SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

43,223 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 35,800 million transistors into a 294 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1980 MHz and boosts to 2475 MHz, with memory running at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). This configuration yields a memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s across a 192-bit bus, paired with 12 GB of GDDR6X VRAM. For a desktop build, this memory capacity is sufficient for high-resolution textures in most contemporary titles, though the 192-bit bus width suggests the card is optimized for 1440p rather than 4K ultra-wide workloads.

The RTX 4070 SUPER houses 7168 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. Ray tracing is handled by 56 dedicated RT cores, while AI acceleration comes from 224 tensor cores. The compute throughput reaches 35.48 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), which is a notable figure for a card in this tier. Pixel fill rate is 198.0 GPixel/s and texture fill rate is 554.4 GTexel/s. These specifications suggest the GPU can handle ray-traced effects at playable frame rates, though the 12 GB VRAM may become a constraint in heavily modded or future titles requiring more than 12 GB at maximum settings.

Benchmark results paint a mixed picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4627 places the card in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 172795 and 205624, respectively, indicate strong general-purpose compute performance. PassMark G3D score of 29995 reinforces the card's position as a high-midrange performer, while the GPU compute score of 17108 shows respectable but not exceptional compute capability. The DirectX 12 score of 110 in PassMark is notably lower than the DirectX 11 score of 273, which could suggest driver overhead or architectural differences in how the GPU handles these workloads.

The RTX 4070 SUPER's nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (avg score 43262, delta -0.1%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (avg score 43268, delta -0.1%), the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (avg score 43301, delta -0.2%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile (avg score 43667, delta -1%). The desktop RTX 4070 SUPER sits within 1% of these competitors, meaning its raw benchmark average is effectively tied with a mobile RTX 4090 and a workstation Quadro M6000 — an interesting result that highlights how mobile and workstation parts have closed the gap with desktop gaming cards in synthetic tests.

For rendering workloads, the combination of 56 RT cores and 224 tensor cores means the GPU can accelerate both ray-traced rendering and DLSS-based upscaling. The FP32 throughput of 35.48 TFLOPS is adequate for real-time rendering tasks, while the 12 GB VRAM allows for moderately complex scenes without spilling to system memory. The 504.2 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1440p rendering but may bottleneck at 4K with high-resolution textures. The GPU's end-of-life production status suggests it's being phased out in favor of newer architectures, but its current benchmark position in the 83rd percentile indicates it remains a viable option for rendering workstations.

# Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 achieves an average benchmark score of 75488, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, averages 43223, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. Combined, this pairing sits at the 89th percentile overall, indicating a system that outperforms the vast majority of desktop configurations.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48945 is exceptional, while the single-core score of 6909 is equally impressive. In Cinebench R20, multicore reaches 20556 and single-core 2901, while R15 scores are 4933 multicore and 696 single-core. PassMark multithread score of 56602 and single-thread score of 4881 confirm the CPU's dual strengths in both parallel and single-threaded tasks. The CPU's nearest rivals are AMD EPYC 8224P (avg score 75582, delta -0.1%), AMD EPYC 4545P (avg score 75373, delta 0.2%), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D (avg score 75716, delta -0.3%), and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 (avg score 75738, delta -0.3%). The Intel chip is within 0.3% of all these competitors, meaning it trades blows with enterprise EPYC processors and high-end Ryzen PRO parts, but it does not decisively beat any of them.

The GPU's benchmark scores, as detailed in the previous section, show a card that is solidly mid-range in the 83rd percentile. The gap between the CPU's 95th percentile and the GPU's 83rd percentile is significant — approximately 12 percentile points. This disparity suggests the CPU has considerably more headroom than the GPU can utilize in most scenarios. In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding or 3D scene compilation, the system will shine. In GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions, the GPU will be the limiting factor.

The combined picture is one of a CPU that is overqualified for its GPU companion. The Core Ultra 9 285 is a top-5% processor, while the RTX 4070 SUPER is a top-17% graphics card. This asymmetry has practical implications: the system will excel in productivity tasks that leverage the CPU's massive multicore throughput, but gaming performance will be capped by the GPU's capabilities. For users who prioritize gaming, this pairing may leave performance on the table, as the CPU could drive a more powerful GPU without becoming a bottleneck. For users who mix heavy CPU workloads with moderate gaming, the balance is more sensible.

# CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is built on the Arrow Lake architecture (Arrow Lake-S codename) using TSMC's 3 nm process, featuring 17,800 million transistors across a 243 mm² die. It has 24 cores and 24 threads, with no hyperthreading — a design choice that prioritizes physical cores over logical threads. Base clock is 2.50 GHz, boosting to 5.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851 and is part of the Core Ultra Series 2. Production status is Active, with a launch MSRP of $579.

The 24-core/24-thread configuration is noteworthy. Without hyperthreading, each core handles one thread, which simplifies scheduling and can reduce latency in certain workloads. The 3 nm process node from TSMC is modern, enabling high clock speeds (up to 5.60 GHz boost) while maintaining a TDP of just 65 watts. This power efficiency is remarkable for a 24-core desktop processor and suggests the CPU can sustain high all-core loads without requiring exotic cooling solutions.

Benchmark results confirm the CPU's capabilities. Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48945 indicates excellent parallel performance, placing it among the fastest desktop processors. The single-core score of 6909 is equally strong, showing that the architecture excels at lightly threaded tasks as well. PassMark integer math score of 164869 and floating-point math score of 194988 demonstrate robust arithmetic processing, while data compression score of 602121 and encryption score of 46949 highlight strong memory and cryptographic performance. The find prime numbers score of 459 is notably lower, which may reflect the lack of hyperthreading in certain integer-heavy algorithms.

Real-world implications: The 24 physical cores handle multi-threaded workloads like video rendering (Cinebench R23 is a strong proxy), software compilation, and scientific computing with ease. The 5.60 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded performance in applications that rely on one or two cores. The 36 MB L3 cache is substantial, aiding in workloads with large working sets. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for dual-channel DDR5, though users with memory-intensive tasks might seek higher bandwidth platforms. The 65 W TDP means the CPU runs cool and quiet, making it suitable for compact builds or systems where noise is a concern.

The CPU's benchmark position at the 95th percentile, combined with its proximity to EPYC and Ryzen PRO competitors (all within 0.3%), suggests it is a well-rounded processor that competes with server-grade parts in raw throughput while offering the clock speeds and efficiency of a desktop chip. The lack of hyperthreading is a notable trade-off, but the sheer core count compensates in most scenarios.

# Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The 12-percentile gap between the CPU (95th) and GPU (83rd) is the primary evidence of imbalance in this pairing. In CPU-bound workloads — such as video encoding, 3D rendering with software rasterization, data compression, or compilation — the RTX 4070 SUPER is unlikely to be a limiting factor. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48945 and PassMark multithread score of 56602 indicate enormous parallel throughput that can feed even demanding compute tasks without stalling.

Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads — particularly gaming at high resolutions with ultra settings — the RTX 4070 SUPER will be the bottleneck. The GPU's 83rd percentile, while respectable, is significantly below the CPU's 95th percentile. Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, FPS estimates must be derived from benchmark scores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4627 and PassMark G3D score of 29995 suggest it can handle 1440p gaming with high settings, but the CPU's potential to drive frame rates far beyond what the GPU can render means the system will be GPU-limited in most gaming scenarios.

The imbalance is more pronounced in lighter workloads. For example, in esports titles at lower resolutions (1080p), the CPU's 5.60 GHz boost clock and strong single-core score (Cinebench R23 single-core 6909) could push frame rates to very high levels, but the GPU's fill rate (198.0 GPixel/s) and pixel throughput may cap performance. Conversely, in ray-traced games, the GPU's 56 RT cores will be the deciding factor, and the CPU's role diminishes.

This pairing is best suited for users who do a mix of heavy CPU work and moderate GPU work. The CPU is overpowered for gaming alone, but for users who render videos, compile code, or run simulations and also game at 1440p, the balance is acceptable — the CPU ensures no bottlenecks in productivity, while the GPU provides competent gaming performance. For pure gaming, a less powerful CPU would suffice, but the Core Ultra 9 285 future-proofs the system against CPU-heavy tasks.

# Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 (Arrow Lake) processors. This socket is not forward-compatible with older LGA 1700 platforms, so users are committed to this generation unless they change motherboards. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability, and 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU provide high-bandwidth connectivity for next-generation GPUs and NVMe drives. The integrated graphics is Arc Xe-LPG with 64 execution units, which can serve as a fallback display output or for light acceleration tasks.

The CPU's TDP is 65 watts, while the GPU's TDP is 220 watts. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 watts, which is quite modest for a system with a 24-core CPU. This leaves considerable headroom for upgrades. The GPU uses a 1x 16-pin power connector and is dual-slot in size (267 mm length, 112 mm height, 42 mm width). The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the GPU will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to replace the RTX 4070 SUPER with a more powerful GPU — the CPU's 95th percentile performance can comfortably drive a GPU in the 90th percentile or higher without becoming a bottleneck. Given the 550 W PSU suggestion, there is ample power headroom for a GPU with a higher TDP. The CPU's 65 W TDP means even with a 300 W+ GPU, the total system power draw stays manageable. However, the end-of-life status of the RTX 4070 SUPER means users might consider newer GPU generations as upgrades. The CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure compatibility with future high-bandwidth devices. For memory, users could upgrade to higher-capacity DDR5 modules, though the dual-channel memory bus at 102.4 GB/s is already a limitation — a platform with quad-channel memory would be needed for significantly higher bandwidth.

# Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination — `measuredFpsUltraByGame` is empty and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48945 and single-core score of 6909 indicate it will not bottleneck in most games, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4627 and PassMark G3D score of 29995 suggest a mid-high range performance tier.

At 1080p, the RTX 4070 SUPER's pixel rate of 198.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 554.4 GTexel/s should deliver high frame rates in most titles, with the CPU's 5.60 GHz boost clock ensuring minimal frame time spikes. Estimates suggest 1440p is the sweet spot for this GPU, where the 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for ultra settings in most games. At 4K, the GPU will likely struggle to maintain 60 FPS in demanding titles, especially with ray tracing enabled, given its 83rd percentile standing.

The GPU's 56 RT cores enable ray-traced effects, but performance will vary by title. DLSS support via the 224 tensor cores could boost frame rates significantly in supported games. The GPU's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 110 is lower than expected, which might indicate some driver inefficiencies in DX12 titles, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4627 tells a more optimistic story. Overall, users should expect 100+ FPS at 1080p, 60-100 FPS at 1440p, and 30-60 FPS at 4K, depending on the game and settings — but these are estimates, not measurements.

# Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 5.60 GHz boost clock and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6909 ensure high minimum frame rates, while the GPU's 83rd percentile (3DMark Steel Nomad 4627) supports 1440p at high refresh rates in many titles. However, the GPU will be the limiting factor at 4K or with heavy ray tracing, so 1080p/1440p high-refresh is the realistic sweet spot.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48945 provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, eliminating the need for GPU-based encoding in most cases. The GPU's 224 tensor cores can also handle NVENC if needed, but the CPU alone can manage simultaneous gaming and streaming without frame drops.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48945 and PassMark multithread score of 56602 indicate fast timeline rendering and export times in editors like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 35.48 TFLOPS FP32 acceleration speed up effects and color grading, though 4K timelines may require proxy workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU's 48945 Cinebench R23 multicore score excels at CPU-based rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles), while the GPU's 17108 PassMark GPU compute score and 35.48 TFLOPS handle GPU-accelerated rendering. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for moderately complex scenes, but large scenes will spill to system memory.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 164869 and data compression score of 602121 accelerate compilation and build times. The 24 cores handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 5.60 GHz boost clock keeps single-threaded tasks responsive. The 36 MB L3 cache aids in caching frequently accessed code.

Student and office work: The CPU's 65 W TDP and integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics with 64 EUs provide an energy-efficient platform for everyday tasks. The PassMark single-thread score of 4881 ensures snappy application launches, while the 24 cores future-proof against more demanding academic software. The GPU is overkill for this scenario but provides headroom for occasional gaming or creative projects.

# FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has 24 cores and 24 threads, with no hyperthreading.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory with a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s across a 192-bit bus.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285's average benchmark score of 75488 is within 0.3% of the AMD EPYC 8224P, EPYC 4545P, Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D, and Ryzen 7 PRO 9755, making it effectively tied with these enterprise and high-end desktop processors.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER is in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 43223.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 supports ECC memory with dual-channel DDR5.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 89, indicating the system outperforms 89% of all desktop configurations.

Q: What is the GPU's production status?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is end-of-life, with a successor in the GeForce 50 series.

# Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This system targets users who need extreme CPU performance with moderate GPU capability. The Core Ultra 9 285's 95th percentile ranking and 24 cores make it ideal for content creators, video editors, 3D artists, and software developers who spend most of their time in CPU-bound applications like Cinebench R23 (score 48945) or PassMark multithread (score 56602). The 65 W TDP is attractive for professionals who build compact workstations or run systems continuously without high power costs.

Gamers at 1440p will find the RTX 4070 SUPER sufficient, given its 83rd percentile ranking and 12 GB VRAM, but those targeting 4K ultra settings or heavy ray tracing may want a more powerful GPU. The system is overkill for office work or students, but the 24 cores and 36 MB L3 cache make it a future-proof investment for academic research, data analysis, or running virtual machines. Industries that benefit include software engineering (PassMark integer math 164869), finance (data encryption 46949), and scientific computing (floating-point math 194988). The GPU's 224 tensor cores also appeal to AI hobbyists running local inference, though 12 GB VRAM is limiting for large models.

# Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 (Arrow Lake, 3 nm, 24 cores, 5.60 GHz boost, 65 W TDP) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (Ada Lovelace, 5 nm, 12 GB GDDR6X, 220 W TDP). The CPU sits in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, the GPU in the 83rd percentile, and the combined system in the 89th percentile of all desktop configurations.

This pairing represents a CPU-first workstation with gaming capability. The Core Ultra 9 285 is a top-tier processor that rivals enterprise EPYC chips (within 0.3% in average benchmark score), while the RTX 4070 SUPER is a solid mid-high range GPU. The 65 W CPU TDP allows for efficient operation, while the GPU's 550 W suggested PSU leaves headroom. The system is best described as a high-end productivity desktop that can handle 1440p gaming at high settings, but its true strength lies in CPU-intensive workloads like rendering, compilation, and data processing. The imbalance between the 95th percentile CPU and 83rd percentile GPU means this is not a balanced gaming rig, but rather a workstation that games on the side.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds