SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

83 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 366H

41,263 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H is a 16-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on Intel's Panther Lake architecture and fabricated on a 3 nm process node at Intel's own foundry. It belongs to the Core Ultra Series 3 family, targeting the mobile market segment with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The processor carries a 25 W TDP, which is notably modest for a 16-core part and suggests it is designed for power-conscious laptops rather than desktop-class performance.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory through a dual-channel interface, delivering 115.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 12 lanes, which is generous for a mobile platform and enables fast NVMe storage and discrete GPU connectivity. Integrated Intel Xe3 Graphics are included, providing a fallback display output when the discrete GPU is not in use.

Benchmark data places this processor in the 87th percentile among all CPUs, which is a strong showing for a mobile part. The Cinebench scores illustrate the multi-threaded capability well: Cinebench R23 multi-core yields 28,477 points, while single-core reaches 4,020 points. The R20 results show 11,960 multi-core and 1,688 single-core, and the older R15 test produces 2,870 multi-core and 405 single-core. These numbers indicate a processor that excels in heavily threaded workloads while maintaining competitive single-thread performance for everyday tasks.

The PassMark suite reinforces this picture. Multi-thread performance scores 33,429, while single-thread performance sits at 4,043 points. Integer math reaches 83,695, floating-point math hits 103,615, and extended instructions score 26,901. Data compression is particularly strong at 327,455, while data encryption scores 25,845. Random string sorting achieves 39,814, and find prime numbers scores 326. Physics calculations come in at 2,880. These varied workloads suggest a processor that handles compression, encryption, and mathematical computation with ease, making it suitable for content creation and scientific computing tasks.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the Ultra 7 366H is essentially tied with the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, which averages 41,215 points against this chip's 41,263 — a delta of just 0.1%. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 also sits at 41,208, another 0.1% difference. Against the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, a desktop part, this mobile chip trails by 0.3% with the 5900X scoring 41,376. Interestingly, it leads the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H by 0.7%, as that chip averages 40,967. The overall average benchmark score is 41,263, placing this mobile processor in the same performance class as a previous-generation desktop Ryzen 9, which is remarkable for a 25 W part. In real workloads, this translates to snappy compilation times, fluid video editing, and rapid data processing in multi-threaded applications.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is a Turing-architecture GPU built on TSMC's 12 nm process, packing 10,800 million transistors across a 445 mm² die. It belongs to the GeForce 30-series family branding but uses the TU106 chip, which is a Turing-generation part. The GPU operates at a base clock of 945 MHz and boosts to 1380 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). This is an end-of-life product, released in May 2019, and it comes in an MXM Module slot width with no power connectors required, drawing an 80 W TDP.

Memory configuration consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is adequate for professional workloads at 1080p and moderate 1440p resolutions, though the 6 GB capacity may limit texture-heavy scenes or large dataset rendering. The GPU contains 1,920 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation processors. It includes 30 RT cores for ray tracing acceleration and 240 tensor cores for AI-accelerated tasks, making it capable of hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS-style inference.

Compute performance is rated at 5.299 TFLOPS for FP32 and 10.60 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. Pixel fill rate reaches 88.32 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate is 165.6 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs. It connects via PCIe 3.0 x16, which is an older bus standard but sufficient for the GPU's memory bandwidth requirements.

The GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, placing it squarely in the mid-range tier. However, the benchmarks array is empty, and there are no nearest rivals listed, which limits direct comparative analysis. The average benchmark score is listed as 0, reflecting the absence of measured data. Despite this, the specifications indicate a capable professional mobile GPU that can handle CAD, 3D modeling, and video rendering tasks. The RT cores and tensor cores provide future-proofing for ray-traced workflows and AI-assisted rendering, though the 6 GB VRAM will be the primary constraint in demanding scenes. Display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, meaning the laptop chassis determines the available ports.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 41,263 places it in the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU's 50th percentile position reflects its mid-range standing. The combined percentile for this laptop configuration is 69, indicating a system that outperforms the majority of laptops but is not at the extreme high end. The data shows a clear imbalance: the CPU is a top-tier mobile processor, while the GPU is a mid-range professional part.

In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 28,477 is approximately 7% higher than the single-core score of 4,020 multiplied by 7, which is a rough estimate of the scaling efficiency. More directly, the multi-core score is about 7.1 times the single-core score, indicating good but not perfect scaling across the 16 cores. The PassMark multi-thread score of 33,429 versus single-thread of 4,043 shows a similar ratio of about 8.3, suggesting that some workloads scale better than others. Data compression at 327,455 is exceptionally high, while find prime numbers at 326 is relatively low, reflecting the CPU's strength in memory-bandwidth-intensive tasks and relative weakness in latency-sensitive integer operations.

Against rivals, the CPU is within 0.7% of all four nearest competitors, showing that this chip is in a tightly contested performance band. The 0.1% lead over the Core Ultra 7 356H and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is statistically negligible, while the 0.3% deficit to the Ryzen 9 5900X is also minimal. The 0.7% lead over the Core Ultra X7 358H is the largest margin in this group. This means that in real-world use, the choice between these processors would come down to other factors like power efficiency, platform features, or price, rather than raw performance.

The combined picture is a laptop that excels in CPU-bound tasks such as code compilation, video encoding, and multi-threaded rendering, while the GPU handles professional graphics workloads at a mid-range level. The 69th combined percentile suggests that this is a balanced system for professional use, where CPU performance is paramount and GPU capability is sufficient for standard workloads but not for extreme gaming or high-end rendering. For gaming, the CPU will rarely be the bottleneck, but the GPU will limit frame rates at higher resolutions and detail settings.

# Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need substantial CPU power in a mobile form factor without requiring top-tier GPU performance. Content creators working with video editing, 3D modeling, or software development will benefit most from the 16-core CPU, which accelerates rendering times and compilation speeds. The 87th CPU percentile means it outperforms 87% of all CPUs, making it a strong choice for professionals who spend hours in multi-threaded applications.

Developers compiling large codebases will see significant throughput gains from the multi-threaded performance, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 28,477 indicating rapid build times. Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the CPU capable of running virtual machines, simulations, and data analysis tools without slowdown. The 25 W TDP means the laptop can sustain performance without excessive heat or fan noise, which is beneficial in classroom or library settings.

Small business workstations that handle spreadsheets, databases, and moderate rendering tasks will find this configuration adequate, with the Quadro GPU providing certified drivers for professional applications. The GPU's RT and tensor cores support ray-traced visualization and AI-assisted tools, though the 6 GB VRAM limits the complexity of scenes that can be rendered. Gamers at 1080p will find the GPU capable of running modern titles at medium to high settings, but those seeking 1440p or 4K gaming should look elsewhere. The 50th GPU percentile indicates that half of all GPUs perform better, so this is not a gaming-first machine.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H has 16 cores and 16 threads, with no hyper-threading, meaning each core handles one thread at a time.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, which is used for both system memory and integrated graphics.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and type?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 30 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes ray tracing features.

Q: What PCIe version does the CPU support?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 12 lanes, while the GPU connects via PCIe 3.0 x16, so the GPU is limited by the older bus standard.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this laptop?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 69, indicating it outperforms 69% of all laptop configurations.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the GPU has an end-of-life production status, meaning it is no longer manufactured, though it remains available in existing laptop inventories.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries. All frame rate discussions below are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggests it performs at the median of all GPUs, which typically translates to playable frame rates at 1080p for most modern titles. With 5.299 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 6 GB of VRAM, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh should handle esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant at high frame rates, likely exceeding 100 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings. For AAA games, the GPU would deliver 60 FPS at 1080p on medium to high settings, but may struggle with ultra settings or ray tracing enabled, given the 30 RT cores are Turing-generation and less efficient than newer architectures.

At 1440p, the GPU would likely produce 40-60 FPS in demanding titles, requiring reduced settings for smooth gameplay. The 336.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p textures but may cause stuttering in games with large, high-resolution texture packs. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (4,020 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures that frame pacing remains consistent, as the CPU will rarely bottleneck the GPU at these performance levels. For players who prioritize high refresh rates at 1080p, this configuration is viable, but those seeking 1440p or 4K gaming should consider a stronger GPU. Ray tracing is technically supported but will significantly impact frame rates, making it suitable only for less demanding titles or at lower resolutions.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a significant performance imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU sits in the 87th percentile, while the GPU is in the 50th, creating a configuration where the CPU substantially outperforms the GPU in relative terms. In CPU-bound workloads like code compilation, video encoding, or data processing, the CPU will be the primary driver, and the GPU will have minimal impact. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,477 indicates that multi-threaded tasks will complete quickly, while the GPU's mid-range position means it will not accelerate these tasks beyond its compute capabilities.

In GPU-bound workloads like gaming or 3D rendering, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU's performance is more than sufficient to feed the GPU, as evidenced by the high single-thread score of 4,020 and PassMark single-thread of 4,043. This means that in games, the frame rate will be determined by the GPU, and the CPU will rarely cause stutters or frame drops due to processing limitations. The 0.1% delta between this CPU and its nearest rivals indicates that swapping for a similar CPU would not change the bottleneck dynamic.

The combined percentile of 69 reflects this imbalance, as the system is dragged down by the GPU's mid-range standing. For users who primarily run CPU-intensive applications, this configuration is well-balanced, as the GPU provides adequate acceleration for display and moderate graphics tasks. However, for gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the system will underperform relative to its CPU capabilities. Upgrading the GPU would yield the largest performance gains for graphics workloads, while the CPU would remain the bottleneck in multi-threaded tasks only if the GPU were significantly faster.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H processor with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh GPU. The CPU is a 16-core Panther Lake part with a 25 W TDP, designed for power-efficient mobile performance. The GPU is a Turing-architecture professional part with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory and an 80 W TDP, using an MXM Module form factor. The combination targets professional mobile workstations, where CPU throughput is prioritized over gaming performance.

The 69th combined percentile places this system above the majority of laptops, though not at the top tier. The CPU's 87th percentile is the standout feature, making this one of the stronger mobile processors available. The GPU's 50th percentile is average, which is acceptable for professional workloads but limits gaming and high-end rendering. The system uses PCIe Gen 5 for the CPU and PCIe 3.0 for the GPU, creating a mixed platform that is forward-looking for storage but uses an older GPU bus.

The 3 nm CPU process node from Intel contrasts with the 12 nm GPU process from TSMC, highlighting the generational gap between the two components. The CPU was released in January 2026 and is still in active production, while the GPU was released in May 2019 and is end-of-life. This pairing represents a modern CPU with a legacy GPU, which is typical for professional laptops that prioritize CPU performance for long-term usability while the GPU is sufficient for current workloads.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2540 socket, which is a ball-grid-array design soldered to the motherboard, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable in most laptop chassis. The GPU uses an MXM Module slot, which is theoretically replaceable, but this depends on the laptop manufacturer's design and BIOS support. Since the GPU is end-of-life, finding a replacement module would require sourcing used or refurbished parts.

Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration, with 115.2 GB/s of bandwidth. Upgrading memory is possible if the laptop has accessible SODIMM slots, but many ultra-thin designs use soldered LPDDR5X. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 12 lanes, which supports fast NVMe SSDs, and upgrading storage is typically the easiest enhancement. The GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16, which limits the potential of a future GPU upgrade, as newer GPUs would be bottlenecked by the older bus standard.

The CPU has a 25 W TDP, and the GPU has an 80 W TDP, totaling 105 W for the core components. The suggested PSU is not listed, but this power budget is manageable for a laptop power brick. A sensible next upgrade would be increasing RAM to the maximum supported capacity, as this improves multitasking and memory-intensive workloads. Storage upgrades to a PCIe Gen 5 NVMe SSD would maximize the CPU's available lanes. A GPU upgrade, if possible, would require an MXM module with similar power and thermal characteristics, but the PCIe 3.0 interface would limit the benefits of newer, faster GPUs.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 50th percentile and 5.299 TFLOPS of FP32 compute support 1080p gaming at medium to high settings, with estimated frame rates around 60-100 FPS in esports titles. The CPU's 4,020 single-core Cinebench R23 score ensures smooth frame pacing, but the GPU will limit performance at higher resolutions or with ray tracing enabled.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores handle encoding and streaming simultaneously without significant impact on gaming performance, as the multi-threaded score of 28,477 in Cinebench R23 indicates ample headroom. The GPU's NVENC encoder, though not listed in the specs, is a standard feature in Turing GPUs, but the lack of data means streaming quality must be inferred from the CPU's capabilities.

Video editing: The CPU excels in this workload, with data compression at 327,455 and multi-thread performance that will accelerate timeline rendering and export. The GPU's 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p editing, and the 336.0 GB/s bandwidth supports multiple video streams, though 4K projects may require reduced preview quality.

3D rendering: The CPU's 16 cores will handle CPU-based rendering engines efficiently, while the GPU's 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores accelerate ray-traced and AI-assisted workflows. The 5.299 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is mid-range, so complex scenes will render slower than higher-tier GPUs, but the 6 GB VRAM is adequate for moderate scenes.

Software development: The CPU's strong integer and floating-point math scores (83,695 and 103,615 respectively) indicate rapid code compilation and test execution. The 16 threads allow parallel builds, and the 25 W TDP ensures sustained performance without thermal throttling during long compile sessions.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance of 4,043 in PassMark ensures responsive application usage, while the integrated Intel Xe3 Graphics provides a fallback for office tasks. The 87th CPU percentile means this laptop will handle spreadsheets, document editing, and web browsing with ease, and the GPU adds capability for CAD or data visualization courses.