SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

98 Score

Top 2% Ranking

98 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 2% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation form a desktop pairing that targets the top 5% of all systems, with the CPU holding the 95th percentile and the GPU matching that exact position. The data shows a workstation-class GPU paired with a high-end desktop CPU, and the combined percentile of 95 confirms this is a premium-tier configuration. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all FPS discussion is estimated from the individual benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is a 24-core, 24-thread processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC. It runs at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boosts to 5.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The chip houses 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, and its cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a desktop segment processor with ECC memory support and dual-channel DDR5 memory, delivering 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth.

Benchmark results position this CPU firmly in the upper echelon. Its average benchmark score of 75,488 places it at the 95th percentile against all CPUs. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945 is the headline number, while the single-core score of 6,909 is equally impressive for Arrow Lake's architecture. In PassMark tests, the multi-thread score of 56,602 and single-thread score of 4,881 reveal a processor that excels in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads.

Looking at nearest rivals, the data shows remarkable parity at the top. The AMD EPYC 8224P scores 75,582, just 0.1% higher, while the AMD EPYC 4545P trails by 0.2%. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 both sit 0.3% behind. This means the Core Ultra 9 285 is statistically tied with server-class EPYC processors and the latest Ryzen PRO chips, making it a desktop CPU that rivals enterprise silicon in raw compute.

For real workloads, the 24 cores without hyperthreading (24 threads) suggest a design focused on efficiency and consistent throughput rather than thread oversubscription. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20,556 and R15 multi-core score of 4,933 reinforce the pattern of strong scaling. The PassMark data encryption score of 46,949 and data compression score of 602,121 indicate this CPU handles security and archival tasks with substantial headroom. The floating-point math score of 194,988 is particularly strong, suggesting scientific and engineering calculations benefit heavily from this chip's architecture.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has 24 cores and 24 threads, with no hyperthreading, running at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 75,488 is essentially tied with the AMD EPYC 8224P (75,582, -0.1% delta), the AMD EPYC 4545P (75,373, +0.2% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D (75,716, -0.3% delta).

Q: What memory and PCIe support does the platform offer?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability, providing 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth, and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Q: What is the CPU's integrated graphics capability?

A: It includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units, which provides a basic display output and light graphics acceleration without a discrete GPU.

Q: What is the CPU's production status and release date?

A: The CPU is in active production, with a release date of December 31, 2024, and a launch MSRP of $579.

Q: What does the PassMark single-thread score of 4,881 indicate?

A: It shows this CPU is highly capable in single-threaded tasks, which benefits applications like web browsing, office productivity, and legacy software that rely on one or two cores.

Q: Does the CPU support error-correcting memory?

A: Yes, it supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation and server platforms, making it suitable for data integrity-critical workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the CPU and GPU benchmarks places this system in the 95th percentile overall. The CPU's average benchmark score of 75,488 is the result of consistent high performance across Cinebench and PassMark suites. The GPU's average benchmark score of 135,218 comes from Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan tests, with scores of 146,593 and 123,842 respectively.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945 is the standout figure, placing it in the top tier of desktop processors. The R23 single-core score of 6,909 is equally notable, indicating that the 5.60 GHz boost clock delivers real-world single-thread performance that matches or exceeds many competitors. In PassMark integer math, the score of 164,869, and floating-point math of 194,988, show a balanced ALU and FPU design that handles both general and scientific workloads.

The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 146,593 positions it at the 95th percentile against all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A10M, scores 135,230 with a 0% delta, meaning the RTX 4000 Ada is effectively matched with that accelerator. The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135,396 (-0.1% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo scores 135,774 (-0.4% delta), and the AMD Radeon PRO V620 scores 136,472 (-0.9% delta). This indicates the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is competitive with, and slightly ahead of, several high-end AMD workstation GPUs.

Since no measured FPS data exists for this combination, performance in games must be estimated. The CPU's 95th percentile and GPU's 95th percentile suggest that at 1080p and 1440p resolutions, the CPU will often be the limiting factor in frame pacing, while at 4K, the GPU will dominate the workload. The data indicates a system that is balanced at the top tier, with neither component dragging the other down significantly.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core score of 6,909 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 146,593 suggest this system can drive high-refresh monitors at 1080p and 1440p. The 24-core CPU ensures background tasks do not interfere with game performance, though the lack of measured FPS data means exact frame rates are estimates.

Streaming: The PassMark multi-thread score of 56,602 provides ample headroom for encoding and streaming software to run alongside games. The CPU's 24 threads handle the encoding load without starving the game of compute resources, while the GPU's 20 GB of VRAM can accommodate large streaming buffers.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945 and the GPU's FP32 performance of 26.73 TFLOPS indicate strong performance for timeline rendering and effects processing. The 20 GB GDDR6 memory with 360.0 GB/s bandwidth is well-suited for 4K and 8K video timelines, though the GPU's workstation focus favors professional editing suites.

3D rendering: The CPU's 48,945 Cinebench R23 score and the GPU's 48 RT cores provide a potent combination for ray-traced renders. The 20 GB VRAM allows for large scene loads, and the 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 throughput accelerates both rasterization and compute-based rendering.

Software development: The PassMark data encryption score of 46,949 and data compression score of 602,121 show this CPU handles compilation, code analysis, and version control tasks efficiently. The 24 cores reduce build times significantly, and the ECC memory support provides stability for long-running compile jobs.

Student and office work: The single-core performance of 4,881 in PassMark and the 95th percentile CPU position mean this system is vastly overqualified for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheets. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU can handle display output for office tasks, but the discrete GPU is unnecessary for this workload.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is the LGA 1851 platform designed for Arrow Lake processors. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability, and the memory bandwidth is listed at 102.4 GB/s. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is the primary interface for high-speed SSDs and graphics cards.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is modest for a 24-core processor, suggesting efficient power delivery on the platform. The GPU has a TDP of 130 W, with a suggested PSU of 300 W. This total system power draw of approximately 195 W for the two main components means a 300 W power supply is the minimum recommendation, leaving headroom for other components like storage, fans, and motherboard VRM overhead.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be adding more DDR5 memory, as the dual-channel bus can support higher capacities for workstation tasks. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes are future-proof for next-gen SSDs, so storage upgrades are viable. For the GPU, the 16-pin power connector and 300 W PSU suggestion mean a more powerful GPU would require a PSU upgrade, but the current pairing is well-matched for the 95th percentile tier.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD104 chip fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 2175 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem consists of 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, delivering 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a generous amount of VRAM for workstation tasks, and the bandwidth supports high-resolution textures and large compute datasets. The GPU has 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, providing a pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 417.6 GTexel/s.

For accelerated compute, the RTX 4000 Ada includes 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores. The FP32 performance is 26.73 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance matching at 26.73 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). This makes the GPU equally capable in single-precision and half-precision workloads, which is unusual and beneficial for AI inference and training where FP16 is common.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 146,593 places this GPU at the 95th percentile against all GPUs. The Vulkan score of 123,842 is lower than OpenCL, indicating the driver and architecture favor compute over graphics API workloads. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA A10M, scores 135,230 with a 0% delta, meaning the RTX 4000 Ada is essentially tied with that accelerator in raw compute. The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 trails by 0.1%, and the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo trails by 0.4%, showing this GPU leads its immediate competition.

For rendering, the 48 RT cores accelerate ray tracing, and the 192 tensor cores handle DLSS and AI-based denoising. The 20 GB VRAM is critical for large scenes in 3D modeling and rendering, as it avoids out-of-memory errors that would stall production. The single-slot design with a 245 mm length and 112 mm height makes it suitable for dense workstation builds, and the 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups.

Who Should Build It

This system targets professionals and enthusiasts who need top-tier compute without compromising on either CPU or GPU performance. Gamers at 1440p and 4K resolutions will benefit from the 95th percentile GPU, which handles high-resolution textures and ray tracing, while the 95th percentile CPU ensures no frame drops in CPU-bound titles. The lack of measured FPS data means gamers should expect high frame rates based on the component percentiles, but exact numbers are estimates.

Content creators in video editing and 3D rendering will find the 20 GB VRAM and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance essential for large projects. The CPU's 48,945 Cinebench R23 score accelerates final renders, while the GPU's RT cores handle interactive ray-traced previews. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 24 cores and ECC memory support, which provide faster builds and data integrity. Students and office workers would be overserved by this configuration, but it will handle any academic or administrative task without breaking a sweat. Small business workstations running virtualization, database workloads, or CAD software will benefit from the dual 95th percentile components.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: "desktop") pairing the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation. The CPU is from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Arrow Lake architecture, and the GPU is from the GeForce 40-series, based on Ada Lovelace. The combined percentile of 95 places this system in the top 5% of all configurations.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 75,488 and the GPU's average benchmark score of 135,218 are both at the 95th percentile, indicating a balanced pairing where neither component is a weak link. The CPU's 24 cores and 24 threads handle multi-threaded workloads, while the GPU's 6,144 shading units and 48 RT cores handle graphics and compute. The system is designed for high-performance computing, with the CPU providing 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth and the GPU providing 360.0 GB/s of VRAM bandwidth.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is exceptional, as both sit at the 95th percentile with identical percentiles. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 146,593 suggest a system where the CPU can feed the GPU without stalling. In CPU-bound workloads like physics calculations (PassMark physics score of 3,598) or data encryption (46,949), the CPU is the limiting factor, but its 95th percentile position means it outperforms 95% of all CPUs.

In GPU-bound workloads like 4K gaming or ray-traced rendering, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, but its 95th percentile position again means it outperforms 95% of all GPUs. The estimated FPS scaling from the benchmark scores indicates that at 1080p, the CPU will limit frame rates in some titles, while at 4K, the GPU will be the primary constraint. The data shows this is a system where the bottleneck shifts depending on the workload, but neither component falls below the 95th percentile, so the user always experiences top-tier performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds