SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 366H

41,263 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile

22,435 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile pairing forms a laptop-class configuration that sits in the 77th percentile overall when compared against all measured systems. The CPU alone lands in the 87th percentile of all processors, while the GPU reaches the 67th percentile of all graphics cards. This is a balanced mobile platform with a clear lean toward compute-heavy CPU work, and the data shows that the processor is the stronger of the two components. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming frame-rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5060 Mobile is built on NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.0 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. The base clock is 952 MHz, boosting to 1455 MHz, with memory running at 1500 MHz or 24 Gbps effective. The shading array comprises 3328 shading units, 104 texture mapping units, and 48 ROPs. Ray tracing is handled by 26 dedicated RT cores, while 104 tensor cores accelerate AI and neural workloads. The GPU’s FP32 throughput is 9.684 TFLOPS, with FP16 running at the same 9.684 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). Pixel fill rate is 69.84 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 151.3 GTexel/s. The card draws up to 45 W, uses no external power connectors, and connects via PCIe 5.0 x16.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 3013.5. Geekbench results show 96969 in OpenCL and 96451 in Vulkan. Passmark G3D score is 18852, with G2D at 876. Compute workloads in Passmark produce 7607, while legacy DirectX tests show 203 in DX9, 168 in DX11, 119 in DX10, and 87 in DX12. The average benchmark score across all GPU tests is 22435. Against its nearest rivals, the RTX 5060 Mobile trails the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT by 0.5% (22449 vs 22549), sits 1.2% above the RX 5700, 1.3% above the RX 6700S, and is 1.3% behind the RTX 4060 Mobile. The GPU percentile of 67 means it outperforms two-thirds of all GPUs in the database.

For rendering, the 8 GB VRAM is a meaningful constraint at higher resolutions and with large textures, but the 384.0 GB/s bandwidth and 104 tensor cores provide solid foundation for real-time ray tracing and AI-accelerated effects. The 26 RT cores are sufficient for entry-level ray tracing, though the relatively low FP32 throughput of 9.684 TFLOPS will limit raw compute-heavy renders. The Steel Nomad score of 3013.5 places it in the same class as mid-range desktop GPUs, which suggests it can handle 1080p and 1440p rendering with moderate settings, but not extreme 4K workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p is the most plausible scenario for this pairing, given the CPU’s 87th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 67th percentile. The RTX 5060 Mobile’s 8 GB VRAM and 384 GB/s bandwidth should support 100+ FPS in less demanding titles at medium-to-high settings, but the lack of measured FPS means these are estimates. The CPU’s 16 cores and 4.8 GHz boost prevent frame drops in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU will likely be the limiting factor in most modern games.

Streaming benefits from the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance, with Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28477 and Passmark multithread score of 33429. These numbers indicate that simultaneous game capture, encoding, and gameplay will not starve the processor. The tensor cores on the GPU can also accelerate AI-based encoding features, though the exact impact is not quantified in the benchmark data.

Video editing workloads will leverage both components. The CPU’s 16 cores and 18 MB L3 cache handle timeline scrubbing and export compression, while the GPU’s 9.684 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 GB GDDR7 accelerate effects and GPU-accelerated rendering. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 11960 and the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3013.5 suggest a balanced platform for 4K timeline editing with light color grading, though the 8 GB VRAM will require proxies for very long timelines.

3D rendering tasks such as Blender or Maya benefit from the CPU’s 16 cores and high IPC. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2870 and R23 of 28477 place it well above most laptop processors, making it a capable workstation for CPU-based renders. The GPU can accelerate GPU-rendered scenes via its tensor cores, but the 9.684 TFLOPS FP32 is modest compared to desktop workstation GPUs. For software development, the high integer math score of 83695 and data compression score of 327455 indicate fast compilation times and snappy code analysis. The 16 threads allow parallel builds, while the single-thread score of 4043 in PassMark ensures responsive IDE interaction.

Student and office work is trivial for this hardware. The CPU’s single-thread performance of 4043 in PassMark and 4020 in Cinebench R23 means quick document loading, spreadsheet calculations, and browser responsiveness. The integrated Xe3 graphics provide a fallback when the discrete GPU is idle, though the 45 W discrete GPU TDP is low enough for sustained light workloads.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core Ultra 7 366H compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The average benchmark score of 41263 is 0.1% above the Core Ultra 7 356H (41215) and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 (41208), 0.7% above the Core Ultra X7 358H (40967), and 0.3% below the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (41376).

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5060 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory support is not present.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 77, meaning it outperforms 77% of all recorded systems.

Q: What is the GPU’s score in 3DMark Steel Nomad?

A: The RTX 5060 Mobile scores 3013.5 in 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12.

Q: How many RT cores and tensor cores does the GPU have?

A: The GPU has 26 RT cores and 104 tensor cores.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and TDP?

A: The boost clock is 4.80 GHz with a TDP of 25 W.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting high-refresh 1080p or solid 1440p experiences will find this pairing well-suited. The CPU’s 87th percentile ensures high frame pacing, while the GPU’s 67th percentile delivers playable frame rates in most modern titles at high settings. Those who play competitive shooters at 1080p will see the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 384 GB/s bandwidth as enough for the high frame rates that the CPU can feed.

Content creators working with 1080p or 1440p video editing will benefit from the CPU’s multi-core muscle. The R23 multi-core score of 28477 and PassMark multithread of 33429 make timeline exports fast, while the GPU’s tensor cores assist with AI-driven effects. However, the 8 GB VRAM limits 4K editing workflows, so users should stick to 1080p/1440p or use proxy editing.

Software developers who compile large codebases will appreciate the 16 cores and 18 MB L3 cache. The integer math score of 83695 and data compression score of 327455 translate to quicker builds and test suites. The single-thread score of 4043 ensures responsive IDEs and debugging sessions. Students and office workers will find this system overpowered for document editing, but the 25 W TDP and laptop class make it a portable choice. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or parallel processing will benefit from the CPU’s 16 threads, though the GPU’s modest compute may not be necessary for such workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 7 366H posts an average benchmark score of 41263, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Core Ultra 7 356H, scores 41215 (0.1% lower), while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 scores 41208 (0.1% lower), the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 41376 (0.3% higher), and the Core Ultra X7 358H scores 40967 (0.7% lower). The CPU’s single-thread performance is strong: 405 in Cinebench R15 single-core, 1688 in R20, 4020 in R23, and 4043 in PassMark single-thread. Multi-thread scores include 2870 in R15, 11960 in R20, 28477 in R23, and 33429 in PassMark multithread. Specialized tests show data compression at 327455, data encryption at 25845, extended instructions at 26901, floating point math at 103615, integer math at 83695, physics at 2880, and prime numbers at 326.

The RTX 5060 Mobile averages 22435 across GPU benchmarks, ranking in the 67th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the RX 7700 XT at 22549 (0.5% faster), the RX 5700 at 22170 (1.2% slower), the RX 6700S at 22154 (1.3% slower), and the RTX 4060 Mobile at 22729 (1.3% faster). The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score is 3013.5, and PassMark G3D is 18852. The combined percentile of 77 indicates a system that is stronger in CPU tasks than GPU tasks, with the processor outperforming most rivals while the GPU sits just above average.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H + RTX 5060 Mobile combination. Therefore, all gaming frame rates here are estimates derived from benchmark scores, not from direct testing. Based on the GPU’s 67th percentile and its similarity to the RTX 4060 Mobile (delta -1.3%), the RTX 5060 Mobile is expected to deliver 60+ FPS in most AAA titles at 1080p with high settings, and 1440p with moderate settings. Esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant should see 144+ FPS at 1080p low, but these are projections. The CPU’s high single-thread and multi-thread scores ensure that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in typical gaming scenarios, so the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 9.684 TFLOPS will be the primary determinants of frame rates. For 4K gaming, the GPU’s 67th percentile and 8 GB memory suggest that only older titles or low settings will be playable. No measured FPS data exists, so these expectations must be treated as rough estimates.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates a clear imbalance in this pairing: the CPU is a top-tier processor (87th percentile) while the GPU is a mid-tier graphics card (67th percentile). In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression (327455), and physics simulation (2880), the Core Ultra 7 366H will not be the limiting factor. In GPU-bound workloads such as high-resolution gaming or ray tracing, the RTX 5060 Mobile will be the constraint, as its 9.684 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 GB VRAM are modest by modern standards. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3013.5 is 1.3% lower than the RTX 4060 Mobile, confirming that the GPU is the weaker link. For gaming, the FPS scaling will be governed by the GPU’s capabilities; the CPU can feed high frame rates, but the GPU will cap them. For content creation, the CPU’s 16 cores and high multi-thread scores make it the dominant component, while the GPU provides acceleration for effects and compute tasks. The combined percentile of 77 reflects this balanced-but-uneven pairing: the system is more capable for processor-heavy workloads than for graphics-heavy ones.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, a mobile processor from the Core Ultra Series 3, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile, a mobile GPU from the GeForce 50-series. The CPU is based on the Panther Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel’s 3 nm process, while the GPU uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on TSMC’s 5 nm node. The combined percentile of 77 indicates that this system outperforms 77% of all recorded builds. The CPU’s percentile of 87 is notably higher than the GPU’s 67, making this a CPU-first design. The pairing is suitable for a high-performance laptop intended for gaming, content creation, and software development, with the CPU delivering exceptional multi-threaded performance and the GPU offering solid mid-range graphics capability. The 25 W TDP of the CPU and 45 W TDP of the GPU suggest a reasonably efficient mobile platform, though the overall system power will depend on other components.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H is a 16-core, 16-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 3, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. It uses the Panther Lake architecture (codename Panther Lake) and is manufactured on Intel’s 3 nm process. The L3 cache is 18 MB shared, with 192 KB L1 and 2.5 MB L2 per core. Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 12 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are provided by Intel Xe3 Graphics. The processor is designed for mobile use (Intel BGA 2540 socket) with a TDP of 25 W.

Benchmark scores show exceptional multi-threaded performance: Cinebench R15 multi-core 2870, R20 11960, and R23 28477. PassMark multithread is 33429, with data compression at 327455. Single-thread performance is strong: Cinebench R15 single 405, R20 1688, R23 4020, and PassMark single 4043. The high floating-point math score of 103615 and integer math of 83695 reflect strong compute for scientific workloads. The 16 threads are enough for heavy parallel tasks, while the single-thread performance ensures responsiveness in everyday applications. The 87th percentile ranking places it among the top processors in the database, and its nearest rival, the Core Ultra 7 355H, is only 0.1% behind. This CPU is a high-end mobile processor suitable for gaming, content creation, and professional development work. The 25 W TDP, however, indicates that sustained full-core boost will be limited by thermal and power constraints typical of thin-and-light laptops.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 366H

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds