SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

56,083 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080: Desktop Benchmark Analysis

This desktop pairing combines Intel's 24-core Arrow Lake flagship with NVIDIA's Blackwell-based RTX 5080, landing at the 91st percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU sits in the 95th percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 87th percentile among all graphics cards—a high-end configuration with strong but not absolute top-tier positioning. No measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing; all game performance discussion below is estimated from the individual benchmark scores.

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285?

A: The CPU offers 24 cores and 24 threads, meaning it does not use simultaneous multithreading (SMT). It is built on the Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm process from TSMC, with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285 has an average benchmark score of 75,488. It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 by 0.3% and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D by 0.3%, sits 0.1% behind the AMD EPYC 8224P, and leads the AMD EPYC 4545P by 0.2%. These are effectively negligible differences, placing the CPU in a tightly competitive cluster.

Q: What memory and PCIe features does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is supported. PCIe is Gen 5 with 20 lanes available from the CPU. The socket is Intel Socket 1851.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5080 has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1875 MHz with 30 Gbps effective data rate.

Q: What are the key benchmark scores for the RTX 5080?

A: The GPU scores 8,637 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), 235,901 in Geekbench OpenCL, 255,450 in Geekbench Vulkan, and 36,565 in PassMark G3D. Its average benchmark score is 56,083 with an 87th percentile ranking among all GPUs.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build achieves a combined percentile of 91, meaning it outperforms approximately 91% of all recorded desktop configurations in the database. The CPU alone is at the 95th percentile, while the GPU is at the 87th percentile.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked is false). The CPU runs at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz with a TDP of 65 W.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this combination is exceptionally well-suited. The CPU's single-thread performance is strong—6,909 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 4,881 in PassMark single-thread—which translates into the high per-core throughput games demand. The GPU's 87th percentile ranking and 56.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute ensure that frame rates at 1080p and 1440p will be driven primarily by the graphics card, with the CPU providing ample headroom for high-refresh monitors.

Streaming workloads benefit from the 24-core, 24-thread configuration. The PassMark multithread score of 56,602 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945 indicate substantial parallel headroom for encoding, overlays, and chat processing while gaming. The lack of SMT means thread scheduling is simpler but total thread count is still high enough for simultaneous game plus encoder workloads.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will leverage both components. The CPU's 194,988 PassMark floating-point math score and 164,869 integer math score provide strong timeline and effect processing, while the GPU's 21,789 PassMark GPU compute score and 336 tensor cores accelerate effects, color grading, and export encoding. The 16 GB GDDR7 frame buffer offers ample capacity for 4K timelines with multiple layers.

3D rendering workloads—whether CPU-based like Blender Cycles or GPU-accelerated like Octane—will see balanced performance. The CPU's multi-core Cinebench scores (20,556 in R20, 48,945 in R23) place it in the top 5% of all processors, while the GPU's 84 RT cores and 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handle ray tracing and compute-heavy passes. The 960.0 GB/s memory bandwidth prevents starvation during large scene loads.

Software development benefits from the CPU's data compression score of 602,121 in PassMark, which accelerates build systems and version control operations. The 45,357 PassMark extended instructions score indicates robust SIMD support for modern compilers. With 24 threads, parallel builds across multiple translation units will see near-linear scaling in many scenarios. The 65 W TDP also means sustained all-core loads remain thermally manageable.

For student and office work, this configuration is overwhelmingly overqualified. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides basic display output for office tasks when the discrete GPU is idle. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures snappy responsiveness in document editing and web browsing, though the platform's full potential remains untapped in these lighter workloads.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS data is not available for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries for this pairing, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Therefore, all frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores and percentile rankings.

At 1080p ultra settings, the RTX 5080's 87th percentile standing among all GPUs suggests very high frame rates in most titles. The CPU's 4,881 PassMark single-thread score and 6,909 Cinebench R23 single-core score indicate minimal bottleneck risk at this resolution, allowing the GPU to operate near its full potential. Esports titles will likely exceed 200 FPS, while AAA games should maintain well above 100 FPS in most cases.

At 1440p ultra, the GPU becomes the primary determinant. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8,637 reflects strong DX12 rasterization performance, while the 255,450 Geekbench Vulkan score suggests excellent API efficiency. The 960.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports high-resolution texture streaming without stutter. Expect frame rates in the 100–160 FPS range for demanding titles, with lighter games pushing higher.

At 4K ultra, the 16 GB GDDR7 frame buffer and 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute become critical. The GPU's 293.1 GPixel/s pixel rate and 879.3 GTexel/s texture rate indicate strong fill-rate capabilities for 4K resolution. Ray tracing workloads will benefit from the 84 RT cores, though performance will naturally drop below rasterized levels. Estimates suggest 60–100 FPS in well-optimized AAA titles at native 4K ultra.

The CPU's 95th percentile ranking ensures it will not limit frame rates at any resolution in most games. However, titles with heavy physics or simulation workloads may show higher CPU utilization, and the lack of SMT could matter in games that assume more than 24 threads—though this is rare in current releases.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 9 285 uses Intel Socket 1851, which supports the Core Ultra Series 2 family. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, enabling fast NVMe storage and high-bandwidth add-in cards alongside the GPU. The RTX 5080 uses PCIe 5.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the available lanes.

Memory support is DDR5 in dual-channel configuration with ECC capability. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for the 24-core CPU, though users requiring more bandwidth would need to consider platforms with quad-channel memory. The 36 MB shared L3 cache and 3 MB per-core L2 cache help mitigate memory latency.

The power delivery requirements are modest for this performance class. The CPU's 65 W TDP is remarkably low for a 24-core processor, while the GPU's 360 W TDP and 750 W suggested PSU provide clear guidance for system builders. A 750 W power supply is the minimum recommendation; users adding multiple storage drives or heavily overclocking other components may want additional headroom.

A sensible next upgrade path depends on the user's primary workload. For gaming at 4K with maximum ray tracing, a future GPU upgrade within the same PCIe Gen 5 platform would be straightforward—the CPU has sufficient headroom to drive higher-end graphics cards. For productivity, adding more DDR5 memory capacity or faster NVMe storage would yield more tangible benefits than a CPU swap, given the 95th percentile standing. The locked multiplier limits CPU overclocking, so platform longevity relies on the base performance remaining competitive.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture (Arrow Lake-S), fabricated on a 3 nm TSMC process. It contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The TDP of 65 W is notable for a processor with this many cores, indicating strong power efficiency from the 3 nm process.

The cache hierarchy comprises 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. This configuration supports high hit rates for both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The absence of SMT means each core handles one thread, which can be advantageous for latency-sensitive tasks but reduces total thread count compared to competitors with similar core counts and SMT.

Benchmark results show balanced performance across workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945 and single-core score of 6,909 demonstrate strong scaling without hyperthreading. PassMark results reinforce this: 56,602 multithread, 4,881 single-thread, 194,988 floating-point math, and 164,869 integer math. The data compression score of 602,121 is particularly strong, indicating excellent memory subsystem performance for the 24 cores.

The 95th percentile ranking among all CPUs places this processor in elite company. Its nearest rivals—the AMD EPYC 8224P, EPYC 4545P, Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D, and Ryzen 7 PRO 9755—all score within 0.3% of the Core Ultra 9 285, demonstrating that at this performance tier, differences are minimal. The average benchmark score of 75,488 reflects consistent high performance across the full test suite.

For real workloads, the combination of high single-thread performance (6,909 Cinebench R23 single-core) and strong multi-thread scaling (48,945 multi-core) means the CPU handles both interactive tasks and batch processing well. The 65 W TDP allows for compact cooling solutions, and the unlocked multiplier is not available (locked), so users seeking overclocking headroom must look elsewhere.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1440p or 4K ultra settings with high refresh rates will find this pairing well-matched. The CPU's 95th percentile single-thread performance ensures no frame-rate bottlenecks in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU's 87th percentile ranking delivers the raw rasterization and ray tracing throughput needed for demanding visual settings. The 16 GB VRAM provides future-proofing for upcoming titles.

Content creators working with video, 3D rendering, or large datasets will benefit from the balanced CPU+GPU compute. The CPU's 48,945 Cinebench R23 multi-core score accelerates timeline rendering and code compilation, while the GPU's 21,789 PassMark compute score and 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handle GPU-accelerated effects and rendering. The 960.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large texture and geometry loads.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 24-core parallel throughput. The 602,121 PassMark data compression score speeds up package management and build artifacts, while the 45,357 extended instructions score supports modern SIMD-optimized code paths. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 lanes allow for fast NVMe storage, reducing I/O wait times during builds.

Students and small business workstations are over-served by this configuration, but the platform's efficiency (65 W CPU TDP) and integrated graphics provide flexibility. The Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU can handle basic display tasks when the discrete GPU is not needed, potentially reducing power draw during office work. The ECC memory support is valuable for data integrity in research or financial applications.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 75,488, placing it at the 95th percentile among all processors. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 8224P, scores 75,582 (0.1% higher), while the AMD EPYC 4545P scores 75,373 (0.2% lower). The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D and Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 score 75,716 and 75,738 respectively, each 0.3% higher. These deltas are within noise for most workloads.

Key CPU scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 48,945 and single-core at 6,909; Cinebench R20 multi-core at 20,556 and single-core at 2,901; and Cinebench R15 multi-core at 4,933 and single-core at 696. PassMark results show multithread at 56,602, single-thread at 4,881, integer math at 164,869, floating-point math at 194,988, and data encryption at 46,949.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 56,083, placing it at the 87th percentile among all graphics cards. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 8060S (55,757, 0.6% lower), AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55,698, 0.7% lower), AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54,828, 2.3% lower), and AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (57,367, 2.2% higher).

Key GPU scores include 3DMark Steel Nomad at 8,637, Geekbench OpenCL at 235,901, Geekbench Vulkan at 255,450, PassMark G3D at 36,565, and PassMark GPU compute at 21,789. The combined picture shows a CPU that is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU, but both components sit in the upper echelon of their respective categories. The combined percentile of 91 reflects the pairing's overall strength.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: "desktop") combining the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080. The CPU belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 lineup, while the GPU is part of the GeForce 50-series based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture.

The overall tier is high-end, with a combined percentile of 91. The CPU's 95th percentile and GPU's 87th percentile indicate a configuration that is near the top of the desktop performance spectrum but not the absolute highest—there are faster CPUs and GPUs in the database. The pairing is well-balanced, with the CPU having slightly more relative headroom than the GPU.

The platform targets enthusiasts and professionals who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance and high-end GPU acceleration. The 65 W CPU TDP combined with the 360 W GPU TDP results in a system that requires a 750 W PSU, which is reasonable for this performance class. The dual-slot GPU with a 16-pin power connector fits most mid-tower and full-tower cases.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-balanced pairing with the CPU having more relative headroom than the GPU. The CPU's 95th percentile versus the GPU's 87th percentile suggests that in CPU-bound workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor; conversely, in GPU-bound workloads, the CPU will have capacity to spare.

For gaming, the bottleneck will be the GPU in most scenarios. At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (6,909 Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures it can feed the GPU adequately, but the GPU's 87th percentile means it sets the frame rate ceiling. At 4K, the GPU's 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the primary constraint, with the CPU rarely exceeding 50% utilization in most titles.

For productivity, the balance shifts. The CPU's 48,945 Cinebench R23 multi-core score is only 0.3% below the top rival in its class, indicating near-peak CPU performance. The GPU's 21,789 PassMark compute score, while strong, is less dominant relative to its peers. In GPU-accelerated rendering or compute workloads, the GPU may become the bottleneck despite its high absolute performance.

The FPS scaling evidence (estimated, as no measured data exists) suggests that upgrading the GPU would yield larger frame rate gains than upgrading the CPU in gaming scenarios. Conversely, upgrading the CPU would provide diminishing returns given its 95th percentile standing. For a mixed workload system, this pairing is near optimal—neither component is severely underpowered relative to the other.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using the GB203 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm TSMC process. It contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, with a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm². The GPU has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz.

Memory consists of 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 960.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is a substantial bandwidth figure that supports high-resolution textures and large compute workloads. The memory clock runs at 1875 MHz with 30 Gbps effective data rate.

Compute resources include 10,752 shading units, 336 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 84 RT cores, and 336 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 293.1 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 879.3 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is rated at 56.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 56.28 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating no half-rate penalty for FP16 workloads.

Benchmark scores show strong DX12 performance (8,637 in 3DMark Steel Nomad) and excellent Vulkan performance (255,450 in Geekbench Vulkan). The OpenCL score of 235,901 reflects robust compute capability. PassMark G3D at 36,565 and GPU compute at 21,789 round out the picture, placing the GPU at the 87th percentile overall.

The 84 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing, while the 336 tensor cores accelerate AI-powered features like DLSS. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K gaming with high-res texture packs and for professional rendering workloads. The GPU's 360 W TDP requires a 750 W PSU, and the dual-slot design with a 16-pin connector fits standard cases. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, supporting high refresh rates and multi-monitor setups.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds