SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + AMD Radeon RX 6700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6700

30,433 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 and AMD Radeon RX 6700 form a desktop pairing with a pronounced CPU-first design: the processor sits at the 95th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU holds the 75th percentile of all GPUs, yielding a combined percentile of 85. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows — so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores, not observed. The CPU is a top-tier Arrow Lake part with 24 cores and a 65W TDP, and the GPU is an RDNA 2.0 mid-range card with 10 GB of GDDR6. The data indicates a system that will compute far above its graphics class.

Balance and Bottleneck

The 20-point gap between the CPU's 95th percentile and the GPU's 75th percentile is the defining structural fact of this build. In gaming workloads, the GPU is the primary limiting component: the Radeon RX 6700's PassMark G3D score of 18931 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2014 put it in the upper-middle of the graphics field, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945 and single-core score of 6,909 indicate it can sustain far more instruction throughput than the GPU can feed. The data suggests that at standard high-refresh gaming settings, the RX 6700 will saturate before the Core Ultra 9 285 does. The CPU, in other words, will not be the reason a frame rate dips.

The bottleneck flips only in compute-heavy, CPU-bound tasks. PassMark multi-threaded score of 56,602 and the integer math score of 164,869 show a processor that is near the top of its class; in workloads like compilation, data compression, or physics simulation, the CPU is the limiting factor. The GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 8,240 is comparatively modest, so tasks that offload to the GPU (like render passes) will be limited by the 6700, while tasks that run on the CPU (like game logic or physics) will run at near-top-tier speeds. The PassMark physics score of 3,598 is a specific data point that shows the CPU's strength in physics calculations, though it is not the highest PassMark sub-score.

The balance is asymmetric: the CPU has headroom to support a much stronger GPU, but the GPU cannot fully exercise the CPU's potential in graphics workloads. For users who want a balanced system, the data suggests the GPU will be the part to upgrade first; the CPU can sustain a much faster GPU without itself becoming a bottleneck.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has an average benchmark score of 75,488. Its nearest rivals, according to the FACT pack, are the AMD EPYC 8224P (average score 75,582, delta -0.1%), the AMD EPYC 4545P (average 75,373, delta +0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D (average 75,716, delta -0.3%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 (average 75,738, delta -0.3%). These deltas are within a fraction of a percent, so the Core Ultra 9 285 is statistically indistinguishable from those four server and prosumer parts. It is not ahead or behind by any meaningful margin — it trades blows with top-tier EPYC and Ryzen PRO chips.

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 has an average benchmark score of 30,433. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA CMP 70HX (average 30,476, delta -0.1%), the NVIDIA Tesla M60 (average 30,490, delta -0.2%), the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (average 30,095, delta +1.1%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (average 29,945, delta +1.6%). The RX 6700 is essentially tied with the CMP 70HX and Tesla M60, and it is 1.1% ahead of the RX 6800 and 1.6% ahead of the RTX 3070 Ti. In practical terms, the GPU is a mid-pack performer that narrowly beats two well-known cards but does not break into the higher tier.

The combined picture is a CPU at the top of the charts and a GPU that is solidly mid-upper. The CPU's 95th percentile places it among the best 5% of all CPUs; the GPU's 75th percentile places it among the best quarter of all GPUs. The system is CPU-dominant, and the benchmark data suggests that in any workload that is not purely graphics-limited, the CPU will be the star.

CPU Analysis

The Core Ultra 9 285 is a 24-core, 24-thread processor built on Intel's Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3nm TSMC process. It packs 17,800 million transistors onto a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 2.50 GHz and the boost clock is 5.60 GHz, with a TDP of just 65W — a notable figure for a 24-core part. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, delivering 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and the CPU supports ECC memory — a feature that matters for workstation builds. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, and the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a display output even without a discrete GPU. The multiplier is locked, so the CPU is not unlocked for overclocking.

The benchmark scores show a processor that excels at both single-threaded and heavily parallel work. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945 is strong, and the single-core score of 6,909 is likewise solid. PassMark multi-threaded of 56,602 and single-thread of 4,881 corroborate the Cinebench picture. The PassMark data compression score of 602,121 and encryption score of 46,949 indicate very high throughput for data-heavy tasks, while integer math at 164,869 and floating-point math at 194,988 show a balanced ALU/FPU design. The extended instructions score of 45,357 and random string sorting of 73,651 round out the compute picture. The low PassMark find-prime-numbers score of 459 and physics score of 3,598 are outliers that reflect specific workloads rather than general weakness.

For real workloads, the data suggests a processor that can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease. The 24 threads at 65W TDP means power efficiency is a defining trait: it delivers near-top-tier performance without a high power draw. The locked multiplier means no overclocking, but the stock boost of 5.60 GHz is already high.

Who Should Build It

The Core Ultra 9 285 + RX 6700 build is for users who need compute muscle but do not demand top-tier graphics. The 95th-percentile CPU makes it a strong choice for content creators who render video, compile code, or run physics simulations — the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945 and PassMark multi-threaded of 56,602 are evidence of that. The 24 cores and 24 threads handle parallel workloads without breaking a sweat, and the 65W TDP means it can run in a workstation without exotic cooling.

The GPU's 75th percentile and its 10 GB GDDR6 make it a reasonable match for gamers at standard high-refresh settings, but it is not a top-tier 4K part. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,014 and PassMark G3D of 18,931 suggest the GPU is better suited to 1080p and light 1440p workloads than to high-end 4K. For users who want to play modern titles at high settings, the GPU is the part to upgrade.

Developers and researchers will appreciate the ECC memory support and the 24 threads for compilation and simulation. Students and small-business users will find the 65W TDP and integrated graphics useful for a low-power, always-on workstation. The build is not a gaming-first rig; it is a compute-first rig with a decent GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is Intel Socket 1851, with DDR5 dual-channel memory support and PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes. The CPU is already at the 95th percentile, so there is little headroom to upgrade the processor within this socket — the 285 is near the top. The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU. The RX 6700's 75th percentile is the clear bottleneck, and the CPU's headroom means a GPU in the 90th percentile or above would better balance the system. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 450W, and the CPU TDP is 65W, so a 450W power supply has enough headroom for a modest GPU upgrade. The 10 GB VRAM of the current GPU is a limitation for heavy texture loads, so a GPU with more VRAM would be the logical next step.

The socket and platform are current: Socket 1851 and DDR5 memory are not legacy. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide future headroom for storage and other expansion cards. The CPU's locked multiplier limits overclocking, so the upgrade path is not about pushing the CPU, but about bringing the GPU up to match the CPU's high performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 sits at the 95th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile among all GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6700 sits at the 75th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU has ECC memory support (true).

Q: What socket does the CPU use?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity?

A: The GPU has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the GPU's production status is end-of-life.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65W.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with a Navi 22 chip on a 7nm TSMC process, containing 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die. It has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The base clock is 1941 MHz, the boost clock is 2450 MHz, and the game clock is 2174 MHz. The GPU has 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 36 RT cores. It delivers 11.29 TFLOPS of FP32 and 22.58 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 156.8 GPixel/s and texture rate is 352.8 GTexel/s. The card uses a single 8-pin power connector, is dual-slot, and has a TDP of 175W, with a suggested PSU of 450W. It supports PCIe 4.0 x16 and outputs 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The benchmark scores show a mid-range part. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,014 is modest, and the PassMark G3D score of 18,931 places it in the 75th percentile. The Geekbench Metal score of 122,223 and OpenCL score of 97,841 show decent compute capability, while the Vulkan score of 83,974 is lower. The PassMark DX12 score of 71 is low, but that is a specialized PassMark test and not a general DX12 indicator. The GPU's 36 RT cores enable ray tracing, but the performance will be limited by the overall compute power. The 10 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p textures, but is a constraint for high-resolution texture-heavy workloads. The 160-bit bus and 320 GB/s bandwidth are mid-range figures, limiting memory-bound performance.

For rendering, the FP32 of 11.29 TFLOPS is the key figure; it is a solid mid-range value but not high-end. The 36 RT cores give ray tracing capability, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,014 indicates that DX12 heavy workloads will be the GPU's weak point. The GPU is best used at 1080p and light 1440p, and its 75th percentile reflects a mid-tier graphics part.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 — a 24-core Arrow Lake processor at the 95th percentile — with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 — a 10 GB RDNA 2.0 GPU at the 75th percentile. The combined percentile is 85. The CPU is a top-tier compute part with a 65W TDP, and the GPU is a mid-range graphics card with a 175W TDP. The system is heavily CPU-biased: the CPU is a class-leading part, while the GPU is an upper-mid-range card. The data shows a desktop workstation-class build that can handle heavy CPU workloads and moderate gaming, but the GPU will be the bottleneck in graphics-heavy applications. The launch MSRP of the CPU is $579, and the GPU has no launch MSRP listed. The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is a high-CPU, mid-GPU system.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 95th percentile and the GPU's 75th percentile suggest that the CPU can drive high frame rates, but the GPU will cap them in most titles. At moderate settings, the CPU will not limit performance; the GPU will be the limit. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,014 indicates the GPU is best at 1080p-class workloads.

Streaming: The 24 cores and 24 threads of the CPU are well-suited to streaming plus gameplay. The PassMark multi-threaded score of 56,602 shows the CPU can handle encoding and game simultaneously. The GPU's 75th percentile is not the bottleneck for streaming; the CPU provides headroom for encoding.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,945 and PassMark data compression of 602,121 show strong performance in video encoding and compression workloads. The GPU's 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing, but the CPU is the clear leader.

3D rendering: The CPU's floating-point math score of 194,988 and the GPU's FP32 of 11.29 TFLOPS combine for a decent rendering system. The CPU will dominate the rendering, while the GPU assists with GPU-accelerated rendering. The 36 RT cores add ray tracing support, but the overall GPU compute score of 8,240 is modest.

Software development: The integer math score of 164,869 and the 24 cores make compilation and large builds quick. The ECC memory support and 102.4 GB/s bandwidth are assets for long-running builds. The GPU is irrelevant for development, but the CPU is a strong choice.

Student and office work: The 65W TDP means low power draw, and the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a display output without the discrete GPU. The PassMark single-thread of 4,881 handles typical office apps with ease. The build is a quiet, efficient workstation for students or small business desktops.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + AMD Radeon RX 6700

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

AMD Radeon RX 6700

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds