SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

17,083 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is a desktop configuration that combines a high-end 24-core processor with a mid-range 16 GB graphics card. This pairing results in a combined performance percentile of 78, indicating a system that sits above the majority of benchmarks, though its exact gaming capabilities are not based on direct measurements. The following analysis is derived exclusively from the provided benchmark scores and hardware specifications.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, specifically the Navi 33 chip, and features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. This configuration yields a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s, which is substantial for a card in this class, though it is paired with a relatively narrow bus width. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1980 MHz, a game clock of 2470 MHz, and a boost clock of 2755 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective.

In terms of raw compute, the GPU delivers 22.57 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and an equal 22.57 TFLOPS of FP16 performance, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The card has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines, producing a pixel rate of 176.3 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 352.6 GTexel/s. For ray tracing, the RX 7600 XT includes 32 dedicated RT cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern rendering APIs.

Benchmark scores place this GPU in the 60th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17083. The nearest rival data shows it performing nearly identically to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690, with a delta of 0.3% higher, and the AMD Radeon HD 7970M at 0.4% higher. More relevantly, it trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 by 0.7%, indicating that despite its newer architecture and larger memory pool, it does not outperform that previous-generation high-end card in these aggregate tests. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2348 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 92426 further illustrate its compute capabilities, while its Passmark G3D score of 17132 confirms its mid-range positioning. The data suggests this is a capable card for 1080p and entry-level 1440p rendering, but its 128-bit memory bus and modest shading unit count relative to higher-tier cards will limit performance in heavily textured or compute-intensive scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the RX 7600 XT’s 16 GB of VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient memory capacity, but the GPU’s 60th percentile standing and its 0.7% deficit against the RTX 3070 suggest it will achieve high frame rates in less demanding titles, though it may not consistently reach very high refresh rates in AAA games without adjustments. The CPU’s strong single-core performance is an asset here, as it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios.

In streaming scenarios, the CPU’s 24 cores and 24 threads, combined with a Passmark multithread score of 56602 and a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48945, provide ample headroom for encoding and game capture simultaneously. The absence of tensor cores on the GPU means that AI-accelerated encoding features are not available, but the processor can handle software encoding without significant frame drops.

For video editing, the CPU’s high multicore throughput, evidenced by a Passmark integer math score of 164869 and floating point math score of 194988, will accelerate rendering and export tasks. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and OpenCL score of 92426 support GPU-accelerated effects and timeline scrubbing, though its 128-bit bus may limit performance with very high-resolution footage.

In 3D rendering workloads, the CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 20556 and R15 multicore score of 4933 indicate strong processor-driven rendering capability, while the GPU’s 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 performance can assist in viewport rendering and real-time previews. The 32 RT cores provide some acceleration for ray-traced renders, but the GPU’s overall 60th percentile ranking means it is not a primary rendering powerhouse.

For software development, the CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 6909 and R20 single-core score of 2901 ensure snappy compilation of sequential code, while the high thread count handles parallel builds effectively. The Passmark data compression score of 602121 and encryption score of 46949 indicate strong performance for archival tasks and secure data handling.

For student and office work, this configuration is beyond sufficient. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4881 and the GPU’s Passmark G2D score of 1030 handle everyday tasks with ease, while the 16 GB VRAM is irrelevant for such workloads but does not hinder them. The low 65 W TDP of the CPU means the system runs efficiently for extended productivity sessions.

Balance and Bottleneck

In this pairing, the RX 7600 XT is the primary limiting factor for gaming performance. The CPU, with a 95th percentile ranking among all CPUs, vastly outperforms the GPU, which sits at the 60th percentile. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 75488 is roughly 4.4 times higher than the GPU’s average score of 17083, indicating a severe imbalance where the processor is unlikely to be the bottleneck in any gaming scenario. The GPU’s nearest rival, the RTX 3070, outperforms it by 0.7%, and this deficit will manifest in frame rates, particularly at higher resolutions where the GPU’s 128-bit memory bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth become constrained.

The CPU’s 24 threads and high cache hierarchy, with 36 MB of shared L3 cache, may actually exceed the requirements of most gaming workloads, leading to idle cores and wasted potential. However, this excess capacity is beneficial for productivity tasks, where the CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 56602 can be fully utilized. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is ample for current games, but its bandwidth is a more significant constraint; at 1440p or 4K, the data throughput required will stress the 288.0 GB/s limit, causing frame pacing issues in memory-intensive scenes. The CPU’s 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth is also modest relative to its core count, but this is a secondary concern as gaming workloads are GPU-limited.

The FPS scaling in this system is dictated by the GPU’s performance ceiling. Since no measured FPS data exists for this combination, estimates based on the GPU’s percentile and rival deltas suggest that the CPU can feed the GPU well beyond its capabilities, meaning any frame rate drops are attributable to the graphics card, not the processor. In productivity workloads, the balance reverses; the GPU’s compute performance is sufficient for acceleration, but the CPU’s superior scores dominate heavy multi-threaded tasks, creating a scenario where the GPU waits on the processor only if tasks are GPU-accelerated.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads but still require a modern GPU for gaming and light creative tasks. Gamers at 1080p resolution will benefit from the RX 7600 XT’s 16 GB VRAM, which future-proofs against high-resolution textures, and the CPU’s speed ensures no frame drops from processor limitations; however, those seeking 1440p high-refresh experiences may find the GPU’s 60th percentile ranking insufficient. Content creators who work with video editing, 3D modeling, or software compilation will see exceptional performance from the Ultra 9 285’s 24 cores, with Cinebench R23 multicore scores of 48945, while the GPU provides acceleration for effects and previews. Developers will appreciate the CPU’s single-threaded speed and multithreaded compilation capabilities, as evidenced by Passmark integer math scores, and the system’s 65 W CPU TDP allows for quieter, more efficient workstations.

Students and small business users in office-based roles will find this system vastly over-specified, but the low CPU TDP and active production status of both components mean a long service life without upgrades. The GPU’s support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 ensures compatibility with the latest software APIs, making it a safer long-term investment for users who may eventually transition to more demanding tasks. The build’s 78th combined percentile places it in the upper tier of desktop configurations, making it suitable for users who need a high-performance workstation that can also handle moderate gaming without compromise.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is a 24-core, 24-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP, making it remarkably power-efficient for its core count. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and includes 36 MB of shared L3 cache with 3 MB of L2 cache per core. It also features ECC memory support, which is critical for data integrity in professional workloads.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 95th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 75488. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 8224P and EPYC 4545P, where it trails the former by 0.1% and beats the latter by 0.2%, indicating performance parity with server-grade processors. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48945 and R20 score of 20556 demonstrate exceptional multi-threaded throughput, while its R23 single-core score of 6909 and R20 single-core score of 2901 show strong single-thread capability. Passmark results reinforce this, with a multithread score of 56602 and a single-thread score of 4881.

The architecture includes an integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU GPU, which provides basic display output and media capabilities, but is not intended for gaming. The CPU’s transistor count of 17,800 million and die size of 243 mm² are significant, yet the 3 nm process and 65 W TDP indicate high efficiency. The lack of an unlocked multiplier means overclocking is not supported, but the high boost clock of 5.60 GHz already provides strong out-of-box performance. For real workloads, the CPU excels in rendering, encoding, and compilation tasks, as evidenced by its Passmark extended instructions score of 45357 and find prime numbers score of 459, the latter being a measure of integer-heavy algorithmic performance.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimated from the benchmark scores. The RX 7600 XT’s 60th percentile ranking and its 0.7% deficit against the RTX 3070 suggest it performs at a mid-range level, capable of high settings at 1080p but requiring reductions for 1440p. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is a strong asset for texture-heavy games, but the 128-bit memory bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance in titles that exceed this throughput.

In esports titles, the CPU’s high single-core performance, with a R23 single-core score of 6909, will allow the GPU to operate at its maximum, likely achieving several hundred FPS at 1080p. For AAA games, the GPU’s 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 compute is sufficient for 60 FPS at 1080p on high settings, but frame rates will drop at 1440p, potentially to 40-50 FPS, due to bandwidth constraints. The CPU’s 95th percentile ensures it is never the bottleneck, so the experience is purely GPU-bound.

DirectX 12 and Vulkan titles will perform optimally due to the GPU’s API support, while older DirectX 11 games may see lower efficiency. The GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 65 is notably low compared to DirectX 11’s 167, suggesting that modern API workloads may not be fully optimized. However, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2348 provides a more reliable estimate, indicating playable performance at 1080p. Overall, this is a 1080p gaming system with headroom for future titles that utilize more VRAM, but not for high-refresh 1440p gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark suite shows a processor that dominates its category. Its Cinebench R15 multicore score of 4933 and single-core score of 696, along with R20 scores of 20556 and 2901, and R23 scores of 48945 and 6909, place it at the 95th percentile. The average benchmark score of 75488 is marginally higher than the AMD EPYC 4545P by 0.2% and slightly lower than the AMD EPYC 8224P by 0.1%, demonstrating that it competes with server-class silicon.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are more modest, with an average score of 17083 and a 60th percentile ranking. Its nearest rival, the RTX 3070, scores 17208, which is 0.7% higher, while the GTX 690 scores 17037, or 0.3% lower. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 92426 and Vulkan score of 48366 provide insight into its compute and graphics API performance, while Passmark G3D and GPU compute scores of 17132 and 8987, respectively, show a capable but not exceptional mid-range part.

Combined, the system achieves a 78th percentile, with the CPU carrying the majority of the performance weight. The CPU’s high scores in data compression (602121) and encryption (46949) make it suitable for server-like tasks, while the GPU’s scores ensure it can handle gaming and light rendering. The disparity between the CPU’s 95th and GPU’s 60th percentile is stark, indicating that the system’s overall tier is held back by the graphics card, but the CPU’s headroom means future GPU upgrades would significantly boost the combined percentile.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The GPU is connected via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for the RX 7600 XT’s bandwidth needs, but a future GPU upgrade would benefit from the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes. The platform has a 65 W TDP for the CPU, and the GPU has a 190 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 450 W, leaving significant headroom for a more powerful graphics card.

The memory support for DDR5 with ECC is a professional-grade feature, and the 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for current tasks, though a higher-capacity memory kit would not increase bandwidth due to the dual-channel limit. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics provides a fallback display output, which is useful for troubleshooting or basic tasks without the discrete GPU.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-performing GPU, as the CPU’s 95th percentile ranking is unlikely to be a bottleneck for several generations. Replacing the RX 7600 XT with a GPU that scores above 17083, such as the RTX 3070 which is 0.7% faster, would improve gaming performance and raise the combined percentile. The CPU’s socket is currently active, but future upgrades would require a new motherboard if a new socket is introduced; however, the current platform’s Gen 5 support ensures longevity. The 450 W PSU suggestion provides a baseline, and a higher-wattage unit would be needed for a more power-hungry GPU, but the current configuration is efficient.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 78, indicating the system outperforms 78% of all configurations in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 8224P?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has an average benchmark score of 75488, which is 0.1% lower than the AMD EPYC 8224P’s score of 75582, indicating near-identical performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The RX 7600 XT has a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s across a 128-bit bus, which is a limiting factor in high-resolution gaming as the bandwidth may be saturated in memory-intensive scenes.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for error-correcting tasks in professional environments.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 190 W. The suggested PSU for this configuration is 450 W.

Q: How does the GPU’s performance compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070?

A: The RX 7600 XT has an average benchmark score of 17083, which is 0.7% lower than the RTX 3070’s score of 17208, meaning the RTX 3070 is slightly faster.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and core count?

A: The CPU has 24 cores and 24 threads, with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz and a base clock of 2.50 GHz.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class configuration that pairs the Intel Core Ultra 9 285, a 24-core processor with a 95th percentile ranking, with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, a 16 GB GPU at the 60th percentile. The system achieves a combined percentile of 78, placing it in the upper-mid tier of desktop builds. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 75488 is more than four times the GPU’s average of 17083, clearly establishing the processor as the dominant component.

The build is designed for users who need extreme CPU performance for productivity tasks like rendering, compilation, and data processing, while still maintaining the ability to play modern games at 1080p with high settings. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and RDNA 3.0 architecture provide a solid foundation for gaming, but the 128-bit memory bus limits its potential. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 190 W TDP make this a relatively power-efficient combination, with a suggested 450 W PSU providing adequate headroom. Overall, this is a workstation-class CPU paired with a mid-range GPU, resulting in a system that excels in compute-heavy workloads but is balanced for gaming only at lower resolutions.