SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

44,795 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

This desktop pairing combines a 24-core Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, creating a system where the CPU and GPU occupy distinctly different performance tiers. The processor sits at the 95th percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card reaches the 84th percentile among all GPUs. That eleven-point gap in percentile positioning is the first indication that the CPU holds a decided advantage in raw compute capability, which shapes how workloads distribute across the two components.

The CPU's multi-threaded scores reinforce this imbalance. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Core Ultra 9 285 posts 48,945 points, a figure that places it within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D and 0.2% of the AMD EPYC 4545P. Its single-core R23 result of 6,909 points is similarly competitive, trailing the nearest rival by less than one percent in most cases. These numbers indicate that the processor is not the limiting factor in gaming workloads; the RTX 4070 Ti, with its 84th percentile standing, will more frequently define frame rate ceilings at higher resolutions.

The PassMark suite provides additional evidence of CPU headroom. The multi-thread score of 56,602 and integer math score of 164,869 demonstrate substantial parallel throughput, while the single-thread score of 4,881 shows strong per-core performance. Data compression at 602,121 and floating-point math at 194,988 further confirm that the CPU can feed the GPU without creating a bottleneck in most scenarios. The bottleneck, where one exists, appears in GPU-bound tasks: the RTX 4070 Ti's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,024 and PassMark G3D score of 31,624 are solid but not exceptional for the 40-series lineup.

FPS scaling, though not measured for this exact pairing, can be inferred from the component balance. At 1080p, the CPU's 95th percentile ranking suggests it can push frame rates high enough that the GPU becomes the constraint. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's workload scales up, and the 12 GB GDDR6X memory with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth becomes the more probable limiting factor. The CPU's 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth is ample for feeding the GPU, but the graphics card's own bandwidth and 192-bit bus width will cap performance in memory-intensive scenes.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285 has an average benchmark score of 75,488. It sits 0.1% below the AMD EPYC 8224P (75,582), 0.2% above the AMD EPYC 4545P (75,373), 0.3% below the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D (75,716), and 0.3% below the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 (75,738). These delta percentages are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating near-parity with four server and workstation-class processors.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is 90, meaning this build outperforms 90% of all recorded desktop configurations in the benchmark database. The CPU alone sits at the 95th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 84th percentile.

Q: Does the RTX 4070 Ti support ray tracing and DLSS?

A: Yes, the RTX 4070 Ti is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and includes 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores. The tensor cores enable AI-accelerated features, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware ray tracing capabilities. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,024 reflects its DirectX 12 performance.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285 supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a desktop processor and may appeal to workstation users who require error correction.

Q: Is the RTX 4070 Ti still in production?

A: No, the RTX 4070 Ti is marked as end-of-life in the database. Its production status is listed as "End-of-life," with the GeForce 50 series listed as its successor. The Core Ultra 9 285, by contrast, has an active production status.

Q: What is the power draw of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 285 W. The suggested PSU for the graphics card is 600 W. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: How does the CPU's single-core performance compare to its multi-core performance?

A: The single-core Cinebench R23 score is 6,909, while the multi-core score is 48,945, giving a multi-core to single-core ratio of approximately 7.1x. The PassMark single-thread score is 4,881, and the multi-thread score is 56,602, a ratio of roughly 11.6x. The difference in ratios reflects the different scaling characteristics of the two benchmark suites.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture and manufactured on a 3 nm TSMC process node. The chip contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The absence of hyper-threading means 24 threads match 24 cores, a design choice that prioritizes power efficiency — evidenced by the 65 W TDP — over raw multi-thread throughput.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. This large L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, which benefits workloads with moderate data reuse. The memory controller supports DDR5 in dual-channel mode with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory support adds a reliability layer for workstation tasks.

Benchmark results place this CPU firmly in the top tier. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 4,933 and single-core score of 696 establish a baseline, while the R20 scores of 20,556 multi-core and 2,901 single-core show scaling. The R23 multi-core result of 48,945 is the headline figure, and it lands within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D and 0.2% of the AMD EPYC 4545P. This indicates that the Core Ultra 9 285 competes directly with AMD's strongest workstation and server silicon.

The PassMark results add depth. The multi-thread score of 56,602 and integer math score of 164,869 demonstrate strong parallel processing, while floating-point math at 194,988 shows the FPUs are well-utilized. Data encryption at 46,949 and extended instructions at 45,357 suggest solid performance in security and SIMD-heavy tasks. The physics score of 3,598 and prime number finding at 459 are lower relative to other metrics, indicating some workloads may not scale as well with this architecture.

For real workloads, the 24 cores handle heavily threaded tasks — video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation — with ease. The 5.60 GHz boost clock ensures single-threaded responsiveness for applications that rely on one or two cores. The 95th percentile ranking across all CPUs confirms that this processor outperforms the vast majority of installed hardware.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU's 95th percentile ranking and 4,881 PassMark single-thread score provide ample headroom for high frame rates. The RTX 4070 Ti, at the 84th percentile, will be the limiting factor at higher refresh rates, particularly in GPU-bound titles. The 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for most current games at these resolutions, though the 192-bit bus width may constrain performance in VRAM-heavy scenes.

Streaming: The 24 cores provide substantial headroom for simultaneous game encoding and streaming workloads. The CPU's multi-thread score of 56,602 and data compression score of 602,121 indicate it can handle the encoding pipeline without starving the game of processor resources. The RTX 4070 Ti's 240 tensor cores and 60 RT cores also enable hardware-accelerated encoding and AI-enhanced streaming features.

Video editing: The combination of high single-core and multi-core scores makes this system well-suited for timeline editing and rendering. The R23 multi-core score of 48,945 accelerates export times, while the single-core score of 6,909 ensures smooth scrubbing and effects preview. The GPU's 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 626.4 GTexel/s texture rate handle GPU-accelerated effects and color grading.

3D rendering: The CPU's 24 cores and 36 MB L3 cache deliver strong performance in CPU-based renderers, with PassMark floating-point math at 194,988 indicating robust FPU throughput. The GPU's 60 RT cores and 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerate ray-traced and GPU-based rendering workloads. The 12 GB GDDR6X memory is sufficient for moderate scene complexity, though extremely large scenes may exceed VRAM capacity.

Software development: The 24 threads and high single-thread performance support both parallel compilation and responsive IDE usage. The PassMark extended instructions score of 45,357 suggests good SIMD performance for numerical and scientific code. The CPU's ECC memory support adds data integrity for long-running build and test processes.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for typical productivity tasks, but the high single-thread score of 4,881 ensures snappy application responsiveness. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps idle and light-load power draw low, which is beneficial for long battery-free desktop sessions. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is not needed.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 75,488, placing it at the 95th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are separated by fractions of a percent: the AMD EPYC 8224P at 75,582 (0.1% higher), the AMD EPYC 4545P at 75,373 (0.2% lower), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D at 75,716 (0.3% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 at 75,738 (0.3% higher). This clustering indicates that the Core Ultra 9 285 sits at the very top of the CPU performance curve, competing directly with AMD's latest EPYC and Ryzen PRO parts.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 44,795, placing it at the 84th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile at 45,152 (0.8% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT at 45,384 (1.3% higher), the NVIDIA RTX A6000 at 44,075 (1.6% lower), and the Intel Arc A730M at 45,592 (1.7% higher). The GPU's position is more varied relative to its rivals, with deltas ranging from -1.7% to +1.6%.

In specific GPU benchmarks, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,024 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 213,808 stand out. The OpenCL score of 176,953 indicates strong compute performance. PassMark G3D at 31,624 and GPU compute at 18,396 round out the picture. The DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores of 187, 288, and 116 respectively are lower, reflecting the PassMark suite's older rendering paths.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 90, meaning 90% of all recorded desktop builds rank below this configuration. The combined picture is one of a top-tier CPU paired with a high-end but not flagship GPU. The CPU's 95th percentile and the GPU's 84th percentile create a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks while remaining strong in GPU-bound workloads. For users prioritizing processor-heavy applications, this pairing delivers near-best-in-class performance; for GPU-bound gaming at high resolutions, the graphics card becomes the more relevant performance gauge.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 9 285 uses Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Arrow Lake platform. This socket supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, enabling high-bandwidth connections for GPUs and NVMe storage. ECC memory support is included, a feature more commonly found on workstation platforms.

The RTX 4070 Ti uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward-compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots. The GPU requires a 600 W suggested PSU and a single 16-pin power connector. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 285 W TDP combine for a total component draw of 350 W, leaving ample headroom within the 600 W PSU recommendation for other system components.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, since the CPU already sits at the 95th percentile. The RTX 4070 Ti is marked end-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor. Replacing the GPU with a newer, higher-tier model would raise the system's GPU percentile and better match the CPU's performance ceiling. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure forward compatibility with next-generation GPUs.

Alternatively, adding more memory or faster DDR5 modules could improve memory-bound workloads, though the 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is already substantial. The CPU's dual-channel memory controller is the limiting factor here, as it does not support quad-channel configurations. For users requiring more memory bandwidth, a platform change to a workstation chipset would be necessary.

The 285 mm GPU length and dual-slot width require a mid-tower or larger case. The 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups. The 42 mm card width is standard for dual-slot designs and should fit most modern cases without clearance issues.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. Gamers at 1080p and 1440p will benefit from the CPU's 95th percentile ranking, which ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. At 4K, the RTX 4070 Ti's 84th percentile standing will be the primary determinant of performance, and users should expect the GPU to be the bottleneck in most modern games.

Content creators — particularly video editors and 3D artists — will find the 24-core CPU with a 48,945 R23 multi-core score well-suited for rendering and encoding tasks. The GPU's 60 RT cores and 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 performance complement the CPU for GPU-accelerated workflows. Developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the multi-thread score of 56,602 and the ECC memory support for data integrity.

Students and office workers are over-served by this configuration. The high single-thread score of 4,881 ensures responsive daily use, but the CPU and GPU capabilities far exceed the demands of word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. Small business workstations handling data analysis, virtualization, or scientific computing would better utilize the CPU's parallel throughput and ECC memory support.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU makes this an efficient choice for always-on workstations, while the GPU's 285 W TDP is typical for a high-end graphics card. The combination of a 95th percentile CPU and 84th percentile GPU creates a system that is best suited for users who run a mix of CPU-heavy productivity and GPU-accelerated workloads, with gaming at high refresh rates as a secondary consideration.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 9 285, a 24-core Arrow Lake processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, an Ada Lovelace graphics card with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory. The combined percentile ranking of 90 places this configuration in the top 10% of all desktop builds in the benchmark database.

The CPU is the dominant component, sitting at the 95th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 75,488. The GPU, at the 84th percentile with an average score of 44,795, is a high-end part but not a flagship. This asymmetry defines the build's character: it is a CPU-first system with a capable but secondary GPU.

The CPU's 24 cores and 24 threads, boost clock of 5.60 GHz, and 36 MB of L3 cache deliver top-tier multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. The GPU's 7,680 shading units, 240 tensor cores, and 60 RT cores provide strong rasterization and ray-traced rendering. The platform supports DDR5 memory, PCIe Gen 5, and ECC, making it suitable for workstation-class tasks.

Overall, this build occupies a tier where CPU performance is near the top of the chart, while GPU performance is strong but not elite. The 90th combined percentile reflects a system that will handle demanding productivity workloads with ease and provide high-quality gaming experiences, particularly at 1080p and 1440p resolutions.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm TSMC process, with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The chip, designated AD104, contains 7,680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. The GPU is equipped with 60 RT cores for ray tracing and 240 tensor cores for AI-accelerated features.

Memory consists of 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1,313 MHz, translating to 21 Gbps effective. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2,310 MHz and a boost clock of 2,610 MHz. Pixel rate is 208.8 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 626.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 40.09 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 40.09 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Benchmark results place the GPU at the 84th percentile among all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,024 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance. Geekbench scores are 176,953 for OpenCL and 213,808 for Vulkan, showing strong compute and graphics API performance. PassMark G3D score of 31,624 and GPU compute score of 18,396 round out the synthetic benchmarks.

The nearest rivals highlight the GPU's mid-high positioning. The RTX 5090 Mobile scores 45,152 (0.8% higher), while the RTX A6000 scores 44,075 (1.6% lower). The AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT at 45,384 (1.3% higher) and Intel Arc A730M at 45,592 (1.7% higher) also fall within a small margin. This clustering indicates that the RTX 4070 Ti competes closely with a range of workstation and mobile GPUs, despite being a desktop part.

For rendering workloads, the 60 RT cores accelerate ray-traced scenes, while the 240 tensor cores enable DLSS and other AI features. The 12 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings, and for moderate 3D rendering scenes. The 504.2 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution textures and complex geometry, though the 192-bit bus width is narrower than higher-tier cards.

The GPU is end-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor. It requires a 600 W PSU and uses a single 16-pin power connector. The dual-slot design and 285 mm length are standard for high-end cards. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting multi-monitor configurations.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so the figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The data is not measured for this pairing, and performance will vary by game, settings, and driver versions. The following frame rate expectations are qualitative projections based on the CPU's 95th percentile and the GPU's 84th percentile rankings.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the CPU's high single-thread score of 4,881 and multi-thread score of 56,602 suggest that most games will be GPU-limited. The RTX 4070 Ti's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5,024 and PassMark G3D score of 31,624 indicate strong rasterization performance. Frame rates in esports titles are expected to be very high, potentially exceeding 144 FPS in well-optimized games. AAA titles at ultra settings should achieve high frame rates, though the 12 GB VRAM may become a constraint in the most demanding scenes.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the more significant factor. The RTX 4070 Ti's 504.2 GB/s bandwidth and 192-bit bus width will define performance. Frame rates in AAA titles are expected to be high, but the GPU's 84th percentile ranking suggests it will not match top-tier cards in the most demanding games. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for most titles at this resolution, but texture-heavy games may approach the limit.

At 4K, the GPU is the clear bottleneck. The 84th percentile ranking and 12 GB VRAM will likely require reduced settings to maintain playable frame rates in AAA titles. The CPU's high performance ensures it will not add overhead, but the GPU's compute and memory bandwidth will cap performance. Users targeting 4K should expect to lower settings or rely on upscaling technologies.

The CPU's 95th percentile ranking ensures that frame pacing and minimum frame rates remain stable, avoiding CPU-related stutters. The 24 cores and 36 MB L3 cache provide ample headroom for background tasks while gaming. The RTX 4070 Ti's 60 RT cores enable ray-traced effects, though enabling them will reduce frame rates further, particularly at higher resolutions. The 240 tensor cores support DLSS, which can recover some performance when ray tracing is enabled.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds