SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

16,504 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture with a 3 nm process node from TSMC. It runs at a 2.50 GHz base clock and reaches a 5.60 GHz boost clock, with a 65 W TDP that signals impressive efficiency for a flagship-class chip. The CPU packs 36 MB of shared L3 cache, with 192 KB of L1 and 3 MB of L2 per core. It supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, delivering 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support—a feature that makes it suitable for workstation reliability. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 EU provides a basic display output capability, though the pairing with a discrete GPU in this build makes it largely secondary.

In multi-threaded workloads, the data shows a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48,945, which places the CPU at the 95th percentile among all CPUs. This is a top-tier result for rendering, compilation, and heavy parallel tasks. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 6,909 is equally strong, indicating excellent responsiveness in lightly threaded applications. The Passmark multithread score of 56,602 reinforces the multicore strength, while the Passmark single-thread score of 4,881 confirms that this chip does not sacrifice single-threaded speed for core count.

The nearest rivals provide context for these numbers. The AMD EPYC 8224P scores 75,582 on average benchmark score, which is 0.1% higher than the Core Ultra 9 285's average of 75,488. The AMD EPYC 4545P sits 0.2% lower, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D trails by 0.3%, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 also trails by 0.3%. These deltas are negligible—the Core Ultra 9 285 trades blows with enterprise and prosumer EPYC and Ryzen parts within a fraction of a percent. What this means in practice is that the Intel chip is not a class leader by a wide margin, but it is firmly in the upper echelon of desktop and workstation CPUs.

The 24-thread count (with no hyperthreading) is notable. Unlike many high-end CPUs that double physical cores with logical threads, this chip relies on its physical cores alone. The Passmark data compression score of 602,121 and encryption score of 46,949 suggest strong throughput in data-heavy tasks. The floating-point math score of 194,988 and integer math score of 164,869 indicate balanced arithmetic performance, which benefits scientific computing and financial modeling. The extended instructions score of 45,357 shows that AVX-style workloads are handled competently, though not at the absolute peak of the market.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, and the measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions, not from direct gameplay measurements.

That said, the components point to a very capable gaming system. The Core Ultra 9 285's single-core performance is exceptional—the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6,909 and Passmark single-thread score of 4,881 are both in the top percentiles, which is what matters most for game logic and physics threads. The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with 21,760 shading units and a boost clock of 2,407 MHz. Its FP32 throughput of 104.8 TFLOPS and texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s suggest it can feed modern displays at high refresh rates.

For 1080p ultra settings, the expectation is extremely high frame rates, likely exceeding 144 FPS in most titles, given the CPU's strong single-thread performance and the GPU's raw compute. At 1440p ultra, the system should still deliver triple-digit FPS in esports titles and high refresh rates in AAA games. At 4K ultra, the GPU becomes the primary driver, and the RTX 5090 D V2's 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus with 1.34 TB/s bandwidth provides ample headroom for high-resolution textures and ray tracing. The pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s and the 170 ray tracing cores suggest that ray-traced workloads will be handled with authority.

The GPU's percentile ranking is 59th among all GPUs, which is lower than the CPU's 95th percentile. This creates an interesting dynamic: the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU's relative position means it may not be the ultimate bottleneck-free pairing. However, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16,504 places it near rivals like the NVIDIA T400 (16,508, 0% delta), AMD Radeon PRO W7500 (16,415, 0.5% higher), NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (16,408, 0.6% higher), and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16,361, 0.9% higher). These are tight margins, suggesting the GPU is competitive but not dominant in its class.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark data shows a system with a combined percentile of 77, which places it in the upper quartile of all desktop builds. The CPU's average benchmark score is 75,488, with a percentile rank of 95 among all CPUs. This is a strong result for a desktop processor, beating the vast majority of parts on the market. The nearest rival comparisons show the CPU is virtually tied with the AMD EPYC 8224P (75,582, -0.1% delta), AMD EPYC 4545P (75,373, +0.2%), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D (75,716, -0.3%), and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 (75,738, -0.3%). These sub-1% differences mean the Core Ultra 9 285 is interchangeable with these alternatives in aggregate performance.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 16,504, with a percentile rank of 59 among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA T400 (16,508, 0% delta), AMD Radeon PRO W7500 (16,415, +0.5%), NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (16,408, +0.6%), and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16,361, +0.9%). The GPU is essentially tied with these parts, which is surprising given the RTX 5090 D V2's massive specifications—92,200 million transistors, 24 GB of GDDR7, and a 750 mm² die. The 59th percentile ranking suggests that the 3DMark Steel Nomad score may not fully capture the GPU's capabilities in real-world gaming, or that the benchmark is particularly demanding on this architecture.

The CPU-specific benchmarks tell a more detailed story. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 4,933 and single-core score of 696 show consistency across generations of the Cinebench suite. The Cinebench R20 scores of 20,556 multicore and 2,901 single-core scale appropriately. The Passmark physics score of 3,598 and random string sorting score of 73,651 are moderate, while the find prime numbers score of 459 is notably low—a potential weak point for certain mathematical workloads. The data encryption score of 46,949 and data compression score of 602,121 are strong, indicating solid performance for archival and security applications.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing is aimed at desktop users who need top-tier CPU performance with a capable GPU. Given the CPU's 95th percentile ranking and the GPU's 59th percentile, the target user is someone who prioritizes multi-threaded and single-threaded CPU work over raw GPU dominance. The combined percentile of 77 confirms this is a high-end system, but the GPU is not the strongest part.

Gamers at 1440p and 4K resolutions will find this system capable, though the GPU's mid-pack percentile means it may not hit the absolute highest frame rates at 4K ultra in the most demanding titles. Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation will benefit most from the CPU's 24 cores and 48,945 Cinebench R23 multicore score. The 36 MB of L3 cache and ECC memory support make it suitable for workstation tasks where data integrity is critical.

Software developers compiling large codebases will see strong performance from the multi-threaded scores, and the Passmark integer math score of 164,869 indicates good general-purpose compute. Students and small business users building a workstation for mixed workloads will find the system responsive, though the GPU's price point and power draw may be overkill for office tasks alone. The 65 W CPU TDP is remarkably low for a 24-core part, which means cooling and power delivery for the CPU are not demanding, allowing more headroom for the GPU's 575 W TDP.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU's single-thread scores (Cinebench R23 6,909, Passmark 4,881) ensure high frame rates in esports and competitive titles. The GPU's 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 and 1.34 TB/s memory bandwidth support high refresh rates, though the 59th percentile ranking suggests it may trail other top GPUs in certain titles. Expect smooth gameplay at 1440p with most settings maxed.

Streaming: The 24 cores handle encoding and streaming overhead without competing with game threads. The Passmark multithread score of 56,602 and data compression score of 602,121 indicate that simultaneous encode and gameplay will remain fluid. The GPU's NVENC-class hardware is not specified, but the Blackwell architecture's 680 tensor cores provide AI-assisted encoding capability.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48,945 accelerates timeline rendering and export. The 24 GB of GPU memory allows for large preview buffers and multi-layer effects. The CPU's 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth is modest for a high-end part, but adequate for most editing suites.

3D rendering: The CPU's 24 threads and strong floating-point math score of 194,988 provide solid CPU rendering performance. GPU-accelerated renderers will use the RTX 5090 D V2's 21,760 shading units and 170 ray tracing cores, though the GPU's percentile suggests it may not outpace all rivals in this workload.

Software development: The single-core scores are excellent for compilation, and the multithread scores handle parallel builds. The Passmark integer math score of 164,869 and extended instructions score of 45,357 support code analysis and simulation tools. The ECC memory support is a plus for long-running build servers.

Student and office work: This system is massively overqualified for typical office tasks. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics could handle basic display output, but the discrete GPU is excessive for spreadsheets and document editing. The low CPU TDP of 65 W means power draw is modest when idle, but the GPU's 575 W TDP makes the total system power hungry.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has 24 cores and 24 threads, with no hyperthreading.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It is within 0.3% of the AMD EPYC 8224P, EPYC 4545P, Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D, and Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 in average benchmark score.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5090 D V2 has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus with 1.34 TB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is useful for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 77, placing it in the upper quartile of desktop builds.

Q: What PCIe version does the GPU use?

A: The GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16, and the CPU provides 20 Gen 5 lanes.

Q: What is the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score?

A: The score is 16,504, which is nearly identical to the NVIDIA T400 at 16,508.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear CPU-favored balance. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking vastly exceeds the GPU's 59th percentile. In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression, and single-threaded tasks, the Core Ultra 9 285 is the dominant component. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48,945 and single-core score of 6,909 put it in the top tier, meaning the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor in gaming or productivity.

The GPU, however, is the bottleneck in GPU-intensive workloads. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16,504 places it at the 59th percentile, and its nearest rivals (T400, W7500, RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, RX 5700 XT) are all within 0.9% of its score. This means that in 4K ultra gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the RTX 5090 D V2 will limit frame rates or render times more than the CPU. The 24 GB of VRAM is ample, but the raw compute of 104.8 TFLOPS, while high in absolute terms, does not outclass its direct competitors by a meaningful margin.

The FPS scaling (estimated, since no measured data exists) follows this pattern: at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread strength (Passmark 4,881) will push frame rates high, and the GPU will keep up. At 1440p, the GPU's load increases, and its mid-pack percentile becomes more relevant. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, and the CPU's power is largely underutilized. For users who want to maximize gaming performance, the GPU is the component to upgrade first. For users who do mixed CPU-heavy and GPU-light work, the current balance is acceptable.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform with DDR5 memory support over a dual-channel bus. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics provide a fallback if the discrete GPU fails or is removed. The CPU's TDP of 65 W is low, so the power delivery requirements for the CPU are modest. The GPU, however, has a TDP of 575 W and a suggested PSU rating of 950 W, so the power supply is a critical component.

The PCIe interface is Gen 5, with 20 lanes from the CPU and PCIe 5.0 x16 on the GPU. This provides ample bandwidth for current and near-future storage and expansion cards. The motherboard should support DDR5 memory, and the ECC capability of the CPU suggests a workstation-class board may be warranted for maximum reliability.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to replace the GPU first, given its 59th percentile ranking. The CPU has headroom to drive a stronger GPU. The 24 GB of GDDR7 memory is generous, but if gaming at 4K ultra is the primary use case, a GPU with a higher percentile score would yield better frame rates. The CPU's 24 cores and 36 MB of L3 cache have long-term viability, so the platform should remain relevant for several years.

The memory bus is dual-channel, which is a potential limitation for a high-end CPU. The 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is not exceptional, and users with memory-intensive workloads might see gains from a platform with quad-channel support. However, this is a desktop platform, and the trade-off is accepted for the lower TDP and smaller footprint.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2. The CPU is a 24-core Arrow Lake-S part with a 65 W TDP, and the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture card with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory and a 575 W TDP. The combined percentile of 77 places this system in the upper quartile of all builds, but the gap between the CPU's 95th percentile and the GPU's 59th percentile defines its character.

The system is best described as a CPU-first workstation with a capable gaming GPU. The 3 nm CPU process node and 17,800 million transistors deliver high efficiency, while the GPU's 5 nm process and 92,200 million transistors provide substantial compute. The CPU's nearest rivals are server-class EPYC and prosumer Ryzen PRO parts, all within 0.3% in average score, which underscores its workstation credentials. The GPU's nearest rivals are a mix of workstation and older gaming cards, all within 0.9%, which places it in a crowded mid-tier segment.

For users who need maximum multi-threaded CPU performance for rendering, compilation, or data processing, and who also want a strong GPU for gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks, this build delivers. The CPU will not be the bottleneck in any workload, and the GPU, while not the absolute fastest, offers a large 24 GB memory pool and modern feature support. The system's combined percentile of 77 confirms it is a high-end build, but the GPU's relative weakness is the most significant compromise.