SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

98%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus

93,785 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This system pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, a 24-core desktop processor from the Arrow Lake Refresh family, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, a 10 GB Ampere-generation graphics card. The combined benchmark percentile of this pairing is 82, placing it above most systems in the database, with a measured average frame rate of 156.6 FPS across a wide array of titles. This analysis breaks down the performance characteristics of each component, their interaction in real-world workloads, and the types of users for whom this build is best suited, based exclusively on the provided benchmark data.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is built on the GA102 chip using Samsung's 8 nm process, packing 28,300 million transistors into a 628 mm² die. The card operates at a base clock of 1440 MHz and a boost clock of 1710 MHz, with its 10 GB of GDDR6X memory running at an effective speed of 19 Gbps across a 320-bit bus. This configuration yields a memory bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s, a substantial figure that is critical for feeding the 8704 shading units, 272 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units.

The GPU's compute capabilities are anchored by its 68 dedicated RT cores and 272 tensor cores, which handle ray-tracing and AI-accelerated workloads respectively. The FP32 and FP16 performance are both rated at 29.77 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio, which is notable for compute tasks that do not require specialized precision. The card achieves a pixel rate of 164.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 465.1 GTexel/s, metrics that directly influence fill-rate-bound scenarios in high-resolution rendering.

In benchmark terms, the RTX 3080 scores 25,086 in Passmark G3D, placing it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Its performance in other tests shows a mixed profile: it scores 4,407 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), 152,423 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 33,620 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Passmark compute score of 14,397 highlights its capability in general-purpose GPU tasks. However, the nearest rival data shows a tight cluster: the NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23,249 (delta of -0.3%), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 23,250 (delta -0.3%), the AMD Radeon RX 6600M scores 23,273 (delta -0.4%), and the AMD Radeon R9 M290X scores 23,276 (delta -0.4%). This indicates that while the RTX 3080's average benchmark score is 23,172, it is statistically indistinguishable from these lower-tier cards in aggregate, despite having much higher raw specification numbers. This suggests that the benchmark suite may not fully capture the RTX 3080's strengths in modern, high-fidelity workloads, or that its performance is heavily driver-dependent in these specific tests.

For rendering, the combination of 10 GB VRAM and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming with high texture quality, but the VRAM capacity may become a limiting factor at 4K in the most demanding titles. The RT and tensor cores provide hardware support for ray-traced effects and DLSS, though the benchmark data does not include specific RT or DLSS performance metrics. The card's dual-slot design and 320 W TDP require a substantial cooling solution and a 700 W power supply, as suggested.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus achieves an average benchmark score of 93,785, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. This score is remarkably close to its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6520P, which scores 93,786 (a 0% delta). The CPU is then slightly behind the AMD EPYC 4564P, which scores 95,183 (a -1.5% delta), the AMD EPYC 9175F at 95,615 (-1.9%), and the AMD EPYC 4565P at 95,764 (-2.1%). This positioning shows the 270K Plus performing at the level of high-end server processors, which is impressive for a desktop part.

The GPU, as noted, has an average score of 23,172 and sits in the 68th percentile. The combined percentile for the build is 82, which is higher than the GPU percentile alone, indicating that the CPU's strong performance lifts the overall system ranking. The pair's rank by FPS is 1023 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS across all tested games of 156.6. This data confirms that the build is well above the median for gaming performance, with the CPU providing a robust foundation for the GPU to operate at its full potential.

The combined picture is one of a system where the CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is solidly mid-to-high range. The disparity in percentiles (96 vs 68) suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, the system will excel, while in GPU-bound scenarios, the RTX 3080 will be the limiting factor. The measured average of 156.6 FPS across games indicates that, at typical gaming resolutions, the GPU is still capable of delivering high frame rates, making the system a strong all-rounder despite the GPU's lower relative standing.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a 24-core, 24-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture and built on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It features a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The die contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² area, with a cache hierarchy consisting of 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering a maximum memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, and includes ECC memory support.

In Cinebench tests, the CPU scores 6,656 in R15 multi-core and 354 in single-core. Moving to R20, it scores 24,461 multi-core and 3,453 single-core. In the more demanding R23 test, it achieves 44,253 multi-core and 2,439 single-core. These scores demonstrate a strong balance between multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. The Passmark results further detail its capabilities: a multi-thread score of 68,574, a single-thread score of 5,068, and a physics score of 4,064. Specific computational tasks show the processor excelling in data compression (804,322) and floating-point math (229,491), while integer math scores 175,986 and extended instructions score 63,506. The data encryption score is 59,097, and random string sorting is 96,945. The find prime numbers test yields a score of 615.

These numbers place the CPU in the 96th percentile, meaning it outperforms 96% of all processors in the database. For real workloads, the high multi-core scores in Cinebench R23 (44,253) and Passmark multi-thread (68,574) indicate that the CPU can handle heavily parallel tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation with ease. The single-core score of 5,068 in Passmark and 2,439 in R23 ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and strong performance in lightly-threaded applications such as gaming. The 24 threads, while not offering hyper-threading (24 cores, 24 threads), still provide ample parallelism for most modern workloads. The 5.50 GHz boost clock is particularly beneficial for tasks that rely on high frequency rather than core count.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is suitable for a range of users, but its strengths and weaknesses point to specific profiles. Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p will find this system highly capable, as the measured average FPS of 156.6 across all games suggests a smooth experience in most titles. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, allowing the RTX 3080 to deliver its full performance at these resolutions.

Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit from the CPU's exceptional multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,253 and Passmark multi-thread score of 68,574 indicate that tasks like rendering a video timeline or compiling a large codebase will be significantly accelerated. The GPU, while not top-tier, still provides a Passmark G3D score of 25,086, which is sufficient for GPU-accelerated effects in editing software.

Developers, particularly those working on game engines or scientific computing, will appreciate the CPU's 24 cores and support for ECC memory, which provides data integrity in long-running computations. The strong floating-point math score of 229,491 in Passmark is indicative of good performance in numerical simulations. Students in engineering or computer science fields would also benefit from this build, as it can handle demanding software like CAD tools or virtual machines without issue. For small business workstations, the CPU's 96th percentile performance in multi-threaded tasks makes it a powerful choice for data analysis, financial modeling, or server-like roles, while the GPU handles any visualization needs.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the system is capable of exceeding 240 FPS in esports titles like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (537 FPS) and Valorant (557 FPS), and it delivers 243 FPS in Counter-Strike 2. Even at 1440p, these titles remain above 160 FPS (370 and 476 FPS respectively), making this an excellent choice for competitive gamers with high-refresh monitors. The average FPS of 156.6 across all games further supports a high-refresh experience in a wide range of titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,253) provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The Passmark data compression score of 804,322 indicates efficient handling of the data streams involved in streaming, allowing the RTX 3080 to focus on rendering frames without a significant performance hit.

Video editing: The combination of the CPU's multi-core might and the GPU's compute capabilities makes this a potent editing rig. The CPU's Passmark multi-thread score of 68,574 will accelerate timeline rendering and export, while the GPU's 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 performance assists with effects and color grading. The system can handle 4K footage, as evidenced by the CPU's high scores in integer math (175,986) and extended instructions (63,506).

3D rendering: For CPU-based rendering, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,253 places this processor in the top 4% of all CPUs, making it a formidable renderer. For GPU-accelerated rendering, the RTX 3080's 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores, combined with its 10 GB of VRAM, provide a capable, though not top-tier, solution. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4,407 suggests it can handle modern DX12 renderers.

Software development: The 24 cores and 24 threads allow for fast parallel compilation, with the Passmark multi-thread score of 68,574 indicating a significant speedup in build times. The CPU's support for ECC memory ensures data integrity during long compilation sessions. The high single-thread score of 5,068 in Passmark also ensures a responsive IDE.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for basic tasks, but it excels in any academic or professional workload that requires computational power. The CPU's single-thread score of 2,439 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy application launches and smooth multitasking. The GPU can handle any visualization tasks for presentations or reports, and the system's overall speed will save time on any intensive spreadsheet or database work, as evidenced by the Passmark data compression score of 804,322.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The data is measured, and the following represents the actual FPS achieved at ultra settings across various games and resolutions.

At 1080p, the system delivers exceptionally high frame rates in competitive titles. Valorant leads at 557 FPS, followed by Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 537 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege hits 289 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 reaches 243 FPS. Minecraft and To The Core both achieve 240 and 244 FPS respectively, while Roblox posts 314 FPS. In more demanding AAA titles, Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 194 FPS, Ready Or Not at 196 FPS, and Doom at 181 FPS. Assetto Corsa achieves 144 FPS, and Dave The Diver hits 202 FPS. Heavier games like Cyberpunk 2077 manage 72 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 65 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended is the most demanding at 36 FPS. The Medium is also challenging at 51 FPS.

Moving to 1440p, the frame rates scale down but remain playable in most titles. Valorant is still high at 476 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 370 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 drops to 161 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege to 190 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone remains smooth at 172 FPS. In AAA games, Assetto Corsa runs at 101 FPS, Doom at 117 FPS, and Control at 77 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 54 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 49 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 22 FPS. The Medium is at 43 FPS.

At 4K, the system is only suitable for less demanding titles or those with lower graphics settings. Valorant still achieves 380 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 218 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 90 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 105 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone is the standout AAA performer at 146 FPS. Most other games fall below 60 FPS: Assetto Corsa at 61 FPS, Doom at 63 FPS, and Control at 52 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 35 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 32 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 12 FPS. The 10 GB VRAM and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth of the RTX 3080 are insufficient to maintain high frame rates at this resolution in modern titles.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The system exhibits a clear CPU-favored balance, with the processor sitting in the 96th percentile and the GPU in the 68th percentile. This 28-point gap indicates that in most workloads, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck. For example, in 4K gaming, the FPS drops significantly compared to 1080p, which is a classic sign of GPU limitation. The RTX 3080's 32 FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2 at 4K versus 65 FPS at 1080p shows that the GPU is struggling with the increased resolution, not the CPU.

Conversely, the CPU's high percentile ensures it is not a limiting factor in any gaming scenario. The measured FPS at 1080p, where CPU load is highest, shows that the processor can feed the GPU effectively, as evidenced by the 537 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. In CPU-bound tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU will be the star, and the GPU's lower relative performance becomes less relevant.

The FPS scaling between resolutions provides further evidence. At 1080p, the average FPS is high, but the drop to 1440p and 4K is not uniform. Games like Valorant drop from 557 to 476 to 380, which is a relatively small decline, suggesting a CPU-bound scenario even at 4K. In contrast, a game like Cyberpunk 2077 drops from 72 to 54 to 35, indicating a GPU-bound scenario where the resolution increase directly impacts the GPU's load. This dual behavior shows that the system is well-balanced for competitive titles but GPU-limited in visually intensive AAA games. For non-gaming workloads, the CPU's 96th percentile makes it the dominant component, and the GPU's compute scores (Passmark compute 14,397) are sufficient but not exceptional, so any GPU-accelerated compute task will be limited by the RTX 3080's performance.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 82, which places it ahead of 82% of all systems in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6520P?

A: The 270K Plus has an average benchmark score of 93,785, which is essentially identical to the Xeon 6520P's score of 93,786, resulting in a 0% delta.

Q: What is the RTX 3080's average benchmark score and its percentile ranking?

A: The RTX 3080 has an average benchmark score of 23,172 and sits in the 68th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 3080?

A: The RTX 3080 has a memory bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s, using a 320-bit bus and GDDR6X memory running at 19 Gbps effective.

Q: How many RT cores and tensor cores does the RTX 3080 have?

A: The RTX 3080 has 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested power supply for the RTX 3080 is 700 W.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. The pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 represents a high-end CPU with a mid-to-high-end GPU. The CPU's 96th percentile places it in the top tier of all processors, while the GPU's 68th percentile is more modest. The combined percentile of 82 confirms that the overall system is in the upper quintile of all builds, offering strong performance across a wide range of applications. The average FPS of 156.6 across all tested games, with a rank of 1023 out of 3732 pairs, solidifies this build as a capable gaming machine that is also a powerhouse for productivity tasks. The CPU's 24 cores and the GPU's 10 GB of VRAM make it a versatile system, but the GPU's 68th percentile is the primary limiting factor for the most demanding 4K gaming scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus uses the Intel Socket 1851 and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a maximum bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s and ECC support. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is the latest standard for high-bandwidth devices. The RTX 3080 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, and the GPU is not bandwidth-limited by the older standard.

The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 320 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 700 W, which provides sufficient headroom for the entire system, including the CPU and other components. This PSU requirement is a critical consideration for any upgrade path.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the RTX 3080 with a newer, more powerful GPU to better match the CPU's high percentile. The CPU's 96th percentile and PCIe Gen 5 support mean it will not be a bottleneck for any future graphics card. The 10 GB VRAM on the RTX 3080 is a potential limitation at 4K, so a GPU with more VRAM would be a logical upgrade for those seeking higher resolutions. The CPU itself is from the Arrow Lake Refresh generation and has an unlocked multiplier, suggesting it is designed for overclocking, but the current platform is likely at its end-of-life, so a CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard. For a more immediate performance boost, adding more RAM (beyond the dual-channel setup) or installing a faster NVMe SSD would be options, but the most impactful upgrade is the GPU. The system's strong CPU performance ensures that any GPU upgrade will yield significant gains in gaming frame rates, especially at higher resolutions.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds