SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus

61,834 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This laptop pairing combines Intel’s 20-core Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus with NVIDIA’s Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh, a configuration that targets professional mobile workstations more than pure gaming rigs. The CPU is a current-generation Arrow Lake-HX Refresh part built on a 3 nm TSMC process, while the GPU is an end-of-life Turing architecture part from 2019. The data shows a significant generational gap between the two components, and the benchmark scores reflect that imbalance clearly.

Important note: The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All performance discussions below are estimated from the synthetic benchmark scores and percentile positions, not from direct game testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus is a 20-core, 20-thread processor with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. It is built on a 3 nm TSMC process with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, placing it in the current Arrow Lake-HX generation. The cache layout includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes. An integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU unit is present, and the multiplier is unlocked.

The 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs tells the story: this is a top-tier mobile processor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41,913 is the headline figure, indicating strong sustained multi-threaded performance for a laptop chip. The single-core R23 score of 5,917 is equally impressive, showing that the 5.30 GHz boost clock delivers in lightly-threaded workloads. PassMark multi-thread score of 48,270 and single-thread score of 4,764 reinforce this position.

The nearest rivals provide context. The Intel Core i9-13900KF scores 61,841 average, essentially identical with a 0% delta. The i9-13900K is 0.1% behind at 61,766, and the i9-13900T is 0.2% behind at 61,723. The Intel Xeon 636 trails by 0.8% at 61,360. This places the Ultra 7 270HX Plus squarely in the performance class of desktop i9-13900 series parts, which is remarkable for a mobile processor. The average benchmark score of 61,834 confirms this positioning.

In real workloads, the high multi-core score translates to serious rendering and compilation capability. The PassMark data compression score of 493,179 and integer math score of 122,449 indicate strong general-purpose compute. Floating point math at 163,567 and extended instructions at 39,283 suggest the CPU handles scientific and engineering workloads well. The 20 threads without hyper-threading mean the core count is physical, which helps with predictable scheduling in multi-threaded applications.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is a Turing architecture part built on a 12 nm TSMC process with 10,800 million transistors on a 445 mm² die. It is based on the TU106 chip and is part of the GeForce 30-series naming scheme, though it is actually a Quadro Turing-M generation part. The GPU has 1,920 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. It includes 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads.

Memory consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1,750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective data rate. Base clock is 945 MHz with a boost clock of 1,380 MHz. Pixel rate is 88.32 GPixel/s and texture rate is 165.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 5.299 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 10.60 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The GPU uses an MXM module slot, has no power connectors, and connects via PCIe 3.0 x16. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs is the critical reference point. This is a mid-pack mobile GPU, not a high-end part. The 6 GB VRAM is modest by current standards, and the 336.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming but will struggle at higher resolutions or with large textures. The 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance is respectable for a 2019-era mobile part but pales against modern laptop GPUs.

The Turing architecture includes dedicated RT cores and tensor cores, which means the GPU can handle ray-traced effects and DLSS-style AI upscaling. However, with only 30 RT cores and 5.299 TFLOPS of compute, ray tracing performance will be limited. The 240 tensor cores provide some AI capability, but the overall throughput is constrained by the aging architecture and 12 nm process.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers an average benchmark score of 61,834, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals are the Intel Core i9-13900KF at 61,841 (0% delta), the i9-13900K at 61,766 (0.1% behind), the i9-13900T at 61,723 (0.2% behind), and the Intel Xeon 636 at 61,360 (0.8% behind). This means the Ultra 7 270HX Plus performs essentially identically to a desktop i9-13900K, a strong result for a mobile chip.

The GPU has an empty benchmark list and a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0. No nearest rival data exists. The 50th percentile placement indicates the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh sits exactly in the middle of the GPU performance distribution, meaning half of all GPUs are faster and half are slower.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 72, which reflects the strong CPU pulling the overall score up while the mid-range GPU holds it back. The contrast is stark: a 93rd percentile CPU paired with a 50th percentile GPU creates a system where the processor is clearly the dominant component. In CPU-bound workloads, this laptop will feel exceptionally fast. In GPU-bound tasks, it will perform at an average level.

The PassMark scores for the CPU show specific strengths: data compression at 493,179, data encryption at 37,813, extended instructions at 39,283, prime number finding at 482, floating point math at 163,567, integer math at 122,449, multi-thread at 48,270, physics at 3,843, random string sorting at 60,020, and single-thread at 4,764. These numbers paint a picture of a CPU that excels at mixed workloads, with particularly strong compression and sorting performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The 50th percentile GPU will not consistently drive high refresh rates at 1080p in demanding titles. The 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 6 GB VRAM limit the GPU to medium or high settings in modern games, and ray tracing will be a performance killer. The CPU's 5,917 single-core R23 score ensures no CPU bottleneck, but the GPU is the constraint. Expect smooth 60 FPS in esports titles but struggles at 144 Hz in AAA games.

Streaming: The 20-core CPU provides plenty of headroom for software encoding while gaming. The 41,913 multi-core R23 score and 48,270 PassMark multi-thread score mean x264 encoding at high presets will not impact gameplay significantly. The 240 tensor cores on the GPU could assist with AI-based streaming features, but the aging Turing architecture limits the effectiveness compared to newer parts.

Video editing: The CPU's 17603 Cinebench R20 multi-core score and 163,567 PassMark floating point math score are strong for video encoding and effects. The GPU's 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p editing timelines with moderate effects. Export times will be CPU-bound, and the processor will shine here. The 336.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for 4K preview, but the GPU may struggle with heavy color grading or noise reduction effects.

3D rendering: This is where the CPU dominates. The 41,913 Cinebench R23 multi-core score is excellent for CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar software. The GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 and 30 RT cores provide some acceleration, but the 6 GB VRAM will limit scene complexity. Larger scenes will need to be CPU-rendered, which is fine given the processor's strength.

Software development: The 20 physical threads and high single-core performance make this an excellent development machine. Compilation times will be short thanks to the 122,449 PassMark integer math score and 48,270 multi-thread score. The 493,179 data compression score helps with large codebases and build artifacts. The 93rd percentile CPU ranking ensures no slowdown during heavy builds.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for basic productivity. The CPU's single-core performance will make spreadsheet and document work instant, but the 55 W TDP and active production status suggest a premium laptop that is more than needed for typing and browsing. The GPU's professional Quadro drivers may offer stability benefits for CAD software, but the 50th percentile performance is not a differentiator for office tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the 93rd percentile CPU and 50th percentile GPU is heavily skewed toward the processor. The CPU's average benchmark score of 61,834 versus the GPU's average score of 0 (no benchmarks available) makes direct comparison difficult, but the percentile gap is clear. The combined percentile of 72 sits between the two component positions, reflecting a system where the CPU carries most of the performance weight.

In CPU-bound workloads such as compilation, rendering, and data processing, the Ultra 7 270HX Plus will deliver near-desktop performance. The 0% delta versus the i9-13900KF means there is no meaningful performance gap in these tasks. The GPU will not be a limiting factor in these scenarios.

In GPU-bound workloads such as gaming, video effects, and GPU rendering, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh becomes the bottleneck. The 50th percentile ranking and 6 GB VRAM will cause frame rate drops in demanding titles, and the 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is roughly a third of what a modern high-end laptop GPU offers. The CPU will sit idle while the GPU struggles.

The FPS scaling follows this pattern. Since no measured FPS data exists, estimates come from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 5,917 single-core R23 score suggests it can feed frames to the GPU without issue. The GPU's 88.32 GPixel/s pixel rate and 165.6 GTexel/s texture rate indicate 1080p gaming at medium settings is achievable, but 1440p will be challenging and 4K will be limited by both VRAM and compute.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need serious CPU performance in a laptop form factor and can tolerate a mid-range GPU. The 93rd percentile CPU ranking makes it ideal for software developers who compile large projects, researchers running simulations, and content creators who do CPU-based rendering. The 20 cores and 41,913 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handle heavy parallel workloads without breaking a sweat.

For gamers at 1080p resolution, the 50th percentile GPU will deliver playable frame rates in most titles at medium settings. Users who prioritize competitive esports games will find the CPU ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU limits maximum FPS in GPU-heavy titles. Gamers at 1440p or 4K should look elsewhere, as the 6 GB VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for high-resolution textures.

Content creators working with video will benefit from the CPU's 48,270 PassMark multi-thread score for fast exports. The GPU's Tensor cores and RT cores provide some acceleration for AI effects and ray-traced previews, but the 12 nm Turing architecture is outdated. Professional users who require certified drivers for CAD or scientific visualization will appreciate the Quadro branding, even if the raw performance is mid-pack.

Students and office workers should not choose this configuration. The high TDP of 55 W and premium positioning mean this is a workstation-class laptop, not a portable productivity device. The CPU performance is wasted on document editing and web browsing. Small business workstations that run complex spreadsheets or local databases could benefit from the CPU's data compression score of 493,179, but the GPU adds cost without benefit for most office tasks.

FAQ

Q: How does the CPU compare to desktop processors?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has an average benchmark score of 61,834, which is essentially identical to the Intel Core i9-13900KF at 61,841 (0% delta) and the i9-13900K at 61,766 (0.1% delta). This is desktop-class performance in a mobile package.

Q: Is 6 GB of VRAM enough for modern games?

A: The 6 GB GDDR6 memory on the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is adequate for 1080p gaming at medium settings, but the 50th percentile GPU ranking and 192-bit bus width limit higher resolutions. Large texture packs and ray tracing will exceed the 336.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Can this laptop do ray tracing?

A: The GPU has 30 RT cores, which enable ray tracing, but the 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance and Turing architecture limit the effectiveness. Ray-traced effects will run at reduced frame rates compared to newer GPUs.

Q: What is the CPU's production status?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has an "Active" production status with a release date of 2026-03-16. The GPU is "End-of-life" with a release date of 2019-05-26.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked on the Ultra 7 270HX Plus. The base clock of 2.40 GHz can be raised toward the 5.30 GHz boost clock, though laptop cooling will limit sustained overclocks.

Q: What memory does this platform use?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its predecessor?

A: The GPU's predecessor is the Quadro Pascal-M, and its successor is Ampere-MW. The current Turing architecture is one generation older than the successor, which explains its mid-pack 50th percentile ranking.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses an Intel BGA 2114 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense; the entire motherboard must be replaced to change processors. The socket supports the Arrow Lake-HX refresh generation, and the CPU is the top-tier option in this lineup based on its 93rd percentile ranking.

Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. This is the current standard for high-performance laptops, and upgrading to higher-capacity DDR5 modules is possible if the laptop has accessible SODIMM slots. ECC memory is not supported, so error-correcting workloads require a different platform.

PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes is available from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for the latest NVMe SSDs and external GPU enclosures. The GPU itself uses PCIe 3.0 x16, which is an older interface but not a bottleneck for the 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance.

The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 80 W, totaling 135 W for the core components. No suggested PSU is listed because this is a laptop with a proprietary power adapter. The 55 W CPU TDP is modest for a 20-core part, indicating efficient power management on the 3 nm process.

The most sensible upgrade path for this laptop is to replace the GPU module. The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh uses an MXM Module slot, which is theoretically replaceable. However, the GPU is end-of-life, and newer MXM modules may not be compatible with the laptop's cooling or BIOS. A more practical upgrade is to increase memory and storage, leveraging the PCIe Gen 5 lanes for a fast NVMe drive.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh. The CPU is a current-generation 20-core processor with a 93rd percentile ranking, while the GPU is an end-of-life Turing part at the 50th percentile. The combined percentile is 72, indicating an above-average system overall, driven almost entirely by the CPU.

The pairing is unusual in that the CPU is significantly stronger than the GPU. The 20-core processor delivers desktop-class performance for compute-heavy workloads, while the 6 GB GPU handles graphics at an average level. This configuration makes sense for users who prioritize CPU performance for development, rendering, or data analysis and need a GPU for basic visualization or occasional gaming.

The 55 W CPU TDP and 80 W GPU TDP mean this laptop will require robust cooling, and battery life will be modest under load. The 3 nm CPU process helps efficiency, but the 12 nm GPU process is power-hungry by comparison. The Quadro branding suggests professional driver support, which adds value for workstation users despite the GPU's mid-pack performance.

This build is best described as a developer workstation with gaming capability rather than a gaming laptop with a fast CPU. The benchmark data supports this: the CPU outperforms the i9-13900KF in average score, while the GPU sits exactly at the median of all GPUs. Users who need heavy CPU compute in a portable form factor will find this pairing delivers, provided they accept the GPU's limitations.