SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of Intel’s Core Ultra 9 285 with NVIDIA’s Quadro RTX 5000 creates a desktop build with a significant performance delta between its two main components. The CPU is a top-tier, modern flagship processor, while the GPU is an end-of-life professional workstation card from a prior architecture generation. This asymmetry defines the system’s character, making it a machine with exceptional computational headroom for processor-intensive tasks, but one that is firmly anchored by its graphics counterpart in visual and GPU-accelerated workflows.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a profound imbalance between the two components. The Core Ultra 9 285 sits in the 95th percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. In contrast, the Quadro RTX 5000 lands in the 67th percentile for GPUs, meaning it is merely above average. This 28-point gap in percentile rankings is the core story of this build: a processor with top-tier capabilities paired with a graphics card that is a generation old.

This configuration means the GPU is the primary bottleneck in almost every graphics-bound scenario. In gaming and 3D rendering, the Quadro RTX 5000 will cap the frame rate and rendering throughput long before the Core Ultra 9 285 breaks a sweat. The CPU’s colossal multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48945, will be largely idle in many gaming scenarios, waiting on the GPU to deliver frames. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks such as code compilation, data compression, or physics simulations, the Core Ultra 9 285 operates at its full potential, and the GPU becomes an irrelevant bystander.

The lack of measured FPS data for this pairing reinforces the need to consider the theoretical limits. The benchmark scores indicate that the CPU has the raw power to feed almost any GPU, but the Quadro RTX 5000’s performance ceiling will be the limiting factor for any visual workload. For users whose primary tasks are heavily threaded CPU workloads, the GPU will not bottleneck the system. However, for any task that involves rendering graphics, the system's overall performance will be dictated by the GPU's capabilities, leaving the massive potential of the Core Ultra 9 285 untapped.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a professional workstation GPU built on the Turing architecture. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. This substantial VRAM capacity is a key asset for professional workloads, allowing large datasets and high-resolution textures to reside on the card without spilling into system memory. The card’s memory clock is listed at 1750 MHz, with an effective data rate of 14 Gbps.

Its computational core includes 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. The card also includes 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, providing dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated tasks. The base clock is 1620 MHz, with a boost clock of 1815 MHz. This hardware configuration delivers a FP32 performance of 11.15 TFLOPS and a FP16 performance of 22.30 TFLOPS (2:1), making it capable for compute tasks that can leverage these features.

The benchmark results for the Quadro RTX 5000 place it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs, a modest standing. Its Passmark G3D score is 15616, which is roughly 1% slower than a GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and about 1.2% faster than an RTX A4000 Mobile. These comparisons illustrate that while the card has professional features and a large memory buffer, its raw graphics performance is not in the same league as modern high-end consumer cards. Its API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern software. The card is a dual-slot design, requires a 550 W power supply, and uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. It has been marked as end-of-life, having been succeeded by the Workstation Ampere generation.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data shows a stark contrast in performance potential. The Core Ultra 9 285 achieves an average benchmark score of 75488, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 8224P (75582, -0.1% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 (75738, -0.3% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D (75716, -0.3% delta). This indicates the Intel chip is essentially neck-and-neck with high-end server and workstation processors.

In specific CPU tests, the Core Ultra 9 285 demonstrates exceptional multi-threaded might. It scores 48945 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 20556 in Cinebench R20 multi-core. Single-threaded performance is also strong, with scores of 6909 and 2901 in Cinebench R23 and R20, respectively. The Passmark suite further confirms its strength, with a multi-thread score of 56602 and a single-thread score of 4881.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 21629, placing it in the 67th percentile. Its Geekbench scores are 78999 for OpenCL and 92309 for Vulkan. While these are respectable numbers, they place the GPU in a different performance tier than the CPU. The combined percentile for this build is 81, reflecting the drag of the lower-performing GPU.

The overall picture is clear: this is a system with a top-5% processor paired with a mid-range GPU. The CPU will dominate in processor-centric tasks, while the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-centric tasks. The deltaPct comparisons for the CPU show it trading blows with professional EPYC processors, while the GPU is compared to consumer cards and mobile workstation GPUs, highlighting the performance class difference.

Who Should Build It

This specific CPU+GPU combination is not for the typical consumer. The Core Ultra 9 285 is a monster for productivity, but the GPU holds the system back in gaming. The target user is a professional or a power user whose primary workload is CPU-bound.

A software developer or data scientist compiling large codebases, running complex simulations, or processing massive datasets would benefit immensely from the CPU’s 24 cores and high single-threaded performance. The Passmark data compression score of 602121 and data encryption score of 46949 point to excellent throughput in these specific tasks. For these users, the GPU is a secondary add-on for basic display output, and its relative weakness is irrelevant.

Content creators who work with 2D graphics, video encoding, or audio processing will also find value. The CPU’s high multi-core scores in Cinebench and Passmark indicate it can handle rendering and encoding tasks efficiently. However, a content creator working heavily in 3D animation or visual effects would be hampered by the GPU, as rendering in applications like Blender or Maya would be slow compared to a modern GPU. The 16 GB of VRAM on the Quadro is a saving grace for large scenes, but the raw compute power is lacking.

This build could also serve as a small business workstation for tasks like financial modeling, engineering simulation (non-GPU accelerated), or server virtualization. The ECC memory support is a critical feature for these environments, ensuring data integrity over long compute runs. Students in computer science or engineering fields would also find the CPU to be a powerful tool, though they would be better served by a more balanced system for general use. In short, this is a machine for users who need a top-tier CPU and have a minimal or secondary need for high-end graphics performance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, part of the Core Ultra Series 2. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The processor is built on a 3 nm process at TSMC and contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. It uses the Intel Socket 1851.

The cache hierarchy is substantial, with 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 36 MB of L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s and includes ECC memory support, a feature often found in workstation platforms. It also provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 20 lanes from the CPU. The processor integrates an Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU GPU for basic display output, though it is not intended for gaming.

The benchmark scores confirm its high-end status. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48945 puts it in the top tier of processors, on par with server-class chips. Its single-core score of 6909 is also impressive, indicating strong performance in lightly-threaded applications. The Passmark results show a multi-thread score of 56602 and a single-thread score of 4881.

Its nearest rivals are all AMD EPYC or Ryzen PRO processors, with score deltas of less than 0.3%. This shows that the Core Ultra 9 285 is not just a good desktop CPU; it is a serious competitor to server and workstation processors, making it an extreme overkill for gaming but a powerhouse for productivity. The TDP is listed at 65 W, which is remarkably low for its performance class, suggesting excellent power efficiency. It has a launch MSRP of $579.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The data clearly indicates the Quadro RTX 5000 will be the primary limiting factor.

The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 15616 puts it in a performance class similar to a GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB. This is a card from several generations ago and is not suited for high-refresh-rate or high-resolution gaming at max settings. At 1080p, the system could handle many esports titles at medium-to-high settings, but modern AAA games would require significant settings reductions to maintain playable frame rates.

At 1440p, the GPU would struggle further. The 256-bit memory bus and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate but not exceptional for that resolution. Expect to play at medium settings to achieve a stable 60 FPS in most games. At 4K, the Quadro RTX 5000 would be out of its depth. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for the resolution, but the raw shading power is insufficient to drive a 4K display in modern games. Frame rates would likely fall below 30 FPS in demanding titles, even at low settings.

The CPU, with its 95th percentile ranking, is not the issue. It can easily handle game logic and AI. The bottleneck is purely the GPU. The presence of RT cores is a positive, but the first-generation Turing RT cores are slow compared to modern implementations. The gaming experience on this machine would be underwhelming for a user expecting high-end performance. The system is built for work, not play.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 81.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 8224P?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285 has an average benchmark score of 75488, which is 0.1% lower than the AMD EPYC 8224P's score of 75582.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 has a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the process node of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is built on a 3 nm process.

Q: How much VRAM does the Quadro RTX 5000 have?

A: The graphics card is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is in the 67th percentile of all GPUs.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 9 285, a top-tier 24-core processor from the Arrow Lake generation, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000, an end-of-life Turing-architecture professional GPU. The system represents a mismatch in performance tiers, with a CPU in the 95th percentile and a GPU in the 67th percentile, resulting in an overall combined percentile of 81.

The build is a workstation-class machine, not a gaming rig. The processor is a performance monster, rivaling server chips from AMD. The graphics card, while competent and featuring a large 16 GB frame buffer, is a generation old and does not have the raw power to match the CPU. This pairing is for a user who needs extreme CPU compute power and requires a professional GPU with certified drivers and large VRAM, but does not prioritize raw graphics frame rates.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 9 285 is built on the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 processors. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory and provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU itself. The GPU uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. While the CPU supports the newer standard, the GPU is limited to the older one, though this does not bottleneck the GPU given its performance class.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 230 W. The suggested power supply for the GPU is 550 W, which is a modest requirement for such a combination. This leaves ample headroom in a standard power supply for other components. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is not an intended path for increasing performance.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system would be the graphics card. The CPU has enough power to drive a significantly faster GPU, and the platform itself is current. Replacing the Quadro RTX 5000 with a modern high-end card would transform this system from a CPU-centric workstation into a balanced high-performance machine capable of both heavy compute and high-end gaming. The CPU platform, with its PCIe Gen 5 support, is future-proof for such an upgrade. The memory and storage are also on modern standards, meaning a GPU swap is a simple and effective way to unlock the system's full potential.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds