experience. However, the system’s high performance comes at a cost that is likely unjustified for basic productivity tasks.

Gamers should look elsewhere. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking means it is not a high-end gaming part, and it will likely be the limiting factor in achieving high frame rates. While the CPU is more than capable of supporting a powerful GPU, this specific pairing does not make sense for a gaming-focused build. Small business workstations that run complex simulations or financial models would benefit immensely from the CPU’s compute power, provided the GPU is not a critical component of their workflow.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is built for the Intel Socket 1851 platform. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory and provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU itself. The CPU has a TDP of 65 watts, which is low enough that most standard desktop power supplies will have ample headroom for a future GPU upgrade. There is no suggested PSU listed for the GPU, but its 120 W TDP is modest.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system is the GPU. The CPU is already a top-tier performer, so replacing the graphics card would provide the most significant performance boost, especially for gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering. A GPU with a higher percentile ranking would better complement the CPU’s capabilities. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface on the GPU is compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the GPU will run at its native PCIe 4.0 speed.

The platform supports ECC memory, which is a valuable feature for workstation users who require data integrity. Upgrading to a larger capacity of DDR5 memory would be a straightforward and beneficial improvement for memory-intensive applications. The CPU’s 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes can support the fastest NVMe SSDs available, making storage upgrades a viable path for improving system responsiveness.

The 65W TDP of the CPU means that a high-end air cooler or a modest liquid cooler will be sufficient to manage thermals, leaving room for a future GPU with a higher power draw. The overall platform is built on a modern socket with a clear path to future Intel processors, though the current CPU is already at the top of its class. The lack of a suggested PSU for the GPU suggests that the system’s power requirements are not extreme, but upgrading to a higher-end GPU would necessitate checking the PSU’s capacity.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core Ultra 9 285, a flagship Arrow Lake processor, with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, a mobile workstation GPU. The system ranks in the 73rd percentile overall, which is driven almost entirely by the CPU’s 95th percentile standing. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking and lack of benchmark data create a significant performance disparity.

The CPU is a 24-core, 24-thread processor with a 65W TDP, a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, and 36 MB of L3 cache. It is a top-tier performer, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945 and its average benchmark score of 75,488, which rivals server-class EPYC processors. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace part with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 9,728 shading units, but its performance is unquantified by benchmarks.

The pairing is unbalanced. The system excels at CPU-bound workloads, such as software development, data processing, and scientific computing. It is less suited for GPU-intensive tasks like gaming or 3D rendering, where the GPU will likely act as a bottleneck. This build represents a workstation-class CPU paired with a mid-range mobile GPU, resulting in a system that is much stronger as a compute server than as a graphics workstation. The overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 73, places it firmly in the upper-middle range of all systems, with the CPU pulling the score up and the GPU holding it back.