SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 268V + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

85%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 268V

20,897 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

29,928 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile form a laptop pairing that targets a specific performance tier: the 75th percentile for the combined system. This places it above the majority of mobile systems, but the data shows a distinct split between the CPU and GPU’s relative strengths. The processor, built on the Lunar Lake architecture, is a power-efficient 8-core part, while the graphics solution is a full Blackwell 2.0 chip with substantial compute resources. This analysis uses only the provided benchmark data to interpret what this combination means for real-world workloads, platform longevity, and gaming expectations.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V is an 8-core, 8-thread processor based on the Lunar Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of just 17 W. This low power envelope is a defining characteristic; the data suggests the chip is engineered for efficiency in mobile chassis, prioritizing battery life and thermal headroom over raw multi-threaded throughput. The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark results show a processor that is strong in single-threaded tasks but modest in multi-threaded ones. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 1921 points in single-core and 10653 points in multi-core. The single-core score is competitive, but the multi-core figure is only about 5.5 times the single-core score, which reflects the lack of hyper-threading. The Geekbench results reinforce this: a single-core score of 2270 and a multi-core score of 9963. The Passmark suite provides a more granular look at specific workloads. For instance, the data compression score is 181443, which is high, but the find prime numbers score is only 192, indicating that integer-heavy, branch-predictor-intensive tasks are not this chip's forte. Floating-point math scores 57628, while integer math scores 42669, showing a bias towards floating-point operations.

The overall average benchmark score is 20897, placing the CPU at the 74th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database are the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE (avg score 20900, deltaPct 0), the Intel Core i5-12600T (avg score 20917, deltaPct -0.1), the AMD EPYC 7J13 (avg score 20845, deltaPct 0.2), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (avg score 20826, deltaPct 0.3). This means the Ultra 7 268V sits in a performance band with desktop and mobile parts from previous generations, showing that its efficiency is not achieved without a trade-off in absolute multi-threaded performance. The Passmark multithread score of 19297 and physics score of 1617 suggest that sustained all-core loads, such as video rendering, will not be its primary strength, but bursty, single-threaded work will feel responsive.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 2833 socket, which is a soldered mobile package. This immediately defines the upgrade path: the CPU is not swappable. The memory support is listed as "unknown" and depends on the motherboard, but the memory bus is dual-channel. This is a critical detail because the CPU's performance is often tied to memory bandwidth, and the lack of a defined memory specification means the system builder must rely on the laptop manufacturer's implementation.

The PCIe support is Gen 5 with 4 lanes for the CPU only. This is a limited allocation, likely intended for the primary NVMe SSD. The GPU, however, has access to a full PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, as listed in its specifications. The TDP of the CPU is 17 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 50 W. Combined, this is a 67 W thermal load for the core components, which is quite low for a system with a discrete GPU. The suggested PSU is null, which is typical for a laptop where the power supply is external and proprietary. The data shows that the platform is designed for a specific, non-upgradable configuration. The sensible "next upgrade" is not a component swap but a full system replacement, as the BGA socket and mobile class preclude any meaningful part changes. The memory being dual-channel and dependent on the motherboard means that the user is locked into whatever the OEM provides.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the GPU and CPU, not from direct gameplay testing. The data is marked as `dataIsMeasured: false`, meaning these figures should be treated as projections of relative capability.

The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, has a Passmark G3D score of 20355, which is at the 75th percentile of all GPUs. This is a strong score, suggesting it can handle modern titles at high settings. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (avg score 29945, deltaPct -0.1), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (avg score 29783, deltaPct 0.5), the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (avg score 30095, deltaPct -0.6), and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 (avg score 30433, deltaPct -1.7). The deltaPct values are negligible, meaning the RTX 5070 Mobile is effectively on par with these desktop-class GPUs from previous generations. This indicates that at 1080p and 1440p, the GPU will likely be the dominant factor in gaming performance, capable of high frame rates in esports titles and playable frame rates in AAA games. However, the CPU's 8 threads and modest multi-core performance could become a limiting factor in CPU-bound scenarios, such as large open-world games with many NPCs or real-time strategy games. The estimated FPS will be high for graphically intensive games, but users should expect occasional frame dips in titles that stress the CPU's single-thread performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a system where the GPU significantly outpaces the CPU in raw compute. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 20355 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 122238 are substantial, while the CPU's Passmark multithread score is 19297 and Geekbench multi-core score is 9963. The combined percentile is 75, but the CPU's percentile is 74, and the GPU's is 75. This near-identical percentile ranking suggests a balanced pairing on paper, but the nature of the workloads matters more.

In gaming, the bottleneck will depend on the title and resolution. At lower resolutions, the CPU's single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1921) will be the limiting factor for maximum frame rates. The GPU has enough compute headroom (13.13 TFLOPS FP32) to render frames faster than the CPU can feed it instructions in many scenarios. At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, which is the more typical and desirable scenario. The CPU's low TDP of 17 W suggests that in a thin-and-light chassis, the cooling solution might be sufficient to maintain boost clocks, but sustained all-core loads will cause the CPU to settle at lower clocks, reducing its multi-threaded output further. The FPS scaling, though not measured, can be inferred: the GPU is likely to be the boundary for most modern games, while the CPU will cause stutters or frame drops in physics-heavy or simulation-style games.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V a good processor for multi-threaded workloads like video editing?

A: The data indicates it is modest. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 10653, which is low compared to many desktop parts. It will handle light editing but will lag behind in heavy rendering tasks.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Mobile compare to older desktop GPUs?

A: Benchmark results show it is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and RTX 2080 Ti, with deltaPct values of -0.1 and 0.5, respectively. It is also comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 6800 and RX 6700.

Q: Can this laptop play games at high settings?

A: Yes, the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 20355, which is at the 75th percentile, suggests it can handle modern games at high settings. However, specific FPS figures are estimated, not measured, for this pairing.

Q: What is the memory configuration for this CPU?

A: The memory support is listed as "unknown" and depends on the motherboard, but it uses a dual-channel memory bus. No specific memory type or speed is given in the data.

Q: Is the CPU upgradeable?

A: No. The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket, which is a soldered mobile package, meaning it cannot be replaced or upgraded.

Q: What is the power draw of the core components?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 17 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 50 W. This is a low total power draw for a discrete GPU laptop.

Q: Does the system support the latest PCIe standard?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes, and the GPU supports PCIe 5.0 x16, so yes, it has access to the latest PCIe standard.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration is best suited for users who prioritize gaming and graphics performance over heavy CPU computation. The 75th percentile GPU ranking means gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p will get a smooth experience in most titles, particularly fast-paced esports games where high frame rates are achievable. The CPU's strong single-core performance (Geekbench single-core score of 2270) makes it suitable for general productivity and software development, where compilers and code editors often rely on single-threaded speed. Students and small business workstations will find the 17 W CPU efficient for office tasks, spreadsheets, and web browsing, though the 8-thread limit may hinder heavy multitasking with virtual machines. Content creators working with photos or light video edits will benefit from the GPU's compute capabilities (Passmark GPU compute score of 8279), but 3D rendering workloads will be CPU-bound and slower than systems with higher multi-core scores. The data does not support this being a workstation for professional 3D animation or high-end video production; it is a gamer's laptop that can do some work, not a work laptop that can play games.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 20897, placing it at the 74th percentile. Its best scores include a Passmark data compression score of 181443, a Passmark floating-point math score of 57628, and a Geekbench multi-core score of 9963. Its weakest scores are in Passmark find prime numbers (192) and Passmark physics (1617), which are low and indicate poor integer and physics simulation performance.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 29928, placing it at the 75th percentile. Its strongest result is the Geekbench OpenCL score of 122238, followed by the Geekbench Vulkan score of 116960 and the Passmark G3D score of 20355. The Passmark DirectX 12 score is 93, which is low, but this is likely a synthetic test that does not reflect real-world gaming performance. The combined percentile for the system is 75. The combined picture is one of a balanced system by percentile, but with the GPU holding the higher absolute performance for gaming and compute, while the CPU acts as a capable but not exceptional driver.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile. The CPU is a low-power Lunar Lake part designed for efficiency, while the GPU is a high-performance Blackwell 2.0 chip. The overall tier is the 75th percentile of all systems, meaning it outperforms three-quarters of the database entries. This is a mid-to-high tier mobile gaming platform, not a flagship, but it is well above the average. The CPU is at the 74th percentile, and the GPU is at the 75th percentile, so the system is not held back by a weak component in terms of relative ranking. It is a coherent pairing where the GPU is the star, and the CPU provides sufficient single-threaded power to avoid major bottlenecks in most tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RTX 5070 Mobile, with a Passmark G3D score of 20355 and a percentile of 75, is well-equipped for high-refresh 1080p gaming. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1921 will support high frame rates in competitive shooters, though the 8-thread limit might cause minor dips in busy scenes.

Streaming: The GPU's NVENC encoder is not detailed in the data, but the Geekbench Vulkan score of 116960 suggests it has the compute power to handle encoding. The CPU, however, may struggle with the simultaneous load of gaming and streaming software, as its multi-thread score of 10653 in Cinebench R23 is not high.

Video Editing: For 1080p or light 4K editing, the GPU's compute score of 8279 in Passmark will accelerate effects and rendering. The CPU's multi-core score is a bottleneck for final export times, so expect slower renders than a system with a higher-thread-count CPU.

3D Rendering: This is not a strong scenario for this system. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10653 is the limiting factor. While the GPU can help with certain render engines, CPU-based rendering will be slow.

Software Development: The CPU's single-core Geekbench score of 2270 is excellent for code compilation, which is often single-threaded. The fast data compression score of 181443 will help with packing and unpacking assets. The 8 threads are sufficient for running a local server and an IDE simultaneously.

Student and Office Work: The 17 W TDP CPU is highly efficient, leading to long battery life (though not measured). The Passmark single-thread score of 4051 ensures that web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheets will feel snappy. The integrated Arc 140V GPU is present, but the discrete RTX 5070 Mobile will handle any graphics-accelerated tasks, making this overkill for pure office work but useful for students in STEM fields.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 268V + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 268V

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds