SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

22,549 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT form a desktop pairing that sits at the 81st percentile overall, combining a top-tier 24-core CPU with a mid-range 1440p-class GPU. This asymmetry defines the system’s character: the processor is built for heavy multi-threaded throughput, while the graphics card is positioned for high-refresh 1080p and capable 1440p gaming. The following analysis is based entirely on the benchmark data in the FACT PACK, with no measured FPS rows available for this specific combination.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance of this build is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 ranks in the 95th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 75,488. Its nearest rivals — the AMD EPYC 8224P (75,582, -0.1%), AMD EPYC 4545P (75,373, +0.2%), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D (75,716, -0.3%), and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 (75,738, -0.3%) — are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating the 285 sits at the very top of the CPU performance hierarchy. The GPU, by contrast, ranks in the 67th percentile against all GPUs, with an average score of 22,549. This places the RX 7700 XT near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile (22,435, +0.5%) and RTX 4060 Mobile (22,729, -0.8%), but well below the absolute top tier.

In CPU-bound workloads — such as data compression, encryption, physics simulation, and multi-threaded rendering — the 285 will be the dominant component, and the GPU will not act as a limiting factor. The PassMark multi-thread score of 56,602 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945 indicate a processor that can saturate nearly any task short of enterprise-scale parallel computing. Conversely, in gaming at 4K or in GPU-heavy tasks like ray tracing, the RX 7700 XT becomes the bottleneck. Its PassMark G3D score of 22,547 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,316 show a mid-range card that will constrain frame rates far below what the CPU is capable of driving.

The FPS scaling evidence is indirect but clear: with no measured FPS data for this pairing, the bottleneck analysis relies on the percentile gap. A 28-point gap between the CPU’s 95th percentile and the GPU’s 67th percentile means that in any workload where the GPU is the primary execution unit, the system will perform like a 67th-percentile machine, not an 81st-percentile one. The combined percentile of 81 reflects the CPU’s dominance pulling the average up, but it does not mean balanced performance. For users who push both components simultaneously — such as gaming while streaming or rendering on the CPU while gaming on the GPU — the system will handle the CPU side effortlessly while the GPU side operates at its mid-range ceiling.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p: The RX 7700 XT’s 12 GB GDDR6 memory and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, paired with its 2,544 MHz boost clock, are sufficient for high frame rates at 1080p in most titles. The CPU’s single-thread score of 6,909 in Cinebench R23 ensures no bottleneck from the processor. Frame rates will be GPU-limited, but the card’s 67th-percentile standing means it will outperform the RTX 5060 Mobile by 0.5% and the RTX 4060 Mobile by 0.8% on average, making it a solid choice for esports and competitive shooters.

Streaming: The 285’s 24 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark data encryption score of 46,949 and data compression score of 602,121 indicate strong throughput for software encoding, though the lack of dedicated tensor cores on the GPU means streaming will rely on the CPU or AMD’s fixed-function hardware. The system can handle a game plus encoding workload without CPU bottlenecks, as the multi-thread score of 56,602 leaves significant reserve capacity.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945 and the PassMark integer math score of 164,869 position the 285 as a leading processor for timeline rendering and export. The RX 7700 XT’s OpenCL score of 138,383 provides accelerated effects processing, though its 67th-percentile GPU standing means GPU-accelerated effects will not match top-tier cards. The 12 GB VRAM is adequate for 4K timeline previews with moderate effects stacks.

3D rendering: The CPU is the star here. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20,556 and R15 multi-core score of 4,933 indicate a processor that competes with server-grade EPYC parts — the nearest rivals are the EPYC 8224P and 4545P, both within 0.2%. For CPU-based rendering engines, this system will outperform nearly 95% of all CPUs. GPU rendering via the RX 7700 XT will be slower, as the card’s FP32 throughput of 35.17 TFLOPS is solid but not exceptional for a 67th-percentile GPU.

Software development: The PassMark single-thread score of 4,881 and the extended instructions score of 45,357 indicate excellent compile times and responsiveness for code editing, debugging, and building. The 36 MB shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory at 102.4 GB/s bandwidth reduce cache misses and memory stalls during large builds. The 24 threads handle parallel compilation jobs efficiently, and the 95th-percentile CPU ranking means developer machines will rarely feel CPU-limited.

Student and office work: This pairing is massively overqualified for office tasks. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides basic display output without the discrete GPU, and the CPU’s single-thread performance ensures snappy application loading. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 245 W TDP of the GPU mean the system draws power far in excess of what office workloads require, but the benchmark data shows no weakness in this scenario — it simply delivers more performance than needed.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 75,488 places it at the 95th percentile against all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 8224P, scores 75,582, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the 285 is effectively tied with a server-class EPYC part. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D scores 75,716 (+0.3% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 scores 75,738 (+0.3% ahead). These sub-0.5% deltas indicate the 285 is within measurement noise of the top-performing CPUs in the database. Key individual scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 48,945, Cinebench R23 single-core at 6,909, PassMark multi-thread at 56,602, and PassMark single-thread at 4,881.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 22,549 places it at the 67th percentile against all GPUs. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile at 22,435, a delta of 0.5% in favor of the RX 7700 XT. The RTX 4060 Mobile scores 22,729 (-0.8%), the RTX 2080 scores 22,895 (-1.5%), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 scores 22,170 (+1.7%). The RX 7700 XT is thus bracketed by mobile RTX 40-series parts and a last-gen desktop RTX 2080, with all deltas under 2%. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,316 and the PassMark G3D score of 22,547 confirm mid-range positioning.

The combined picture is a system at the 81st percentile overall, pulled up by the CPU’s exceptional 95th-percentile ranking and dragged down by the GPU’s 67th-percentile standing. The data shows a processor that outperforms 95% of all CPUs and a graphics card that outperforms 67% of all GPUs. The gap between these two percentiles is the defining characteristic of this build.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need extreme CPU throughput without requiring top-tier GPU performance. Gamers at 1440p with high-refresh monitors will find the RX 7700 XT adequate, as its 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth handle modern titles at that resolution, though the 67th-percentile GPU ranking means 4K gaming will require settings reductions. Content creators working with CPU-based rendering — such as video editors using software encoders or 3D artists using CPU renderers — will benefit most from the 95th-percentile CPU performance. The near-tie with EPYC-class server processors in multi-threaded benchmarks makes this a workstation alternative for small studios.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 24 threads and 36 MB L3 cache, which reduce build times significantly compared to lower-ranked CPUs. Students and office workers in technical fields — engineering, data science, simulation — will find the CPU headroom useful for occasional heavy computations, but the system is far more powerful than typical office workloads require. Small business workstations running database queries, virtual machines, or batch processing can leverage the 285’s multi-thread dominance, though the discrete GPU is unnecessary for such tasks.

The system is not ideal for users prioritizing GPU compute, ray tracing, or 4K gaming. Those users would be better served by a lower-ranked CPU paired with a higher-ranked GPU. The data shows this build is for CPU-first workloads with gaming as a secondary consideration.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking against all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 ranks in the 95th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 75,488.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 7700 XT scores 22,549 on average, which is 0.5% ahead of the RTX 5060 Mobile, 0.8% behind the RTX 4060 Mobile, 1.5% behind the RTX 2080, and 1.7% ahead of the RX 5700.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in gaming?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU ranks in the 95th percentile, while the GPU ranks in the 67th percentile, so frame rates will be constrained by the RX 7700 XT in GPU-bound scenarios.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 81.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The RX 7700 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the 285 includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units.

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-threaded Cinebench R23 score?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 48,945, and the single-core score is 6,909.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations. The RX 7700 XT’s 67th-percentile GPU ranking, 12 GB VRAM, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest strong 1080p and solid 1440p performance. At 1080p ultra settings, the card’s 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 2,544 MHz boost clock should deliver high frame rates in most titles, with the CPU’s 6,909 single-core score ensuring no processor bottleneck.

At 1440p ultra, the GPU’s 192-bit memory bus and 12 GB capacity will handle most games, though the 67th-percentile standing means performance will trail top-tier cards by a significant margin — the RTX 2080, a last-gen flagship, scores 1.5% higher on average. At 4K ultra, the RX 7700 XT will struggle, as its memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s is insufficient for high-resolution textures combined with heavy effects. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,316 indicates moderate DX12 performance. Users seeking 4K gaming should look at higher-ranked GPUs, while those targeting 1080p high-refresh or 1440p 60+ FPS will find this card adequate. The CPU will never be the limiting factor in gaming, as its 95th-percentile single-thread and multi-thread scores far exceed what current games require.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. The card features 3,456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units, with 54 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 1,435 MHz, the boost clock is 2,544 MHz, and the game clock is 2,171 MHz. Memory consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, running at 2,250 MHz with an effective speed of 18 Gbps, yielding a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s.

The benchmark scores position this card at the 67th percentile against all GPUs. The PassMark G3D score of 22,547 and the average benchmark score of 22,549 show consistency across tests. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 138,383 indicates strong compute performance for its class, while the Vulkan score of 46,443 suggests solid API-level efficiency. The FP32 throughput of 35.17 TFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 35.17 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio) are notable for a mid-range card, enabling capable compute workloads. The pixel rate of 244.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 549.5 GTexel/s support high-resolution rendering, though the 96 ROPs limit fill-rate-bound scenarios.

The card’s TDP of 245 W requires a 550 W suggested PSU and uses dual 8-pin power connectors. Its dual-slot design with a length of 267 mm fits most mid-tower cases. The 54 ray tracing cores provide hardware RT support, but the 67th-percentile ranking suggests RT performance will be modest compared to top-tier cards. The 12 GB VRAM is adequate for current games at 1080p and 1440p, but future titles with high-resolution textures may exceed this capacity. The card supports PCIe 4.0 x16, DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad software compatibility.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT. The CPU is part of the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Arrow Lake architecture on a 3 nm TSMC process, and the GPU is part of the Radeon RX 7000 series, based on RDNA 3.0 on a 5 nm TSMC process. The pairing ranks at the 81st overall percentile, reflecting a system that is significantly above average but not at the extreme top end.

The 285 is a 24-core, 24-thread processor with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, a 65 W TDP, and support for DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus. The RX 7700 XT is a mid-range GPU with 12 GB VRAM, a 245 W TDP, and a boost clock of 2,544 MHz. The combination targets users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity, content creation, and development, while still wanting a capable gaming GPU for 1080p and 1440p.

The 81st combined percentile is misleading if interpreted as balance — the CPU’s 95th percentile and GPU’s 67th percentile create a lopsided system. In CPU-heavy tasks, this build performs like a top-5% machine; in GPU-heavy tasks, it performs like a top-33% machine. This is a workstation-class CPU paired with a mid-range gaming GPU, making it suitable for professionals who game occasionally rather than gamers who do occasional productivity work.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Arrow Lake architecture (codename Arrow Lake-S) on Intel Socket 1851. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 3 nm process with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only) and includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units.

The benchmark scores place this CPU at the 95th percentile against all CPUs, with an average score of 75,488. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945 and single-core score of 6,909 demonstrate leading performance in both threaded and single-threaded workloads. The PassMark multi-thread score of 56,602 and single-thread score of 4,881 confirm this positioning. The data compression score of 602,121 and data encryption score of 46,949 indicate strong throughput for archival and security workloads. The floating-point math score of 194,988 and integer math score of 164,869 show balanced ALU and FPU performance.

The nearest rivals are server-class AMD EPYC parts and high-end Ryzen PRO processors, all within 0.3% of the 285’s average score. This means the 285 is competitive with enterprise silicon in multi-threaded benchmarks, despite being a desktop part with a 65 W TDP. The 24 threads without hyper-threading (24 cores, 24 threads) is notable — the processor relies on physical cores rather than SMT. The 5.60 GHz boost clock drives exceptional single-thread performance, as shown by the 6,909 Cinebench R23 single-core score. For real workloads, this translates to fast compile times, rapid video encoding, and responsive application performance across the board. The 36 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 support ensure memory bandwidth is not a bottleneck for most tasks.