SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 and AMD Radeon RX 9060 form a desktop build with a stark performance asymmetry. The CPU sits in the 95th percentile of all processors, delivering class-leading multi-threaded performance, while the GPU, at the 59th percentile, is a mid-range part that will cap the system's high-refresh and high-resolution potential. Benchmark data shows the processor is the dominant component, making this pairing ideal for compute-heavy workloads rather than top-tier gaming.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm TSMC process. This is a high-end part, with the data placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 95% of processors in the benchmark database. The core configuration, which lacks hyperthreading, is a deliberate design choice that prioritizes efficiency and raw throughput from physical cores. With a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, the chip can scale from power-efficient multi-core workloads to demanding single-threaded tasks.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: each core gets 192 KB of L1 and 3 MB of L2, with a shared 36 MB L3 pool. This large cache allocation supports the CPU's strong performance in latency-sensitive applications. The processor supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and includes ECC memory support, which is a feature typically sought in professional and server environments.

Benchmark results confirm the Ultra 9 285's dominance in multi-threaded tasks. In Cinebench R23, it scores 48,945 points in multi-core and 6,909 points in single-core. The multi-core score is roughly seven times higher than the single-core score, indicating exceptional parallel processing capability. PassMark tests reinforce this, with a multithread score of 56,602 and an integer math score of 164,869. Data compression performance is particularly strong at 602,121 in PassMark, a figure that suggests excellent throughput for archival and database workloads. The chip's average benchmark score of 75,488 places it nearly neck-and-neck with its nearest rivals: it trails the AMD EPYC 8224P by a negligible 0.1%, leads the AMD EPYC 4545P by 0.2%, and is 0.3% behind both the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755. This indicates the Ultra 9 285 is trading blows with enterprise-class server processors in raw compute.

FAQ

Q: What is the benchmark percentile of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285?

A: The CPU is in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database in aggregate benchmark scores.

Q: How does the Ultra 9 285 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 8224P?

A: The Ultra 9 285 has an average benchmark score of 75,488, which is 0.1% lower than the EPYC 8224P's score of 75,582. This makes the two processors effectively equivalent in overall performance.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile and how does it compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 16,014 is 0.7% lower than the RTX 3060 Ti's score of 16,129, making them very close in performance.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing a total memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the process node and foundry for the CPU and GPU?

A: The Intel CPU is built on a 3 nm process at TSMC, while the AMD GPU uses a 4 nm process, also at TSMC.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The launch MSRP of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is $579.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the components' benchmark scores and percentile positions.

The Radeon RX 9060's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,322 and its PassMark G3D score of 17,631 place it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. This is a mid-range tier of performance. In practical terms, this GPU is positioned to deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with high settings in most titles, but it will struggle to maintain high refresh rates at 1440p or 4K with ultra settings.

The CPU's performance is not a limiting factor for gaming in this pairing. The 24-core processor with a 5.60 GHz boost clock and a single-core Cinebench R23 score of 6,909 is more than capable of feeding frames to the GPU in any scenario. The bottleneck in gaming will be the GPU. For esports titles that are CPU-bound, the Ultra 9 285's strong single-threaded performance will allow the RX 9060 to operate near its maximum output. For graphically demanding AAA titles, the GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth will be the limiting factors. Expect the system to handle 1080p ultra settings with ease, but frame rates will drop significantly at 1440p, and 4K gaming will require substantial settings reductions to hit 60 FPS. The data suggests this is a 1080p gaming system with the occasional ability to handle 1440p with tweaked settings.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU compute power above all else. The Ultra 9 285's 95th percentile ranking makes it a prime candidate for professionals in content creation, software development, and data analysis. The processor's strong PassMark data compression score of 602,121 and integer math score of 164,869 indicate excellent performance in file archiving, database operations, and financial modeling.

For developers, the 24 physical cores and 24 threads (with no hyperthreading) are well-suited for code compilation and parallel build tasks. The CPU's average benchmark score of 75,488 rivals server-grade AMD EPYC parts, so users who need workstation-class compute without a workstation price tag are the target audience. Students in engineering or computer science fields, small business workstations running virtual machines, and researchers handling large datasets will all benefit from the CPU's capabilities.

The GPU, while not top-tier, is sufficient for general desktop use and light gaming. This is not a system for the enthusiast gamer chasing 240 Hz at 1440p; rather, it is for the professional who games occasionally at 1080p. The RX 9060's performance relative to the RTX 3060 Ti (0.7% faster) makes it a competent part for mainstream gaming, but it is the CPU that defines this system.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system with a massive compute core and a balanced mid-range GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score is 75,488, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all AMD processors: the EPYC 8224P (75,582, -0.1% delta), the EPYC 4545P (75,373, +0.2% delta), the Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D (75,716, -0.3% delta), and the Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 (75,738, -0.3% delta). This shows the Ultra 9 285 is operating at the edge of the performance envelope for x86 processors.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 16,014, which places it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti with an average score of 16,129, a 0.7% difference. The RX 9060 is also 1% ahead of the AMD Radeon R9 370X and RX 7700, and 2.1% ahead of the Radeon Pro W5500. The combined percentile for the build is 77, reflecting the fact that the CPU's strong performance is dragged down by the GPU's more modest showing.

In specific GPU tests, the RX 9060 scores 88,183 in Geekbench OpenCL and 39,476 in Vulkan. Its PassMark DirectX 12 score is 44, which is notably low, while the DirectX 11 score is 182. These figures suggest the GPU is better optimized for compute tasks (OpenCL) than for legacy DirectX rasterization. The FP32 throughput is 21.43 TFLOPS, which is respectable for rendering tasks in Blender or similar applications.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is a mid-range graphics card built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture, with a Navi 44 chip manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The GPU features 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, with 28 ray accelerators for hardware-accelerated ray tracing. It is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s.

Clock speeds are substantial: a base clock of 1700 MHz, a game clock of 2400 MHz, and a boost clock of 2990 MHz. These high clocks allow the GPU to achieve a pixel rate of 191.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 334.9 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute performance of 21.43 TFLOPS (with FP16 running at a 1:1 ratio) indicates that the card can handle compute-heavy workloads like video encoding and 3D rendering, though the 8 GB memory capacity may limit the size of scenes that can be processed.

The GPU's benchmark scores place it at the 59th percentile, with an average score of 16,014. It is 0.7% slower than the RTX 3060 Ti, which is a well-known 1080p gaming card. The low PassMark DirectX 12 score of 44 is a concern for modern gaming, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,322 is a more reliable indicator of DX12 performance. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with all modern APIs.

For rendering, the 28 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the mid-range positioning means ray tracing performance will be modest. The 21.43 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is more than enough for rasterized graphics and light 3D rendering tasks. The GPU's transistor count of 29,700 million on a 199 mm² die shows a dense, efficient design.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 9060's 59th percentile ranking means it can push high frame rates at 1080p in competitive titles. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 6,909 ensures no bottleneck in CPU-bound scenarios. However, 240 Hz monitors at 1440p will be out of reach in most games.

Streaming: The CPU has ample headroom for software encoding. Its 24 cores and multithread score of 56,602 in PassMark can handle game capture and encoding without impacting frame rates. The GPU's lack of a dedicated NVENC-equivalent encoder (no tensor cores listed) means the CPU will do the heavy lifting, which it does well.

Video editing: The CPU's 48,945 Cinebench R23 multi-core score excels at timeline rendering and export tasks. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p editing with effects, but 4K multi-stream projects may hit memory limits.

3D rendering: The CPU's 95th percentile performance is ideal for CPU-based rendering engines like Blender's Cycles. The GPU's 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 compute can accelerate GPU rendering, but the 8 GB memory will restrict scene complexity.

Software development: The 24 physical cores and high integer math score of 164,869 in PassMark make this a compilation powerhouse. Large codebases will build significantly faster than on mainstream 8-core CPUs. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running build servers.

Student and office work: This is overkill for standard office tasks. The CPU's 95th percentile performance is wasted on spreadsheets and web browsing, but it provides future-proofing for any computational coursework.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 9 285, a flagship-level CPU, with the AMD Radeon RX 9060, a mid-range GPU. The CPU is in the 95th percentile of all processors, while the GPU is in the 59th percentile. The combined percentile is 77, indicating a system that is above average overall but with a clear performance skew. The pairing makes sense for a professional workstation that also serves as a 1080p gaming machine, rather than a dedicated gaming rig. The CPU's 24 cores and 5.60 GHz boost clock are the star of the show, and the GPU is a competent, but not spectacular, companion.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry is the defining characteristic of this build. The CPU's average benchmark score of 75,488 is roughly 4.7 times higher than the GPU's average score of 16,014. This creates a situation where the CPU is the clear bottleneck in gaming scenarios, while the GPU is the limiting factor in compute-heavy tasks.

In gaming, the RX 9060 will be the limiting component. The GPU's 59th percentile ranking means it will hit its performance ceiling in most titles before the CPU is stressed. The CPU's strong single-core performance (6,909 in Cinebench R23) means it can easily feed the GPU in any game. The result is that the system's FPS will be dictated entirely by the GPU's capabilities. For tasks like 3D rendering or video encoding that use both components, the CPU will finish its work and wait on the GPU to process frames.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like code compilation, data compression (PassMark score of 602,121), or scientific simulations, the GPU sits idle. The CPU's 95th percentile performance is the primary driver of system responsiveness in these tasks, and the GPU's 59th percentile ranking is irrelevant. The balance is heavily skewed toward the CPU, meaning users who buy this system should do so for the processor's compute capabilities, not the GPU's graphics power.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

AMD Radeon RX 9060

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds