SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

98 Score

Top 2% Ranking

98 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 2% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation — Hardware Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 24-core Arrow Lake desktop flagship with NVIDIA's 32 GB workstation-class Ada Lovelace GPU, creating a desktop configuration that sits at the 97th percentile overall. The data shows no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data — so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores, not empirical game testing. The CPU holds a 95th percentile position among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 98th percentile among all graphics cards, indicating both components are near the top of their respective performance distributions. This analysis interprets synthetic benchmark results to project real-world behavior across gaming, rendering, and productivity workloads.

Gaming Performance — estimated FPS by game and resolution

Because no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, frame rate figures cannot be cited from the FACT PACK. The data contains zero entries in measuredFpsUltraByGame, so all gaming expectations must be derived from the underlying benchmark scores. The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 194041 and OpenCL score of 175286 place it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs, suggesting it will handle demanding titles at high settings with ease. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6909 and multi-core score of 48945 indicate strong per-thread performance that modern game engines require for consistent frame pacing.

At 1080p and 1440p resolutions, the CPU's single-thread capabilities become the primary driver of frame rates in most titles. The 69th-percentile single-thread score (4881 on Passmark) is competitive with the nearest rivals listed, though the deltaPct values are small — the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 sits 0.3% behind and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D sits 0.3% ahead. This suggests frame rates at lower resolutions will be typical of a high-end desktop CPU, with the GPU rarely becoming the limiting factor. The RTX 5000 Ada's 12800 shading units and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provide ample raw compute for pixel-heavy effects like ambient occlusion and shadow mapping.

At 4K resolution, the GPU's 32 GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth becomes the decisive factor. The 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate and 1,020.0 GTexel/s texture rate indicate the card can sustain high fill rates at 4K, but the lack of measured data means exact FPS figures remain estimates. The 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores suggest ray tracing workloads will perform strongly, though again, no game-specific numbers exist in the pack. The GPU's 98th percentile ranking relative to all GPUs implies it outperforms roughly 98% of graphics cards in synthetic tests, which typically translates to high frame rates in most titles. The estimated FPS envelope — based on benchmark scores, not direct measurement — points to 4K ultra settings being viable in many games, but the absence of measured data precludes definitive statements about specific titles.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 75488 places it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with the nearest rival being the AMD EPYC 8224P at 75582 (a 0.1% deltaPct). This near-parity with server-class silicon is notable — the EPYC 8224P is a data center processor, yet the desktop Ultra 9 285 trades blows within a fraction of a percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D sits 0.3% ahead at 75716, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 sits 0.3% behind at 75738. These sub-1% deltas indicate the CPU is squarely in a performance cluster with several rival processors, none of which holds a decisive advantage.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 184664 places it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, scores 183725 (0.5% behind), while the A100 SXM4 40 GB scores 187147 (1.3% ahead). The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell trails by 1.4% at 182109, and the GeForce RTX 4090 D is 3.7% behind at 178050. The GPU's lead over the RTX 4090 D by 3.7% is the largest delta in its rival group, showing that the Ada workstation card holds a meaningful edge over a consumer flagship in these synthetic workloads.

The combined picture shows a 97th percentile desktop configuration. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48945 is particularly strong for a desktop part, and the Passmark multithread score of 56602 reinforces this. The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 194041 is the higher of its two benchmark results, suggesting compute-heavy rendering tasks benefit more from the Vulkan API path. Together, these scores indicate a machine that excels at both CPU-bound and GPU-bound workloads, with no obvious weak link in the benchmark data.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation uses the AD102 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process, packing 76,300 million transistors into a 609 mm² die. The 32 GB GDDR6 memory operates at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, delivering 576.0 GB/s across a 256-bit bus. This memory configuration is substantial for workstation tasks — 32 GB capacity handles large datasets and multi-GPU rendering scenes without spilling to system memory. The 400 tensor cores and 100 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for AI acceleration and ray tracing, respectively, aligning with the Ada Lovelace architecture's focus on these workloads.

The clock speeds — 1155 MHz base and 2550 MHz boost — are modest compared to gaming GPUs, but the sheer width of the compute pipeline compensates. With 12800 shading units, 400 TMUs, and 176 ROPs, the card's raw throughput is exceptional: 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio). The pixel rate of 448.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,020.0 GTexel/s indicate the card can drive high resolutions with dense geometry and texture detail. The 250 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 600 W is reasonable for this performance class, though the single 16-pin power connector requires a compatible power supply.

Benchmark scores for the GPU — 175286 in Geekbench OpenCL and 194041 in Geekbench Vulkan — show a 10.7% advantage for the Vulkan path. This suggests rendering workloads that leverage Vulkan will see better performance than those using OpenCL. The 98th percentile ranking confirms the card sits among the fastest GPUs available, outpacing the A100 SXM4 80 GB by 0.5% and the RTX 4090 D by 3.7% in average score. For rendering tasks, the 32 GB VRAM is the standout feature — it enables loading large 3D scenes, high-resolution textures, and multi-layer compositing without memory constraints. The dual-slot form factor (267 mm length, 112 mm height) is manageable for most desktop cases, and the 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor workstation setups.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data presents an interesting balance question: the CPU sits at the 95th percentile while the GPU sits at the 98th percentile, meaning the GPU is slightly more dominant relative to its peers. This suggests the GPU is the stronger component in gaming workloads, particularly at higher resolutions where pixel throughput matters most. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48945 and single-core score of 6909 are both strong, but the GPU's 98th percentile ranking implies it will scale better with increased resolution and graphical fidelity.

In CPU-bound scenarios — such as 1080p gaming with low graphical settings or physics-heavy simulations — the CPU's 24 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom. The Passmark physics score of 3598 and integer math score of 164869 indicate strong computational throughput for game logic and AI processing. However, the CPU's multithread score of 56602 and floating point math score of 194988 show it handles parallel workloads effectively, meaning the GPU is more likely to become the bottleneck in rendering tasks that fully utilize its 12800 shading units.

The FPS scaling picture, derived from benchmark scores, shows the GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute is roughly 3.4 times the CPU's Passmark floating point score of 194988, though these metrics are not directly comparable. For 4K gaming, the GPU's 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and 448.8 GPixel/s fill rate become the limiting factors — the CPU's 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for its tasks but far below the GPU's. In mixed workloads like game development or content creation, the balance shifts between components: the CPU handles compilation and asset processing, while the GPU handles rendering and preview. The 97th combined percentile indicates neither component drags the system down, but the GPU's higher percentile ranking suggests it is the marginally stronger link.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm TSMC process. It packs 17,800 million transistors into a 243 mm² die, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The 65 W TDP is notably low for a flagship desktop CPU, suggesting excellent power efficiency at this performance level. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3, providing substantial on-die storage for frequently accessed data.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6909 is strong for a desktop part, while the multi-core score of 48945 demonstrates impressive scaling across 24 cores. The Passmark suite reveals specific strengths: data compression at 602121, data encryption at 46949, extended instructions at 45357, and random string sorting at 73651. The find prime numbers score of 459 is notably lower, suggesting integer-heavy math that doesn't parallelize as effectively. The single-thread score of 4881 (duplicated as both passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread) places it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest rivals — AMD EPYC 8224P, EPYC 4545P, Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D, and Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 — all sit within 0.3% of the Ultra 9 285's average score of 75488. This tight clustering indicates the CPU is not dramatically faster or slower than its closest competitors; instead, it's part of a performance tier where small benchmark variations separate leaders. The CPU's 5.60 GHz boost clock is the highest among these rivals (though rival clock speeds are not in the pack), and the 3 nm process gives it a manufacturing advantage. For real workloads, the 24 cores handle multi-threaded rendering, video encoding, and compilation tasks efficiently, while the high boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded response in applications like web browsing and office productivity.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is the latest desktop socket from Intel. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth, along with ECC memory for error-correcting workloads. The PCIe Gen 5 interface provides 20 lanes from the CPU, ensuring ample bandwidth for the latest GPUs and NVMe storage devices. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a basic display output capability, though the discrete RTX 5000 Ada handles the heavy graphical lifting.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is one generation behind the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 capability. This is not a bottleneck in practice — the GPU's 32 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth are the limiting factors, not the interface. The suggested PSU of 600 W for the GPU, combined with the CPU's 65 W TDP, indicates a total system power draw that is moderate for a high-end desktop. The GPU's 250 W TDP and single 16-pin power connector are standard for this performance class, and the dual-slot cooler (267 mm length) fits in most mid-tower cases.

A sensible next upgrade depends on the workload. For gamers, the existing configuration is already near the top (97th percentile), so the most impactful upgrade would be a higher-refresh-rate monitor or faster storage. For content creators, adding more system RAM or a PCIe Gen 5 NVMe SSD would complement the CPU's 20 PCIe lanes. The platform's DDR5 support and ECC capability make it suitable for workstation use, but the socket 1851 is likely the last for this generation — future upgrades would require a new motherboard. The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is a potential limitation for memory-intensive tasks, but it's typical for dual-channel DDR5.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 97, meaning this desktop configuration outperforms 97% of all systems in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 8224P?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has an average benchmark score of 75488, which is 0.1% behind the AMD EPYC 8224P's score of 75582. This difference is negligible in real-world terms.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 supports ECC memory. It also supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and 102.4 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and how does it compare to the GeForce RTX 4090 D?

A: The GPU ranks in the 98th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 184664 is 3.7% higher than the GeForce RTX 4090 D's score of 178050.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and process node?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.60 GHz and is manufactured on a 3 nm TSMC process. It uses the Arrow Lake architecture with 24 cores and 24 threads.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 600 W. The GPU itself has a TDP of 250 W.

Build Overview

This desktop configuration pairs the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation, creating a system that sits at the 97th combined percentile. The CPU, with its 24 cores and 5.60 GHz boost clock, handles compute-heavy tasks efficiently, while the GPU's 32 GB VRAM and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provide workstation-class rendering capability. The build class is desktop, confirming this is a stationary workstation/gaming hybrid rather than a laptop or mobile solution.

The overall tier is near-flagship: the CPU at the 95th percentile and GPU at the 98th percentile place this system in the top 3% of all configurations in the database. The CPU's nearest rivals are server-class EPYC processors and high-end Ryzen PRO chips, while the GPU's nearest rivals include the A100 SXM4 and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell. This positioning indicates a system that competes with professional-grade hardware despite using consumer desktop components. The 65 W CPU TDP and 250 W GPU TDP combine for a reasonable power envelope, making this a potent yet manageable desktop build.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 4K ultra settings will benefit from the GPU's 98th percentile performance and 32 GB VRAM, though the absence of measured FPS data means expectations should be based on the benchmark scores. Content creators working with large 3D scenes or high-resolution video will appreciate the 32 GB VRAM and the CPU's 48945 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. Software developers compiling large codebases will find the 24 cores and 56602 Passmark multithread score useful for parallel builds and test suites.

Students in engineering or data science programs can leverage the ECC memory support and 102.4 GB/s bandwidth for numerical simulations, while small business workstations requiring reliability and performance will benefit from the active production status of both components. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking and the GPU's 98th percentile ranking make this a versatile build for demanding workloads. However, the lack of measured FPS data means gamers should approach this as a high-performance estimate rather than a verified gaming machine. The nearest rival deltas — all within 3.7% for the GPU and 0.3% for the CPU — suggest this build is competitive but not class-leading in every metric.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 194041 Geekbench Vulkan score and 98th percentile ranking indicate strong frame generation potential, though the absence of measured FPS data means exact refresh rates are estimates. The CPU's 6909 Cinebench R23 single-core score supports high frame rates in CPU-bound titles.

Streaming: The 24 CPU cores and 24 threads handle encoding and game logic simultaneously, while the GPU's 400 tensor cores could accelerate AI-based stream enhancement. The 65 W CPU TDP leaves thermal headroom for sustained streaming sessions.

Video editing: The GPU's 175286 OpenCL score and 32 GB VRAM enable smooth timeline scrubbing and effects preview in 4K projects. The CPU's 48945 multi-core score accelerates export rendering and color grading.

3D rendering: The GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth provide fast ray tracing and path tracing performance. The 100 RT cores handle ray intersection, while the CPU's 36 MB L3 cache reduces scene asset loading times.

Software development: The CPU's 602121 Passmark data compression score speeds up build artifact compression, and the 24 cores parallelize compilation jobs. The ECC memory support prevents silent data corruption during long compile runs.

Student and office work: The CPU's 4881 Passmark single-thread score ensures responsive application launches and browser performance. The 95th percentile ranking provides headroom for future software demands, while the GPU's workstation nature supports CAD and scientific visualization coursework.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance — estimated FPS by game and resolution

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds