SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 pairs a flagship-class 24-core processor with a mid-range Radeon RX 7600 graphics card, creating a desktop build with a stark performance asymmetry. The CPU operates in the 95th percentile of all processors, while the GPU sits in the 57th percentile, producing a system whose overall combined percentile of 76 is pulled down almost entirely by its graphics component. This is a machine designed for productivity first and gaming second, with the processor delivering exceptional compute throughput that the GPU cannot fully match in graphics-bound tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is built on the Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm process at TSMC, packing 24 cores and 24 threads into a 243 mm² die with 17,800 million transistors. This is a desktop-class processor on the Intel Socket 1851 platform, part of the Core Ultra Series 2 family. The absence of hyperthreading means the 24 cores operate as 24 threads, which is a deliberate design choice that favors sustained multi-core workloads over bursty single-thread scheduling. The base clock sits at 2.50 GHz with a boost clock reaching 5.60 GHz, and the cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. The processor supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, delivering 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support, which is rare for a consumer desktop part and points toward workstation usage.

Benchmark results confirm the CPU's high-end positioning. In Cinebench R23, the Ultra 9 285 scores 48,945 in multi-core and 6,909 in single-core. The multi-core figure is the headline number, reflecting the processor's ability to sustain heavy all-core loads. The single-core score of 6,909 indicates strong per-thread performance, boosted by the 5.60 GHz turbo. The R20 results show 20,556 multi-core and 2,901 single-core, while R15 shows 4,933 multi-core and 696 single-core. These scores scale consistently across Cinebench versions, confirming that the processor maintains its relative performance regardless of the benchmark generation.

PassMark results provide a broader view of real-world capabilities. The multithread score of 56,602 places the CPU in the top tier for parallel workloads, while the single-thread score of 4,881 is similarly strong. Data compression scores 602,121, data encryption scores 46,949, and extended instructions score 45,357 — all indicating that the CPU handles specialized instruction sets efficiently. Floating-point math scores 194,988, integer math scores 164,869, and random string sorting scores 73,651. The physics score of 3,598 and the prime number finding score of 459 are lower in absolute terms but still consistent with a processor that prioritizes throughput over latency-sensitive tasks.

The average benchmark score of 75,488 places the Ultra 9 285 in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all AMD server or prosumer parts: the AMD EPYC 8224P scores 75,582 (0.1% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D scores 75,716 (0.3% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 scores 75,738 (0.3% higher). The AMD EPYC 4545P scores 75,373 (0.2% lower). These deltas are negligible — within a fraction of a percent — meaning the Ultra 9 285 trades blows with enterprise-grade silicon. For desktop workloads like compiling code, rendering frames, or running virtual machines, the 24-core count and high boost clock make this processor exceptionally capable, with headroom to spare for background tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark scores is one of a CPU that outperforms its GPU by a wide margin. The CPU's average benchmark score of 75,488 places it in the 95th percentile, while the GPU's average score of 15,171 places it in the 57th percentile. The combined percentile for the build is 76, which is a weighted average that reflects the CPU's dominance in the overall score.

Looking at the GPU specifically, the Radeon RX 7600 delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,310. In Geekbench, it scores 88,051 in OpenCL and 34,401 in Vulkan. PassMark results show a G3D score of 16,634, a GPU compute score of 8,790, and G2D score of 984. The DirectX 9 score of 226 is notably higher than the DirectX 12 score of 58, which indicates that the card's older API performance is relatively stronger than its modern API performance — a sign that the RX 7600 is better suited to lighter graphics loads than to modern titles.

The GPU's nearest rivals are a mix of older and lower-tier cards. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 15,199 (0.2% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro 560X scores 15,082 (0.6% lower), the AMD Radeon 680M scores 15,270 (0.7% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti scores 15,063 (0.7% lower). This places the RX 7600 in a performance band that is roughly equivalent to an entry-level ray tracing card from NVIDIA and an older integrated GPU from AMD. The deltas are small, but the context is important: the RX 7600 is not competing with modern mid-range or high-end cards. It is a 1080p-oriented GPU that sits near the bottom of the desktop discrete GPU hierarchy.

The disparity between the CPU and GPU percentiles means that in mixed workloads, the CPU will frequently be waiting on the GPU. In CPU-bound tasks like compilation or rendering, the system will perform at the 95th percentile level. In GPU-bound tasks like gaming, the system will perform at the 57th percentile level. The overall 76th percentile is therefore a realistic expectation for a balanced workload, but users should understand that the ceiling is set by the GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck in this build is unambiguously the GPU. The CPU's 95th percentile and the GPU's 57th percentile represent a 38-point gap, which is enormous in benchmark terms. The CPU's average score of 75,488 is roughly five times the GPU's average score of 15,171, and the CPU's nearest rivals are server-class EPYC processors while the GPU's nearest rivals include a GTX 660 Ti from over a decade ago.

In gaming workloads, the RX 7600 will be the limiting factor. The CPU can feed frames at a rate far exceeding what the GPU can render, meaning that frame rates will be dictated by the GPU's 57th percentile performance. In CPU-bound scenarios — such as high-refresh-rate gaming at low resolutions, where the CPU must process many draw calls per second — the Ultra 9 285 will have no trouble keeping up, but the GPU will still cap the output. Conversely, in productivity workloads that rely on the CPU, such as video encoding or software compilation, the GPU will sit mostly idle, and the system will perform at the 95th percentile level.

The FPS scaling picture is simple: the GPU is the constraint in graphics-heavy tasks, and the CPU is the constraint in compute-heavy tasks. There is no scenario where both components are evenly matched. The system is balanced only in the sense that the CPU has enough headroom to handle any background task while the GPU is busy, but for pure gaming performance, upgrading the GPU would yield a far larger frame rate improvement than upgrading the CPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 7600's 57th percentile and its DirectX 12 score of 58 in PassMark indicate that it can handle 1080p gaming at moderate refresh rates, but it will struggle to maintain high frame rates in modern titles at high settings. The CPU's 95th percentile ensures that there will be no CPU-side frame drops, but the GPU will cap the experience at roughly mid-range levels. Estimated frame rates in esports titles will be playable at 1080p, while AAA games will require reduced settings to approach 60 FPS.

Streaming: The Ultra 9 285's 24 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The CPU's multithread score of 56,602 and its 36 MB L3 cache mean that software encoding (x264) will not interfere with game performance, as the CPU has more than enough throughput to handle both tasks. The GPU's limitations will still cap the game's frame rate, but the stream quality will be excellent.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945 and its data compression score of 602,121 indicate that timeline scrubbing, rendering, and export will be fast. The GPU's 8 GB of memory and 2048 shading units will assist with effects and color grading, but the CPU will be the primary driver of performance. This is a strong configuration for 4K video editing, with the CPU handling heavy codecs and the GPU providing acceleration where needed.

3D rendering: The CPU's 24 cores and high Cinebench scores make it excellent for CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar applications. The GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 32 ray tracing cores will handle GPU-based rendering, but its 8 GB memory and 57th percentile position mean that complex scenes will be limited by the GPU. For hybrid rendering, the CPU will carry most of the load.

Software development: The CPU's multithread score of 56,602 and its 36 MB L3 cache make compilation fast. The PassMark integer math score of 164,869 indicates strong performance in build tools, and the ECC memory support ensures data integrity during long builds. The GPU is largely irrelevant here, making this an excellent developer workstation.

Student and office work: This is overkill for typical office tasks. The CPU's 95th percentile is far more than needed for word processing or spreadsheets, and the GPU's 57th percentile is more than adequate for web browsing and office applications. The system will idle through most workloads, but it offers headroom for any future compute-heavy tasks a student might encounter.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this build is a professional who needs maximum CPU throughput and only occasional GPU acceleration. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 95th percentile performance, especially in tasks that are not GPU-accelerated. Software developers compiling large codebases will find the 24 cores and 56,602 multithread score invaluable, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running processes.

Gamers should look elsewhere, or at least plan to upgrade the GPU. At 1080p, the RX 7600 can deliver playable frame rates in many titles, but the 57th percentile GPU will leave the 95th percentile CPU underutilized. Gamers at 1440p or 4K will find the GPU's 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus to be severe limitations.

Small business workstations that run virtualization, database servers, or heavy spreadsheet analysis will benefit from the CPU's compute power and ECC memory. Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the CPU useful for simulations and compilation, though the GPU is more than sufficient for their needs. The build is not ideal for anyone whose primary workload is gaming or GPU-accelerated machine learning.

FAQ

Q: Is the Core Ultra 9 285 a good match for the RX 7600?

A: The CPU is in the 95th percentile while the GPU is in the 57th percentile, creating a significant imbalance. The CPU will not be the limiting factor in any workload, but the GPU will cap gaming performance at mid-range levels.

Q: What is the CPU's single-core performance like?

A: The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 6,909, and the PassMark single-thread score is 4,881, placing it in the top 5% of all processors for single-threaded tasks.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core Ultra 9 285 supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a desktop processor and useful for workstation reliability.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 7600 scores 16,634 in PassMark G3D, which is within 0.7% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and the AMD Radeon 680M, placing it in a similar performance band.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 76, driven entirely by the CPU's 95th percentile and dragged down by the GPU's 57th percentile.

Q: Is this build good for gaming?

A: It is adequate for 1080p gaming at moderate settings, but the GPU's 57th percentile and 8 GB memory limit its ability to handle high-refresh-rate or high-resolution gaming.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The dual-channel DDR5 memory bus delivers 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for the 24-core processor's compute demands.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 9 285 uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is ample for a high-end GPU and NVMe storage. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU fails or is removed.

The CPU's TDP is 65 W, which is remarkably low for a 24-core processor on a 3 nm process. The GPU's TDP is 165 W, and the suggested PSU for the GPU is 450 W. This means the total system power draw is modest, and a 450 W power supply is sufficient for the GPU alone, though a higher-wattage unit would allow for future GPU upgrades. The CPU's low TDP also means that a capable air cooler is sufficient, and the 3 nm process keeps thermals manageable.

The sensible next upgrade for this build is the GPU. The CPU has enormous headroom, and replacing the RX 7600 with a higher-percentile card would immediately raise the combined percentile and gaming performance. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and the 65 W CPU TDP leave ample room for a more power-hungry GPU. The platform also supports future Socket 1851 processors, though the Ultra 9 285 is already near the top of the stack. Memory can be expanded since the dual-channel DDR5 bus supports standard DIMMs, and ECC support remains available for professional workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with the AMD Radeon RX 7600. The CPU is a 24-core Arrow Lake processor with a 5.60 GHz boost clock, and the GPU is an 8 GB RDNA 3.0 card with 2048 shading units. The combined percentile of 76 reflects a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks and is merely average for GPU-bound tasks. The CPU's 95th percentile and the GPU's 57th percentile define the system's character: it is a workstation-class CPU with a budget-to-mid-range GPU attached.

The build is best understood as a productivity machine with gaming capability as a secondary function. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945 and PassMark multithread score of 56,602 place it among the fastest desktop processors available, while the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 16,634 places it in the middle of the pack. The overall tier is high for compute, moderate for graphics, and the build's identity is defined by this split.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured frame rates for this build, so all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

Based on the GPU's 57th percentile and its PassMark DirectX 12 score of 58, the RX 7600 is estimated to deliver playable frame rates at 1080p in most titles. For esports games like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the CPU's 95th percentile and the GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS should allow frame rates well above 60 FPS at high settings. For AAA titles, the 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus will limit performance, and the estimated frame rates at 1080p ultra settings are likely to fall in the 40-60 FPS range. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle, with estimated frame rates dropping below 40 FPS in demanding titles. At 4K, the RX 7600 is not viable for modern gaming, with estimated frame rates below 30 FPS in most games.

The CPU will never be the bottleneck in gaming. The 5.60 GHz boost clock and 36 MB L3 cache ensure that frame times are consistent, and the 24 cores handle any background tasks without affecting game performance. The GPU is the sole determinant of gaming performance, and its 57th percentile position means that this build is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings rather than high-refresh or high-resolution play.