SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

98%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

77,712 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

This pairing combines Intel's 24-core Arrow Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA's flagship Blackwell GPU, creating a desktop build that sits at the 94th combined percentile across all CPU-GPU pairings in the database. The CPU alone achieves a 95th percentile versus all CPUs, while the GPU ranks at the 92nd percentile versus all GPUs, indicating a system positioned near the top of the performance hierarchy for compute-heavy and graphics-intensive workloads. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame-rate discussions below are estimated from the individual benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 features 24 cores and 24 threads, operating at a base clock of 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. This is a locked processor with no unlocked multiplier, built on the Arrow Lake-S architecture using a 3 nm process from TSMC. The chip contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, with a TDP of just 65 watts — a remarkably low power envelope for a 24-core desktop part. Cache is distributed as 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3, providing substantial on-die storage for frequently accessed data.

Cinebench results reveal strong multi-threaded capability. The R23 multi-core score of 48,945 places this CPU in the top 5% of all processors, while the R23 single-core score of 6,909 demonstrates excellent per-thread performance. The R20 multi-core score of 20,556 and R15 multi-core score of 4,933 follow the same pattern, showing consistent scaling across render workloads. Single-core R20 at 2,901 and R15 at 696 confirm that the 5.60 GHz boost clock delivers tangible benefits for latency-sensitive tasks like gaming and interactive applications.

PassMark tests provide a broader view of workload diversity. The multi-thread score of 56,602 and single-thread score of 4,881 both sit well above typical desktop processors. Integer math at 164,869 and floating-point math at 194,988 indicate robust arithmetic throughput, while data compression at 602,121 and random string sorting at 73,651 suggest strong memory and cache subsystem performance. Data encryption at 46,949 and extended instructions at 45,357 point to capable cryptographic and SIMD processing. The find prime numbers score of 459 is comparatively modest, reflecting the trade-off between core count and per-core integer performance in this particular workload.

The nearest rivals bracket this CPU tightly. The AMD EPYC 8224P scores 75,582 on average, just 0.1% higher, while the AMD EPYC 4545P at 75,373 trails by 0.2%. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D at 75,716 sits 0.3% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 at 75,738 also leads by 0.3%. These sub-1% deltas indicate that the Ultra 9 285 trades blows with enterprise and enthusiast server processors, though the Intel part does so at a 65-watt TDP, which is far more accessible for desktop cooling.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform centers on Intel Socket 1851, which supports the Core Ultra Series 2 generation. Memory is limited to DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with a theoretical bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory support is present, making this platform viable for error-sensitive workstation tasks where data integrity matters. PCIe connectivity includes Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast NVMe storage and expansion cards, while the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units provides a fallback display output.

The suggested PSU for this build is 950 watts, while the GPU alone carries a 575 W TDP and the CPU draws 65 W. This leaves substantial headroom for other components, though the 1x 16-pin power connector on the GPU means users need a power supply with that connector or an appropriate adapter. The GPU's dual-slot design and 304 mm length require a case with adequate clearance; the 137 mm height and 48 mm width also factor into chassis compatibility.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to the CPU being the component with more headroom relative to its power budget. At 65 W, the Ultra 9 285 leaves thermal and power overhead that could allow for higher sustained clocks if the platform permits, though the locked multiplier limits overclocking. The GPU, at 575 W, is already operating near the upper bound of what the 950 W PSU can comfortably support alongside other components. A future upgrade would likely target the GPU first if gaming performance becomes insufficient, but the 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth suggest this will not be an immediate concern.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 75,488 places it at the 95th percentile, with the nearest rival AMD EPYC 8224P at 75,582 showing a delta of -0.1% — essentially a statistical tie. The GPU's average benchmark score of 77,712 sits at the 92nd percentile, though its nearest rivals are notably different in character. The AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT scores 76,904, just 1.1% behind, while the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT at 78,940 leads by 1.6%. The NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB and 16 GB variants score 79,396 and 79,605 respectively, leading by 2.1% and 2.4%. These mobile and datacenter comparisons reveal that the RTX 5090 D's average score is competitive with a wide range of GPU classes.

The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pair is 94, meaning this build outperforms 94% of all recorded pairings in the database. The CPU's 95th percentile and GPU's 92nd percentile are closely aligned, suggesting neither component dramatically outclasses the other. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 14,326, a strong result for modern rasterization workloads. Geekbench OpenCL at 310,674 and Vulkan at 376,915 show massive compute throughput, while PassMark G3D at 44,065 and GPU compute at 28,396 round out the picture. The DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores of 231, 371, and 219 respectively are lower, but these are older API tests that do not fully exercise Blackwell's feature set.

Balance and Bottleneck

The tight alignment between the CPU's 95th percentile and the GPU's 92nd percentile suggests a well-balanced pairing for most workloads. In CPU-bound scenarios like data compression and encryption, the Ultra 9 285's 24 threads provide ample parallelism, with compression at 602,121 and encryption at 46,949. For GPU-bound tasks like rendering and ray tracing, the RTX 5090 D's 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 and 1.79 TB/s memory bandwidth dominate.

However, the bottleneck analysis reveals nuance. In gaming at lower resolutions, the CPU's single-thread score of 4,881 in PassMark becomes the limiting factor, as frame generation relies heavily on per-core performance. At higher resolutions, the GPU's pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s take over as the primary constraint. The absence of measured FPS data means these conclusions are inferred from benchmark scores rather than direct testing, but the pattern is consistent with typical desktop behavior.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts depending on the application. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 48,945 shows the CPU handling render tasks efficiently, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 14,326 indicates strong DX12 gaming performance. For mixed workloads like video editing, which use both CPU and GPU, this pairing offers complementary strengths — the CPU's 65 W TDP leaves thermal headroom for sustained all-core loads, while the GPU's FP16 at 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1) accelerates compute-heavy effects.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB202 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 92,200 million transistors across 750 mm², yielding a transistor density of 122.9 million per square millimeter. Memory consists of 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, delivering 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth — a figure that dwarfs most desktop GPUs and enables high-resolution texture streaming and large dataset processing.

Clock speeds are set at a 2017 MHz base and 2407 MHz boost, with memory running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, and 176 ROPs provide substantial raw rasterization power, reflected in the 423.6 GPixel/s pixel rate and 1,636.8 GTexel/s texture rate. The 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores handle ray tracing and AI acceleration, respectively, making this GPU suitable for both real-time ray-traced gaming and machine learning inference.

PassMark G3D at 44,065 and GPU compute at 28,396 demonstrate strong general-purpose performance, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 376,915 indicates excellent cross-API compute capability. The OpenCL score of 310,674 confirms this across the open standard. The DirectX 12 score of 219 in PassMark is lower, but this test is less representative of modern DX12 workloads than 3DMark Steel Nomad, where the 14,326 score paints a more favorable picture. For rendering, the FP32 and FP16 both at 104.8 TFLOPS mean the GPU handles single-precision and half-precision workloads at identical throughput, which is advantageous for AI training where FP16 is common.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core R23 score of 6,909 and PassMark single-thread of 4,881 provide the per-core speed needed for high frame rates, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 14,326 and 32 GB VRAM handle demanding titles at high resolutions. Expect strong 1440p and 4K performance, though exact FPS is estimated.

Streaming: The 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores can handle real-time encoding and AI-enhanced streaming features, while the CPU's 24 threads at 65 W TDP leave overhead for simultaneous game and stream processing. The PassMark multithread score of 56,602 supports concurrent workloads.

Video editing: The combination of CPU multi-core at 48,945 in Cinebench R23 and GPU compute at 28,396 in PassMark accelerates timeline rendering and effects processing. The 32 GB VRAM allows large preview buffers and multi-layer compositions without memory pressure.

3D rendering: Cinebench R15 multi-core at 4,933 and R20 at 20,556 show the CPU handles CPU-based renderers efficiently, while the GPU's 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 accelerates GPU-accelerated renderers. The 1.79 TB/s bandwidth moves scene data quickly.

Software development: The 24 cores and 24 threads compile code in parallel, with PassMark integer math at 164,869 reflecting strong arithmetic throughput. ECC memory support adds reliability for long build sessions.

Student and office work: The 65 W TDP makes this an efficient system for daily tasks, with the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics providing display output when the discrete GPU is idle. PassMark single-thread at 4,881 ensures responsive application usage.

Who Should Build It

This build targets enthusiasts and professionals who need top-tier performance across both CPU and GPU workloads. Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolutions will benefit from the GPU's 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth, which accommodate high-resolution textures and ray tracing without compromise. Content creators working with 4K video or complex 3D scenes will find the CPU's 24 cores and the GPU's compute throughput well-matched, avoiding the typical bottleneck where one component idles while the other struggles.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 24-thread parallelism and ECC memory support, while data scientists running AI inference can leverage the 680 tensor cores. Students and small business users seeking a future-proof workstation will find the 95th percentile CPU and 92nd percentile GPU provide headroom for years of demanding applications. The 65 W CPU TDP makes cooling simpler and keeps system noise lower, while the 950 W suggested PSU ensures stable operation under full GPU load.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 94, placing this build above 94% of all recorded CPU-GPU pairings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ultra 9 285 trails the AMD EPYC 8224P by 0.1% and leads the AMD EPYC 4545P by 0.2%, while both AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D and 9755 lead by 0.3%.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The RTX 5090 D has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, delivering 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory is supported, making this platform suitable for error-sensitive workstation tasks.

Q: What is the TDP of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 575 W.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 950 W.

Q: Is measured FPS data available for this exact combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this CPU-GPU pairing, so all frame-rate figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4,881 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 6,909 indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for maintaining high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 14,326 and PassMark G3D of 44,065 suggest excellent rasterization throughput.

At 1440p, the combination of a 95th percentile CPU and 92nd percentile GPU should sustain high refresh rates in most titles, with the 32 GB VRAM eliminating texture memory limitations. At 4K, the GPU's 423.6 GPixel/s pixel rate and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth become the dominant factors, and the 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 compute provides headroom for demanding effects. Ray tracing performance is supported by 170 RT cores, while 680 tensor cores enable DLSS-style upscaling. The 1750 MHz memory clock (28 Gbps effective) ensures the GDDR7 memory keeps pace with the GPU's compute capabilities. These estimates suggest a system capable of high settings at high resolutions, but exact FPS numbers require direct testing.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D. The CPU, part of the Core Ultra Series 2 based on Arrow Lake, delivers 24 cores and 24 threads with a 5.60 GHz boost clock at just 65 W TDP. The GPU, built on Blackwell 2.0 with the GB202 chip, offers 32 GB of GDDR7 memory, 21,760 shading units, and 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The combined percentile of 94 places this system in the upper echelon of desktop builds, with the CPU at the 95th percentile and GPU at the 92nd percentile.

The build's overall tier is high-end, suitable for demanding gaming, content creation, and compute workloads. The CPU's 65 W power envelope is notably efficient for a 24-core part, while the GPU's 575 W TDP is substantial but supported by the 950 W suggested PSU. The platform supports DDR5 memory, PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, and ECC memory, making it flexible for both consumer and professional use. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $579, and the GPU's launch MSRP is 2,299 USD, though these are stated once for reference. This pairing represents a balanced high-performance desktop configuration, with no single component dramatically outclassing the other, as reflected in the closely aligned percentiles.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds