SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus

61,834 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus is a 20-core, 20-thread mobile processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Arrow Lake-HX Refresh architecture. Built on a 3nm TSMC process with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, it features a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s and uses the Intel BGA 2114 socket. Its cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The chip also includes an integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU solution, making it a self-contained package for laptops. Data from the Passmark suite shows a single-thread score of 4764 and a multithread score of 48270, indicating strong per-core performance and robust multi-core throughput.

In Cinebench tests, the processor scores 5917 in R23 single-core and 41913 in R23 multi-core, with corresponding R20 scores of 2485 and 17603. These numbers place the CPU in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 93% of processors in the database. Its average benchmark score is 61834, which puts it in direct competition with desktop-class parts like the Intel Core i9-13900KF (score 61841, delta 0%), the Intel Core i9-13900K (score 61766, delta 0.1%), and the Intel Core i9-13900T (score 61723, delta 0.2%). For real workloads, this translates to excellent responsiveness in single-threaded applications like office suites and web browsing, while the multi-core scores suggest it can handle heavy parallel tasks such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computations without breaking a sweat. The Passmark data encryption score of 37813 and data compression score of 493179 further indicate strong performance in security and storage-related tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 61834 is nearly identical to the Intel Core i9-13900KF at 61841, a delta of 0%. This means the 270HX Plus offers desktop-level performance in a mobile form factor. Its percentile rank of 93 among all CPUs confirms that it sits near the top of the performance hierarchy. The GPU, however, tells a different story. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, and its percentile rank is 50, placing it exactly in the middle of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 72, indicating that the system as a whole outperforms 72% of all builds in the database, though this is heavily weighted by the CPU’s strong showing.

The CPU’s passmark floating-point math score of 163567 and integer math score of 122449 are indicative of strong arithmetic processing capabilities, which are useful for simulations, financial modeling, and engineering software. The extended instructions score of 39283 and random string sorting score of 60020 suggest solid performance in cryptography, data parsing, and sorting algorithms. The find prime numbers score of 482 is relatively modest, but this is a niche workload that few users will encounter. For the combined picture, the CPU is clearly the dominant component, providing top-tier processing power while the GPU is mid-range, which creates an imbalance for graphics-intensive tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (4764 in Passmark) and high boost clock of 5.30 GHz suggest it can feed frames to the GPU effectively in most games. However, the GPU’s mid-range percentile rank of 50 indicates that gaming performance will be limited by the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile rather than the CPU. Based on this pairing, users should expect playable frame rates at 1080p in most modern titles, with settings adjusted to medium or high. At 1440p, the GPU’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory (with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth) will help with texture-heavy games, but the 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance will cap frame rates in demanding scenes. At 4K, the GPU will likely struggle to maintain smooth frame rates in AAA titles, and users should expect to lower settings significantly or rely on upscaling technologies.

The GPU’s architecture is Turing, with 3072 shading units, 48 RT cores, and 384 tensor cores. While this supports ray tracing and DLSS in theory, the 12nm process node and 110W TDP limit its raw power compared to newer GPUs. The 1530 MHz boost clock is modest, and the 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, while adequate, is not exceptional for 4K gaming. For esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, the high single-core CPU performance will shine, likely pushing frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p. For more demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Microsoft Flight Simulator, the GPU will be the limiting factor, and users should temper expectations.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need substantial CPU power without necessarily prioritizing top-tier graphics. Content creators working with video editing software will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41913, which is nearly identical to desktop i9-13900K levels. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the multithread performance, as compilation tasks scale well with core counts. Students and researchers running simulations or data analysis in Python or MATLAB will see significant speedups compared to typical laptop CPUs. Small business workstations handling database queries, spreadsheet calculations, and virtual machines will also benefit from the 20 threads and 30 MB of L3 cache.

Gamers at 1080p with a focus on high refresh rates will find the CPU more than capable, but they should pair it with a better GPU if possible. The quad-channel memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s helps with memory-intensive workloads like large dataset manipulation. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a fallback for basic display tasks when the discrete GPU is not needed, potentially saving power. The 55W TDP suggests this is a high-performance mobile chip, likely found in larger laptops with robust cooling solutions. The fact that the multiplier is unlocked indicates potential for overclocking, though this is less common in laptops.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a CPU-heavy build. The CPU ranks in the 93rd percentile, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. This means the GPU is the primary bottleneck for gaming and other graphics-intensive workloads. In CPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering, video encoding, or compilation, the system will perform exceptionally well, with the CPU delivering near-desktop performance. However, in GPU-bound scenarios like gaming at high resolutions or running machine learning inference, the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile will limit overall performance.

The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 48270 is more than sufficient to keep any mid-range GPU fed at 1080p, but at 1440p or 4K, the GPU’s mid-range standing becomes apparent. The 16 GB VRAM is generous, which helps with large textures and professional workloads like CAD or 3D modeling, but the raw compute power of 9.400 TFLOPS is only average. For balanced performance, users would want a GPU in the 70th percentile or higher. The CPU’s performance is never the limiting factor in this pairing; all evidence points to the GPU as the component that dictates overall system capability in graphics tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 4764 and boost clock of 5.30 GHz can drive high frame rates in competitive titles, likely exceeding 144 FPS in less demanding games. The GPU’s mid-range performance will allow for high settings in esports titles, but AAA games may require medium settings to maintain 100+ FPS. At 1440p, frame rates will drop, and users should expect 60-80 FPS in most titles with adjusted settings.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 threads are more than adequate for encoding video while gaming. The Passmark data encryption score of 37813 suggests strong performance for hardware-accelerated streaming. The GPU’s Turing architecture includes NVENC, which offloads encoding from the CPU, though the 110W TDP limit means the GPU will have less headroom for concurrent gaming and encoding tasks.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41913 ensures fast export times in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The 16 GB GPU memory helps with timeline scrubbing and effect previews, and the GPU’s 48 RT cores provide some acceleration for ray-traced effects, though performance will be moderate.

3D rendering: The CPU excels in this workload, with its multithread performance rivaling desktop i9-13900K levels. The GPU’s 3072 CUDA cores can accelerate rendering in Blender or Octane, but the 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest compared to newer GPUs. Expect longer render times than a high-end desktop GPU would provide.

Software development: Compilation will be fast with 20 threads, and the Passmark integer math score of 122449 indicates strong performance for code processing. The 30 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code segments, and the high single-thread score speeds up code analysis and IDE responsiveness.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for typical office tasks, but the CPU’s power ensures smooth multitasking across dozens of browser tabs, spreadsheets, and document editors. The integrated GPU offers a low-power mode for battery saving, though the discrete GPU will engage for any graphics workload, potentially reducing battery life.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a Turing-architecture GPU with 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. It features 48 RT cores for real-time ray tracing and 384 tensor cores for AI acceleration. The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its clock speeds are modest, with a base of 1035 MHz and boost of 1530 MHz, resulting in 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 18.80 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The pixel rate is 97.92 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 293.8 GTexel/s.

This GPU is based on the TU104 chip, which is the same die used in desktop RTX 2080-class cards, but the mobile version has lower clocks and power limits. The 110W TDP is typical for a mobile workstation GPU, but it is low compared to desktop counterparts. The 12nm process node from TSMC is older and less efficient than the CPU’s 3nm node, which contributes to the performance gap. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern games and professional software.

Its percentile rank of 50 places it exactly at the median of all GPUs in the database. This means half of all GPUs are faster, and half are slower. For professional workloads like CAD, the 16 GB VRAM is advantageous for large models, and the driver optimizations for Quadro cards benefit stability in certified applications. For gaming, the performance is equivalent to a mid-range desktop GPU, suitable for 1080p gaming at high settings but not for high-refresh 1440p or 4K. The GPU’s production status is end-of-life, indicating it is older technology, but it retains functionality for legacy workstation tasks.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, while the GPU is an older mobile workstation part from the Turing generation. The combined percentile rank is 72, meaning this system outperforms 72% of all builds in the database, but the distribution is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The CPU’s 93rd percentile rank indicates top-tier processing power, while the GPU’s 50th percentile is average.

This pairing is best understood as a CPU-first machine. It will excel at processor-intensive tasks like compilation, rendering, video encoding, and scientific computing, where the CPU’s 20 threads and 5.30 GHz boost clock deliver desktop-class performance. The GPU is sufficient for professional visualization and moderate gaming, but it is not a gaming powerhouse. The system’s overall tier is upper-midrange, driven primarily by the CPU. The absence of measured FPS data means that gaming performance must be inferred from benchmarks, which point to a capable but not exceptional gaming experience. This is a workstation-class laptop for users who prioritize raw compute power over graphics fidelity.

FAQ

Q: How does the CPU compare to a desktop i9-13900K?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has an average benchmark score of 61834, which is 0.1% below the Intel Core i9-13900K’s score of 61766. This places the mobile CPU at parity with a high-end desktop processor from the previous generation.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance percentile?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile ranks in the 50th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it is exactly average. Half of all GPUs are faster, and half are slower.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: No measured FPS data exists for this combination. Based on the GPU’s mid-range percentile and 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance, 4K gaming would require significantly reduced settings and would likely result in sub-60 FPS in demanding titles.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the GPU have?

A: The GPU has 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth from its 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus. This is sufficient for 1080p gaming and professional workloads, but less than newer GPUs offer.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance?

A: The CPU scores 4764 in Passmark single-thread tests and 5917 in Cinebench R23 single-core. These scores indicate strong per-core performance, which is important for gaming and lightly-threaded applications.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the CPU does not support ECC memory. It uses dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 72, meaning it outperforms 72% of all builds in the database. This is driven by the CPU’s 93rd percentile rank, while the GPU’s 50th percentile pulls the average down.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds