SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 356H

41,215 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

22,729 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is a laptop-class combination built around Intel’s latest Panther Lake architecture and NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace GPU. The CPU is a 16-core, 16-thread part with a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, built on Intel’s 3 nm process. The GPU is the AD107 chip on TSMC’s 5 nm node, with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. This pairing sits at the 77th combined percentile across all CPU+GPU configurations, indicating a solidly above-average mobile platform. The following analysis breaks down what the benchmark data means for real workloads, gaming, content creation, and overall build balance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H is a 16-thread processor with a 25 W TDP, designed for mobile platforms on the Intel BGA 2540 socket. Its Panther Lake architecture marks a significant generation shift, and the 3 nm process node from Intel allows for high efficiency in a constrained thermal envelope. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. This structure supports both single-thread responsiveness and multi-threaded throughput, which is reflected in the benchmark scores.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 2040 points in single-core and 18395 points in multi-core. The single-core result is modest—about 70% of what a top-tier desktop part might achieve—but it is competitive for a 25 W mobile chip, indicating strong per-core efficiency. The multi-core score of 18395 is more impressive, showing that the 16 threads scale well under sustained load. The Cinebench R20 scores follow the same pattern: 1715 single-core and 12153 multi-core, while R15 shows 303 single-core and 3055 multi-core. These numbers suggest a processor that handles lightly threaded tasks adequately but really shines when all cores are engaged.

PassMark results add depth. The multithread score is 33978, which places the CPU at the 87th percentile among all CPUs—a strong showing for a laptop part. The single-thread PassMark score is 4072, which is respectable but not class-leading. Data compression scores 336177, indicating fast archival and file-handling performance, while data encryption hits 26345, showing capable AES and cryptographic workloads. Floating-point math scores 103128, and integer math scores 83111, both of which are healthy for productivity tasks. The extended instructions score of 27898 and random string sorting at 40990 round out a profile that favors mixed workloads over pure number-crunching.

The nearest rivals contextualize this performance. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 scores an average of 41208, essentially identical to the 356H’s 41215 average—a 0% delta. The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H is 0.1% faster, and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is 0.4% faster. The Intel Core Ultra X7 358H is 0.6% slower. This clustering means the 356H trades blows with upper-midrange desktop and mobile parts from the previous generation, making it a versatile choice for a laptop where power efficiency matters more than absolute peak performance.

For real workloads, the data shows a CPU that can handle video editing timelines, software compilation, and 3D rendering in a portable chassis. The 18 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency, and DDR5/LPDDR5X support with 115.2 GB/s bandwidth ensures data feeds the cores without stalling. The integrated Intel Xe3 Graphics provides a fallback for display output when the discrete GPU is idle, though it is not a gaming solution on its own.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core Ultra 7 356H compare to the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical—41215 for the Intel part versus 41208 for the AMD part, a 0% delta. In practical terms, they are performance equivalents, so the choice comes down to platform features rather than raw speed.

Q: Is the RTX 4060 Mobile faster than a desktop RTX 2080?

A: The data shows the RTX 4060 Mobile has an average score of 22729, while the RTX 2080 scores 22895, making the 2080 0.7% faster. The 4060 Mobile is within a rounding error of the older desktop card, which is impressive for a laptop GPU.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking?

A: The Core Ultra 7 356H sits at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 87% of processors in the benchmark database. This is a strong result for a mobile part with a 25 W TDP.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported. The memory controller is configured for DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a dual-channel setup, which is typical for consumer mobile platforms.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 18 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a moderate amount for a 16-thread part, but combined with 2.5 MB of L2 per core, it provides ample on-die storage for frequently accessed data.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile has 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, delivered over a 128-bit bus with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory running at 16 Gbps effective. This is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings.

Q: Is the RTX 4060 Mobile better than the Intel Arc B580?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile scores 22729 on average, while the Arc B580 scores 23021, making the Intel card 1.3% faster. However, the 4060 Mobile is a laptop part with lower power draw, so the comparison favors NVIDIA in mobile contexts.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The RTX 4060 Mobile’s PassMark G3D score of 17469 and its 67th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicate it is a solid 1080p performer with headroom for 1440p in many titles. The CPU’s 87th percentile ranking ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, though some CPU-heavy games may see the processor as the limiting factor.

At 1080p ultra settings, this pairing should deliver high frame rates in esports titles like Fortnite or Valorant, where the CPU’s single-thread score of 2040 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU’s 11.61 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput are more than sufficient. For AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin’s Creed Mirage, expect playable frame rates in the 60-80 FPS range at 1080p ultra, with drops to around 50-60 FPS if ray tracing is enabled. The 24 RT cores on the 4060 Mobile provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the 256.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance in path-traced scenes.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary constraint. The 4060 Mobile’s 67th percentile puts it below the RX 7700 XT by 0.8% and the desktop RTX 2080 by 0.7%, meaning it is roughly equivalent to a mid-range desktop card from a few generations ago. Expect 40-60 FPS at 1440p ultra in demanding titles, and consider lowering settings to high to maintain a stable 60 FPS. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1440p textures, but 4K is not recommended; the 128-bit bus and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth will cause stuttering in memory-heavy scenes.

The CPU’s PassMark physics score of 2895 and integer math score of 83111 suggest strong performance in simulation and strategy games, where AI and unit calculations tax the processor. The 16 threads and 18 MB L3 cache help here, providing smooth minimum frame rates even when the average FPS is moderate. Overall, this is a 1080p gaming machine that can stretch into 1440p with settings tweaks, but it is not a high-refresh-rate 1440p or 4K solution.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the RTX 4060 Mobile’s 17469 G3D score and the CPU’s 2040 single-core Cinebench R23 score can drive 144 Hz displays in competitive titles, though AAA games will hover around 60-90 FPS. The GPU’s 67th percentile means it is not a top-tier part, so expect to dial back settings for consistent triple-digit frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads and 33978 PassMark multithread score provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The data encryption score of 26345 also helps with stream encryption overhead. The GPU’s NVENC-like tensor cores (96 total) can offload encoding, but the 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggests a balanced approach is best.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18395 and data compression score of 336177 indicate strong performance in export and render tasks. The 18 MB L3 cache and 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth keep timeline scrubbing smooth, while the GPU’s 11.61 TFLOPS accelerates effects and transitions. This is a capable mobile editing rig for 1080p and light 4K work.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s 87th percentile and R23 multi-core score of 18395 place it above the Ryzen 9 5900X by 0.4% in average benchmarks, making it suitable for CPU-based rendering in Blender or Cinema 4D. The GPU’s 6816 PassMark compute score and 96 tensor cores accelerate GPU rendering, though the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity.

Software Development: The integer math score of 83111 and extended instructions score of 27898 show strong compile and code-analysis performance. The 16 threads handle parallel builds well, and the 25 W TDP means sustained load does not throttle heavily. The dual-channel DDR5 support ensures fast memory access for large codebases.

Student and Office Work: The single-thread score of 4072 in PassMark handles everyday productivity with ease. The 25 W TDP and integrated Xe3 Graphics mean long battery life for note-taking and document editing. The 87th CPU percentile is overkill for spreadsheets, but it future-proofs the system for heavier tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 41215, placing it at the 87th percentile among all CPUs. This is a strong result, ranking it alongside the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (41376, 0.4% faster) and the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (41263, 0.1% faster). The GPU’s average score is 22729, at the 67th percentile among all GPUs. This puts it just below the desktop RTX 2080 (22895, 0.7% faster) and above the RX 7700 XT (22549, 0.8% slower). The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 77, indicating a well-matched system where neither component dramatically outperforms the other.

The CPU’s strongest results are in multi-threaded workloads: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 18395 and PassMark multithread at 33978. These numbers suggest a processor that excels at parallel tasks like rendering and compilation. The single-thread scores are more modest—2040 in R23 and 4072 in PassMark—but they are consistent with a mobile chip prioritizing efficiency. The GPU’s best showing is in PassMark G3D at 17469, which is a composite of DirectX and OpenGL tests. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 89569 and OpenCL score of 89420 are nearly identical, indicating balanced compute performance across APIs.

The combined picture is a laptop that can handle CPU-intensive productivity and GPU-accelerated gaming without major bottlenecks. The 87th CPU percentile and 67th GPU percentile mean the processor is relatively stronger than the graphics card, which is common in mobile builds where power budgets favor the CPU. This imbalance is minor—the 77th combined percentile shows the pairing works well together—but it suggests that upgrading the GPU would yield bigger gaming gains than upgrading the CPU.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is built on the AD107 chip using TSMC’s 5 nm process, with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. This density of 118.9 million transistors per mm² is high, enabling 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. The GPU has 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, which are essential for ray tracing and DLSS-style upscaling. The base clock is 1545 MHz with a boost clock of 1890 MHz, and the memory runs at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) across a 128-bit bus.

Memory configuration is 8 GB of GDDR6 with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is adequate for 1080p gaming at high settings and 1440p with reduced textures, but the 128-bit bus is a limiting factor for higher resolutions. The pixel rate is 90.72 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 181.4 GTexel/s, which support the 11.61 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The FP16 performance is identical at 11.61 TFLOPS (1:1), meaning there is no half-precision boost for AI workloads—the tensor cores handle that separately.

The GPU’s benchmark scores show a capable mid-range part. PassMark G3D scores 17469, which is the primary gaming metric, while DirectX 12 scores 73 and DirectX 11 scores 157. The DirectX 10 score of 107 is lower, reflecting older API inefficiencies. Geekbench OpenCL scores 89420 and Vulkan scores 89569, indicating strong compute for rendering and physics. PassMark GPU compute scores 6816, which is modest compared to desktop parts but reasonable for a 115 W mobile chip.

The RTX 4060 Mobile’s 67th percentile ranking places it in the upper-middle tier of all GPUs. It is 0.7% slower than the desktop RTX 2080 and 1.3% slower than the Intel Arc B580, but 0.8% faster than the RX 7700 XT and 1.3% faster than the RTX 5060 Mobile. This clustering means the 4060 Mobile is a known quantity: it delivers consistent 1080p performance and acceptable 1440p performance, with ray tracing enabled by the 24 RT cores but limited by the 256.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is ideal for gamers who prioritize 1080p resolution with high settings and occasional 1440p play. The GPU’s 67th percentile and the CPU’s 87th percentile ensure that most titles run smoothly at 1080p, with the CPU handling physics and AI while the GPU renders frames. Gamers with 144 Hz monitors will find this system capable in esports titles, though AAA games may require lowering settings to reach high refresh rates.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, will benefit from the CPU’s 18395 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU’s 6816 compute score. The 16 threads and 18 MB L3 cache accelerate export times, while the 8 GB VRAM handles 1080p and light 4K projects. Software developers will appreciate the integer math score of 83111 and the 25 W TDP, which allows for sustained compile sessions without thermal throttling.

Students and office workers will find this system overkill for basic tasks, but the 87th CPU percentile means it will not become obsolete quickly. The integrated Xe3 Graphics provides a power-saving fallback, and the 25 W CPU TDP contributes to battery life. Small business workstations that run virtualization or data analysis will benefit from the data encryption score of 26345 and the multithread score of 33978.

This is not a build for 4K gaming or heavy GPU compute. The 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB VRAM are hard limits, and the GPU’s 67th percentile reflects that. For users who need 1440p high-refresh gaming or professional GPU rendering, a higher-tier GPU is necessary. But for a balanced mobile workstation that handles a wide range of tasks, this pairing is well-suited.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile. The CPU is a 16-thread Panther Lake part with a 25 W TDP, and the GPU is an Ada Lovelace chip with a 115 W TDP, making this a mainstream mobile configuration. The combined percentile of 77 indicates it outperforms 77% of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database, placing it in the upper-middle tier of laptops.

The CPU’s 87th percentile is the standout feature, outperforming many desktop parts from previous generations. The GPU’s 67th percentile is solid but not exceptional, meaning the processor is the stronger component. This is a practical choice for a laptop where battery life and thermals matter, as the 25 W CPU and 115 W GPU are manageable in a thin chassis. The build supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, PCIe Gen 5 with 12 CPU lanes, and uses the Intel BGA 2540 socket, which is not upgradeable.

The RTX 4060 Mobile’s predecessor is the GeForce 30 Mobile, and its successor is the GeForce 50 Mobile, placing it in a mature product cycle. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern games and applications. Overall, this is a well-rounded laptop platform that balances CPU throughput with GPU capability, suitable for a broad range of users.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a CPU that is significantly stronger than the GPU relative to their respective pools. The CPU’s 87th percentile versus the GPU’s 67th percentile means the processor will rarely be the limiting factor in gaming. In CPU-heavy titles like strategy or simulation games, the 356H’s 16 threads and 18395 R23 multi-core score will keep frame rates high, but the GPU may struggle to keep up at higher resolutions.

In GPU-bound workloads like 4K gaming or ray tracing, the RTX 4060 Mobile will be the clear bottleneck. Its 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for 4K textures and path tracing, and the 67th percentile confirms it is not a high-end part. At 1080p, the balance is nearly ideal: the CPU provides enough single-thread performance (2040 in R23) to feed the GPU, and the GPU delivers 17469 in G3D, which is enough for 60+ FPS in most titles.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, supports this imbalance. At 1080p, the CPU and GPU are roughly balanced, with the CPU’s 87th percentile providing headroom for background tasks like streaming. At 1440p, the GPU’s 67th percentile becomes the limiting factor, and frame rates will drop as the 128-bit bus struggles with memory bandwidth. The combined 77th percentile reflects this balance, showing a system where upgrading the GPU would yield more gaming performance than upgrading the CPU.

For productivity tasks, the CPU is the star, and the GPU is secondary. Video editing and 3D rendering will be CPU-bound in many cases, with the GPU accelerating specific effects. The data encryption score of 26345 and floating-point math score of 103128 show a CPU that handles these tasks efficiently, while the GPU’s 6816 compute score is adequate but not exceptional. In summary, this pairing is balanced for 1080p gaming and mixed productivity, but the GPU is the component to upgrade first for higher resolutions or more demanding graphics workloads.