SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 pairs a 24-core desktop processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, a combination that sits at the 78th percentile among all tracked builds. This pairing is defined by a stark contrast in tier: the CPU is a top-tier workstation-class part, while the GPU is a mature, mid-range performer. The data shows that this is a system built around raw CPU throughput, with the GPU acting as a capable but not leading-edge companion for graphics tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, the RTX 3070 can push high frame rates in most titles, but the ultimate ceiling will be set by the GPU’s 61st percentile ranking. The CPU’s impressive single-core score of 4881 in PassMark and 6909 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame pacing and physics calculations are handled with minimal latency, but the GPU’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the limiting factor for achieving maximum refresh rates in demanding AAA releases.

Streaming: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285’s 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and overlays, though the CPU’s 65 W TDP suggests it can sustain these tasks efficiently. The RTX 3070’s dedicated 184 tensor cores and 46 RT cores can offload encoding duties, but the GPU’s 61st percentile performance means that simultaneous gaming and streaming will require careful settings management to avoid frame drops.

Video editing: The CPU is the star here, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48945 that places it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. Timeline scrubbing, effect rendering, and export tasks will be exceptionally fast. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3162 and OpenCL score of 112821 assist with GPU-accelerated effects, but the 8 GB VRAM may choke on very complex 4K compositions with multiple layers.

3D rendering: This workload is dominated by the CPU’s multi-threaded power. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20556 and R15 multi-core score of 4933 indicate that CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or V-Ray will be a joy. GPU-based renderers will be limited by the RTX 3070’s 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is solid but far from leading-edge, making it a secondary engine rather than the primary workhorse.

Software development: Compilation times benefit directly from the CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 56602 and data compression score of 602121. The 24 cores/24 threads (no hyperthreading) handle parallel builds efficiently. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 21022 is useful for graphics debugging, and the platform’s support for ECC memory adds a layer of stability for long-running test suites.

Student and office work: This is massive overkill. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4881 and the GPU’s PassMark G2D score of 1001 make everyday tasks like web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheets feel instant. However, the 65 W TDP of the CPU and the 220 W TDP of the GPU mean the system will draw more power than necessary for such light loads, and the cost of the platform is far beyond what these tasks require.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 75488, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD EPYC 8224P (score 75582, deltaPct -0.1), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 (score 75738, deltaPct -0.3), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D (score 75716, deltaPct -0.3). This shows that the Core Ultra 9 285 performs within a fraction of a percent of these high-end server and workstation chips, making it statistically tied with them in aggregate performance.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 17208, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (score 17083, deltaPct 0.7), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (score 17037, deltaPct 1), and the NVIDIA Tesla K40c (score 17468, deltaPct -1.5). This means the RTX 3070 is about 1% slower than the RX 7600 XT and about 1.5% slower than the Tesla K40c, a professional compute card.

The combined picture is a system with a world-class CPU and a mid-pack GPU. The CPU’s 95th percentile ranking indicates it is among the top 5% of all processors, while the GPU’s 61st percentile places it in the upper-middle class of graphics cards. This creates a lopsided build where the processor outclasses the graphics card by a significant margin in relative terms.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is built on the Arrow Lake architecture, using a 3 nm process node from TSMC with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. It features 24 cores and 24 threads, meaning it lacks simultaneous multithreading. The base clock is 2.50 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48945 is exceptional, and the PassMark multi-thread score of 56602 confirms this strength. The data compression score of 602121 and integer math score of 164869 further indicate strong throughput in data-heavy workloads. The floating-point math score of 194988 shows robust scientific computing performance.

Single-thread performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6909 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4881. This ensures that lightly-threaded tasks like gaming logic and general responsiveness are handled with ease. For real workloads, this means video encoding, 3D scene rendering, and software compilation will complete in dramatically less time than with a mid-range CPU, while everyday use remains snappy. The 24 threads are enough to saturate most professional applications, and the lack of hyperthreading is offset by the high core count and modern architecture.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a clear bottleneck situation: the GPU is the limiting factor in most gaming and graphics-intensive scenarios. The CPU’s 95th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 61st percentile means that in any workload that relies heavily on rasterization or ray tracing, the RTX 3070 will be unable to feed the CPU enough frames to utilize its full potential. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 22214 and DirectX 12 score of 85 are respectable but not in the same league as the CPU’s performance.

In CPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding, and compilation, the balance is reversed. The GPU’s compute capabilities (OpenCL score of 112821) can assist, but the CPU will do the heavy lifting. Here, the system runs at near-peak efficiency, as the GPU is not a limiting factor.

For gaming, the bottleneck manifests as a frame rate cap. The CPU can deliver frames at a very high rate, but the GPU will reach its limit first. This means that lowering resolution from 1440p to 1080p will yield diminishing returns because the GPU’s pixel rate of 165.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 317.4 GTexel/s become the wall. The CPU’s high single-thread performance ensures it will never be the cause of stutters, but the GPU will hold the system back from achieving the highest possible FPS in most titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 9 285 uses the Intel Socket 1851 and supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It supports ECC memory, which is a boon for workstation stability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a fallback display output.

The RTX 3070 has a 220 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The CPU has a 65 W TDP. This means a 550 W power supply is sufficient for the current configuration, but there is limited headroom for overclocking or adding many peripherals. The CPU’s multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not an option.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU. The CPU has enough headroom to drive a much more powerful graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU is future-proof, although the current GPU only uses PCIe 4.0. The platform also supports newer GPUs that use PCIe 4.0 or 5.0, so the user can upgrade to a higher-tier card to match the CPU’s performance class. The 550 W PSU would likely need to be upgraded to a higher wattage unit to support a more powerful GPU, but the motherboard and CPU socket are ready for a drop-in GPU replacement.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this build is a professional or power user who needs massive CPU compute power but has a more modest graphics requirement. This includes software developers who compile large codebases, video editors working with 4K timelines who rely on CPU-based effects, and 3D artists who use CPU-based render engines. The 95th percentile CPU performance will slash render times and compilation waits.

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p will find this system capable, but they are not the primary audience. The RTX 3070’s 61st percentile means it will run modern titles at high settings but not at maximum refresh rates. Gamers who play esports titles or less demanding games will find the system more than adequate.

Students and small business workstations are not a good fit due to the high cost and power consumption relative to the tasks. However, a small business that runs complex simulations or data analysis will benefit from the CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 164869 and extended instructions score of 45357. The ECC memory support is a strong selling point for professionals who need data integrity.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms 95% of processors in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The RTX 3070 has an average benchmark score of 17208, which is 0.7% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (17083) and 1.5% lower than the NVIDIA Tesla K40c (17468).

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combination of the Core Ultra 9 285 and the RTX 3070 sits at the 78th percentile of all tracked builds.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 supports ECC memory, which can improve stability in professional workloads.

Q: What is the recommended power supply wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 3070 is 550 W. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, so this is sufficient for the stock configuration.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: Is there any measured FPS data for this build?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All FPS figures are estimates based on the individual component benchmark scores.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: "desktop") pairing the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070. The CPU is a 24-core Arrow Lake processor with a 5.60 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is an Ampere-based card with 8 GB of memory. The combined percentile of 78 places this system in the upper echelon of all tracked configurations, but the specific component percentiles (CPU at 95, GPU at 61) reveal a significant imbalance. This is a workstation-class CPU mated to a mid-range GPU, making it a compute-first system rather than a gaming-first one.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this CPU+GPU pairing, so all frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Based on the GPU’s 61st percentile ranking and its PassMark G3D score of 22214, the RTX 3070 is expected to deliver playable frame rates at 1080p in most modern titles. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will become limiting factors in high-texture games, likely requiring medium-to-high settings for smooth gameplay. The GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 85 suggests solid, if not spectacular, DirectX 12 performance.

The CPU’s high single-thread score (4881 PassMark) ensures that the system will not experience CPU-related frame drops, meaning the GPU will be the primary determinant of FPS. For esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, which are less GPU-intensive, the system could achieve very high frame rates. For AAA single-player games at 4K, the RTX 3070 will struggle to maintain 60 FPS on ultra settings, and the CPU’s power will be largely unused. The data indicates that this build is best suited for high-refresh 1080p gaming or 1440p with settings tuned to the GPU’s capabilities, with the CPU providing a rock-solid foundation that will never be the cause of a stutter.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds