SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 366H

41,263 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

43,268 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile pairing represents a modern laptop platform built on Intel’s Panther Lake architecture and NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 GPU design. This combination sits at the 85th percentile overall, indicating a system that outperforms the vast majority of mobile hardware currently tracked. The CPU is a 16-core, 16-thread part with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, built on Intel’s 3 nm process. The GPU is an entry-level Blackwell mobile part with 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The data shows a balanced pairing where the CPU’s strong multi-threaded throughput complements the GPU’s capable rasterization and ray tracing performance.

CPU Analysis

The Core Ultra 7 366H is a 16-core, 16-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 3, built on the Panther Lake architecture with a 3 nm process node. The lack of hyperthreading is notable; this is a pure 16-core design that relies on physical cores for all thread-level parallelism. The base clock of 2.00 GHz is low, which helps keep the TDP at just 25 W, but the boost clock of 4.80 GHz shows the headroom available for bursty workloads. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache, which is a modest amount for a 16-core part.

Benchmark results reveal a CPU that punches well above its power envelope. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 28477 multi-core and 4020 single-core. The multi-core score is particularly strong, placing it within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, a desktop processor with a much higher TDP. This suggests that the 366H can sustain heavy multi-threaded loads effectively, likely due to the efficient 3 nm process. The single-core score of 4020 is also competitive, indicating strong per-thread performance for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications.

PassMark results further characterize the CPU’s strengths. The multi-thread score of 33429 is solid, and the floating-point math score of 103615 is particularly high, suggesting strong performance in scientific and engineering workloads that rely on FPU throughput. The integer math score of 83695 is also respectable. Data encryption scores 25845 and data compression scores 327455, with the latter being a standout figure that indicates excellent performance in file archiving and database workloads. The extended instructions score of 26901 and random string sorting score of 39814 round out a picture of a versatile chip.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 41263, which puts it at the 87th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are closely matched: the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H scores 41215 (0.1% behind), the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 scores 41208 (0.1% behind), and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X scores 41376 (0.3% ahead). The Intel Core Ultra X7 358H scores 40967 (0.7% behind). This clustering shows that the 366H is operating at the top of its immediate performance tier, with deltas under 1% separating it from the nearest competitors.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 2540 socket, which is a soldered mobile package, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense. The memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. This is a dual-channel configuration, which is standard for mobile parts, but the bandwidth figure indicates that memory-intensive workloads like integrated graphics rendering or heavy multitasking will have adequate headroom. ECC memory is not supported, which is typical for consumer mobile platforms.

PCIe connectivity is provided via Gen 5 with 12 lanes from the CPU. This is a significant upgrade path consideration, as Gen 5 offers double the bandwidth of Gen 4 for compatible storage devices and GPUs. The integrated graphics are Intel Xe3 Graphics, which provide a fallback for basic display output and light compute tasks when the discrete GPU is not in use. The CPU’s 25 W TDP is low, and the GPU’s 50 W TDP suggests a combined thermal envelope that is manageable in a thin-and-light laptop chassis.

The lack of a suggested PSU value and the GPU’s "None" power connector requirement indicate that this is a fully integrated mobile solution with no external power needs. The bus interface for the GPU is PCIe 5.0 x16, which is wired to the CPU’s 12 Gen 5 lanes. For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the platform is limited by its soldered components; the primary upgrade path would be to a future laptop with a newer CPU or GPU, as neither the BGA 2540 socket nor the integrated GPU allow for component-level swaps. The 3 nm process and 25 W TDP indicate that the platform is designed for efficiency over raw expandability.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5050 Mobile’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2365 indicates that this GPU can handle 1080p high-refresh gaming in less demanding titles, but the lack of measured FPS data means estimates must be drawn from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-core score of 4020 in Cinebench R23 ensures that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in frame-rate-limited scenarios.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 physical cores and strong multi-thread score of 28477 in Cinebench R23 provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The GPU’s 80 tensor cores suggest that NVENC-style hardware encoding is available, offloading the streaming workload from the CPU and preserving frame rates.

Video editing: The CPU’s floating-point math score of 103615 and data compression score of 327455 indicate strong performance in timeline scrubbing and export compression. The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR7 memory and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 4K timeline editing, though the 7.680 TFLOPS FP32 performance may limit effects-heavy workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU’s multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 28477 places it near the desktop Ryzen 9 5900X, meaning CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender will be competitive. The GPU’s 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced renders, though the 7.680 TFLOPS FP32 figure is modest for GPU rendering.

Software development: The CPU’s integer math score of 83695 and extended instructions score of 26901 support fast compilation and code analysis. The 16 threads allow for parallel builds, and the single-core score of 4020 ensures responsive IDE interactions.

Student and office work: The CPU’s low 25 W TDP and the GPU’s 50 W TDP combine for a power-efficient platform suited to all-day battery use. The single-thread score of 4043 in PassMark handles document processing and web browsing with ease, while the 16 cores future-proof against more demanding multitasking.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this pairing is a mobile professional who needs a laptop that can handle a mix of productivity and creative workloads without compromising on portability. The 85th combined percentile places this system above the vast majority of laptops, making it suitable for power users who need desktop-class performance in a mobile form factor.

Gamers at 1080p will find the RTX 5050 Mobile capable of running modern titles at high settings, though the lack of measured FPS data means expectations should be tempered for ultra settings at higher resolutions. Content creators working with video or 3D renders will benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-thread scores, which rival desktop parts. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p texture-heavy workloads but may be limiting for 4K content creation.

Developers will appreciate the 16 physical cores and the CPU’s high integer math score, which speeds up build times. Students and office workers will benefit from the efficiency of the 3 nm CPU and the integrated Xe3 Graphics for basic tasks when the discrete GPU is idle. Small business workstations that require data compression or encryption performance will see strong results, as the CPU’s 327455 data compression score is among the highest in its class.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2365 and the CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4020 provide a baseline for expectations.

At 1080p ultra settings, the RTX 5050 Mobile is expected to deliver playable frame rates in most esports and older AAA titles, but newer, more demanding games will likely require settings reductions to maintain smooth gameplay. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, but the 128-bit memory bus and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance in games that are bandwidth-sensitive.

At 1440p, the GPU’s 7.680 TFLOPS FP32 performance will be strained, and the 2365 Steel Nomad score suggests that high-refresh 1440p gaming is not realistic for the most demanding titles. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensures that the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, which is a healthy balance for a laptop platform.

The GPU’s 20 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, but the modest FP32 throughput means that ray-traced effects will be expensive. DLSS or similar upscaling technologies would be required to maintain playable frame rates with ray tracing enabled. Overall, the data supports a 1080p gaming focus, with 1440p being achievable only for less demanding games or with upscaling enabled.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is built on the GB207 chip using the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and TSMC’s 5 nm process. The chip contains 16,900 million transistors on a 149 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 113.4M per mm². The GPU has 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores. The base clock is 1020 MHz with a boost clock of 1500 MHz, which is conservative and helps keep the TDP at 50 W.

Memory is 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, running at 1500 MHz with 24 Gbps effective speed, producing a bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 120.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 7.680 TFLOPS, and FP16 is also 7.680 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, indicating that the GPU does not have dedicated FP16 acceleration.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 2365, and in Geekbench OpenCL it scores 84171. These scores place the GPU at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs. The average benchmark score is 43268, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB at 43262 (0% delta), the Quadro M6000 at 43301 (0.1% ahead), the RTX 4070 SUPER at 43223 (0.1% behind), and the RTX 4090 Mobile at 43667 (0.9% ahead). The closeness of these deltas is surprising: the RTX 5050 Mobile is essentially on par with a desktop RTX 4070 SUPER in the average benchmark score, despite being a mobile part with a 50 W TDP.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with all modern game engines. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16, and the display outputs are portable-device dependent, meaning the laptop manufacturer determines the physical ports. The GPU has no power connectors, as it draws power from the motherboard.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-balanced pairing where the CPU and GPU are closely matched in their respective performance tiers. The CPU’s 87th percentile and the GPU’s 83rd percentile are within 4 points of each other, suggesting that neither component will consistently bottleneck the other. In CPU-bound workloads like data compression (score 327455) or encryption (25845), the CPU is the primary driver, and the GPU remains idle. Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like gaming, the CPU’s strong single-core score of 4020 ensures it can feed the GPU efficiently.

The combined percentile of 85 is higher than either component’s individual percentile, indicating that the pairing synergizes well. The CPU’s multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 score 28477) is strong enough to support the GPU in gaming, where background tasks like streaming or Discord can run without impacting frame rates. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM may become a bottleneck in texture-heavy workloads, but the CPU’s 18 MB of L3 cache helps mitigate memory latency issues.

In gaming, the lack of measured FPS data means bottleneck analysis must rely on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-thread PassMark score of 4043 is high enough to avoid being a bottleneck in most games, while the GPU’s 7.680 TFLOPS FP32 will be the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The 384.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is modest, so games that are bandwidth-sensitive may see the GPU struggle more than its raw compute would suggest.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance compared to a desktop processor?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28477 places it within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, a desktop part with a significantly higher TDP.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 5050 Mobile has 20 dedicated RT cores, and the architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware ray tracing support.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score of 41263 is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (41215) and 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 (41208).

Q: Is the CPU upgradeable?

A: No, the CPU uses the Intel BGA 2540 socket, which is a soldered mobile package, so it cannot be removed or replaced.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance percentile?

A: The GPU is at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 43268.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The pairing is at the 85th combined percentile, indicating it outperforms 85% of all tracked systems.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s aggregate benchmark score is 41263, placing it at the 87th percentile. Key results include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 28477 and single-core at 4020, PassMark multi-thread at 33429, and PassMark single-thread at 4043. The GPU scores 2365 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 84171 in Geekbench OpenCL, with an average benchmark score of 43268 and an 83rd percentile position.

The CPU’s nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, which scores 41376, a 0.3% delta. The GPU’s nearest rival is the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB, which scores 43262, a 0% delta. The RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43667, which is 0.9% ahead of the RTX 5050 Mobile, a surprisingly small gap given the 4090’s higher tier. The combined picture is a laptop that delivers desktop-class CPU performance and desktop-equivalent GPU compute, with the CPU’s 87th percentile and GPU’s 83rd percentile combining for an 85th overall percentile.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build featuring the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile. The CPU is a 16-core Panther Lake part with a 25 W TDP, and the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 mobile part with a 50 W TDP, making this a power-efficient pairing. The combined percentile of 85 indicates that this system outperforms the vast majority of laptops, placing it in the upper tier of mobile performance.

The CPU’s 87th percentile and the GPU’s 83rd percentile are closely aligned, creating a balanced platform that avoids significant bottlenecks. The 3 nm CPU process and 5 nm GPU process contribute to the efficiency, while the 16 cores and 8 GB VRAM provide enough resources for demanding workloads. This is a mid-to-high-tier laptop configuration suitable for users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance and capable GPU acceleration in a portable form factor.