SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

98%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus

93,785 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a 24-core desktop processor paired with an NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 GPU in a desktop build. The benchmark database contains no measured frame rates for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores. The CPU ranks at the 96th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, a gap that defines the balance of this system.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is built on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, fabricated on a TSMC 3 nm process with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. It has 24 cores and 24 threads, meaning each core processes a single thread. The base clock is 3.70 GHz and the boost clock is 5.50 GHz. The TDP is 125 W. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is enabled. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the processor itself. An integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics unit with 64 execution units is present, and the multiplier is unlocked. The socket is Intel Socket 1851, and the launch MSRP is $299.

The average benchmark score for this CPU is 93,785, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, it scores 44,253 multi-core and 2,439 single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 24,461 multi-core and 3,453 single-core. Cinebench R15 gives 6,656 multi-core and 354 single-core. PassMark results include a multi-thread score of 68,574, a single-thread score of 5,068, data compression of 804,322, data encryption of 59,097, extended instructions of 63,506, integer math of 175,986, floating point math of 229,491, physics of 4,064, random string sorting of 96,945, and prime number finding of 615.

The 96th percentile means this CPU is faster than almost all other CPUs in the database. The closest rival is the Intel Xeon 6520P, which scores 93,786 (a deltaPct of 0). The AMD EPYC 4564P scores 95,183 (deltaPct -1.5), the EPYC 9175F scores 95,615 (deltaPct -1.9), and the EPYC 4565P scores 95,764 (deltaPct -2.1). These deltas show the Ultra 7 is within 2.1% of three EPYC server processors, which is notable for a desktop part.

In real workloads, the 24-core configuration and 36 MB L3 cache excel in multi-threaded tasks such as video encoding, 3D scene rendering, and large-scale compilation. The 5.50 GHz boost clock provides quick single-core responsiveness for office applications and legacy software. The 125 W TDP is modest relative to the core count, and the unlocked multiplier allows tuning. The PassMark data compression score of 804,382 indicates strong throughput for archiving, and the encryption score of 59,097 suggests capable security workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is an Ada Lovelace architecture GPU built on a TSMC 5 nm process with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. It has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The base clock is 930 MHz and the boost clock is 1,680 MHz. The memory clock is 2,250 MHz, translating to 18 Gbps effective. The GPU contains 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, 112 ROPs, 76 ray tracing cores, and 304 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 188.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 32.69 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is also 32.69 TFLOPS (1:1). The TDP is 150 W, with no power connectors required. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are described as “Portable Device Dependent.” The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

There are no benchmark scores recorded for this GPU in the database, so its average benchmark score is 0. Its percentile among all GPUs is 50th, meaning half of all GPUs in the database are expected to perform better. The hardware specifications—16 GB of VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth—are sufficient for large textures and 3D scenes. The 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores suggest the GPU can accelerate ray tracing and AI-based tasks, but without measured scores, we cannot quantify its real-world position relative to other GPUs. The 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 output is a raw compute figure that gives a baseline for graphics and compute performance.

The lack of benchmark scores makes direct comparison impossible, but the 50th percentile rank indicates a mid-tier GPU. This is consistent with its embedded-class designation and the “IGP” slot width, which suggests it is designed for portable or compact systems rather than full-length desktop cards. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is sufficient for its bandwidth, and the 150 W TDP is low enough for many small form factor builds.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s 5.50 GHz boost and 5,068 single-thread PassMark score provide strong frame generation. The GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS and 16 GB VRAM can support 1080p and 1440p gaming at medium to high settings. No measured FPS exists, but the 50th percentile GPU suggests frame rates will be moderate, with the CPU rarely limiting.

Streaming: The 24-core CPU with a multi-thread score of 68,574 can handle encoding and gaming simultaneously. The GPU’s tensor cores may accelerate AI-based encoding, though no dedicated encoder hardware is listed. The data compression score of 804,382 further supports real-time compression workloads.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core 44,253 and PassMark data compression 804,382 indicate fast timeline rendering and export. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth handle 4K textures and effects. The CPU’s single-thread 2,439 in R23 ensures smooth timeline scrubbing.

3D rendering: CPU-based renderers will leverage all 24 cores and 36 MB L3, with the R23 multi-core score being strong. GPU-accelerated renderers will be limited by the 50th percentile GPU; the 32.69 TFLOPS is modest for compute-heavy rendering.

Software development: The 24 cores and 24 threads compile large codebases quickly, and the 36 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency. The single-thread 5,068 score keeps IDEs responsive. The ECC memory support is beneficial for long-running build servers.

Student and office work: The CPU is overkill for basic tasks, but the 5.50 GHz boost and 24 cores provide instant response for spreadsheets, web browsing, and document editing. The GPU’s 50th percentile is more than enough for productivity display output.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K use?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory is supported.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5000 Embedded have?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the GPU’s architecture?

A: The GPU is based on Ada Lovelace architecture.

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The CPU has 24 cores and 24 threads.

Q: What is the GPU’s bus interface?

A: The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU’s 96th percentile versus the GPU’s 50th percentile creates a significant imbalance. In CPU-bound workloads like rendering, compilation, and compression, the CPU will be the primary driver, and the GPU will rarely interfere. In gaming, the GPU is likely the bottleneck for frame rate, because the CPU can feed frames at a high rate but the GPU’s mid-range throughput will cap the output. The build’s combined percentile of 73rd reflects this gap: the CPU’s strength lifts the overall tier, but the GPU holds it back from top-tier status. Without measured FPS scaling, we rely on the percentile difference to infer that the GPU will limit gaming performance at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU may partially compensate, but at 1440p and above, the GPU’s 50th percentile becomes the limiting factor.

Who Should Build It

This build suits users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. Developers who compile large codebases will benefit from the 24 cores and 68,574 multi-thread score. Content creators who rely on CPU-based video encoding and rendering will see strong results in Cinebench and PassMark multi-thread tests. Small business workstations running heavy data processing or simulation software will use the CPU’s 36 MB L3 and ECC support. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p with moderate settings will find the GPU sufficient, but those targeting 4K or maximum ray tracing should consider a higher-percentile GPU. The system is also suitable for students who need a fast CPU for technical work and a GPU capable of light gaming or CAD.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 93,785, placing it at the 96th percentile of all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 44,253, and single-core is 2,439. PassMark multi-thread is 68,574, and single-thread is 5,068. The nearest rival is the Intel Xeon 6520P with an average score of 93,786 (deltaPct 0). The AMD EPYC 4564P scores 95,183 (deltaPct -1.5), the EPYC 9175F scores 95,615 (deltaPct -1.9), and the EPYC 4565P scores 95,764 (deltaPct -2.1). The GPU has no benchmark scores; its average score is 0, and its percentile is 50th. The combined build percentile is 73rd, which places the system in the upper-middle tier of all desktop builds. The CPU is the dominant component, while the GPU sits in the middle of the performance distribution.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851, which supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s and ECC functionality. It provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so there is headroom for a future GPU that can use Gen 5. The CPU TDP is 125 W, and the GPU TDP is 150 W; no suggested PSU is provided, so power supply selection depends on the rest of the system. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking of the CPU. The most sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a higher-percentile model to balance the system, as the CPU’s performance is already near the top of the database. Memory can be expanded within the dual-channel DDR5 standard, and the ECC support adds reliability for data-intensive tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing a 24-core Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus with an NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2. The CPU is in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 50th percentile. The overall build is at the 73rd percentile of all desktop systems. This places the system in the upper tier, but the CPU is significantly stronger than the GPU. The build is best described as a CPU-first workstation with a mid-range GPU that can handle everyday graphics and light gaming.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data is available for this exact CPU and GPU combination. All frame rate estimates are based on the CPU’s 5,068 single-thread PassMark score, 2,439 Cinebench R23 single-core score, and the GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 16 GB VRAM. For 1080p gaming, the CPU is likely to deliver high frame rates in esports titles, while the GPU’s 50th percentile will cap performance in AAA games at medium-to-high settings. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, and the 16 GB VRAM may be insufficient for ultra textures. At 4K, the GPU’s mid-range performance will limit frame rates to below 60 FPS in most demanding titles. The CPU’s 96th percentile ensures that the processor will not be the limiting factor in any gaming scenario, but the GPU’s mid-range standing means the system is not a high-end gaming machine. Users should expect playable 1080p and acceptable 1440p performance, but not top-tier 4K gaming.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds