SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

75,488 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600

19,036 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 and AMD Radeon RX 6600 represent a striking pairing of a flagship 24-core desktop processor with a mainstream, end-of-life graphics card. This combination creates a significant performance imbalance, but the data reveals a platform with immense potential for specific workloads. The benchmark scores show a CPU that sits in the 95th percentile among all processors, paired with a GPU that lands in the 63rd percentile, indicating that this system’s overall capability is heavily dictated by its graphics card.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination, and the data pack contains no measuredFps data. Consequently, all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores of the individual components. The GPU's performance in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where it scored 1492, and its Passmark G3D score of 15096, provide a baseline for its rendering capability. The RX 6600’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest that at 1080p resolution, this system is likely capable of delivering high frame rates in most esports and older titles, where the CPU’s massive processing power can push the GPU to its limits.

However, the data indicates a clear ceiling. The GPU's 8.928 TFLOPS of FP32 compute performance and 279.0 GTexel/s texture rate place it firmly in the mainstream segment. For modern, graphically demanding AAA games at 1440p, the frame rates would drop considerably, and the 8 GB VRAM could become a limiting factor for texture quality and detail settings. The system’s overall gaming performance is likely to be bottlenecked by the RX 6600, meaning that while the CPU can handle the most complex game logic and physics calculations, the GPU will be the component that determines the final frame rate output. The lack of measured data means these are qualitative expectations, but the scores suggest a capable 1080p gaming machine that is not optimized for high-refresh-rate 1440p or 4K gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark performance is exceptional across all tests. In Cinebench R23, it achieved a multi-core score of 48945 and a single-core score of 6909, demonstrating leadership in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. Its Passmark multi-thread score of 56602 and single-thread score of 4881 reinforce this position. The CPU's average benchmark score of 75488 places it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, showing that it outperforms the vast majority of available processors. Looking at its nearest rivals, the AMD EPYC 8224P scores 75582, a delta of -0.1%, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 scores 75738, a delta of -0.3%. This places the Core Ultra 9 285 in a virtual tie with these top-tier server and workstation parts, making it a powerhouse for compute-intensive tasks.

In contrast, the GPU’s benchmark scores are far more modest. Its average benchmark score of 19036 places it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs, a mid-range position. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 with a score of 19030 and a delta of 0%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile with a score of 19049 and a delta of -0.1%. This indicates that the RX 6600 performs on par with older professional cards and entry-level mobile parts, which is a significant gap in capability when paired with the top-tier CPU. The combined picture is one of extreme CPU dominance and GPU adequacy, resulting in a system that is a specialist for CPU-bound tasks rather than a balanced gaming or general-purpose machine.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using a 7 nm process at TSMC, featuring the Navi 23 chip. It is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. Its clocks are specified with a base of 1626 MHz, a game clock of 2044 MHz, and a boost clock of 2491 MHz. The GPU has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, and it includes 28 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing. Its FP32 performance is rated at 8.928 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 17.86 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. The card’s pixel rate is 159.4 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 279.0 GTexel/s.

The benchmark scores for this GPU indicate its mainstream positioning. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1492 and Passmark G3D score of 15096 confirm that it is a capable 1080p rasterization card. However, the data suggests that its ray tracing performance is not a strong point; the 28 RT cores are present, but the raw compute power is limited for demanding ray-traced scenes. The Passmark DirectX 12 score of 51 is notably low, which may indicate that the card’s performance in modern, API-heavy titles is not exceptional. For rendering workloads, the 8.928 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is adequate for basic 3D modeling and rendering, but it is far from the speed of professional workstation cards. The GPU’s API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, ensuring broad compatibility with modern software.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a profound imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The Core Ultra 9 285, sitting in the 95th percentile for CPUs, is a top-tier compute processor. The RX 6600, in the 63rd percentile for GPUs, is a mid-range graphics card. This means that in gaming workloads, the GPU is almost certainly the primary bottleneck. The CPU’s immense single-thread performance, evidenced by its 6909 Cinebench R23 score, can easily feed the GPU with draw calls and physics calculations, but the GPU can only process a limited amount of data per frame. The FPS scaling in games would be limited by the GPU’s 8.928 TFLOPS compute and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, not the CPU’s power.

Conversely, in CPU-intensive workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and code compilation, the GPU is not a limiting factor at all. The CPU’s multi-core might, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48945, will be fully utilized, and the GPU will simply handle the display output or provide minor acceleration. The Passmark data compression score of 602121 and floating-point math score of 194988 highlight the CPU’s dominance in processing tasks. Therefore, the system’s balance is highly workload-dependent. For gaming, it is a severely GPU-limited system; for productivity, it is a CPU-first workstation where the GPU is a secondary component.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This system is not ideal for high-refresh gaming beyond 1080p. The RX 6600’s performance, with a Passmark G3D score of 15096, is sufficient for high frame rates in esports titles at 1080p, but the GPU will struggle to maintain high FPS in demanding AAA games. The CPU’s power is wasted in this scenario, as the GPU becomes the limiting factor.

Streaming: The Core Ultra 9 285 is exceptionally well-suited for streaming. Its 24 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming, even with the most demanding x264 presets. The CPU’s high passmark multi-thread score of 56602 ensures that the streaming workload will not impact game performance, although the game’s FPS will still be limited by the RX 6600.

Video Editing: This pairing is strong for video editing. The CPU’s multi-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 48945, will significantly accelerate video rendering, effects application, and export times. The GPU can assist with effects and color grading, but the CPU is the primary workhorse. The 8 GB of VRAM on the GPU is adequate for 1080p editing timelines.

3D Rendering: The CPU is the star here. The 48945 Cinebench R23 multi-core score indicates exceptional CPU-based rendering performance for applications like Blender or V-Ray. The GPU’s 8.928 TFLOPS can provide some acceleration for GPU-based renderers, but its 8 GB of VRAM may limit the complexity of scenes that can be rendered without out-of-core memory.

Software Development: This is a fantastic environment for developers. The CPU’s high single-thread score of 6909 in Cinebench R23 ensures fast compilation times for smaller projects, while its massive multi-core score allows for parallel builds and test suites. The Passmark integer math score of 164869 further supports its capability in handling complex data structures and algorithms.

Student and Office Work: For standard productivity tasks like document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheets, this system is massively overqualified. The CPU’s performance is far beyond what these workloads require, and the GPU is more than sufficient for driving multiple 4K displays, even if it is not needed for such basic tasks. The system would be extremely responsive, but the cost is not justified for this use case alone.

Who Should Build It

This build is for a user who prioritizes CPU compute power above all else and is willing to pair it with a modest GPU for basic rendering and display output. The target user is a content creator who works with video editing and 3D rendering and can benefit from the CPU’s 48945 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. This system is also ideal for software developers who require fast compilation times and heavy parallel processing, as indicated by its high passmark scores. The GPU is suitable for a secondary display or for light gaming at 1080p, but the system is not intended for gamers seeking high-end graphics performance at higher resolutions. It could also serve as a small business workstation for scientific computing, data analysis, or financial modeling, where the CPU’s 95th percentile standing is the primary requirement. The end-of-life status of the GPU suggests that a user building this system might plan to upgrade the GPU in the future, using the CPU as a long-term foundation.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture with a 3 nm process at TSMC. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The processor’s cache configuration includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s and includes 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The CPU also features integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 EU.

The benchmark results for this CPU are stellar. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48945 and single-core score of 6909 show top-tier performance in both multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks. The Passmark results reinforce this, with a multi-thread score of 56602 and a single-thread score of 4881. These scores indicate that the CPU can handle the most demanding productivity workloads with ease. For real-world tasks, this means video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific simulations will be exceptionally fast. The high single-core performance is crucial for tasks like gaming, where it ensures high minimum frame rates, and for general responsiveness. The 65 W TDP is also notable, as it indicates high efficiency, allowing this powerful processor to be cooled by a capable air cooler, despite its high performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 9 285 uses the Intel Socket 1851 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support, with 20 lanes from the CPU, provides a high-bandwidth connection for future GPUs and NVMe SSDs. The suggested PSU for the RX 6600 is 300 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 132 W, while the CPU has a 65 W TDP. This leaves significant headroom for a substantial GPU upgrade in the future without requiring a new power supply. The system’s memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is a baseline for DDR5.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the RX 6600 with a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has ample headroom to support a much faster graphics card. The PCIe Gen 5 x16 slot would allow for the latest high-end GPUs to run at full bandwidth. The platform’s support for DDR5 memory also allows for faster kits to be installed, potentially improving performance in memory-sensitive applications. The 24-core CPU is a long-term platform anchor, so users can expect to upgrade the GPU and possibly the memory over the system’s lifetime before needing to replace the motherboard and CPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance gap between the Core Ultra 9 285 and its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285 has an average benchmark score of 75488, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 has an average score of 75738, which is a delta of -0.3%. This means the two CPUs perform nearly identically in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: Is the Radeon RX 6600 a good match for the Core Ultra 9 285 for gaming?

A: The data suggests it is not a balanced match. The Core Ultra 9 285 is in the 95th percentile for CPUs, while the RX 6600 is in the 63rd percentile for GPUs. In gaming, the GPU would be the primary bottleneck, limiting the system’s frame rates.

Q: How much VRAM does the Radeon RX 6600 have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The RX 6600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: What are the Cinebench R23 scores for the Core Ultra 9 285?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285 scored 48945 points in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test and 6909 points in the single-core test.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) of the CPU and GPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has a TDP of 65 W, and the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has a TDP of 132 W.

Q: Does the Core Ultra 9 285 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU’s specifications list ECC memory as a supported feature.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6600 had a launch MSRP of 329 USD.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with the AMD Radeon RX 6600. The pairing represents a top-tier CPU and a mid-range GPU, resulting in a combined percentile of 79. The system is a specialist tool, optimized for CPU-intensive workloads like content creation, 3D rendering, and software development. The CPU’s performance is in the 95th percentile, making it one of the fastest processors available, while the GPU’s performance is in the 63rd percentile, positioning it as a capable but not high-end graphics solution. The overall tier of this build is high, due to the CPU’s dominance, but its gaming and graphics capability is firmly in the mainstream segment.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

AMD Radeon RX 6600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds