SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 366H

41,263 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

19,049 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile pairing represents a specific tier of laptop hardware aimed at balancing everyday productivity with capable 1080p gaming. This analysis uses the provided benchmark data to assess the CPU and GPU separately and as a combined system, focusing on what the scores indicate for real-world use. Note that no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination; all gaming performance discussion is estimated from the synthetic benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H is a 16-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on the Panther Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 3 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, drawing 25 W of TDP. The cache layout includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 18 MB L3 cache. This processor supports dual-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, with a peak memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, and it uses the Intel BGA 2540 socket.

The benchmark scores place this chip at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, indicating strong performance relative to the broader market. In multi-core workloads, the Cinebench R23 score of 28,477 points demonstrates significant parallel processing capability. This is particularly relevant for video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation where all 16 cores can be utilized. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 11,960 and R15 score of 2,870 follow a consistent pattern, showing scalable performance across different rendering engines. Single-core performance is equally impressive, with a Cinebench R23 score of 4,020, which is critical for responsiveness in everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,043 corroborates this, suggesting that the CPU handles typical office work and web browsing with ample headroom. The Passmark multithread score of 33,429 and an average benchmark score of 41,263 across all tests reinforce the CPU's position as a high-tier mobile processor.

Comparing to its nearest rivals, the Core Ultra 7 366H is effectively tied with the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, posting a 0.1% higher average score (41,263 vs 41,215). It also edges out the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 by 0.1% (41,263 vs 41,208). The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, a desktop part, scores 41,376, which is 0.3% higher than the 366H, showing that this mobile chip can trade blows with older desktop hardware. The Intel Core Ultra X7 358H is 0.7% behind, scoring 40,967. These narrow deltas indicate that the 366H is not a performance outlier among its immediate peers but is solidly within the top tier of mobile processors, with results that are highly competitive for its class. The data shows the CPU is capable in both bursty single-thread tasks and sustained multi-thread workloads, making it a versatile foundation for a laptop.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU combination needs to be examined for balance, as a significant mismatch would create a bottleneck. The CPU sits at the 87th percentile for all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 63rd percentile for all GPUs. This gap suggests that in most workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU has more relative compute headroom than the GPU, meaning that in gaming scenarios, the RTX 4050 Mobile will likely be the component that determines the maximum achievable frame rate at higher settings, as it will be saturated before the CPU's processing capacity is fully used.

For CPU-bound tasks like data compression, the Passmark score of 327,455 and integer math score of 83,695 show the processor can handle heavy computational loads without breaking a sweat. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 14,423 is the primary indicator of its graphical throughput. The delta between the CPU's 87th percentile and the GPU's 63rd percentile indicates that this pairing is not perfectly balanced; the CPU is more capable relative to its peers than the GPU is. This means that for tasks that rely heavily on the GPU, such as high-resolution gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the system's overall performance will be capped by the RTX 4050 Mobile. Conversely, for tasks like code compilation or multi-threaded productivity, the CPU can perform at a high level without being held back by the GPU. The lack of measured FPS data prevents a direct analysis of frame scaling, but the percentile disparity is a strong signal that the GPU is the primary constraint in graphics-heavy workloads, while the CPU offers a buffer of performance for general computing.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is an Ada Lovelace architecture chip (AD107) with 2,560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. It features 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores, which are essential for ray tracing and AI-accelerated tasks like DLSS. The GPU is built on TSMC's 5 nm process and has a transistor count of 18,900 million on a 159 mm² die. Its clocks are set at a base of 1455 MHz and a boost of 1755 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus provides 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a notable constraint for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games.

In terms of raw compute, the GPU delivers 8.986 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 operations. Its pixel rate is 84.24 GPixel/s and texture rate is 140.4 GTexel/s. The Passmark G3D score of 14,423 places it at the 63rd percentile among all GPUs. This is a solid mid-range result, indicating it can handle modern games at 1080p with high settings, but it may struggle with 1440p or 4K. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74,748 and Vulkan score of 75,235 are strong, showing good compute performance for non-gaming workloads. The Passmark GPU Compute score of 5,947 is lower, suggesting less robust performance in generic compute tasks compared to its graphics rendering capabilities. The nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6600, which scores 19,036, a delta of 0.1% (the 4050 Mobile averages 19,049). This indicates the 4050 Mobile is a direct competitor to desktop-class mid-range GPUs from the previous generation. The NVIDIA Quadro K6000 and Tesla K20m are also within 0.2% of the 4050 Mobile's score, highlighting that this mobile chip offers workstation-level compute in a low-power package. The 6 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p gaming but could be a limitation for future titles with high VRAM requirements or for professional 3D rendering with large scenes.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration is best suited for users who need a primary machine for productivity and occasional to moderate gaming. The CPU's 87th percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for students and professionals who run complex spreadsheets, compile code, or use virtual machines. The 16 cores provide ample headroom for multi-threaded applications like video editing in software such as Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve, though the GPU's 6 GB VRAM may limit the complexity of effects or the resolution of the timeline. For developers, the strong single-thread score (4,043 in Passmark) ensures fast build times for smaller projects, while the multi-thread score (33,429) helps with parallel compilation tasks. Small business workstations would benefit from the CPU's reliability and performance for office tasks, database management, and financial modeling. Gamers targeting 1080p resolution with medium to high settings will find this GPU adequate, but those seeking maximum frame rates in esports titles or high-fidelity AAA games at 1440p should look for a higher-tier GPU. The integrated Intel Xe3 Graphics provides a fallback for basic display tasks, potentially saving power when the discrete GPU is not needed. This is a balanced mainstream laptop, not a hardcore gaming rig or a professional workstation, but it covers a wide range of general use cases competently.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark data shows a system with a very strong CPU and a competent, but not exceptional, GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score is 41,263, placing it in the 87th percentile, which means it outperforms 87% of all CPUs in the database. The GPU's average score is 19,049, placing it in the 63rd percentile, which is above the median but not near the top. The combined percentile for the build is 75, indicating that as a whole, this laptop outperforms three-quarters of the systems in the database. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28,477 is particularly noteworthy, as it suggests the chip can handle sustained heavy loads. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 14,423 is respectable for a mobile part, but the 6 GB VRAM and 96-bit memory bus are limiting factors that will show up in memory-intensive scenarios. The CPU is clearly the stronger component relative to its peers, which means the overall system performance is more constrained by the GPU. This is a typical trade-off in laptops where power and thermal budgets are shared. The data indicates that the system will excel in CPU-heavy tasks and be adequate for GPU-heavy tasks, with the specific performance in any application depending on which component is the bottleneck for that workload.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK does not contain measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all gaming figures presented here are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 14,423 and its 63rd percentile ranking suggest that this system is capable of running most modern games at 1080p with medium to high settings to achieve playable frame rates. For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, which are not heavily GPU-bound, the strong CPU single-thread performance (4,043 in Passmark) should allow for very high frame rates, potentially exceeding 144 FPS on low settings. In more demanding AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin's Creed Mirage, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The 6 GB VRAM may cause texture quality to be reduced at higher settings. Based on the GPU's raw compute (8.986 TFLOPS) and the CPU's capability, a reasonable estimate is that this system could achieve 60 FPS at 1080p with a mix of medium and high settings in most titles, but may drop below 60 FPS in the most demanding scenes or with ray tracing enabled. The RT cores (20) are present, but their performance in a mobile 50-watt part is limited, so ray tracing should be used sparingly. DLSS, enabled by the 80 tensor cores, would be a valuable tool to boost frame rates at higher settings. Overall, this is a 1080p gaming system, and users should not expect consistent high-refresh-rate performance at 1440p. The lack of measured FPS data means these are educated guesses, but the benchmark scores suggest a playable 1080p experience for most titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the Intel BGA 2540 socket, which is a soldered mobile socket, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense. The memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with a dual-channel bus providing 115.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The system uses PCIe Gen 5 with 12 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. This provides a modern I/O foundation. The CPU has a TDP of 25 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 50 W, which is a combined 75 W for the core components. The suggested PSU is not listed, but for a laptop, the power delivery is handled by the system's adapter. Upgradeability is limited to what the laptop chassis allows, typically meaning users can upgrade storage and RAM. The next sensible upgrade for this system would be to increase the memory capacity if the laptop supports it, as 16 GB is often the minimum for modern multitasking. The PCIe Gen 5 support for the CPU means that future NVMe SSDs can achieve extremely high transfer speeds. For graphical upgrades, users are generally out of luck in a laptop, but an external GPU enclosure via the PCIe lanes could be an option, though this is not a common path for mobile systems. The platform is current and supports the latest memory and storage technologies, but the soldered CPU means the processor's performance is fixed for the life of the machine. The GPU's 50 W TDP suggests it is a lower-power variant, which may limit its boost clocks compared to higher-power versions of the same chip in other laptops.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system that pairs the 16-core Intel Core Ultra 7 366H with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile. The CPU is a high-performance part, ranking in the 87th percentile, while the GPU is a mid-range mobile solution, ranking in the 63rd percentile. The combined percentile of 75 means this system is better than 75% of all recorded builds. This is a mainstream laptop configuration designed for a balance of productivity and gaming. The CPU's performance is a clear strength, making it suitable for demanding workloads like video editing and software development. The GPU is adequate for 1080p gaming and general graphics acceleration but is not a high-end part. The overall tier of this build is upper-midrange, where it excels in CPU-bound tasks and provides a competent, but not overwhelming, gaming experience. It is a versatile machine for a user who needs strong processing power for work or study, with the ability to play games on the side. The 6 GB VRAM and 96-bit memory bus on the GPU are the most significant limitations, as they will cap performance in the latest games at higher settings. The data suggests that the CPU will not be the bottleneck in any scenario, and the GPU will be the component that users will need to manage their expectations around for the most demanding applications.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile compared to all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H places in the 87th percentile among all CPUs, indicating it performs better than 87% of the processors in the database.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6600?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 19,049, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6600's score of 19,036.

Q: What is the size of the L3 cache on the CPU?

A: The CPU has a shared L3 cache of 18 MB.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s, utilizing 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU build?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 75, meaning it outperforms 75% of all builds in the database.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so gaming performance figures are estimates based on synthetic benchmark scores.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 25 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 50 W.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 366H

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds