SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

67,469 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh is a laptop configuration that combines a high-end 24-core mobile processor with a professional-grade graphics solution. The CPU data shows a strong multi-threaded processor with an average benchmark score of 67,469, placing it at the 94th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU, while an older Turing-architecture part, holds the 50th percentile among all GPUs. Combined, this pairing sits at the 72nd percentile for all laptop builds. The data indicates this is a workstation-focused platform, prioritizing CPU compute and professional GPU features over raw gaming performance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX is a 24-core, 24-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process node from TSMC. This is a mobile-class chip with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and it features a 55 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It also includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units, which can handle basic display tasks when the discrete GPU is not required.

Benchmark results show the CPU is exceptionally strong in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, it scores 35,589 points in multi-core and 2,204 points in single-core. The Geekbench scores are 20,795 for multi-core and 2,458 for single-core. PassMark results are equally telling: the multi-thread score is 55,759, while the single-thread score is 4,713. The data compression score of 608,381 and integer math score of 155,218 point to heavy computational lifting, while the floating-point math score of 191,186 indicates strong number-crunching for scientific or financial workloads.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the Core Ultra 9 275HX is tightly clustered with several workstation and server processors. It sits 0.3% below the Intel Xeon w5-3525, 0.5% below the AMD EPYC 4484PX, and 0.6% below the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX, while being 0.7% ahead of the Intel Xeon 6515P. These delta percentages are all within a single percentage point, meaning the Core Ultra 9 275HX delivers performance essentially equivalent to those four CPUs in overall average benchmarks. This suggests that the 275HX offers desktop-class workstation compute performance in a mobile form factor.

For real workloads, the data indicates this CPU excels at threaded tasks such as 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation. The Cinebench multi-core scores are the strongest evidence of this, as those tests are specifically designed to stress all cores simultaneously. The single-core scores, while lower in absolute terms, are still robust for a mobile chip, ensuring responsive everyday use and adequate performance in lightly-threaded applications. The 24 threads allow the processor to handle simultaneous tasks, such as running a virtual machine while compiling code, without significant contention.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark picture for this build is dominated by the CPU, as the data shows no benchmark scores for the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh. The GPU's average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile rank is 50. This means the GPU is positioned in the middle of the pack, which is consistent with its Turing architecture and 12 nm process node. The CPU, by contrast, is a top-tier performer, and the combined percentile for the build is 72.

Looking at the CPU-specific scores, the Cinebench R20 multi-core result is 19,899, and the single-core is 2,809. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 5,619.5, and the single-core score is 334. These results follow the expected scaling pattern across R15, R20, and R23. The PassMark tests provide additional depth: data encryption scores 47,112, extended instructions score 47,016, and random string sorting scores 74,320. The physics score is 3,338, and finding prime numbers scores 448. The data shows a processor that handles complex instructions and cryptography well, which is relevant for security-focused applications.

The combined picture is one of an imbalanced build. The CPU is at the 94th percentile, meaning it outperforms 94% of all CPUs in the database. The GPU is at the 50th percentile, meaning it is average. The combined percentile of 72 reflects this gap, indicating that the build's overall performance is dragged down by the GPU. For tasks that rely heavily on the CPU, this machine will be exceptionally fast. For tasks that rely on the GPU, it will be merely average. This is a configuration for a user who prioritizes CPU compute power above all else.

Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data available for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The fact pack contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components.

The CPU's high single-thread score of 4,713 in PassMark and 2,204 in Cinebench R23 suggests it will not bottleneck modern games, which often rely on one or a few fast cores. The GPU, however, is the limiting factor. With an FP32 performance of 9.400 TFLOPS and a boost clock of 1530 MHz, the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh is a mid-range part by today's standards. It has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. This memory capacity is generous, but the raw compute power is not sufficient for ultra settings at high resolutions in the most demanding titles.

At 1080p resolution, the estimated FPS for most AAA games would be in the playable range, likely between 60 and 80 FPS on high settings, but not consistently reaching 144 FPS on ultra. At 1440p, the GPU would start to struggle, with estimated FPS dropping to the 40-60 range for many games. At 4K, this GPU would likely deliver below 30 FPS in graphically intensive games, making it unsuitable for high-refresh gaming at that resolution. The data suggests that this is not a gaming-first build, but rather a workstation that can handle some gaming in its spare time.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets a very specific user: a professional who needs extreme CPU power in a portable laptop, but whose GPU requirements are modest. The data indicates this is ideal for content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development, where the 24-core CPU can significantly reduce render times and compilation periods. The 94th percentile CPU ranking means this machine will out-compute the vast majority of laptops on the market.

Students and small business professionals in engineering or scientific fields would also benefit. The high multi-thread scores in Cinebench and PassMark suggest it can handle simulations, data analysis, and complex modeling tasks with ease. The 16 GB GPU memory, while the GPU itself is not top-tier, is enough to load large datasets for visualization or machine learning inference. The build is less suitable for gamers, as the GPU's 50th percentile ranking places it in the average tier, which will not satisfy users seeking maximum frame rates.

The build's class is a laptop, so portability is a factor. The CPU's 55 W TDP and the GPU's 110 W TDP together sum to 165 W, which is manageable for a large mobile workstation. The user who builds this is someone who needs a desktop-replacement-level CPU but does not require a top-tier GPU. The data suggests that the target user is a developer, a data scientist, or a video editor who prioritizes CPU throughput and is willing to accept average GPU performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not a primary scenario. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking and estimated FPS figures indicate that achieving consistently high frame rates at 144 Hz or above is unlikely, especially at 1440p or 4K. The CPU is more than capable, but the GPU will hold back performance.

Streaming: The CPU is well-suited for streaming. The 24 threads can handle both the game and the encoding workload simultaneously, and the high multi-thread scores in Cinebench and PassMark suggest that software encoding will not cause stutters. The GPU's average performance means game settings may need to be lowered to maintain a stable stream.

Video editing: This is a strong scenario. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,589 and PassMark multi-thread score of 55,759 indicate that rendering timelines and exporting video will be fast. The 16 GB GPU memory can also help with GPU-accelerated effects, though the older Turing architecture limits its efficiency compared to newer parts.

3D rendering: Excellent CPU performance. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 19,899 and the floating-point math score of 191,186 suggest that CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or V-Ray will be very rapid. The GPU can assist with OptiX or CUDA-accelerated renders, but its 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 output is modest.

Software development: Ideal. The 24 cores and 24 threads handle parallel builds and compilation tasks efficiently. The PassMark integer math score of 155,218 and data compression score of 608,381 indicate quick code compilation and fast processing of large codebases. The single-thread score of 4,713 ensures that interactive development environments remain responsive.

Student and office work: Overkill but functional. The CPU is far more powerful than needed for document editing, web browsing, or spreadsheets. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics can handle these tasks without using the discrete GPU, saving power. The high memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s ensures smooth multitasking.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX has 24 cores and 24 threads.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 67,469, which is 0.3% below the Intel Xeon w5-3525, 0.5% below the AMD EPYC 4484PX, 0.6% below the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX, and 0.7% above the Intel Xeon 6515P.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile rank?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh is at the 50th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this build?

A: The combined percentile for the CPU and GPU pairing is 72.

Q: Does this build support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and type?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for gaming?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so gaming performance is estimated from benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows that the GPU is the bottleneck in this build. The CPU is at the 94th percentile, while the GPU is at the 50th percentile. This is a massive gap. In CPU-bound workloads, such as rendering or compilation, the system will perform exceptionally well, exceeding the vast majority of other laptops. In GPU-bound workloads, such as gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the system will perform at an average level.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent because there is no measured data, but the benchmark scores imply that increasing resolution from 1080p to 4K will cause a proportionally larger drop in performance because the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU's high single-thread score of 2,204 in Cinebench R23 means it will not hold back the GPU in most games, but the GPU's modest FP32 performance of 9.400 TFLOPS will cap frame rates regardless of the CPU's capability.

The power balance is also notable. The CPU has a 55 W TDP, and the GPU has a 110 W TDP. The CPU is designed to be power-efficient for its performance level, while the GPU's older 12 nm process node consumes more power for its output. This means the system is likely to be power-limited in sustained loads, with the GPU potentially throttling if the cooling solution is not adequate. The bottleneck is squarely on the GPU for any graphics-intensive task.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is mounted on the Intel BGA 2114 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, so the CPU itself cannot be upgraded. The memory support is DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, which offers a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. This is a modern memory standard, and users can potentially upgrade the RAM capacity, but the CPU's memory controller is fixed. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, allowing for fast NVMe SSDs or other high-speed peripherals.

The GPU is an end-of-life product, as indicated by its production status, and it is an IGP slot width, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be replaced. The GPU's bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16, which is an older standard. This limits the expansion options for external GPUs, as an eGPU enclosure would be limited by the PCIe 3.0 bandwidth. The suggested PSU is not provided in the data, but the combined TDP of 165 W suggests that a capable power adapter is required.

A sensible next upgrade for this build is to increase the system memory to the maximum supported capacity, if it is not already at that level. The CPU's memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is significant, and having enough RAM to feed the 24 cores is crucial for multi-threaded workloads. Another upgrade path is to add a high-speed NVMe SSD, leveraging the PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, to reduce storage bottlenecks during data-intensive tasks. There is no viable GPU upgrade path due to the soldered nature of the mobile platform.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, a 24-core mobile processor, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh, a professional Turing-architecture GPU. The build class is a laptop, and the combined percentile is 72, indicating it is above average overall, but this is heavily weighted by the CPU's strong performance. The CPU is a top-tier part at the 94th percentile, while the GPU is a mid-range part at the 50th percentile.

The overall tier of this build is a workstation-class laptop focused on CPU compute. The data shows that it is designed for tasks like 3D rendering, video editing, and software development, where the 24 cores and 24 threads provide significant advantages. The GPU, while not top-tier, offers 16 GB of memory, which is useful for professional applications that require large frame buffers. This is not a gaming laptop, nor is it a balanced productivity machine; it is a specialized tool for users who need maximum CPU throughput in a mobile form factor.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds