SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus

61,834 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh: Database Analysis

This pairing combines a 20-core Intel Arrow Lake-HX Refresh mobile processor with a Turing-architecture NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh GPU in a laptop build class. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, producing a combined system percentile of 72. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core strength is substantial, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5917, placing it in the top 7% of all CPUs. This single-threaded performance is the primary driver for high-refresh gaming, as game engines typically rely on one or two heavily loaded threads for frame generation. The GPU, however, sits at the 50th percentile, which means at 1080p and 1440p the CPU can likely push frames faster than the GPU can render them in many titles, making the GPU the limiting factor for achieving very high refresh rates.

Streaming: The combination of 20 cores and 20 threads provides ample parallel processing headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 48270 indicates strong simultaneous multi-tasking capability, allowing game rendering, video encoding, and chat applications to run concurrently without significant frame drops. The lack of dedicated NVENC data in the FACT PACK means encoding quality is not directly quantified, but the CPU's 93rd percentile position suggests software encoding is also viable.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 41913 places this CPU within 0.1% of the Intel Core i9-13900K (61766 avg score) and effectively tied with the i9-13900KF (61841 avg score). For video editing workloads that scale across cores, such as timeline rendering and export, this CPU delivers desktop-class performance in a mobile form factor. The GPU's 16 GB GDDR6 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth provides sufficient capacity for scrubbing high-resolution timelines and applying GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The PassMark floating-point math score of 163567 highlights strong FP32 compute, which is relevant for CPU-based rendering engines. The GPU's 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 3072 shading units provide additional acceleration for GPU-rendered frames, though the GPU's 50th percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier renderer. For architectural visualization or product design workloads, the 16 GB VRAM is a notable advantage over smaller-memory consumer GPUs.

Software development: The PassMark data encryption score of 37813 and data compression score of 493179 indicate robust performance for build pipelines and cryptographic operations. The 30 MB of shared L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code and data structures. Compilation tasks that parallelize across 20 threads will benefit significantly, though single-threaded compilation stages still execute at the strong 5917 R23 single-core level.

Student and office work: The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking means it outperforms the vast majority of installed processors, making even the most demanding spreadsheet, database, or research software feel responsive. The PassMark single-thread score of 4764 ensures snappy UI interactions. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a fallback display output, though the discrete Quadro GPU will handle most rendering tasks. The 55 W CPU TDP is moderate for a 20-core part, indicating reasonable power efficiency for a laptop.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh is built on the Turing architecture with a TU104B chip fabricated on a 12 nm process at TSMC, containing 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. The GPU features 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, delivering a pixel rate of 97.92 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 293.8 GTexel/s. The 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI inference capabilities, though these are first-generation Turing implementations rather than the newer architectures found in subsequent NVIDIA generations.

Memory configuration is substantial: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus yields 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This capacity is particularly valuable for professional workloads like large 3D scenes, high-resolution texture sets, and machine learning inference, where consumer GPUs with 8 GB or even 12 GB can run out of memory. The 1750 MHz memory clock translates to 14 Gbps effective, which is moderate by current standards but adequate for the GPU's compute throughput.

Clock speeds are 1035 MHz base and 1530 MHz boost, which are conservative for a 110 W TDP mobile part. The FP32 throughput of 9.400 TFLOPS and FP16 of 18.80 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) place this GPU in the mid-range of mobile workstation graphics. The PCIe 3.0 x16 bus interface is a generation behind the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support, which could slightly limit data transfer speeds between CPU and GPU in bandwidth-intensive workloads, though for most rendering tasks the impact is minimal.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking means it performs better than half of all GPUs in the database but is not exceptional. For rendering tasks specifically, the 16 GB VRAM is the standout feature — it allows loading larger scenes and higher-resolution textures than 8 GB competitors. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support ensures compatibility with modern graphics APIs, and Vulkan 1.4 support means the GPU can take advantage of low-overhead rendering paths in supported applications.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 61834, placing it at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are remarkably close: the Intel Core i9-13900KF at 61841 (0% delta), the Intel Core i9-13900K at 61766 (0.1% ahead of the 270HX), and the Intel Core i9-13900T at 61723 (0.2% ahead). This means the 270HX Plus delivers essentially identical multi-threaded performance to Intel's flagship desktop parts from the 13th generation, which is exceptional for a mobile processor.

In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 41913 and single-core score of 5917 demonstrate strong performance in both parallel and single-threaded workloads. The single-core result is particularly notable because it exceeds what many desktop CPUs achieve, indicating excellent boost clock behavior up to 5.30 GHz. The Cinebench R20 scores of 17603 multicore and 2485 single-core follow the same pattern, confirming consistency across benchmark versions.

The PassMark suite shows a mixed profile: multithread score of 48270, single-thread of 4764, integer math at 122449, floating-point math at 163567, and extended instructions at 39283. The data compression score of 493179 is very high, suggesting the 30 MB L3 cache and high memory bandwidth (102.4 GB/s) work well together for data-dense workloads. The find prime numbers score of 482 is comparatively lower, indicating that pure integer iteration is not this CPU's strongest area.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the FACT PACK, so its performance must be inferred from its specifications and 50th percentile ranking. The combined system percentile of 72 reflects that the CPU is significantly stronger than the GPU, pulling the overall system above the median but not into the top quartile. In practical terms, this means the system will excel at CPU-bound tasks while GPU-bound workloads will be limited by the Quadro's mid-range standing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance imbalance between the CPU (93rd percentile) and GPU (50th percentile) is stark. In gaming workloads, this means the GPU will almost always be the bottleneck at standard resolutions. The CPU's 5917 R23 single-core score is sufficient to drive high frame rates in most games, but the GPU's mid-range compute throughput will cap frame rates well below what the CPU could theoretically support.

For productivity and content creation, the balance is more favorable. Rendering tasks that use both CPU and GPU (like hybrid renderers) will see the CPU finish its portion faster than the GPU completes its share, potentially leaving CPU cores idle while waiting on the GPU. Conversely, CPU-only workloads like video encoding or compilation will fully utilize the 20 cores and benefit from the 93rd percentile ranking.

The memory subsystem is another consideration: the CPU supports DDR5 with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, while the GPU has 448.0 GB/s. For workloads that stream data between CPU and GPU, the PCIe 3.0 x16 interface on the GPU (versus the CPU's Gen 5 support) creates a potential transfer bottleneck. However, for most laptop use cases, the practical impact is modest. The 16 GB VRAM helps mitigate GPU-side memory pressure, allowing larger working sets to stay on the GPU rather than spilling to system memory.

In FPS terms, the data indicates that at 1080p, the CPU could likely push well over 100 FPS in many titles, but the GPU's 50th percentile performance suggests actual frame rates will be considerably lower. At 4K, the GPU becomes even more dominant as a bottleneck, and the CPU's advantage becomes largely irrelevant. For workstation tasks, the CPU will often finish compute tasks faster than the GPU can process graphics, so users should expect GPU-bound performance in renderers that rely heavily on graphics acceleration.

Who Should Build It

This laptop build targets users who prioritize CPU compute power but need professional-grade GPU features. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p will benefit from the CPU's strong single-threaded performance, but should expect GPU-limited frame rates in demanding titles. Those playing at 4K will find the GPU is the clear constraint, and the 16 GB VRAM helps maintain texture quality at high resolutions even if raw FPS is moderate.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D modeling, and software development will find the CPU's 93rd percentile performance valuable for export times, compilation, and simulation tasks. The 16 GB GPU memory is a significant advantage for working with large textures, complex 3D scenes, or training larger machine learning models locally. The 20 cores and 20 threads handle multitasking well, allowing background renders or builds while other work continues.

Students in engineering, architecture, or data science programs will benefit from the combination of strong CPU performance and professional GPU memory capacity, especially if their coursework involves CAD, GIS, or computational simulations. Small business workstations handling database operations, financial modeling, or light rendering will perform admirably, though the GPU's mid-range standing means it is not suited for heavy GPU compute tasks like real-time ray tracing at high resolutions.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures here are estimates derived from benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The CPU's 93rd percentile single-threaded performance suggests it can feed frames quickly, but the GPU's 50th percentile ranking means actual gaming frame rates will be moderate.

At 1080p ultra settings, estimates suggest this system would achieve playable frame rates in most titles, with esports games likely exceeding 60 FPS due to the strong CPU. AAA single-player games would likely run in the 40-60 FPS range at ultra settings, depending on the title's GPU demands. At 1440p ultra, frame rates would drop further, with many titles falling below 60 FPS in demanding scenes. At 4K ultra, the GPU's 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth would likely produce frame rates in the 25-40 FPS range for most AAA games.

The 16 GB VRAM is a positive for gaming, as it allows high-resolution textures and ray tracing effects without running out of memory. However, the first-generation Turing RT cores (48 of them) are slower than later implementations, so ray tracing performance would be modest. Gamers who prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity should lower settings to gain performance, as the GPU's mid-range compute limits headroom at high settings.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus is a 20-core, 20-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake-HX Refresh architecture. It uses a 3 nm process at TSMC, packing 17,800 million transistors into a 243 mm² die. The base clock of 2.40 GHz boosts to 5.30 GHz, which is a substantial single-core turbo. The 55 W TDP is noteworthy for a 20-core mobile part, suggesting efficient power management.

The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3. The 30 MB L3 is generous for a mobile processor and helps with workloads that exhibit data locality. Memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel configuration, yielding 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU does not support ECC memory, which may be a consideration for mission-critical workstation use. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes provides modern connectivity, though the paired GPU uses PCIe 3.0.

The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides basic display output and light graphics acceleration, useful for troubleshooting or low-power tasks without engaging the discrete GPU. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking on supported systems, though this is less common in laptop form factors. The CPU's release date of 2026-03-16 and active production status indicate it is a current product.

Benchmark results show the CPU's strengths: Cinebench R23 multicore of 41913 and single-core of 5917 are both strong. The PassMark single-thread score of 4764 confirms excellent per-core performance. The data compression score of 493179 is exceptional, indicating strong memory subsystem performance. The encryption score of 37813 and extended instructions score of 39283 show solid throughput for security and SIMD workloads. The floating-point math score of 163567 is high, but the integer math score of 122449 is comparatively lower, suggesting the architecture favors FP workloads. The find prime numbers score of 482 is the weakest result, indicating that tight integer loops are not this CPU's forte. Overall, this is a top-tier mobile CPU that competes with desktop flagship parts from the previous generation.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus compare to the Intel Core i9-13900KF?

A: The two processors are effectively tied, with the i9-13900KF's average benchmark score of 61841 being 0% different from the 270HX Plus's 61834. This means the mobile 270HX delivers desktop-class multi-threaded performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and why does it matter?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. This large capacity is beneficial for professional workloads like 3D rendering and machine learning, where running out of VRAM is a common limitation.

Q: Is this system suitable for high-refresh-rate gaming?

A: The CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5917) can support high frame rates, but the GPU's 50th percentile ranking means it will limit frame rates. At 1080p, esports titles may exceed 60 FPS, but demanding AAA games will likely run at moderate frame rates.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The CPU is built on the Arrow Lake-HX Refresh architecture using a 3 nm process at TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. It is part of the Core Ultra Series 2 generation.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus does not support ECC memory. This is a consideration for users who require error-correcting memory for data integrity in professional workloads.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined system percentile is 72, reflecting the CPU's strong 93rd percentile ranking and the GPU's mid-range 50th percentile ranking. The system overall is above average but not in the top quartile.

Q: What is the GPU's production status and release date?

A: The GPU is end-of-life with a release date of 2020-06-07, while the CPU is active with a release date of 2026-03-16. This means the GPU is older technology paired with a newer processor.

Build Overview

This laptop build pairs a top-tier 20-core Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus processor with a mid-range NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh GPU. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking places it among the best processors available, while the GPU's 50th percentile ranking indicates it is an average performer by current standards. The combined system percentile of 72 reflects a machine that excels at CPU-intensive tasks but is limited by its GPU in graphics-heavy workloads.

The CPU's performance is comparable to Intel's desktop i9-13900K and i9-13900KF parts, which is remarkable for a mobile processor. The GPU, despite being end-of-life, offers 16 GB of GDDR6 memory that is valuable for professional applications. This pairing is best suited for users who need serious CPU compute power for productivity, development, and content creation, with gaming as a secondary use case where moderate frame rates are acceptable. The laptop class means all components are integrated into a portable form factor, and the system's overall tier is above average but not flagship-level due to the GPU's mid-range standing.