SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

40,377 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 form a desktop pairing that targets high-end productivity and modern gaming. The CPU, built on Intel’s Arrow Lake architecture with a 3 nm process from TSMC, offers 24 cores and 24 threads, a configuration that prioritizes parallel throughput over simultaneous multithreading. The GPU, based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, brings 12 GB of GDDR7 memory and a robust feature set. The data in this analysis is drawn directly from synthetic benchmarks; no measured game frame rates exist for this exact combination, so all gaming performance discussions are estimates derived from those scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake-S architecture using a 3 nm process at TSMC. It houses 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 2.50 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, and the chip has a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This design supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s and ECC memory support, making it suitable for error-sensitive workstation tasks.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 48,945, while the single-core score is 6,909. The R20 results show 20,556 for multicore and 2,901 for single-core. PassMark’s multithread score is 56,602, with a single-thread score of 4,881. For specialized tasks, the data shows 602,121 in data compression, 46,949 in data encryption, and 194,988 in floating-point math. The integer math score is 164,869, and extended instructions score 45,357. These numbers indicate a processor capable of handling video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific simulations with significant headroom.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 75,488, placing it in the 95th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all AMD EPYC or Ryzen PRO parts, with scores within a fraction of a percent. The AMD EPYC 8224P scores 75,582, a 0.1% difference, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 scores 75,738, a 0.3% gap. This shows the Ultra 9 285 is statistically tied with these server and professional-grade chips, meaning real-world differences will be negligible. For a desktop part, this level of parity with EPYC processors signals exceptional multi-core capability, though the lack of SMT means thread scheduling and core count utilization must be optimal to reach these heights.

The single-core performance is equally strong. A Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6,909 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4,881 indicate excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications like web browsing, office suites, and legacy software. The boost clock of 5.60 GHz is a major contributor here, allowing the chip to surge past competitors that rely on higher TDPs to achieve similar frequencies.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 uses the Intel Socket 1851, a platform tied to the Arrow Lake generation. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is a substantial amount of bandwidth for a single high-end GPU and one or more fast NVMe SSDs. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, and the 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient to feed the 24 cores without starving them in memory-intensive workloads. ECC memory support is a differentiator, making this a viable option for small workstations where data integrity is paramount.

The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, has a TDP of 250 W and a suggested PSU of 600 W. The CPU’s TDP is only 65 W, so the combined system power draw is modest relative to the performance on offer. A 600 W power supply provides ample headroom for the CPU and GPU, even with additional drives and peripherals. The RTX 5070 uses a single 16-pin power connector, which is standard for modern high-end cards.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests the platform has room to grow. The PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface on the GPU is current-generation, so there is no immediate bottleneck there. The CPU’s 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes allow for a second Gen 5 device, such as a high-speed storage array, without compromising the GPU’s bandwidth. A future GPU upgrade would be feasible within the same 600 W PSU budget, provided the new card has a similar power draw. The DDR5 memory platform is also future-proof, as memory bandwidth is not a limiting factor at 102.4 GB/s for current workloads. However, the CPU’s locked multiplier means overclocking is not an option, so performance gains will come from platform improvements rather than manual tuning.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this CPU and GPU combination, so the following gaming performance discussion is an estimate based on the benchmark scores. The data must be interpreted qualitatively, using the CPU’s and GPU’s synthetic results to infer frame rates.

The RTX 5070’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5,077, and its PassMark G3D score is 29,137. These numbers suggest a GPU that is well-suited for 1440p and 4K gaming at high settings, though the lack of direct FPS data prevents precise resolution-specific claims. The GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM is adequate for modern titles, but it may be a constraint at 4K with ultra textures in the most demanding games. The CPU’s single-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 score of 6,909, ensures that it will not hold back the GPU in frame generation, as the processor can feed the graphics card in most scenarios.

For competitive shooters, the high boost clock and strong single-thread score will likely translate to high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, where CPU performance often dictates the ceiling. In contrast, for story-driven AAA titles at 4K, the GPU’s 30.87 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will be the primary driver, and the 12 GB VRAM may require texture quality adjustments to maintain stable frame pacing. The GPU’s 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores will accelerate ray tracing and DLSS workloads, which are increasingly common in modern games, but the exact FPS impact cannot be quantified from the provided data.

Who Should Build It

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 and RTX 5070 combination serves a specific audience: desktop users who need both high-end compute throughput and solid graphics performance. The CPU’s 95th percentile ranking among all processors makes it a strong candidate for content creators who render video, compile code, or run complex simulations. The 24 cores and 24 threads, combined with a 48,945 Cinebench R23 multicore score, will dramatically reduce render times compared to mainstream 8-core parts. Data scientists and researchers who rely on ECC memory support will find this platform attractive, as it offers server-grade reliability in a desktop form factor.

For developers, the strong single-thread score of 4,881 in PassMark ensures fast compilation times for single-threaded build steps, while the multithread score of 56,602 accelerates parallel builds. Students and small business workstations that run virtual machines or database workloads will benefit from the 36 MB of L3 cache and the 602,121 data compression score. The GPU’s 82nd percentile ranking among all GPUs makes it a reasonable choice for gamers targeting 1440p with high refresh rates, though it is not a top-tier 4K powerhouse. The combined 89th percentile ranking for the pair reinforces that this is a high-end build, suitable for enthusiasts who want a balanced system rather than an extreme GPU-first or CPU-first configuration.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is listed in the FACT PACK as a feature of the processor.

Q: What is the process node for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070?

A: The GPU is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, according to the FACT PACK.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5070 have, and what type is it?

A: The RTX 5070 has 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the boost clock of the CPU?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, as listed in the FACT PACK.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is not unlocked, meaning the CPU is locked and cannot be overclocked.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 5070 is 600 W, per the FACT PACK.

Q: Which benchmark score shows the CPU’s single-thread performance?

A: The PassMark single-thread score is 4,881, and the Cinebench R23 single-core score is 6,909.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is a desktop GPU from the GeForce 50-series, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a 5 nm process at TSMC. The chip, designated GB205, contains 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, with a transistor density of 118.3 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. It operates at a base clock of 2325 MHz and a boost clock of 2512 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz for 28 Gbps effective speed. The 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus delivers 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Ray tracing and AI acceleration are handled by 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, respectively. The GPU’s FP32 and FP16 performance are both listed at 30.87 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio, which is typical for modern architectures. The pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 482.3 GTexel/s. For API support, the card is DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 compliant.

Benchmark scores for the GPU show a mixed bag. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5,077, which is a modern test and reflects strong DirectX 12 performance. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 172,660 and 178,923, respectively. However, PassMark DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores are 180, 277, and 108, respectively, which are notably low compared to the G3D score of 29,137. This discrepancy suggests the card’s driver optimization or architecture is better suited for newer API workloads rather than legacy DirectX tests. The PassMark GPU Compute score is 15,787, indicating solid compute throughput for general-purpose tasks.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 40,377, placing it in the 82nd percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are a mix of AMD Radeon Pro and NVIDIA RTX A-series mobile parts. The AMD Radeon Pro 580 scores 40,318, a 0.1% difference, while the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile scores 39,568, a 2% gap. These rivals are professional or mobile parts, which highlights that the RTX 5070 sits in a performance tier that is competitive with workstation GPUs, but its gaming-oriented feature set and 12 GB VRAM make it more suitable for consumer workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 and the RTX 5070 depends on the workload. The CPU is in the 95th percentile, while the GPU is in the 82nd percentile, indicating a CPU-heavy pairing where the processor has more relative headroom than the graphics card. For multi-threaded CPU tasks like rendering, the GPU will not be a limiting factor, as the CPU’s 48,945 Cinebench R23 multicore score will dominate the workload. In this scenario, the GPU sits idle, and the CPU is the clear bottleneck.

For gaming, the bottleneck flips. The GPU’s 30.87 TFLOPS and 12 GB VRAM will be the primary constraint at high resolutions, especially if ray tracing is enabled. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensures it can keep up with the GPU’s frame generation in most titles, but at 1080p with lower graphics settings, the CPU could become the limiting factor if the frame rate exceeds what the GPU can render. The lack of measured FPS data prevents a precise breakdown, but the percentile gap suggests that in gaming, the GPU is likely to be the limiting component at 4K, while the CPU may limit at 1080p in esports titles.

The memory bandwidth of the system is another consideration. The CPU’s 102.4 GB/s is sufficient for its 24 cores, but the GPU’s 672.0 GB/s is much higher, which is typical for discrete graphics. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface ensures the GPU has full bandwidth to communicate with the CPU, so there is no platform-level bottleneck there. Overall, this is a balanced pairing for most workloads, with the CPU having more compute headroom for productivity and the GPU being the focal point for gaming.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 in a desktop configuration. The CPU is a high-end desktop processor with 24 cores and a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a mid-to-high-end consumer card with a 250 W TDP. The combined percentile ranking is 89th, which places this system in the upper tier of all possible builds. The CPU’s 95th percentile and GPU’s 82nd percentile indicate that this is a CPU-first build, where the processor is the standout component.

The class is desktop, confirming this is a stationary system intended for workstations or gaming rigs. The CPU’s ECC memory support and 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes make it suitable for professional use, while the GPU’s 12 GB GDDR7 memory and RTX features cater to gamers and creators. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $579, and the GPU is $549 USD, but no pricing analysis is provided here. The overall tier is high-end, with the processor rivaling server-class EPYC parts and the GPU holding its own against professional cards.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 achieves an average benchmark score of 75,488, which puts it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 8224P, scores 75,582, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the Ultra 9 285 is effectively tied with a server processor. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 scores 75,738, a -0.3% delta, which is also within statistical noise. This suggests the CPU’s performance is not just high, but exceptionally consistent with top-tier professional parts.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 has an average benchmark score of 40,377, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 580, scores 40,318, a 0.1% delta, while the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile scores 39,568, a 2% delta. The GPU’s percentile is lower than the CPU’s, confirming that the graphics card is the weaker link in this pairing, but it still performs above the majority of GPUs.

The combined picture is a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks and is competent in GPU-bound tasks. The CPU’s top-tier ranking ensures that no productivity workload will be left wanting, while the GPU’s 82nd percentile provides a strong foundation for 1440p gaming and entry-level 4K. For users who prioritize compute performance over raw frame rates, this pairing is well-suited. For those seeking maximum gaming performance, the GPU may be the first component to upgrade. The data shows a clear hierarchy: the CPU is a flagship-class part, and the GPU is a capable mid-high-range companion.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds