SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

98%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus

93,785 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

27,565 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC. It carries a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The chip's cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, delivering 115.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support — a feature typically reserved for workstation-class parts. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for modern storage and expansion cards. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU offers basic display output without a discrete GPU.

Benchmark results place this processor in the 96th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 93,785. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 44,253 in multi-core and 2,439 in single-core. The R20 results show 24,461 multi-core and 3,453 single-core. R15 scores are 6,656 multi-core and 354 single-core. PassMark tests reveal strong throughput: multi-thread score of 68,574, single-thread of 5,068, integer math at 175,986, floating-point math at 229,491, and data compression at 804,322. Data encryption scores 59,097, extended instructions at 63,506, and random string sorting at 96,945.

The nearest rivals in the benchmark database are all server-class EPYC and Xeon parts. The Intel Xeon 6520P scores 93,786, matching the 270K Plus within 0%. The AMD EPYC 4564P scores 95,183, which is 1.5% higher. The AMD EPYC 9175F scores 95,615, 1.9% higher, and the AMD EPYC 4565P scores 95,764, 2.1% higher. This positioning is notable: a desktop chip trading blows with enterprise server processors in average benchmark score. The single-core performance, however, is where the 270K Plus likely pulls ahead in everyday responsiveness, as server chips typically prioritize multi-threaded throughput over single-thread speed. The 5.50 GHz boost clock and 3 nm process contribute to strong per-core performance, as reflected in the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,439.

The 24 threads equal the 24 cores — there is no hyperthreading here. This means each core handles one thread, which simplifies scheduling but limits thread oversubscription in heavily parallel workloads. For mixed workloads like video editing with background tasks, the absence of SMT could be a consideration, but the high core count compensates in most scenarios. The 36 MB L3 cache and 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth support data-intensive applications without excessive cache misses.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The 270K Plus single-core score of 5,068 in PassMark and 2,439 in Cinebench R23 indicates strong per-thread performance, which is critical for high-refresh gaming. Combined with the RTX 3090, this pairing can push high frame rates at 1440p and 4K, though the GPU will often be the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The 96th percentile CPU ranking ensures minimal bottleneck for CPU-bound titles.

Streaming: The 24-core configuration provides ample headroom for encoding and gaming simultaneously. The PassMark multi-thread score of 68,574 shows substantial parallel capability, while the 3 nm process keeps power draw manageable at 125 W TDP. Streamers running x264 encoding alongside game rendering will find the 270K Plus capable of handling both without stutter, though the RTX 3090's NVENC encoder offers an alternative offload path.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,253 places this CPU among the top echelon for rendering timelines and exporting projects. The 36 MB L3 cache accelerates repeated access to source footage, and the dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s moves large video files efficiently. The 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die indicate a dense, efficient design suited to sustained encoding workloads.

3D rendering: With PassMark floating-point math at 229,491 and integer math at 175,986, the 270K Plus handles geometric transformations, ray tracing calculations, and physics simulations with high throughput. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking means it outperforms 96% of all processors in the database, making it a viable choice for CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar tools. The 24 threads will saturate multi-threaded render engines effectively.

Software development: Compilation workloads benefit from the multi-core score of 68,574 in PassMark multithread. The data compression score of 804,322 accelerates build artifact packing, while the high single-thread score of 5,068 ensures responsive IDE interaction and fast incremental builds. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build servers or development workstations handling critical codebases.

Student and office work: The 270K Plus is overkill for basic productivity, but the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics provides display output without a discrete GPU, potentially reducing system cost and power draw. The single-thread performance ensures snappy spreadsheet calculations, document rendering, and web browsing. The 3 nm process keeps the 125 W TDP reasonable for a desktop workstation in a dorm room or small office.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 93,785 places it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6520P, scores 93,786 — a 0% delta, indicating near-identical average performance. The AMD EPYC 4564P scores 95,183, 1.5% higher, while the EPYC 9175F and 4565P score 95,615 and 95,764, respectively, 1.9% and 2.1% higher. These deltas are small, meaning the 270K Plus trades blows with enterprise silicon within a narrow margin.

The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, achieves an average benchmark score of 27,565, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 5,118. Geekbench OpenCL shows 172,758, and Vulkan scores 53,927. PassMark G3D scores 26,645, with GPU compute at 15,356. The nearest GPU rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile at 27,435 (0.5% higher), AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT at 27,425 (0.5% higher), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 at 27,839 (1% lower), and AMD Radeon RX 7800M at 27,883 (1.1% lower). The RTX 3090 sits in a competitive mid-range position, not the top tier, but its 24 GB VRAM and 936.2 GB/s bandwidth make it a specialist for large datasets.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 85, indicating that the system outperforms 85% of all tested configurations. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the FACT PACK — all frame rate discussion is estimated from benchmark scores. The CPU's 96th percentile versus the GPU's 73rd percentile reveals an imbalance: the processor is significantly more powerful relative to its peers than the graphics card. This suggests the RTX 3090 will be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, especially at lower resolutions where CPU performance matters less.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for Core Ultra Series 2 processors. Memory support is DDR5 via dual-channel, with a 115.2 GB/s bandwidth ceiling. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), enabling fast NVMe storage and current-generation graphics cards. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking within the 125 W TDP envelope, though the 3 nm process may have limited thermal headroom depending on cooling.

The RTX 3090 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward-compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The GPU's suggested PSU is 750 W, while the CPU TDP is 125 W, leaving substantial headroom for additional components. A 750 W power supply can handle this pairing with room for drives, fans, and modest overclocking. The GPU's TDP of 350 W combined with the CPU's 125 W totals 475 W under full load, well within the 750 W recommendation.

A sensible next upgrade would be a newer GPU generation, as the RTX 3090 is end-of-life and its 73rd percentile ranking shows room for improvement. The CPU's 96th percentile means it will not bottleneck a faster GPU for several generations. For storage, the PCIe Gen 5 lanes support the fastest NVMe drives available, and the 36 MB L3 cache helps with data-heavy workloads. The ECC memory support is a differentiator for users who need error-correcting RAM, though it requires compatible DDR5 ECC modules. The integrated graphics provide a fallback display output if the discrete GPU fails or during troubleshooting.

# Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1440p and 4K: The RTX 3090's 24 GB VRAM and 936.2 GB/s bandwidth handle high-resolution textures and ray tracing. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking ensures no bottleneck at these resolutions, where GPU load dominates. The GPU's 73rd percentile means it is not the fastest available, but it is sufficient for high-refresh 1440p and playable 4K in most titles.

Content creators: Video editors and 3D artists benefit from the CPU's 44,253 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU's 35.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The 24 GB VRAM allows large scenes and high-resolution video scrubbing without out-of-memory errors. The combined 85th percentile system ranking indicates strong overall performance for rendering and exporting.

Software developers: The high single-thread score of 5,068 in PassMark provides fast compilation times for incremental builds, while the 24 threads handle parallel builds. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running test suites or development servers. The data encryption score of 59,097 accelerates secure operations like code signing and SSH.

Students: The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics provides display output without a discrete GPU, potentially reducing system cost. The 3 nm process keeps power draw reasonable at 125 W TDP, lowering electricity costs. The CPU's 96th percentile ensures it will handle any academic workload, from CAD to simulation.

Small business workstations: The ECC memory support and 24 threads make this suitable for financial modeling, database work, and data analysis. The PassMark data compression score of 804,322 speeds up backup and archival tasks. The Xeon and EPYC rivals in the nearestRivals list indicate this CPU competes with server parts, making it a cost-effective workstation alternative.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is built on the GA102 chip using the Ampere architecture, manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process with 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die. It has 10,496 shading units, 328 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units. The GPU features 82 RT cores and 328 tensor cores, providing dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI acceleration. The base clock is 1,395 MHz with a boost clock of 1,695 MHz, and memory runs at 1,219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem is the standout feature: 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus delivers 936.2 GB/s bandwidth. This is exceptionally high for a GPU in the 73rd percentile, making it well-suited for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and compute workloads that exceed the VRAM capacity of typical graphics cards. The pixel rate is 189.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 556.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 35.58 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Benchmark scores show a mixed picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,118 and PassMark G3D score of 26,645 place it in a competitive mid-range position, matching the RTX 4070 Mobile and RX 6700 XT within 0.5%. The GPU's 73rd percentile ranking means it outperforms 73% of all GPUs but trails the top-tier cards. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 172,758 indicates strong compute throughput, while Vulkan at 53,927 shows solid API performance. The PassMark GPU compute score of 15,356 reflects the tensor core capabilities for AI workloads.

The RTX 3090's end-of-life production status means it is no longer manufactured, but its 24 GB VRAM remains relevant for AI inference, 3D rendering, and video editing. The 82 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, and the 328 tensor cores accelerate DLSS and AI-based features. The triple-slot cooler and 336 mm length require a spacious case, and the 1x 12-pin power connector needs an adapter for standard PSUs. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting multi-monitor setups.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance: the CPU sits at the 96th percentile while the GPU sits at the 73rd percentile. This means the RTX 3090 will be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, especially at lower resolutions where CPU performance dominates. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 5,068 could push high frame rates, but the GPU's 73rd percentile ranking may cap performance in GPU-bound titles. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, with the CPU having ample headroom.

For compute workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's 44,253 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU's 35.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance mean either component could be the bottleneck depending on the application. CPU-bound tasks like physics simulation or data compression will saturate the 24 threads, while GPU-bound tasks like rendering or AI inference will utilize the RTX 3090's CUDA cores and tensor cores. The 936.2 GB/s GPU memory bandwidth exceeds the CPU's 115.2 GB/s system bandwidth, so data transfer between CPU and GPU could become a bottleneck in mixed workloads.

The combined percentile of 85 reflects the pairing's overall tier, but the 23-point gap between CPU and GPU percentiles indicates a mismatch. A GPU in a higher percentile would better complement the CPU's performance, while the RTX 3090's 73rd percentile suggests it is the weaker link. For users prioritizing CPU-heavy tasks like software compilation or 3D scene processing, this pairing is well-balanced. For gamers, the GPU will limit performance more than the CPU.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090. The CPU is a 24-core, 24-thread part from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on Arrow Lake Refresh at 3 nm. The GPU is the Ampere-based RTX 3090 with 24 GB GDDR6X memory. The combined percentile of 85 places this system above 85% of tested configurations, making it a high-tier desktop for both gaming and productivity.

The CPU's 96th percentile ranking is exceptional, matching server-class processors like the Xeon 6520P within 0% and trailing EPYC parts by only 1.5-2.1%. The GPU's 73rd percentile is more modest, sitting alongside mid-range cards like the RTX 4070 Mobile and RX 6700 XT. This creates a system that excels at CPU-intensive workloads while offering solid, but not top-tier, GPU performance. The 24 GB VRAM and 936.2 GB/s bandwidth are the GPU's key advantages, enabling large datasets and high-resolution textures that lesser cards cannot handle.

The dataIsMeasured field is false, meaning no measured FPS data exists for this combination. All performance estimates are derived from the benchmark scores. The pairRankByFps is null, confirming the absence of direct frame rate comparisons. Users should interpret gaming performance from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores rather than expecting FPS-specific results.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 270K Plus scores 93,785 on average, matching the Intel Xeon 6520P at 93,786 (0% delta). The AMD EPYC 4564P scores 95,183 (1.5% higher), the EPYC 9175F scores 95,615 (1.9% higher), and the EPYC 4565P scores 95,764 (2.1% higher). This places the desktop CPU within 2.1% of server-class processors.

Q: What is the RTX 3090's percentile ranking and average score?

A: The RTX 3090 ranks in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 27,565. Its nearest rivals include the RTX 4070 Mobile at 27,435 (0.5% higher) and the RX 6700 XT at 27,425 (0.5% higher).

Q: Does this build support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus supports ECC memory. It uses DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus with 115.2 GB/s bandwidth. This makes it suitable for workstation and server-like applications requiring error correction.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The RTX 3090 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward-compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, so the GPU will operate without issue.

Q: Is the RTX 3090 still in production?

A: No, the RTX 3090 is end-of-life. It was released on 2020-08-31, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor. Its production status is listed as "End-of-life" in the FACT PACK.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 85, meaning this system outperforms 85% of all tested configurations. The CPU contributes a 96th percentile ranking, while the GPU contributes a 73rd percentile ranking.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus scores 44,253 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2,439 in single-core. In R20, it scores 24,461 multi-core and 3,453 single-core.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds