SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

67,469 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh: A Mobile Workstation Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's flagship Arrow Lake-HX mobile processor with NVIDIA's professional Turing-based GPU in a laptop configuration, delivering a 72nd-percentile combined performance tier that positions it as a capable workstation-class system. The CPU carries the performance weight, sitting at the 94th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU rests at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, creating an asymmetric profile that favors compute-heavy and multi-threaded workloads over graphics-intensive tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX uses the Intel BGA 2114 socket, a soldered mobile platform that precludes traditional CPU upgrades. The processor is built on the Arrow Lake architecture with a 3 nm process node from TSMC, incorporating 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. This is a fully integrated mobile solution, meaning the upgrade path is essentially the entire laptop chassis rather than individual components. The BGA socket is designed for factory installation, so users should consider the complete system's longevity when evaluating this platform.

Memory support is limited to DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and a maximum bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The platform does not support ECC memory, which may be a consideration for certain professional workloads that require error correction. For storage and expansion, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes directly from the processor, enabling high-speed NVMe SSDs and other Gen 5 peripherals. The GPU connects via PCIe 3.0 x16, which is an older interface standard but remains functional for the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile's bandwidth requirements.

The CPU's TDP is rated at 55 W, while the GPU's TDP is 80 W, giving a combined thermal envelope of roughly 135 W for the primary compute components. The suggested PSU field is null in the data, so power supply headroom cannot be quantified, but the laptop form factor implies an integrated power delivery system designed around these specifications. The GPU's power connectors are listed as "None," indicating it draws power through the MXM module interface rather than auxiliary connectors.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would involve moving to a newer generation mobile workstation with a more balanced CPU-GPU pairing, given that the current combination's GPU sits at the 50th percentile while the CPU achieves 94th percentile performance. The platform's soldered nature means no meaningful component-level upgrades are possible beyond storage and memory capacity within the supported DDR5 specification.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads while maintaining strong single-thread performance. In Cinebench R23, the Core Ultra 9 275HX scores 35,589 in multi-core and 2,204 in single-core tests. The R20 results show 19,899 multi-core and 2,809 single-core scores, while R15 delivers 5,619.5 multi-core and 334 single-core. Geekbench scores are 20,795 multi-core and 2,458 single-core. These figures place the CPU at the 94th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 67,469.

The nearest rivals provide context for this performance level. The Intel Xeon w5-3525 scores 67,673 on average, a 0.3% difference from the Core Ultra 9 275HX. The AMD EPYC 4484PX is 0.5% behind with 67,822, and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX sits 0.6% behind at 67,868. The Intel Xeon 6515P actually edges ahead by 0.7% with 67,006. These deltas are remarkably tight, indicating the Core Ultra 9 275HX competes directly with enterprise-grade server and workstation processors despite being a mobile part.

The GPU's benchmark situation is unusual: the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh has no benchmark scores in the data, and its average benchmark score is listed as zero. Its percentile rank is 50th among all GPUs, placing it at the median of the GPU performance distribution. The combined percentile for this build is 72, reflecting the CPU's strong showing pulling up the GPU's middling position. The data shows no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates must be treated as estimates derived from the component benchmarks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX is a 24-core, 24-thread processor in the Core Ultra Series 2 family, built on the Arrow Lake architecture with the Arrow Lake-HX codename. It has no hyperthreading, meaning each core handles exactly one thread, which is a design choice that emphasizes physical cores over logical threads. The base clock is 2.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking in systems with adequate cooling and power delivery.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache allocation supports the processor's multi-threaded capabilities by keeping frequently accessed data closer to the cores. The PassMark results illustrate the processor's strengths: multithread score of 55,759, integer math at 155,218, floating-point math at 191,186, and extended instructions at 47,016. Data compression scores 608,381, while data encryption reaches 47,112. Random string sorting hits 74,320, and find prime numbers is 448. Physics processing scores 3,338, and single-thread performance is 4,713.

These benchmark scores translate to real workload performance. The 24 physical cores with no hyperthreading are well-suited for heavily parallel workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific simulations, where each thread benefits from dedicated execution resources. The high boost clock of 5.40 GHz ensures strong single-thread performance for applications that rely on fewer, faster cores. The 3 nm process from TSMC helps manage power efficiency within the 55 W TDP envelope, which is notable for a processor with this many cores in a mobile form factor.

The CPU's integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units, providing a fallback display output and basic GPU acceleration when the discrete Quadro GPU is not in use. The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s over dual-channel DDR5 is adequate for most workloads, though it may limit performance in memory-bandwidth-sensitive applications compared to quad-channel workstation platforms.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile's 50th percentile GPU ranking and the lack of measured FPS data suggest this system is not optimized for high-refresh gaming. The CPU's 94th percentile performance would not be the limiting factor, but the GPU's mid-range position would constrain frame rates at high settings and resolutions.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and strong PassMark multithread score of 55,759 provide ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and streaming workloads. The Turing architecture's tensor cores, 240 in total, could assist with AI-enhanced streaming features, though the GPU's overall performance tier limits the quality settings achievable in games while streaming.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,589 and Geekbench multi-core of 20,795 indicate strong performance for video editing software that leverages multi-threaded encoding and rendering. The 6 GB GDDR6 VRAM and 336.0 GB/s memory bandwidth on the GPU support timeline scrubbing and effect previews, but large 4K projects may exceed this capacity.

3D rendering: The CPU's 24 physical cores excel at CPU-based rendering workloads, with PassMark floating-point math at 191,186 and integer math at 155,218 supporting complex scene calculations. The GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 30 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the 12 nm Turing architecture is older than current-generation alternatives.

Software development: The 24 threads and 36 MB L3 cache benefit compilation workloads, which are often parallelizable across translation units. PassMark data encryption at 47,112 supports secure development workflows, and the single-thread score of 4,713 ensures responsive IDE interactions.

Student and office work: This configuration is significantly overprovisioned for typical student and office tasks. The 94th percentile CPU performance is far beyond what document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing require, making this a workstation-class investment rather than a value-oriented choice.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile pairing is a mobile professional who needs extreme CPU compute power but can accept mid-range GPU performance. Content creators working with multi-threaded rendering applications will benefit most from the 24-core processor, with Cinebench R23 multi-core scores of 35,589 supporting complex 3D scenes and video exports. Developers compiling large codebases will find the multi-threaded PassMark score of 55,759 valuable for reducing build times.

Researchers and engineers running simulation software that scales across cores will appreciate the 94th percentile CPU ranking, which places this mobile processor in the same performance class as enterprise Xeon and EPYC workstation parts. The 24 threads handle parallel workloads efficiently, and the 36 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency in data-intensive applications.

For gaming, this system targets users who play at 1080p or medium settings on more demanding titles, given the GPU's 50th percentile ranking. Professional users who require ISV-certified graphics drivers for CAD, 3D modeling, or scientific visualization will find the Quadro branding appropriate, even if the underlying Turing architecture is several generations old.

Small business workstations that need a portable system for occasional rendering, data analysis, and general productivity could use this configuration, though the GPU's limitations may require a separate desktop for graphics-intensive tasks. Students in engineering or computer science programs who run simulations and compile code will benefit from the CPU performance, provided their software does not heavily depend on GPU acceleration.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor's core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX has 24 cores and 24 threads, with no hyperthreading. Each core operates at a base clock of 2.70 GHz and can boost up to 5.40 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to similar workstation processors?

A: The CPU sits at the 94th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 67,469. It trails the Intel Xeon w5-3525 by 0.3%, the AMD EPYC 4484PX by 0.5%, and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX by 0.6%, while leading the Intel Xeon 6515P by 0.7%.

Q: What memory and storage does this platform support?

A: The platform supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. It does not support ECC memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes for storage and expansion.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. It has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 336.0 GB/s bandwidth, and its FP32 performance is 5.299 TFLOPS.

Q: Does this system have measured gaming frame rates available?

A: No. The data contains no measured FPS results for this specific CPU-GPU combination. All gaming performance discussions must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components.

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 72, reflecting the CPU's strong 94th percentile performance partially offset by the GPU's 50th percentile ranking.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking. However, the BGA 2114 socket is soldered in a mobile form factor, so cooling and power delivery constraints will limit practical overclocking headroom.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The data contains an empty measuredFpsUltraByGame object, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all frame rate expectations must be framed as estimates derived from the component benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggests mid-range gaming capability. With 6 GB of GDDR6 VRAM and 336.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile can handle most games at 1080p resolution with medium to high settings. The 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest by current standards, and the 12 nm Turing architecture lacks the efficiency of newer designs. At 1440p, users should expect to lower settings to maintain playable frame rates, and 4K gaming would require significant compromises.

The CPU's exceptional performance means it will not bottleneck the GPU in gaming scenarios. The 24 cores and 5.40 GHz boost clock provide more than enough processing power for game logic, physics, and AI calculations. Single-thread performance of 4,713 in PassMark ensures good frame pacing in titles that are not heavily multi-threaded. However, games that are GPU-bound will see performance limited by the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile's 50th percentile position.

For esports titles and older games, this system should deliver smooth high-refresh experiences at 1080p, as these games are often CPU-bound and the Core Ultra 9 275HX is exceptionally strong in CPU-bound scenarios. For modern AAA titles with demanding graphics, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and users should target 1080p with adjusted settings for the best balance of visual quality and frame rate.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, a 24-core Arrow Lake-HX mobile processor, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh, a Turing-architecture professional GPU with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory. The system is classified as a laptop by buildClass, and its combined percentile of 72 indicates a configuration that is above average overall but with a significant imbalance between CPU and GPU performance.

The CPU represents the top tier of mobile processing power, achieving a 94th percentile rank among all CPUs and competing with enterprise workstation processors like the Intel Xeon w5-3525 and AMD EPYC 4484PX within a 0.7% performance margin. The GPU, by contrast, sits at the median with a 50th percentile rank, making this a compute-first system where CPU-intensive workloads take priority.

The 3 nm process node for the CPU and 12 nm for the GPU highlight the generational gap between the two components. The CPU is a current-generation product released in January 2025, while the GPU dates from May 2019 and is marked as end-of-life in production status. This pairing is typical of workstation laptops where the CPU is the primary compute engine and the GPU serves professional graphics and CUDA-accelerated tasks rather than gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry in this build is pronounced: the CPU operates at the 94th percentile while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. This 44-point gap means the CPU will frequently outpace the GPU in workloads that involve both components. In gaming, the GPU is the clear bottleneck, as frame rates will be constrained by the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile's mid-range capabilities regardless of the CPU's headroom. The lack of measured FPS data prevents precise bottleneck quantification, but the percentile gap provides a clear directional signal.

For CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression, and physics simulations, the CPU delivers near-workstation-class performance with PassMark multithread scores of 55,759 and data compression at 608,381. The GPU is largely irrelevant in these scenarios, and the system performs as a high-end mobile compute platform. The 24 cores and 36 MB L3 cache ensure that multi-threaded applications scale effectively.

In GPU-bound workloads such as 3D rendering with GPU acceleration, video encoding with NVENC, or any CUDA-based computation, the GPU's 80 W TDP and 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance become the limiting factor. The 6 GB VRAM capacity may also constrain large datasets or high-resolution textures. The CPU will be underutilized in these scenarios, waiting on GPU results.

The combined 72nd percentile ranking reflects this imbalance: the system is better than average overall, but it is not a balanced performer. Users who need both extreme CPU compute and high-end GPU performance should look elsewhere, while those whose workloads are predominantly CPU-intensive will find this configuration well-suited. The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, supports this analysis: higher resolutions and graphics settings will increasingly favor the CPU's headroom being wasted as the GPU becomes the sole performance limiter.