SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 366H

41,263 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile

38,349 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile pairing is a laptop configuration where the CPU and GPU occupy distinctly different performance tiers. The CPU sits at the 87th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 81st percentile among all graphics cards. That seven-point gap suggests the processor is slightly stronger relative to its own competitive field than the graphics chip is relative to its own, but both are high-end parts within striking distance of each other.

Benchmark data reveals how these components handle different workloads. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 33,429 and single-thread score of 4,043 indicate a processor that excels at both heavily parallelized tasks and lightly threaded applications. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 27,711 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,952 show a graphics solution that is competitive but not class-leading. When the GPU is the bottleneck in gaming scenarios, the CPU has ample headroom to feed frames without becoming the limiting factor.

For CPU-bound workloads like data compression (PassMark score of 327,455) or integer math (83,695), the processor handles the heavy lifting, and the GPU's role is minimal. Conversely, in graphics-intensive tasks like DirectX 12 rendering (PassMark score of 116), the GPU dominates, and the CPU's contribution shrinks. The balance tilts in favor of the CPU in productivity and compute tasks, while the GPU takes over in visual workloads.

The 25W TDP of the CPU versus the 80W TDP of the GPU reinforces this split. The processor is designed for efficiency and sustained multi-core output within a modest power envelope, while the graphics chip draws significantly more power to drive high-resolution visuals. In a laptop chassis, this means the GPU is likely the component that dictates thermal behavior during gaming, while the CPU can sustain its boost clock of 4.80 GHz with less thermal strain.

FPS scaling in games will be dictated primarily by the GPU at higher resolutions, but at lower resolutions and with lighter graphical loads, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,020) will matter more. The data suggests no single component creates a severe bottleneck; instead, the bottleneck shifts depending on whether the workload is compute-heavy or graphics-heavy.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H delivers a robust benchmark portfolio. In Cinebench R23, it scores 28,477 in multi-core and 4,020 in single-core tests. The R20 results show 11,960 multi-core and 1,688 single-core, while R15 yields 2,870 multi-core and 405 single-core. These scores place the CPU at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 41,263.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the Core Ultra 7 366H is virtually tied with the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (0.1% higher average score) and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 (0.1% higher). It trails the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X by 0.3% but leads the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H by 0.7%. This places the processor in a narrow competitive band where performance differences are within noise margins.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,952, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 166,986, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 169,754. Its PassMark G3D score is 27,711, with a GPU compute score of 12,134. The GPU sits at the 81st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 38,349.

Rival comparisons for the GPU show it is 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce MX570, 0.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, 0.9% behind the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A, and 0.9% behind the AMD Radeon Pro 580X. These deltas are remarkably small, meaning the RTX 5080 Mobile occupies a tight performance cluster with its immediate competitors.

The combined picture is a laptop system at the 84th percentile overall. The CPU is the stronger component relative to its field, while the GPU, despite being a 50-series part, does not dominate its rivals as decisively as the naming might suggest. The average benchmark scores — 41,263 for the CPU and 38,349 for the GPU — indicate a balanced system where neither component dramatically outclasses the other.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than empirical results.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,952 and its PassMark G3D score of 27,711, the RTX 5080 Mobile is positioned to handle modern titles at high settings. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth provides ample memory capacity and throughput for 1440p and 4K gaming. The 7,680 shading units and 240 texture mapping units suggest strong raw rasterization capability.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,020 ensures that frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios will be smooth. In esports titles that rely heavily on single-thread performance, the processor should keep frame rates high. For AAA games, the GPU will likely be the limiting factor, but with 23.04 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, it should deliver playable frame rates at high presets in most titles.

At 1080p, the CPU's strength becomes more relevant, and the system should deliver high refresh rates in competitive shooters. At 1440p, the GPU's 16 GB memory buffer and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth will support high texture quality without stuttering. At 4K, expect the GPU to be fully utilized, with the CPU providing adequate headroom.

Given the GPU's percentile position at 81, it is not a top-tier part by benchmark averages, but it is close enough to flagship performance that gaming at high settings across resolutions from 1080p to 1440p should be a comfortable experience. For 4K, users may need to adjust settings from ultra to high to maintain smooth frame rates.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need a balance of CPU and GPU horsepower in a mobile form factor. The build class is explicitly "laptop," so this is not a desktop replacement in the traditional sense but rather a portable workstation or gaming machine.

Gamers playing at 1080p and 1440p with high refresh rate displays will find the CPU's single-thread performance and the GPU's 16 GB memory buffer well-suited to their needs. The CPU's 87th percentile ranking ensures that even the most demanding simulation or strategy games, which often tax the processor heavily, will run smoothly.

Content creators working with video editing software that leverages multi-threaded rendering will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,477. The GPU's 12,134 PassMark GPU compute score also accelerates effects and encoding tasks. Photographers using tools that rely on single-thread performance will appreciate the 4,020 single-core score.

Software developers compiling large codebases will see strong performance from the 16-core, 16-thread processor. The PassMark integer math score of 83,695 indicates robust integer throughput, which is critical for compilation and code analysis. Data scientists working with compression or encryption workloads will find the PassMark data compression score of 327,455 and data encryption score of 25,845 useful.

Students in engineering or computer science programs who need a portable machine for both coursework and light gaming will find this configuration capable. Small business workstations that require multi-threaded productivity applications, such as spreadsheet analysis or database management, will benefit from the CPU's multithread score of 33,429 without needing a desktop-class GPU.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H is a 16-core, 16-thread processor based on the Panther Lake architecture, built on Intel's 3 nm process node. It belongs to the Core Ultra Series 3 and is designed for mobile platforms, as indicated by its market segment and Intel BGA 2540 socket. The base clock runs at 2.00 GHz, boosting up to 4.80 GHz under load.

The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache configuration supports the processor's strong performance in both latency-sensitive single-threaded tasks and throughput-oriented multi-threaded workloads. The 25W TDP is modest for a 16-core part, emphasizing efficiency over raw power draw.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels across diverse workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,477 places it in the upper tier of mobile processors, while the single-core score of 4,020 demonstrates excellent per-thread performance. PassMark results reinforce this: floating point math at 103,615, integer math at 83,695, and extended instructions at 26,901 all indicate strong compute capability.

The processor's nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, which it edges by 0.1% in average benchmark score. It also trades blows with the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, a desktop-class processor, coming within 0.3% of the latter. The 0.7% lead over the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H shows consistent performance within Intel's own lineup.

Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration, providing 115.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The integrated Intel Xe3 Graphics offers a fallback for basic display tasks, though the discrete RTX 5080 Mobile will handle graphics-heavy workloads. The processor supports PCIe Gen 5 with 12 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast NVMe storage and GPU connectivity.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H has 16 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Core Ultra 7 366H scores an average benchmark of 41,263, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440, 0.3% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, and 0.7% higher than the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking?

A: The RTX 5080 Mobile sits at the 81st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 38,349.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and platform?

A: The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2540 socket, which is a mobile platform, and supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU's TDP and power connector requirement?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 80 W and requires no power connectors, as it is designed for an IGP slot width configuration.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,020 ensures fast frame generation in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU's 16 GB GDDR7 memory with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth provides the frame buffer headroom needed for high refresh rates at 1080p and 1440p. Estimated FPS in esports titles should be high enough to take advantage of 144 Hz or faster displays.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and multithread score of 33,429 can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously without significant frame drops. The GPU's 60 ray tracing cores and 240 tensor cores may also assist with hardware-accelerated encoding, though no specific encoding benchmarks are available in the data.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,477 indicates strong rendering performance for timeline previews and exports. The GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 12,134 accelerates effects and color grading that rely on parallel processing.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will benefit from the 16-core processor's PassMark floating point math score of 103,615. GPU-based renderers can leverage the RTX 5080 Mobile's 23.04 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 60 RT cores for ray-traced workloads.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 83,695 supports fast compilation and code analysis. The 16 threads handle parallel build systems efficiently, and the L3 cache of 18 MB shared reduces memory latency during iterative builds.

Student and office work: The 25W CPU TDP allows for long battery life in a laptop form factor, while the integrated Intel Xe3 Graphics handles basic display tasks. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,043 in PassMark ensures responsive application launches and document editing.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile in a laptop configuration. The CPU is a 16-core Panther Lake processor from Intel's Core Ultra Series 3, built on a 3 nm process, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture chip from NVIDIA's GeForce 50-series, built on a 5 nm process with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die.

The combined system sits at the 84th percentile overall, indicating a high-performance laptop that is not at the absolute top tier but is comfortably above the majority of systems. The CPU's 87th percentile and the GPU's 81st percentile create a configuration where the processor is relatively stronger than the graphics chip, but both are competitive within their respective fields.

This is a mobile workstation or gaming laptop aimed at users who need significant compute power in a portable chassis. The CPU's 16 cores and 16 threads handle productivity workloads, while the GPU's 7,680 shading units and 16 GB memory handle graphics-intensive tasks. The pairing is balanced enough that neither component is an obvious weak link for most use cases.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H uses the Intel BGA 2540 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense; users cannot swap in a different processor. The memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, so users should ensure they purchase a configuration with sufficient RAM at the time of sale.

PCIe support includes Gen 5 with 12 lanes from the CPU, which accommodates high-speed NVMe storage and the GPU's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The GPU itself is also soldered or integrated into the motherboard, given its IGP slot width and lack of power connectors, so it is not upgradeable either. The 80W GPU TDP and 25W CPU TDP together suggest a modest total power draw, but no suggested PSU is listed because this is a laptop with a proprietary power delivery system.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be maximizing the memory configuration to the full dual-channel bandwidth and installing the fastest PCIe Gen 5 NVMe storage that the 12 CPU lanes support. Users should also consider external GPU options if the built-in RTX 5080 Mobile becomes insufficient for future titles, though the integrated graphics (Intel Xe3) and the discrete GPU both rely on the laptop's internal display outputs, which are listed as "Portable Device Dependent." The platform's active production status and 2025-2026 release dates indicate a current-generation system with no immediate need for replacement.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 366H

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds