SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 represents a desktop configuration where a top-tier, current-generation 24-core processor is matched with a previous-generation high-end graphics card. The benchmark data indicates a system with a strong overall percentile ranking of 82, driven primarily by the CPU’s exceptional compute performance, while the GPU, though capable, occupies a lower percentile position. This creates a notable performance imbalance, with the processor capable of far exceeding the graphics card in many synthetic workloads, suggesting that the GPU will be the primary determinant of frame rates in most gaming and graphics-intensive scenarios. The following analysis details the specific benchmark scores, component characteristics, and the practical implications of this hardware pairing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a significant imbalance between the two core components. The CPU holds a 95th percentile ranking among all processors, while the GPU sits at a 68th percentile among all graphics cards. This 27-percentage-point gap is substantial and indicates that the processor is not the limiting factor in this system. In gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks, the RTX 3080 will consistently be the bottleneck, as the CPU has ample headroom to feed it data. The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 56602 and single-thread score of 4881 are exceptionally high, meaning that even in lightly-threaded tasks, the processor is unlikely to hold back the GPU.

However, the bottleneck shifts in the opposite direction for CPU-bound workloads. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 25086 and its 68th percentile ranking are respectable but not class-leading. In tasks like 3D rendering or physics simulations that utilize the GPU for compute, the RTX 3080 will be the constraining hardware. The CPU’s PassMark physics score of 3598 is a modest figure relative to its other scores, suggesting that while the CPU is powerful, the GPU’s compute capabilities will still dictate performance in GPU-accelerated physics. The data shows a system where the CPU is rarely the limiting factor; the RTX 3080 will define the ceiling for frame rates and GPU-accelerated workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 delivers exceptional benchmark results across all tested workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48945 is a dominant figure, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. The single-core score of 6909 in the same test is equally impressive, demonstrating strong per-thread performance. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 75488, which is nearly identical to its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 8224P, which scores 75582, a negligible difference of -0.1%. Other close rivals include the AMD EPYC 4545P at 75373 (+0.2%) and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 at 75738 (-0.3%), showing the Core Ultra 9 285 is competitively positioned at the very top of the desktop processor market.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, while older, still posts solid numbers. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 4407, and its PassMark G3D score is 25086, placing it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 23172. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA P106-100, scores 23249, a delta of -0.3%, while the AMD Radeon RX 6600M scores 23273, a delta of -0.4%. These figures indicate that the RTX 3080 is performing at a level comparable to mid-range offerings from newer generations. The combined picture is of a system with a top-5% CPU paired with a GPU that is solidly above average but not at the same elite tier.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is built on the Ampere architecture and the GA102 chip, fabricated on an 8 nm process by Samsung. It features 8704 shading units, 272 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. The GPU is equipped with 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores, providing dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated tasks. The memory subsystem consists of 10 GB of GDDR6X on a 320-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s. The boost clock is rated at 1710 MHz, with a base clock of 1440 MHz. The FP32 performance is rated at 29.77 TFLOPS.

Benchmark results show the GPU’s compute capabilities are moderate for its class. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 152423 and Vulkan score of 33620 indicate solid but not outstanding compute throughput. The PassMark GPU Compute score is 14397. For rendering, the 10 GB VRAM buffer may be a limiting factor in very high-resolution texture workloads, though the high bandwidth helps mitigate this. The 68 RT cores provide a baseline for ray-traced effects, but the performance will not match newer architectures. The pixel rate of 164.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 465.1 GTexel/s are strong figures that support high-resolution rasterization, but the 68th percentile ranking suggests that in raw compute, it is outperformed by many newer and some older high-end cards.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RTX 3080’s 68th percentile and the CPU’s 95th percentile mean that at 1080p and 1440p, the GPU will be the primary constraint on frame rates. The GPU’s strong pixel rate of 164.2 GPixel/s and bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s will support high refresh rates in less demanding titles, but the CPU’s 4881 single-thread PassMark score ensures it will not be a bottleneck. Expect high frame rates in most competitive games, but the 10 GB VRAM may limit maximum settings in future titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 cores and 24 threads, combined with a PassMark multithread score of 56602, provide ample headroom for software encoding. The GPU’s tensor cores can also assist with encoding, but the CPU’s raw throughput is the more robust asset here. The system can handle game capture and encoding without significant performance loss, as the CPU is unlikely to be saturated.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48945 and the PassMark data compression score of 602121 indicate that timeline rendering and export tasks will be exceptionally fast on the CPU. The GPU’s 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 10 GB VRAM will accelerate effects and previews, but the CPU will carry the bulk of the load. This is a potent combination for 4K editing workflows.

3D Rendering: In CPU-based rendering engines, this system excels, with the Core Ultra 9 285’s multi-core performance being in the 95th percentile. However, for GPU-accelerated renderers, the RTX 3080’s 68th percentile ranking and PassMark GPU Compute score of 14397 will be the limiting factor. The 10 GB VRAM is also restrictive for large scenes. The CPU is a powerhouse here, but the GPU will hold back progress in GPU-accelerated pipelines.

Software Development: The high single-thread score of 4881 in PassMark and 6909 in Cinebench R23 ensure fast compilation and responsive IDE performance. The 24 threads handle parallel builds with ease. The ECC memory support is a boon for long-running, data-intensive development tasks, ensuring stability.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is overpowered for these tasks. The CPU’s 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low for a processor of this capability, but the GPU’s 320 W TDP makes the system a power-hungry desktop. For standard office applications, the performance is excessive, but the system will handle any multitasking or productivity suite without breaking a sweat.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The processor features 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB of L2 cache per core. The memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and it supports ECC memory. The CPU is unlocked, allowing for overclocking, and has a TDP of 65 W.

The benchmark scores reflect a processor that is at the top of its class. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48945 is a massive result, putting it in the 95th percentile. This score indicates excellent performance in heavily threaded workloads like video encoding and 3D rendering. The single-core score of 6909 is similarly strong, ensuring high performance in games and office applications. The PassMark integer math score of 164869 and floating-point math score of 194988 show a balanced ALU/FPU design. The data encryption score of 46949 and extended instructions score of 45357 suggest robust cryptography and SIMD performance. The processor’s nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 8224P, scores nearly identically, indicating that the Core Ultra 9 285 is the performance leader for desktop users.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all FPS figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The data indicates the CPU will not be a limiting factor in gaming, given its 95th percentile ranking and strong single-thread performance. The GPU, with a 68th percentile, will dictate the frame rates. Based on the RTX 3080’s PassMark G3D score of 25086 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4407, this system should deliver high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p in most modern titles with high settings. At 4K, the 10 GB VRAM and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth will be taxed, and frame rates will be lower. The system is well-suited for 1440p high-refresh gaming, but for 4K ultra settings, the GPU’s 68th percentile ranking suggests it will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in the most demanding games.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is ideal for a content creator or professional who primarily works in CPU-intensive applications but also needs a solid gaming and GPU-accelerated workstation. The Core Ultra 9 285’s 95th percentile multi-core performance makes it a perfect fit for video editors, 3D modelers using CPU renderers, software developers compiling large codebases, and data analysts running complex simulations. The RTX 3080 allows for 1440p gaming at high refresh rates and handles GPU-accelerated effects in creative suites. This is not a system for budget-conscious builders or those whose primary focus is 4K gaming. It is a workstation-class CPU paired with a high-end, but not flagship, GPU. Students and office workers would find this system vastly overpowered for their needs, but it would provide a multi-year performance buffer for any demanding task.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 9 285, a flagship 24-core Arrow Lake processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, a high-end Ampere architecture graphics card. The combined system percentile is 82, reflecting the high performance of the CPU and the solid, though not elite, performance of the GPU. The CPU is in the 95th percentile of all processors, while the GPU is in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. The overall tier of this build is a high-performance desktop workstation with strong gaming capabilities. It is a configuration that prioritizes CPU compute power, with the GPU serving as a capable but secondary component. The 65 W TDP CPU is surprisingly efficient for its performance level, but the 320 W TDP GPU makes the total system power draw significant.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of this CPU and GPU combination?

A: The combined system percentile is 82. The CPU is in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 68th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: What is the processor's multi-core performance compared to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 75488. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 8224P, has an average score of 75582, which is a -0.1% difference, meaning they perform nearly identically.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3080 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3080 has 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s.

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the data shows that the processor supports ECC memory, alongside its dual-channel DDR5 memory support.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has a launch MSRP of $579, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 has a launch MSRP of 699 USD.

Q: What is the TDP of each component, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 320 W. A power supply with a 700 W rating is suggested for this configuration.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and its PassMark G3D score?

A: The RTX 3080 is in the 68th percentile of all GPUs and has a PassMark G3D score of 25086.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 uses the Intel Socket 1851 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is a high-bandwidth interface for the latest NVMe SSDs and graphics cards. The RTX 3080 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe 5.0 slots, but will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The suggested PSU is 700 W, which provides a substantial amount of headroom given the 65 W CPU TDP and 320 W GPU TDP. A sensible next upgrade would be a newer-generation GPU, as the RTX 3080 is the primary bottleneck in this system. The CPU has enough performance headroom to support a significantly more powerful graphics card, such as a top-tier model from the GeForce 40 series, without becoming a limiting factor. The platform’s support for 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensures that storage and other high-speed peripherals will not be constrained.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds