SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

26,331 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 form a desktop pairing that sits at the 84th percentile overall, combining a top-tier 24-core processor with a mid-range Blackwell graphics card. The data in this analysis is derived entirely from synthetic benchmark scores, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination. Consequently, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the relative performance of the components, not direct gameplay measurements.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this combination, so all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4881 and the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20891 provide the foundation for these expectations.

At 1080p resolution, the RTX 5060’s raw rasterization performance, indicated by its 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, should be sufficient for high-refresh-rate gaming in most esports and competitive titles. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 77 suggests the GPU is well-optimized for modern APIs, which typically translates to strong DX12 game performance. The CPU’s single-core strength, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6909, ensures that frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios remains consistent, preventing stutter even when the GPU is pushing high frame rates.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary determinant of frame rates. The 8 GB GDDR7 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate headroom for most current titles, but the 128-bit bus width may limit performance in games that are particularly memory-hungry. The estimated frame rates at this resolution would be lower than at 1080p, but the GPU’s 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores suggest that enabling ray tracing or DLSS features would still yield playable results, albeit with reduced native resolution performance.

For 4K gaming, this pairing is not ideal. The RTX 5060’s 8 GB VRAM capacity is a limiting factor, as many modern titles at 4K with ultra textures can exceed this amount. The pixel rate of 119.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 299.6 GTexel/s are modest for 4K workloads. While the CPU’s immense multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48945) would not bottleneck at this resolution, the GPU would likely struggle to maintain 60 FPS in demanding AAA titles without significant graphical compromises or reliance on upscaling technologies.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The combination of the CPU’s 4881 PassMark single-thread score and the GPU’s 20891 PassMark G3D score is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p high-refresh gaming. The processor’s strong single-core performance prevents bottlenecks in esports titles, while the GPU can deliver high frame rates in less demanding competitive games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The PassMark multi-thread score of 56602 and the data compression score of 602121 indicate that the processor can handle game capture, encoding, and streaming overhead without significantly impacting game performance. The GPU’s NVENC capabilities, while not detailed in the pack, are implied by its 120 tensor cores.

Video editing: This workload benefits from both components. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20556 and 48945 in R23 demonstrate exceptional rendering capability for video exports and effects processing. The GPU’s 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates GPU-accelerated effects and previews. PassMark GPU compute score of 10899 shows the GPU can offload substantial processing from the CPU.

3D rendering: The CPU’s PassMark floating point math score of 194988 is extraordinarily high, making this pairing excellent for CPU-based rendering workloads like Blender’s Cycles or V-Ray. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3628 indicates moderate GPU rendering capability, suitable for real-time viewport work but not top-tier for GPU-only rendering.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 164869 and random string sorting score of 73651 suggest fast compilation times and efficient code processing. The 24 threads handle parallel builds effectively, while the single-thread score of 4881 ensures responsive IDE performance. The GPU’s compute capabilities accelerate machine learning training and inference tasks common in modern development.

Student and office work: This pairing is significantly over-specified for basic productivity tasks. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 145 W TDP mean the system runs efficiently, and the PassMark data encryption score of 46949 provides fast file encryption. For office applications, the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU in the CPU could handle basic display tasks, but the dedicated RTX 5060 is vastly more powerful than needed for spreadsheets and document editing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 features 24 cores and 24 threads, a configuration that prioritizes parallel throughput over simultaneous multi-threading. Based on the Arrow Lake architecture on a 3 nm TSMC process, the processor integrates 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The base clock of 2.50 GHz boosts up to 5.60 GHz, providing a wide frequency range for both efficiency and peak performance.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48945 places the CPU at the 95th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 75488. This performance is nearly identical to its nearest rivals: the AMD EPYC 8224P (deltaPct -0.1), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D (deltaPct -0.3), and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 (deltaPct -0.3). The processor is only 0.2% behind the AMD EPYC 4545P in average score, indicating that it competes directly with high-end server and workstation processors.

The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This substantial cache allocation supports the high single-thread performance evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6909. The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s via dual-channel DDR5 is adequate for the 24 cores, though not exceptional. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide high-bandwidth connectivity for GPUs and NVMe storage, while the unlocked multiplier is false, meaning the processor is not overclockable.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance between the Core Ultra 9 285 and RTX 5060 is heavily skewed toward the CPU. With the CPU at the 95th percentile and the GPU at the 72nd percentile, the processor is substantially more capable than the graphics card. This creates a scenario where the GPU will be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions.

The evidence for this bottleneck is clear in the benchmark scores. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 56602 is exceptionally high, while the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20891 is only moderately above average. In gaming, the GPU’s rendering speed will cap frame rates well before the CPU’s processing capability is saturated. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3628 confirms that the GPU is a mid-range performer, while the CPU’s Cinebench scores are in the top tier.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the GPU will sit idle while the CPU performs the heavy lifting. The PassMark data compression score of 602121 and floating point math score of 194988 demonstrate the CPU’s dominance in these tasks. For a balanced gaming system, this pairing would benefit from a more powerful GPU, but for productivity-focused users who game occasionally, the strong CPU ensures that the system remains responsive across all workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using the GB206 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm TSMC process with 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, effective 28 Gbps.

The GPU’s compute capabilities include 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. The FP32 performance of 19.18 TFLOPS is identical to the FP16 performance at a 1:1 ratio, indicating that the GPU does not have dedicated half-precision acceleration. The base clock of 2280 MHz boosts to 2497 MHz, producing a pixel rate of 119.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 299.6 GTexel/s.

The benchmark scores place the GPU at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26331. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 860M (deltaPct -0.3), NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (deltaPct -0.3), AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (deltaPct -0.8), and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (deltaPct 1.2). The performance delta is remarkably tight, with the RTX 5060 trailing the Radeon 860M by just 0.3% and leading the RX 6750 XT by 1.2%. This places the GPU in a competitive mid-range segment where small performance differences separate rivals.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 112787 and Vulkan score of 113321 indicate solid compute performance for non-gaming workloads. The PassMark GPU compute score of 10899 confirms that the GPU can handle general-purpose compute tasks, though it is not a compute powerhouse. For rendering, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3628 suggests moderate performance in DX12 workloads, which is the primary API for modern games.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive productivity tasks while still wanting a capable gaming system. The 95th percentile CPU performance makes this ideal for video editors who work with high-resolution footage, 3D artists who render complex scenes, and software developers who compile large codebases. The PassMark floating point math score of 194988 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48945 directly support these workloads.

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p who play competitive titles will find the RTX 5060 sufficient, especially given the CPU’s strong single-thread performance that ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound games. However, gamers targeting 4K or those who want maximum settings with ray tracing enabled may find the GPU underwhelming and should consider a more powerful graphics card.

Content creators who work with AI-based tools will benefit from the GPU’s tensor cores, which accelerate features like DLSS in games and AI denoising in creative applications. The 120 tensor cores provide a meaningful boost for these workloads. Students and small business users who run database applications, virtualization, or data analysis will appreciate the CPU’s 24 threads and the PassMark data encryption score of 46949 for secure data handling. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps the system power-efficient for long-running tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 9 285 delivers exceptional processor benchmark results. In Cinebench R15, it scores 4933 in multi-core and 696 in single-core. The R20 scores are 20556 multi-core and 2901 single-core. The R23 results show 48945 multi-core and 6909 single-core. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 56602, single-thread score of 4881, floating point math of 194988, integer math of 164869, data compression of 602121, data encryption of 46949, extended instructions of 45357, find prime numbers of 459, physics of 3598, and random string sorting of 73651.

The RTX 5060’s benchmark results include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3628, Geekbench OpenCL score of 112787, and Geekbench Vulkan score of 113321. The PassMark suite shows DirectX 10 score of 127, DirectX 11 score of 200, DirectX 12 score of 77, DirectX 9 score of 225, G2D score of 1154, G3D score of 20891, and GPU compute score of 10899.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 75488, placing it at the 95th percentile, with its nearest rivals being within a 0.3% performance delta. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 26331, placing it at the 72nd percentile, with nearest rivals within a 1.2% delta. The combined percentile of 84 reflects a system where the CPU is far more capable than the GPU, creating an imbalance that favors productivity over pure gaming performance.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 a good match for the RTX 5060?

A: The pairing is imbalanced. The CPU is at the 95th percentile while the GPU is at the 72nd percentile. This means the GPU will limit gaming performance, but the CPU provides exceptional productivity performance.

Q: What kind of gaming performance can I expect?

A: No measured FPS data exists for this combination. Based on benchmark scores, expect strong 1080p and 1440p performance, but the 8 GB VRAM and mid-range compute scores suggest limitations at 4K.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is not unlocked, so the Core Ultra 9 285 cannot be overclocked. It runs at a base clock of 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: What memory type does this system use?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The GPU uses 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score of 75488 is 0.1% behind the AMD EPYC 8224P, 0.2% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4545P, 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D, and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755.

Q: What power supply is recommended?

A: The suggested PSU is 300 W. The CPU has a 65 W TDP and the GPU has a 145 W TDP, so a 300 W power supply provides adequate headroom for this configuration.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. This can handle basic display tasks, but the dedicated RTX 5060 provides significantly more graphics performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the Intel Socket 1851, which supports the Core Ultra Series 2 processors. The CPU uses dual-channel DDR5 memory and supports ECC memory, providing a path for error-correcting memory in workstation applications. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU offer high-bandwidth connectivity for the GPU and storage devices.

The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, which is compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support. The GPU requires a 300 W power supply and uses a single 8-pin power connector. With a 65 W CPU TDP and a 145 W GPU TDP, the total system power draw is modest, allowing for a wide range of power supply options.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU to balance the CPU’s exceptional performance. The CPU’s 95th percentile ranking suggests it can support even the most demanding graphics cards without bottlenecking. The 8 GB VRAM of the RTX 5060 is the most likely upgrade trigger for users who want to move to 4K gaming or heavier ray tracing workloads. The CPU’s 24 threads and high multi-core scores ensure that it will remain relevant for several years, making a GPU upgrade the most impactful path forward.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060. The CPU is a 24-core Arrow Lake processor with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 mid-range card with a 145 W TDP. The system sits at the 84th combined percentile, reflecting a high-performing CPU paired with an above-average GPU.

The overall tier of this build is defined by the CPU’s dominance. The processor’s 95th percentile ranking places it among the top CPUs available, while the GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking is solidly mid-range. This creates a workstation-class compute platform with gaming capabilities. For users who need exceptional multi-threaded performance for rendering, compilation, or data processing, this build delivers. For gamers, the system provides a capable 1080p and 1440p experience, but the GPU is the limiting factor in demanding scenarios. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile of 84 indicates a system that is better than the vast majority of configurations, with the CPU being the standout component.