SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 266V + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 266V

23,297 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

27,435 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a pairing where the CPU and GPU sit at surprisingly similar percentile positions. The Intel Core Ultra 7 266V lands in the 76th percentile among all CPUs, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile sits at the 73rd percentile among all GPUs. This near-match suggests a balanced platform where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. However, the nature of the workloads matters more than the raw percentiles. The CPU's multicore score of 16,544 in Cinebench R23 is respectable for a 17 W part, but the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 19,587 indicates substantial rendering headroom. In gaming scenarios, the GPU is almost certainly the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the CPU's single-thread performance — a 3,943 Passmark single-thread score — is adequate to feed the GPU at lower settings.

The CPU's 8 cores and 8 threads, combined with a 5.00 GHz boost clock, point to a design optimized for responsiveness rather than brute parallel throughput. The absence of Hyper-Threading means thread count equals core count, which can create a bottleneck in heavily threaded workloads that scale beyond 8 threads. The Passmark multithread score of 19,461, while competitive against the nearest rivals, is only 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900F. This indicates the 266V is not a workstation-class compute monster; it is a mobile-efficient chip that punches near desktop parts from a few generations back.

For GPU-bound tasks, the RTX 4070 Mobile's 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB GDDR6 VRAM are the limiting factors. The bus width of 128 bit constrains how much data can flow to the GPU cores, which is evident in the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 85 — a relatively low figure that suggests driver or architectural overhead in certain API paths. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 15.62 TFLOPS is strong for a mobile part, but the memory subsystem will throttle performance in texture-heavy or large-scene workloads. The combined percentile of 75 for this build reflects a system that is well above average but not flagship-tier.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16,544 and a single-core score of 2,335. The single-core result is particularly telling: it places the 266V in a class where rapid per-thread response matters, which aligns with its 5.00 GHz boost clock. The Cinebench R20 scores — 6,948 multicore and 980 single-core — follow the same pattern. Passmark results reinforce this profile: integer math at 41,558, floating-point math at 56,923, and extended instructions at 15,928. The data compression score of 187,050 is notably high, suggesting the CPU handles archival or compression tasks efficiently, while the encryption score of 13,822 indicates moderate cryptographic throughput.

The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 109,197 and Vulkan score of 108,367 are nearly identical, implying the compute units are well-utilized across different API abstractions. Passmark G3D of 19,587 places it near the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (0% delta) and within 0.5% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090. This is a striking comparison: a mobile GPU essentially matching a desktop flagship from a previous generation in average benchmark score. The GPU compute score of 8,399 is lower relative to the G3D score, which suggests that raw compute workloads (such as FP32 math) do not scale as well as graphics rendering tasks.

When combined, the CPU's average benchmark score of 23,297 and the GPU's average of 27,435 produce a system that is 75th percentile overall. The nearest CPU rivals — the Ryzen 7 5800H, Core i9-11900F, Core Ultra 9 288V, and EPYC 4124P — all fall within 0.6% of the 266V's score. This means the CPU is not a differentiator; the GPU carries more weight in overall system performance. For users considering this build, the data suggests the GPU is the component to prioritize in workload planning.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4070 Mobile is built on the AD106 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5 nm process. It packs 4,608 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, along with 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores. The transistor count of 22,900 million on a 188 mm² die gives a density of 121.8M transistors per mm², which is high but not extreme for the process node. The base clock of 1,395 MHz and boost clock of 1,695 MHz are modest for a GPU with this many cores, indicating power constraints typical of mobile parts. The memory runs at 2,000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) across a 128-bit bus, yielding 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The RT and tensor core counts are significant for a mobile GPU. With 36 RT cores, ray-traced workloads have dedicated hardware, and the 144 tensor cores enable DLSS and AI-accelerated features. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support means the GPU can handle hardware ray tracing, mesh shaders, and variable-rate shading. The pixel rate of 81.36 GPixel/s and texture rate of 244.1 GTexel/s indicate the GPU can fill frames quickly at high resolutions, provided the memory bandwidth does not starve it.

The Passmark DirectX scores tell an interesting story: DirectX 9 at 223, DirectX 10 at 116, DirectX 11 at 179, and DirectX 12 at 85. The drop from DirectX 11 to DirectX 12 is notable, suggesting that the GPU's performance in older APIs is stronger relative to newer ones, possibly due to driver maturity or architectural scheduling. The G2D score of 763 is low, which is expected for a discrete GPU that prioritizes 3D performance. For rendering tasks, the FP32 throughput of 15.62 TFLOPS (with FP16 at 1:1 ratio) means the GPU can handle both single-precision and half-precision workloads at similar rates, which is beneficial for AI inference and certain compute shaders.

Who Should Build It

This laptop build targets users who need strong GPU performance without the thermal and power penalties of a full desktop. The 73rd GPU percentile and 76th CPU percentile indicate a system that can handle high-refresh gaming at 1080p and likely 1440p, based on the GPU's raw score relative to desktop rivals like the RTX 3090 (0.5% behind). Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, though the 128-bit bus may limit very large texture sets. The CPU's 17 W TDP and 8 cores make it suitable for thin-and-light laptops where battery life is a priority, but its 8 threads will not satisfy heavy multi-threaded rendering where a 16-thread CPU would be preferred.

Software developers compiling code will find the CPU's single-thread score of 3,943 in Passmark useful for fast builds, and the data compression score of 187,050 indicates quick archive operations. Students and office workers will see no benefit from this GPU unless they run CUDA-accelerated applications; the G2D score of 763 shows basic 2D performance is not a selling point. Small business workstations running professional software that leverages NVIDIA CUDA — such as CAD, simulation, or AI prototyping — would find the tensor cores and 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 throughput valuable. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is sufficient for most mobile workloads, though it halves the bandwidth of a full x16 slot.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 266V is a Lunar Lake part, fabricated on TSMC's 3 nm process. It has 8 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The absence of simultaneous multithreading means each core handles one thread, which simplifies scheduling but limits parallel throughput. The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3. The memory support is LPDDR5X with dual-channel configuration, providing 136.5 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that is low compared to the GPU's 256.0 GB/s, meaning the CPU's memory access is not the bottleneck for GPU-bound workloads.

The CPU scores 16,544 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 2,335 in single-core. The single-core score is robust, reflecting the high boost clock and efficient architecture. The Passmark single-thread score of 3,943 is competitive with desktop CPUs from several generations ago, as evidenced by the 0.2% delta against the Intel Core i9-11900F. The 76th percentile ranking places it above the average CPU but below high-end desktop parts. The 17 W TDP is remarkable for this performance level, indicating excellent power efficiency, which is critical for mobile devices.

The integrated graphics, Arc 140V, is present but not benchmarked in this data pack, so its capabilities are unknown. The PCIe support is Gen 5 with 4 lanes from the CPU, which is unusual — most mobile CPUs offer more lanes, but this is a low-power part. The socket is Intel BGA 2833, meaning the CPU is soldered and not upgradeable. The release date of September 23, 2024, makes this a current-generation part. The nearest rival, the Core Ultra 9 288V, is only 0.3% ahead in average score, indicating that stepping up within the same family yields marginal gains.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's Passmark G3D of 19,587, paired with the CPU's single-thread score of 3,943, suggests this system can drive high frame rates at 1080p in most titles. The absence of measured FPS data means exact figures are estimates, but the GPU's near-parity with the RTX 3090 (0.5% delta) implies strong 1080p and viable 1440p performance.

Streaming: The GPU's 144 tensor cores and NVENC (implied by the Ada Lovelace architecture) can handle video encoding without taxing the CPU. The CPU's 8 threads are sufficient for light streaming workloads, but the 8-core limit may struggle if the game is CPU-intensive and encoding runs simultaneously.

Video editing: The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth support 4K timeline scrubbing and effects. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 109,197 indicates strong compute acceleration for render effects. The CPU's 16,544 Cinebench R23 multicore score will handle export encoding adequately.

3D rendering: The GPU's 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is the primary asset. The 36 RT cores accelerate ray-traced renders, and the 144 tensor cores can speed up AI denoising. The CPU's 8 threads will be a bottleneck for CPU-based renderers, as the Passmark multithread score of 19,461 is modest.

Software development: The CPU's single-thread performance of 3,943 Passmark points ensures fast compilation of single-file changes. The data compression score of 187,050 helps with package management and build artifact zipping. The 17 W TDP means sustained compile sessions will not cause thermal throttling.

Student and office work: The GPU is overkill for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The G2D score of 763 suggests basic 2D performance is adequate but not exceptional. The CPU's efficiency is the main benefit, enabling long battery life for portability.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's Passmark G3D of 19,587, which is 0% from the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT and 0.5% from the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, provides a reference point. These desktop GPUs are known to handle 1080p ultra settings at 60-100+ FPS in demanding titles, and 1440p at 60 FPS in most games. The RTX 4070 Mobile should therefore deliver similar performance at 1080p, with 1440p being playable but requiring settings adjustments in the most demanding games.

The CPU's single-core strength ensures that frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios will not be a major issue. The 5.00 GHz boost clock and 3,943 Passmark single-thread score are sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most titles. However, the 8 GB VRAM may become a limit at 1440p with high-resolution textures, where some modern games exceed 8 GB. The 128-bit memory bus will also constrain performance in games that stream large amounts of geometry. For competitive esports titles, the GPU is more than capable of exceeding 144 FPS at 1080p, and the CPU's high boost clock will keep frame times consistent. For AAA single-player games, expect 60-80 FPS at 1080p ultra, with ray tracing enabled requiring DLSS to maintain playable frame rates.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is soldered via Intel BGA 2833, so there is no CPU upgrade path. The GPU is also integrated into the laptop chassis, meaning the entire system must be replaced for a significant performance increase. The memory is LPDDR5X, which is typically soldered as well, with bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s. The PCIe support is Gen 5 with 4 lanes from the CPU, and the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8 — these are fixed and cannot be changed. The TDP of the CPU is 17 W, and the GPU is 115 W, so the combined power draw is within the range of a typical high-performance laptop power adapter, though no suggested PSU is listed.

A sensible next upgrade would be to move to a system with a higher-tier GPU, such as an RTX 4080 or 4090 mobile, which would provide more VRAM and bandwidth. Alternatively, waiting for the GeForce 50 Mobile series (listed as the successor) could offer architectural improvements. For users who need more CPU threads, a system with a higher core count, such as an Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (0.3% ahead in CPU score), would be marginal. The platform is not designed for user upgrades, so the only practical upgrade is a full system replacement, ideally one with a larger GPU memory bus and more VRAM to eliminate the bottlenecks identified in this data.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 75, with the CPU at 76th percentile and the GPU at 73rd percentile among all parts.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 Mobile compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score of 27,435 is exactly 0% different from the RX 6700 XT's score of 27,425, indicating near-identical average performance.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 266V scores 16,544 in Cinebench R23 multicore, with a single-core score of 2,335.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 36 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The GPU has 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth from 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this CPU+GPU pairing, so all frame rate figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and how does it affect performance?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 17 W, which is very low for a processor with a 5.00 GHz boost clock, indicating high power efficiency that allows sustained performance in thin laptops.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 266V and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile. The CPU is an 8-core, 8-thread Lunar Lake part with a 5.00 GHz boost clock and 17 W TDP, scoring 23,297 on average. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace mobile part with 4,608 shading units, 36 RT cores, and 144 tensor cores, averaging 27,435. The system sits at the 75th overall percentile. The CPU is 76th percentile among CPUs, and the GPU is 73rd among GPUs, making this a well-balanced mid-to-high-tier mobile platform.

The CPU's nearest rivals — Ryzen 7 5800H, Core i9-11900F, Core Ultra 9 288V, and EPYC 4124P — all score within 0.6%, confirming the 266V is a solid performer but not a leader. The GPU's nearest rival is the RX 6700 XT at 0% delta, and it trails the RTX 3090 by only 0.5%, which is remarkable for a mobile part. This pairing is suitable for users who want desktop-class GPU performance in a portable form factor, with the understanding that the CPU's 8 threads limit extreme multi-threaded workloads. The lack of measured FPS data means gamers should treat any frame rate claims as estimates, but the benchmark scores indicate a system capable of high-refresh 1080p gaming and entry-level 1440p gaming, with strong compute performance for content creation and AI-assisted workloads.