SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE

32,456 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 and AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE form a high-end desktop pairing that combines a 24-core Arrow Lake processor with a 16 GB RDNA 3 graphics card. The CPU sits in the 95th percentile of all processors, while the GPU holds the 77th percentile among graphics cards, placing the combined system in the 86th percentile overall. Because there is no measured frame-rate data for this specific combination, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of each component.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this platform is exceptionally strong. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 6909 and its 4881 Passmark single-thread score indicate the processor can feed frames quickly, minimizing CPU-side bottlenecks in esports and fast-paced titles. The GPU’s 45.98 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest it can push high frame rates at 1440p and handle demanding scenes at 4K, though exact figures depend on the title.

Streaming while gaming benefits from the CPU’s 24 threads and high multi-core throughput. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48945 and Passmark multithread score of 56602 provide ample headroom for encoding video alongside game logic, while the GPU’s dedicated video encode capabilities via RDNA 3.0 can offload the streaming workload entirely, leaving the CPU free for game physics and AI.

Video editing is a primary strength of this build. The CPU’s 24 cores and 24 threads, combined with a 36 MB shared L3 cache, deliver strong performance in rendering timelines and applying effects. The Passmark data compression score of 602121 and floating-point math score of 194988 indicate fast processing of codec operations and color grading math, while the GPU’s 91.96 TFLOPS FP16 performance (2:1 ratio) accelerates preview rendering and export in compatible software.

3D rendering workloads scale aggressively with core counts, and this CPU does not disappoint. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20556 and R15 multi-core score of 4933 place it among the top 5% of all CPUs, meaning ray-traced renders and complex scene assembly will complete quickly. The GPU’s 80 ray accelerators and 5120 shading units provide a secondary render path for GPU-accelerated engines, though the CPU remains the primary driver for most production renderers.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s balanced architecture. The Passmark integer math score of 164869 and random string sorting score of 73651 suggest fast compilation of large codebases and efficient handling of text processing workloads. The 24 threads allow parallel builds across multiple modules, while the 2.50 GHz base clock and 5.60 GHz boost clock provide responsive single-threaded performance for IDE interactions and script execution.

Student and office work far exceeds requirements. The CPU’s single-thread performance alone is sufficient for everyday productivity, and the Passmark single-thread score of 4881 ensures snappy application launches. The GPU’s 1180 Passmark G2D score indicates smooth 2D desktop rendering, while the Arc Xe-LPG integrated graphics in the CPU provide a fallback display output. This system is overkill for spreadsheets and documents, but it handles them with zero perceptible lag.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between CPU and GPU is well matched for most workloads, though the CPU is the more dominant component. The CPU’s 95th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 77th percentile means the processor has more relative headroom than the graphics card. In CPU-intensive scenarios like 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation, the CPU will be the primary performer, with the GPU contributing where parallel compute is needed.

In gaming, the GPU is likely the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The CPU’s strong single-core scores (6909 in Cinebench R23 single-core) suggest it can drive high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, but the GPU’s 16 GB memory and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth will govern performance at 4K or with maximum detail settings. The GPU’s passmark G3D score of 27089 places it in the upper tier, but the CPU’s 95th percentile ranking indicates it can outpace the GPU in purely computational tasks.

The GPU’s 260 W TDP and the CPU’s 65 W TDP create an asymmetric power envelope. The CPU is remarkably efficient for its core count, drawing minimal power while delivering top-tier multi-threaded performance. The GPU, by contrast, requires substantial power — its 260 W TDP and suggested 600 W PSU indicate it is the power-hungry half of this pair. This means the GPU will generate more heat and require more robust cooling, while the CPU can be handled by a modest air cooler.

The 16 GB GPU memory is a potential bottleneck in VRAM-heavy workloads like 4K texture packs or large machine learning models. While 16 GB is generous, the CPU’s 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth is limited by dual-channel DDR5, which may constrain data-heavy applications that require frequent CPU-GPU transfers. The PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface provides adequate bandwidth for the GPU, though the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes (20 lanes CPU only) offer headroom for future devices.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform uses Intel Socket 1851, which supports the Core Ultra Series 2 family. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with a maximum bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported for workstation reliability. This socket is current and active, so future Arrow Lake refresh processors may be compatible, though the LGA 1851 platform is designed for this generation.

The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is sufficient for a single high-end GPU plus a fast NVMe SSD. The GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes. There is no support for a second full-bandwidth GPU on the CPU lanes, so multi-GPU configurations would require a chipset with additional lane allocation.

The power delivery requirements are modest for this class. The CPU’s 65 W TDP means a standard mid-range motherboard can handle it without exotic VRM cooling. The GPU’s suggested PSU of 600 W is the primary power consideration, and it uses two 8-pin power connectors. A quality 600 W PSU is sufficient for the entire system, with headroom for a few drives and peripherals.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU has more performance headroom than the current graphics card. The CPU’s 95th percentile ranking suggests it can support a GPU in the 90th percentile or above without becoming a bottleneck. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory (currently dual-channel) or a faster NVMe drive would improve storage-bound workloads, though the CPU’s 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes already accommodate modern SSDs.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers who play at 1440p or 4K with high refresh rates. The CPU’s single-core performance (6909 Cinebench R23 single-core) and the GPU’s 45.98 TFLOPS FP32 compute suggest smooth high-resolution gameplay, though users at 1080p with a 360 Hz monitor may find the GPU limiting in esports titles.

Content creators who edit video, render 3D scenes, or work with large datasets are ideal users. The CPU’s 24 cores and 48945 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handle heavy rendering, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 91.96 TFLOPS FP16 performance accelerate GPU-accelerated effects and AI workloads. The 36 MB L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth reduce stutter in timeline scrubbing and large file operations.

Software developers building large C++ or Rust projects will appreciate the CPU’s 24 threads and integer math score of 164869. The system compiles code quickly and handles parallel test suites efficiently. The ECC memory support is a boon for developers running long-duration simulations or data processing where memory errors are unacceptable.

Students in engineering or data science programs benefit from this system’s versatility, though it exceeds typical requirements. The CPU’s 95th percentile ranking ensures it will remain relevant for years of coursework, and the GPU’s compute performance (15016 Passmark GPU compute) supports machine learning assignments. Small business workstations running virtualization, database workloads, or financial modeling will find the CPU’s data encryption score of 46949 and multithread score of 56602 sufficient for concurrent workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no frame rate rows, so all figures below are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s percentile rank (95th) and the GPU’s rank (77th) indicate a system that should perform strongly in most games, but exact numbers cannot be verified.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the CPU’s single-core performance (4881 Passmark single-thread, 696 Cinebench R15 single-core) should drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles like strategy games and simulators. The GPU’s 45.98 TFLOPS FP32 compute is more than sufficient for 1080p ultra, and the 16 GB VRAM eliminates texture loading stutter. Expect triple-digit frame rates in most esports titles and 60+ FPS in AAA games, though these are estimates.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes more significant. The RX 7900 GRE’s 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 160 ROPs suggest strong rasterization performance, likely delivering 60-100 FPS in demanding titles on ultra settings. The CPU’s multi-core performance (48945 Cinebench R23 multi-core) ensures consistent frame pacing even in open-world games with heavy NPC simulation.

At 4K, the GPU’s 16 GB memory and 256-bit bus are adequate but not class-leading. The 45.98 TFLOPS FP32 compute should deliver 30-60 FPS in AAA titles on ultra, with lower settings enabling higher refresh rates. The CPU’s 95th percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck the GPU at this resolution, but the GPU’s 77th percentile suggests it is the limiting factor.

Ray tracing performance is supported via 80 ray accelerators, but the GPU’s architecture is not the strongest for this workload. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4814 indicates moderate ray tracing capability, with playable frame rates only with upscaling or reduced ray tracing settings. The CPU’s strong single-core performance helps maintain frame times when ray tracing is enabled.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has 24 cores and 24 threads, with no hyperthreading. It features a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: How much memory does the GPU have and what type?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What socket does the CPU use?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851, which supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with a maximum bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU’s power requirement?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 260 W and requires a suggested power supply of 600 W. It uses two 8-pin power connectors.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 supports ECC memory, which is useful for workstation reliability in data-intensive workloads.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this build?

A: The combined percentile ranking is 86, meaning this system outperforms 86% of all desktop configurations in the benchmark database.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is not unlocked (multiplierUnlocked: false), so overclocking is limited to base clock adjustments or BCLK overclocking on supported motherboards.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is built on the Arrow Lake architecture using TSMC’s 3 nm process node, with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. This is a desktop-class processor (marketSegment: Desktop) with an active production status, released at the end of 2024. The 24 cores and 24 threads operate at a 2.50 GHz base clock and 5.60 GHz boost clock, with a 65 W TDP that is remarkably low for this core count.

The cache hierarchy comprises 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This arrangement provides fast access to frequently used data, contributing to the CPU’s 95th percentile ranking among all processors. The average benchmark score of 75488 places it just 0.1% above the AMD EPYC 8224P and 0.2% below the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755, indicating it trades blows with server and workstation chips.

In real workloads, the CPU’s multi-core performance is exceptional. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48945 and R20 multi-core score of 20556 demonstrate strong scaling across all 24 cores, making it suitable for rendering, encoding, and scientific computing. The single-core scores are equally impressive — the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6909 and Passmark single-thread score of 4881 ensure snappy response in everyday tasks and gaming.

The Passmark sub-scores reveal specific strengths. The data compression score of 602121 and floating-point math score of 194988 indicate strong performance in data-heavy and numerical workloads, while the extended instructions score of 45357 shows good SIMD execution. The find prime numbers score of 459 is comparatively low, suggesting that integer-heavy algorithmic workloads are not the primary strength, but this is offset by the high integer math score of 164869.

The CPU includes integrated graphics — Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units — providing a display output and basic acceleration without a discrete GPU. This is useful for troubleshooting or office tasks, though the discrete RX 7900 GRE will handle all graphics workloads. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth from dual-channel DDR5 is adequate but not exceptional, making the CPU more suited to compute-heavy tasks than memory-bandwidth-intensive applications.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) pairing the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE. The CPU is a 24-core Arrow Lake processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, while the GPU is a Navi 31 chip from the Radeon RX 7000 series based on RDNA 3.0 architecture. Both components are active production parts, meaning they are currently available and supported.

The combined percentile ranking of 86 places this system in the upper tier of desktop configurations. The CPU’s 95th percentile is the stronger contributor, while the GPU’s 77th percentile is still respectable. This asymmetry means the system excels in CPU-bound workloads more than GPU-bound ones, but both components are above average.

The GPU is a dual-slot card measuring 276 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 51 mm in width, requiring two 8-pin power connectors. It has a 260 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 600 W. The display outputs include one HDMI 2.1a, two DisplayPort 2.1, and one USB Type-C, supporting modern monitors and VR headsets. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering all current graphics APIs.

This pairing is well suited for a high-end gaming and productivity workstation. The CPU’s low 65 W TDP means it can be cooled by a modest air cooler, while the GPU requires more robust cooling due to its 260 W TDP. The system’s overall tier is high — the 86th percentile — making it appropriate for users who demand strong multi-threaded performance and capable 1440p or 4K gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 75488, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 8224P, scores 75582 (0.1% higher), while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 scores 75738 (0.3% higher). This puts the Ultra 9 285 within a fraction of a percent of server-class chips, demonstrating exceptional value in raw compute terms.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 32456, placing it in the 77th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 570X, scores 32176 (0.9% lower), while the AMD FirePro S9300 X2 scores 32540 (0.3% higher). The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4814 and Passmark G3D score of 27089 indicate solid rasterization performance, though not at the very top tier.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms 95% of processors and a GPU that outperforms 77% of graphics cards, resulting in an overall 86th percentile system. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48945 is the standout figure, while the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 175758 and Vulkan score of 99850 indicate strong compute and graphics API performance.

The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 56602 and the GPU’s Passmark GPU compute score of 15016 together suggest a system that handles both CPU-intensive and GPU-accelerated workloads effectively. The data shows that the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, and the GPU, while not class-leading, provides more than adequate graphics horsepower for this processor. The combined 86th percentile ranking confirms this is a high-tier desktop configuration suitable for demanding applications.