SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 366H

41,263 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

22,729 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile pairing presents a fascinating balance question, and the data reveals a system where the CPU holds a distinct advantage in relative performance tiering. The processor sits at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU occupies the 67th percentile among all GPUs. That 20-percentage-point gap suggests the CPU is the more dominant component in this pairing, and in CPU-bound workloads, the processor will likely reach its ceiling before the graphics card does.

Examining the CPU's multithreaded results reinforces this view. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28477 places it within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, a desktop-class processor with a significantly higher power envelope. The single-core Cinebench R23 result of 4020 is equally telling, as it indicates strong per-thread performance that can drive high frame rates in games that rely on a few fast cores. Meanwhile, the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 17469 puts it roughly on par with the desktop RTX 2080, which trails by 0.7%, and just ahead of the RX 7700 XT by 0.8%. This is a capable mobile GPU, but it is not in the same percentile tier as the CPU.

The bottleneck analysis becomes clear when considering the FPS scaling implications. In a typical gaming workload, the CPU's 87th percentile ranking and strong single-thread score of 4020 in R23 mean it can feed frames to the GPU without becoming the limiting factor at most settings. However, at lower resolutions where the GPU is less stressed, the 67th-percentile GPU may struggle to keep pace with what the CPU can deliver. Conversely, at higher resolutions or with heavy graphical effects, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, as the CPU's headroom goes unused.

The Passmark physics score of 2880 and the multithread score of 33429 further confirm the CPU's robustness for compute-heavy tasks. The data compression score of 327455 and integer math score of 83695 indicate strong general-purpose throughput. This means the CPU can handle background tasks like streaming encoding or voice chat while gaming without dragging down frame rates. The GPU's compute score of 6816 in Passmark, while respectable, is less impressive relative to its own field, suggesting that GPU-bound scenarios will emerge more readily.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RTX 4060 Mobile's 67th percentile and its proximity to the desktop RTX 2080 (within 0.7%) suggest it can drive 1080p high-refresh displays in most titles, though the CPU's superior single-thread score of 4020 in Cinebench R23 will help in esports titles where frame rates scale with CPU speed. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate headroom for modern game assets, but the 128-bit bus may limit performance at higher resolutions.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 16 threads, combined with a Passmark multithread score of 33429, provide ample capacity for software encoding while gaming. The data encryption score of 25845 and extended instructions score of 26901 indicate that the CPU can handle the cryptographic overhead of streaming protocols without significant frame drops. The GPU's NVENC-capable Ada Lovelace architecture, with 96 tensor cores, offers an alternative hardware encoding path.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28477 places this CPU within 0.3% of the Ryzen 9 5900X, a desktop processor often used for video work. The floating-point math score of 103615 and integer math score of 83695 suggest strong performance in rendering and effect processing. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and DirectX 12 Ultimate support can accelerate timeline playback and effect previews, though the 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is modest by modern standards.

3D Rendering: The CPU's 28477 Cinebench R23 multicore score indicates it can handle CPU-based rendering workloads competently, rivaling a desktop Ryzen 9 5900X. The GPU's 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced and AI-denoised rendering, but the 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 figure places it below many desktop GPUs, so GPU rendering will be slower than a dedicated desktop workstation.

Software Development: The Passmark random string sorting score of 39814 and data compression score of 327455 show strong performance in parsing and data manipulation tasks. The 16-thread configuration, while lacking hyperthreading (16 cores, 16 threads), still provides solid parallel compilation throughput. The single-thread score of 4043 ensures fast response in code editors and compilers that are often single-threaded.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's 87th percentile ranking and strong single-thread performance make everyday productivity tasks feel responsive. The integrated Intel Xe3 Graphics provides a fallback for basic display output, though the discrete GPU handles any graphical acceleration. The 25 W TDP of the CPU, combined with the 115 W GPU TDP, suggests a laptop that balances performance with portability for campus use.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Core Ultra 7 366H compare to its closest CPU rival, the Ryzen 9 5900X?

A: The two are nearly identical in average benchmark score, with the Intel chip at 41263 and the Ryzen 9 5900X at 41376, a difference of -0.3%. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the Intel chip scores 28477 while the Ryzen's exact score is not listed, but the average scores indicate parity.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier relative to desktop cards?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile's average benchmark score of 22729 places it 0.7% below the desktop RTX 2080 and 1.3% below the Intel Arc B580. It is 0.8% ahead of the RX 7700 XT and 1.3% ahead of the RTX 5060 Mobile.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Core Ultra 7 366H does not support ECC memory, as indicated by the "eccMemory": false field. It supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 77, meaning this laptop configuration outperforms 77% of all tested CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 18 MB of shared L3 cache, with 192 KB of L1 cache per core and 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core.

Q: What is the GPU's pixel and texture throughput?

A: The GPU achieves a pixel rate of 90.72 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 181.4 GTexel/s, which are derived from its 48 ROPs and 96 TMUs running at the boost clock of 1890 MHz.

Q: Is there a measured FPS dataset for this exact combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this combination. All FPS figures provided in this analysis are estimates based on the benchmark scores and percentile rankings.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H is a 16-core, 16-thread processor built on Intel's 3 nm process under the Panther Lake architecture, part of the Core Ultra Series 3. Its base clock of 2.00 GHz and boost clock of 4.80 GHz provide a wide operating range, allowing it to scale from power-efficient light loads to peak performance under multithreaded stress. The 25 W TDP is notably low for a 16-core part, suggesting that the 3 nm process enables high efficiency, though sustained performance may depend on the laptop's cooling solution.

The CPU's cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration, while not exceptional, is adequate for the processor's class. The memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s over a dual-channel DDR5/LPDDR5X interface is sufficient to feed the CPU's cores, though bandwidth-sensitive workloads may see some limitation.

Benchmark scores paint a picture of a well-rounded processor. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28477 places it within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, a desktop processor with a much higher power draw. This suggests the 366H punches above its weight in multithreaded tasks. The single-core score of 4020 in the same benchmark is strong, driving responsive single-threaded applications. The Passmark single-thread score of 4043 corroborates this, while the multithread score of 33429 indicates solid parallel performance.

The data compression score of 327455 and integer math score of 83695 are particularly strong, indicating the CPU excels in data-intensive and arithmetic workloads. The floating-point math score of 103615 is also impressive, supporting scientific and engineering applications. The extended instructions score of 26901 shows capable SIMD performance. However, the find prime numbers score of 326 is notably low, suggesting that certain specialized workloads may not be optimally optimized for this architecture.

The nearest rival, the Core Ultra 7 356H, is only 0.1% behind in average score, indicating that the 366H offers a marginal improvement over its sibling. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 also sits 0.1% behind, making the 366H part of a tightly clustered group of mid-range mobile processors. The Core Ultra X7 358H trails by 0.7%, while the Ryzen 9 5900X leads by 0.3% — proof of how close modern mobile silicon has come to desktop parts.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 7 366H uses the Intel BGA 2540 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform — this means the CPU is not upgradeable in a traditional sense. The laptop's motherboard and cooling solution are designed for this specific processor, so any future CPU upgrade would require replacing the entire laptop. The same applies to the RTX 4060 Mobile, which is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) soldered to the board, despite its discrete-class performance.

Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. The system supports up to this bandwidth, but the actual capacity depends on the laptop's design. Users should check whether the laptop has accessible SODIMM slots or soldered LPDDR5X, as this affects upgradeability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 12 lanes for CPU-attached devices, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for the RTX 4060 Mobile's bandwidth needs.

The GPU's TDP of 115 W, combined with the CPU's 25 W TDP, gives a total of 140 W for the core components. The suggestedPsu field is null, so no specific PSU requirement is stated, but a laptop power adapter must handle this load plus the rest of the system. Given the mobile form factor, the PSU headroom is determined by the laptop's design, not user upgradeability.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be adding more system memory if the laptop allows it, as the dual-channel bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s can be fully utilized with sufficient capacity. Storage upgrades via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes for NVMe SSDs would also yield tangible benefits, particularly for data compression and random sorting workloads that score 327455 and 39814 respectively. The GPU and CPU are not upgradeable, so the platform's longevity depends on the initial configuration being sufficient for the user's needs over time.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is built on the AD107 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process, with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die — a transistor density of 118.9M per mm². This compact design allows the GPU to deliver desktop-class features in a mobile power envelope. The base clock of 1545 MHz boosts to 1890 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for 1080p gaming but may constrain performance at higher resolutions.

The GPU's 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 90.72 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 181.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput of 11.61 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1), places it in the mid-range of mobile GPUs. The 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI features like DLSS, which can significantly boost frame rates in supported titles.

The Passmark G3D score of 17469 places the GPU at the 67th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 22729. This puts it within 0.7% of the desktop RTX 2080, a remarkable achievement for a mobile part. The DirectX 12 score of 73 in Passmark, while lower than the DirectX 11 score of 157, reflects the different workloads these tests represent. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 89420 and Vulkan score of 89569 indicate strong compute and graphics API performance.

The GPU's predecessor is the GeForce 30 Mobile, and its successor is the GeForce 50 Mobile, placing it in the 40-series generation. The RTX 5060 Mobile, a newer part, trails by 1.3% in average score, suggesting the 4060 Mobile remains competitive. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is sufficient for the GPU's bandwidth needs, and the lack of power connectors indicates it draws power from the motherboard, typical for mobile designs.

# Who Should Build It

The target user for this Core Ultra 7 366H and RTX 4060 Mobile pairing is a mobile professional who needs strong CPU performance without sacrificing portability. The CPU's 87th percentile ranking and parity with the desktop Ryzen 9 5900X (within 0.3%) make it ideal for developers who compile large codebases, researchers running data-intensive simulations, and analysts working with large datasets — tasks that benefit from the 28477 Cinebench R23 multicore score and the 327455 data compression score.

Gamers at 1080p will find the RTX 4060 Mobile's 67th percentile performance sufficient for high-refresh gaming, particularly in titles that favor the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4020. The GPU's proximity to the desktop RTX 2080 (0.7% behind) means it can handle most modern titles at high settings, though the 8 GB VRAM may necessitate texture quality reductions in VRAM-hungry games.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's strong multithreaded performance, which rivals desktop parts. The GPU's 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced rendering and AI denoising, though the 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is modest for heavy GPU rendering. Students and office workers will find the CPU's single-thread performance of 4043 in Passmark delivers snappy application loading, while the 25 W CPU TDP contributes to longer battery life during light use.

Small business workstations that run virtual machines, databases, or engineering software will appreciate the CPU's high percentile ranking and the balanced overall performance. The combined 77th percentile means this laptop outperforms 77% of tested configurations, making it a versatile choice for users who need one device for both compute-heavy work and entertainment.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (as indicated by "buildClass": "laptop") pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile. The CPU is a 16-core, 16-thread mobile processor from the Panther Lake generation, built on Intel's 3 nm process, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture mobile chip from NVIDIA's 40-series, built on TSMC's 5 nm process. This combination represents a mid-to-high-end mobile platform, as indicated by the combined 77th percentile ranking.

The overall tier is defined by the component percentiles: the CPU sits at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, placing it in the top 13% of processors, while the GPU sits at the 67th percentile, placing it in the top third of graphics cards. This asymmetry means the platform is CPU-dominant, with the processor providing more relative performance headroom than the graphics subsystem. The average CPU benchmark score of 41263 is closely matched by rivals within ±0.7%, indicating a competitive mid-range mobile CPU market.

This pairing is best described as a "CPU-first" laptop configuration, where the processor is the star component and the GPU provides competent, though not exceptional, graphics performance. Users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads — such as compiling, data analysis, or multitasking — will find this build well-suited to their needs, while those who prioritize gaming above all else may want to seek a configuration with a higher-GPU-percentile pairing.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 41263 places it at the 87th percentile, and its individual scores reveal a balanced profile. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28477 is the standout result, putting it within 0.3% of the desktop Ryzen 9 5900X. The single-core R23 score of 4020 demonstrates strong per-thread performance. The Passmark multithread score of 33429 and single-thread score of 4043 corroborate the Cinebench results, while the data compression score of 327455 and floating-point math score of 103615 highlight specific strengths.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 22729 places it at the 67th percentile. The Passmark G3D score of 17469 is its primary gaming performance indicator, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 89420 and Vulkan score of 89569 show strong compute and graphics API performance. The DirectX scores — 157 for DirectX 11 and 73 for DirectX 12 — reflect the GPU's capability in different graphics APIs, with the lower DirectX 12 score suggesting that some newer workloads may be less optimized for this architecture.

Combined, this CPU+GPU pairing achieves a 77th percentile ranking, meaning it outperforms 77% of all tested configurations. The CPU's 87th percentile is the primary driver of this ranking, with the GPU's 67th percentile providing solid, though not dominant, graphics support. The nearest CPU rival, the Core Ultra 7 356H, is within 0.1% in average score, indicating that the 366H offers only a marginal performance uplift over its sibling. The nearest GPU rival, the RTX 2080, is within 0.7%, showing that the 4060 Mobile is competitive with a previous-generation desktop card.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries for any game or resolution. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile rankings, not from direct testing.

Based on the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 17469 and its proximity to the desktop RTX 2080 (0.7% behind), the RTX 4060 Mobile should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p in most modern titles. At 1080p ultra settings, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth should suffice for most games, but titles with large texture packs may require settings reductions. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4020 in Cinebench R23 should prevent CPU bottlenecks in most games, allowing the GPU to be the limiting factor.

At 1440p, the GPU's 128-bit memory bus and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth may become a bottleneck, as the 4060 Mobile's 67th percentile ranking suggests it is better suited to 1080p gaming. The CPU's 87th percentile provides ample headroom, so any frame rate drops at higher resolutions would be attributable to the GPU. In esports titles with lighter graphics loads, the CPU's strong single-thread performance could drive frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p, but the exact figures depend on the game's optimization.

Given the lack of measured data, these estimates should be treated as approximations. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 73 in Passmark, lower than the DirectX 11 score of 157, suggests that some newer DirectX 12 titles may not perform as well as older DirectX 11 games. However, the GPU's 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores enable DLSS and ray tracing technologies that can improve perceived performance in supported titles. For a more precise understanding of gaming performance, users should consult direct benchmarks of laptops with this exact configuration.