SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

54,247 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 form a high-end desktop pairing that targets serious performance across both productivity and gaming. The CPU, built on Intel's Arrow Lake architecture, presents a 24-core, 24-thread configuration, while the GPU is a member of the Ada Lovelace generation. The data indicates this is a top-tier combination, with the CPU placing in the 95th percentile of all processors and the GPU in the 86th percentile of all graphics cards. This analysis breaks down the individual components, their combined potential, and the practical implications for various workloads, using only the provided benchmark data.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is a 24-core processor with 24 threads, a configuration that prioritizes parallel throughput over simultaneous multithreading. It operates on a 3 nm process node from TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 2.50 GHz, which can boost up to 5.60 GHz, demonstrating a significant dynamic range for both efficiency and peak performance. The cache hierarchy is substantial, featuring 192 KB of L1 and 3 MB of L2 cache per core, alongside a 36 MB shared L3 cache. The processor is not multiplier-unlocked, indicating a locked design.

Benchmark results show the CPU is a formidable performer. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score reaches 48,945, while the single-core score is 6,909. This suggests a balanced architecture capable of both heavy multi-threaded rendering and responsive single-threaded tasks. The PassMark multithread score of 56,602 and single-thread score of 4,881 corroborate this, placing the CPU in the 95th percentile overall. The average benchmark score of 75,488 places it in close competition with server-class EPYC processors; it is a mere 0.1% behind the AMD EPYC 8224P and 0.2% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4545P. This indicates the Core Ultra 9 285's multicore strength rivals that of enterprise silicon. For real workloads, the data suggests exceptional performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, while the high boost clock ensures snappy application launches and fluid interaction. The PassMark data encryption score of 46,949 and data compression score of 602,121 further highlight its capability in data-intensive tasks, making it a robust choice for workstations.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is centered on the Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 generation. Memory support is limited to DDR5, operating on a dual-channel bus with a maximum bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The platform supports ECC memory, which is a key feature for workstation stability and data integrity. For expansion, the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, offering high-bandwidth connectivity for the latest storage devices and expansion cards. The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG with 64 execution units, which provides a basic display output and hardware acceleration without a discrete GPU.

Power requirements are a notable aspect of this platform. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is surprisingly modest for a 24-core part. However, the suggested PSU for the system is 700 W, a figure driven by the GPU's 320 W TDP. This suggests that a high-quality 700 W power supply provides sufficient headroom for the entire system under load. For a sensible next upgrade, the data points toward the GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom. The RTX 4080 is listed as End-of-life, so a future upgrade could be to a newer generation GPU, which would likely require a similar or higher wattage power supply. The platform's support for PCIe Gen 5 ensures that future high-bandwidth devices will not be bottlenecked by the CPU's interface.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 and the RTX 4080 is well-matched for high-end gaming. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking in all processors ensures it can feed the GPU in most scenarios. However, the data suggests that the GPU will be the primary limiting factor in many gaming workloads. The RTX 4080's 86th percentile rank, while high, is lower than the CPU's rank, indicating that the GPU is more likely to be the performance ceiling in graphically intensive tasks at high resolutions.

The PassMark physics score of 3,598 for the CPU is a measure of its game physics processing capability. While not directly comparable to the GPU's scores, it indicates a strong foundation for handling in-game calculations. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,567 shows its raw gaming prowess. In this pairing, the CPU's 24 cores and high boost clock will prevent it from bottlenecking the GPU at lower resolutions or in less GPU-intensive titles. Conversely, at 4K resolution with ultra settings, the RTX 4080 will be the component that determines the frame rate, with the CPU having ample capacity to spare. This is a classic high-end desktop balance, where the CPU is a long-term investment and the GPU is the primary driver of gaming performance.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is tailored for performance-focused users who demand the best in both compute and graphics. The data shows it is ideal for content creators who work with 4K video editing, 3D rendering, and large datasets, given the CPU's high Cinebench and PassMark scores. Developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 24 cores and high multithreaded performance. Gamers at 1440p and 4K resolutions seeking maximum detail settings will find the RTX 4080's performance suitable, though the data does not include specific frame rates for this combo. The platform's ECC memory support also makes it attractive for small business workstations that handle financial modeling or scientific computing, where data accuracy is paramount. For students and general users, this is an over-specification, but it offers a future-proof system that can handle any academic or personal project with ease. The combination is less about value and more about a no-compromise experience for high-end workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 achieves an average benchmark score of 75,488, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are remarkably close, with the AMD EPYC 8224P scoring 75,582 (-0.1%) and the AMD EPYC 4545P scoring 75,373 (+0.2%). This indicates that the Core Ultra 9 285 is at the absolute top tier of processor performance. Specific CPU scores include a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48,945 and a single-core score of 6,909, alongside a PassMark multithread score of 56,602 and a single-thread score of 4,881.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 achieves an average benchmark score of 54,247, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival is the RTX 4080 SUPER, with a score of 54,209, a delta of just 0.1%. Other rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54,828, -1.1%) and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55,698, -2.6%). In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 6,567. Its PassMark G3D score is 34,457, and its Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 214,739 and 263,779, respectively. Combined, the system scores in the 91st percentile of all desktop builds, indicating a top-tier pairing.

Gaming Performance

Important note: No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data, so the following discussion is an estimate based on the benchmark scores of the individual components.

Given the RTX 4080's high percentile rank and strong DirectX 12 performance, it is expected to deliver an excellent gaming experience. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6,567 and PassMark G3D score of 34,457 suggest it is more than capable of handling modern titles at maximum settings. The CPU's 24 cores and high boost clock ensure it can handle game logic and physics without becoming a bottleneck. At 1440p and 4K resolutions, the frame rates will be primarily limited by the GPU, which should provide consistently high frame rates in most games. For competitive esports titles, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6,909) will support very high refresh rates on high-refresh monitors. For demanding AAA games with ray tracing enabled, the RTX 4080's 76 RT cores will provide hardware-accelerated performance, though the exact frame rates are not available in this data.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The combination of the Core Ultra 9 285's strong single-core performance (6,909 in Cinebench R23) and the RTX 4080's high GPU score (34,457 in PassMark G3D) makes this an ideal platform for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p. The CPU will not bottleneck the GPU, allowing it to push high frame rates.

Streaming: The 24 cores of the CPU provide ample headroom for encoding a video stream while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 56,602 indicates that the CPU can handle the extra load of streaming software without significantly impacting game performance, even with the GPU focused on rendering.

Video Editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48,945 and the GPU's compute capabilities (Geekbench OpenCL score of 214,739) make this a powerful combination for 4K video editing. Timeline scrubbing and effects rendering will be accelerated by both components, leading to a smooth editing experience.

3D Rendering: For CPU-based rendering, the 24-core Core Ultra 9 285 with its high PassMark integer math score of 164,869 will excel at final frame rendering. For GPU-accelerated rendering, the RTX 4080's 48.74 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will dramatically speed up render times in compatible software.

Software Development: Compilation tasks will benefit from the CPU's 24 cores and high multithreaded performance (56,602 in PassMark). The fast storage and memory bandwidth (102.4 GB/s) will also help reduce build times, making this a highly productive development workstation.

Student and Office Work: For standard office applications, web browsing, and productivity suites, this system is massively overpowered. However, it provides a completely fluid experience with zero lag. Any student performing data analysis, running simulations, or creating multimedia projects will find that this system handles all tasks with significant headroom.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's average benchmark score and percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has an average benchmark score of 75,488, which places it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 8224P?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285 is practically tied with the AMD EPYC 8224P, being just 0.1% behind in average benchmark score.

Q: What are the key performance metrics for the RTX 4080?

A: The RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54,247, a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6,567, and a PassMark G3D score of 34,457.

Q: Does the system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this system?

A: The suggested PSU for this build is 700 W, primarily to accommodate the GPU's 320 W TDP.

Q: Are there measured gaming frame rates for this specific CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. Any gaming performance discussion is estimated from the individual component benchmark scores.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a launch MSRP of $579, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm process from TSMC, with a transistor count of 45,900 million on a 379 mm² die. It features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s. The core clock runs at 2205 MHz with a boost clock of 2505 MHz. The GPU is equipped with 9,728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. For accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads, it has 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores. The FP32 performance is rated at 48.74 TFLOPS, which is a strong indicator of its raw compute power for rendering and compute tasks. It connects via a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and requires a single 16-pin power connector.

Benchmark results confirm its high-end status. Its average benchmark score of 54,247 places it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. It is nearly identical in performance to the RTX 4080 SUPER, with a delta of just 0.1%. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,567 is a measure of its modern gaming performance. In compute tests, it scores 214,739 in Geekbench OpenCL and 263,779 in Geekbench Vulkan, showing strong performance in parallel processing workloads. The PassMark G3D score of 34,457 is a solid indicator of its overall graphics capability. For rendering, the 48.74 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will accelerate 3D rendering and video effects, while the 76 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for ray-traced lighting and shadows in supported games.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds