SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

47,697 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T pairs with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation in a desktop-class build that lands at the 70th combined percentile across all CPU+GPU pairings, with the CPU sitting at the 90th percentile versus all CPUs and the GPU at the 50th percentile versus all GPUs. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than observed in-game data.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform anchor for this build. This socket supports the Arrow Lake architecture, and the CPU itself is part of the Core Ultra Series 2 family. Memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The platform does not support ECC memory, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU only. That PCIe Gen 5 connectivity is relevant for future storage or expansion cards, though the GPU in this build uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so the CPU's Gen 5 lanes remain available for other devices.

The CPU has a TDP of 35 watts, which is notably low for a 20-core desktop processor. The GPU has a TDP of 120 watts, and the power connectors are listed as "None," meaning the GPU draws power through the slot rather than supplementary cables. The suggested PSU field is null, but the combined thermal envelope (35W CPU plus 120W GPU) indicates that a modest power supply would suffice for this pairing. The GPU is an IGP form factor with slot width listed as "IGP," so it is designed for embedded or compact systems rather than full-length expansion cards.

A sensible next upgrade path on this platform would involve adding more PCIe Gen 5 devices, such as a high-speed NVMe SSD, since the CPU provides 20 Gen 5 lanes that are not consumed by the GPU. The DDR5 memory bus could also be expanded within the dual-channel constraint, though the 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is already fixed by the memory controller. Because the CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, overclocking is not an option, so upgrades would focus on storage, memory capacity, or the GPU itself — though the GPU's embedded form factor limits replacement options. The platform's active production status and 2025 release date suggest longevity for future CPU upgrades within the same socket, provided Intel maintains compatibility.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores cover multiple rendering and compute tests. In Cinebench R15, the multi-core score is 3180 and single-core is 449. Cinebench R20 shows a multi-core score of 13254 and single-core of 1871. Cinebench R23 yields a multi-core score of 31558 and single-core of 4455. These scores place the CPU at the 90th percentile versus all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 47697.

The nearest rivals provide context for this performance. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 scores 47527 on average, which is 0.4% lower than the 265T. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D scores 47908, which is 0.4% higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 3900 scores 47918, 0.5% higher. The Intel Core Ultra X9 378H scores 47468, 0.5% lower. This clustering within a 1% band means the 265T is essentially performance-equivalent to these four rivals in aggregate benchmarks, despite differences in architecture and core counts.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the FACT PACK, and its average benchmark score is 0, with a percentile versus all GPUs of 50. This places it at the median of all GPUs, but without specific scores, the GPU's performance must be inferred from its specifications rather than measured results. The combined percentile for the build is 70, which reflects the CPU's strong showing tempered by the GPU's median position.

The combined picture is a CPU that leads its class at the 90th percentile, paired with a GPU at the 50th percentile. The CPU's average score of 47697 is within a fraction of a percent of its nearest rivals, meaning the 265T offers no meaningful advantage or disadvantage over those specific alternatives in aggregate CPU workloads. The GPU's median percentile suggests it will handle mainstream workloads but will not compete with high-end desktop GPUs.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T has 20 cores and 20 threads, meaning no hyperthreading — each core handles one thread. The base clock is 1.50 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.30 GHz, a wide range that allows the chip to idle at low power and ramp aggressively under load. The architecture is Arrow Lake, built on a 3 nm process node at TSMC, with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

The low 35W TDP is the defining characteristic. A 20-core processor with a 5.30 GHz boost clock at 35W is unusual, and the benchmark scores reflect that efficiency. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 31558 is strong for a 35W chip, and the single-core score of 4455 is competitive with higher-TDP parts. The PassMark results show additional strengths: multi-thread score of 37084, single-thread score of 4338, integer math at 104943, floating point math at 129817, and data compression at 370158. Data encryption scores 29687, extended instructions 28609, and random string sorting 44400. The find prime numbers score is 322, and physics is 2391.

These numbers indicate a CPU that excels at parallel workloads like rendering and compression, while maintaining strong single-thread performance for everyday tasks. The 20 cores without hyperthreading mean that workloads optimized for many physical cores will see full utilization, but threads that rely on simultaneous multithreading may not gain as much. The 30 MB L3 cache is shared across all cores, which helps with data-heavy tasks. The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG with 64 execution units, providing a basic display output capability separate from the dedicated GPU.

The 90th percentile versus all CPUs confirms that this is a top-tier processor overall, despite its low TDP. The nearest rivals — all AMD Ryzen 9 parts or another Intel Core Ultra — are within 0.5% in average score, so the 265T does not outclass them, but it achieves parity at a fraction of the power draw. For real workloads, this means a user gets roughly the same multi-core performance as those rivals while consuming far less power.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong CPU performance but have power or space constraints. The 35W CPU TDP and 120W GPU TDP make it suitable for compact desktop systems where cooling and power delivery are limited. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p would benefit from the CPU's high single-thread score (4455 in Cinebench R23) for frame pacing, though the GPU's median percentile limits ultra-high settings at higher resolutions.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will see the CPU's multi-core strength: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 31558 and PassMark multi-thread at 37084 support heavy rendering tasks. The data compression score of 370158 helps with file archiving and compression workflows. Software developers compiling code would benefit from the 20 cores and the PassMark integer math score of 104943. Students and small business workstations would find the low TDP reduces cooling requirements and electricity draw, while the 90th CPU percentile ensures responsive multitasking.

The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is suited for professional applications that need large VRAM buffers, such as CAD or machine learning inference, though the absence of GPU benchmark scores means its exact performance is unverified. The build class is desktop, so it is not portable, but the embedded GPU form factor suggests it could fit in a workstation or industrial chassis. The combined 70th percentile places this build above average overall, but below the top tier that would require a higher-ranked GPU.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T use?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and how does it affect cooling?

A: The CPU TDP is 35 watts, which is low for a 20-core processor, allowing for a compact or low-noise cooling solution.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D?

A: The 265T has an average score of 47697, which is 0.4% lower than the Ryzen 9 7900X3D's 47908.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does this platform support?

A: The platform supports DDR5 over a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the GPU have any benchmark scores in the data?

A: No, the GPU has no benchmark scores, and its average benchmark score is 0, with a 50th percentile versus all GPUs.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is not unlocked, so overclocking is not supported.

Q: What is the CPU's release date and launch MSRP?

A: The CPU was released on 2025-01-06, with a launch MSRP of $384.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all frame-rate figures here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not observed results. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4455 indicates strong per-thread performance, which is critical for game physics and draw call handling. The GPU's specifications — 9728 shading units, 76 RT cores, and 304 tensor cores — suggest it can handle modern titles, but its 50th percentile versus all GPUs places it at the median, so expect medium to high settings at 1080p rather than maximum settings at 4K.

At 1080p resolution, the CPU's high single-thread score should prevent bottlenecks in most games, allowing the GPU to be the limiting factor. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is ample for 1080p and 1440p textures, and the 576.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution textures without stutter. At 1440p, the GPU's 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 188.2 GPixel/s pixel rate will deliver playable frame rates, but the 50th percentile suggests it will not match dedicated high-end desktop GPUs. At 4K, the GPU is likely to struggle with ultra settings, and users should expect to lower settings or use upscaling.

Ray tracing performance is supported via 76 RT cores, but without measured FPS, the impact is unknown. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, so modern game features are available. Given the CPU's 90th percentile and the GPU's 50th percentile, this build is best suited for competitive or esports titles at 1080p high refresh rates, where the CPU's single-thread strength shines. For AAA single-player games, expect to adjust settings based on the GPU's median standing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4455 supports high frame rates at 1080p, but the GPU's 50th percentile limits how high those frames go. Esports titles should run smoothly, while demanding AAA games will require lower settings to maintain high refresh rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 cores handle encoding workloads, with PassMark data compression at 370158 and multi-thread at 37084. Software encoding via x264 or x265 would be feasible without a dedicated capture card, though the GPU's lack of benchmark scores means its NVENC performance is unverified.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 31558 and PassMark floating point math at 129817 indicate strong performance for timeline rendering and effects processing. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM helps with previewing 4K footage, but export times will be CPU-bound.

3D rendering: The CPU's 20 cores deliver a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31558, which is competitive with other high-end CPUs. The GPU's 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 can accelerate rendering in GPU-based engines, though its median percentile suggests it will not replace a high-end workstation GPU.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 104943 and 20 threads speed up compilation, and the 30 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases. The GPU is less relevant for this workload, so the CPU's 90th percentile is the key asset.

Student and office work: The 35W CPU TDP keeps power draw low, and the single-thread score of 4338 in PassMark ensures snappy responsiveness in office applications. The GPU's 50th percentile is more than sufficient for productivity tasks, and the 16 GB VRAM is unused but available for any GPU-accelerated workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation. The CPU is a 20-core, 20-thread Arrow Lake processor on Intel Socket 1851, with a 35W TDP and a 5.30 GHz boost clock. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture part with 16 GB GDDR6 memory, a 256-bit bus, and 9728 shading units, operating at a 120W TDP. The build sits at the 70th combined percentile across all CPU+GPU pairings, which is above average but not top-tier.

The CPU's 90th percentile versus all CPUs is the standout feature, placing it in the top 10% of processors. The GPU's 50th percentile versus all GPUs is exactly median, meaning half of all GPUs are faster and half are slower. This asymmetry defines the build: it is a CPU-centric system where the processor exceeds the graphics card in relative standing. The CPU's average benchmark score of 47697 is within 0.5% of four nearest rivals, so there is no clear winner among those alternatives. The GPU has no benchmark scores, so its performance is characterized only by its 50th percentile rank.

The pairing is not a high-end gaming rig, nor is it a budget system. It is a balanced desktop workstation where the CPU carries the load, and the GPU provides adequate but not exceptional graphics. The 70th combined percentile reflects a system that will handle most tasks competently, but will not excel at GPU-bound workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are imbalanced in their percentile standings: the CPU is at the 90th percentile versus all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 50th percentile versus all GPUs. This means the GPU is the limiting factor in most graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the CPU's single-core score of 4455 in Cinebench R23 will not bottleneck most titles, but the GPU's median standing will cap frame rates, especially at higher resolutions or with ray tracing enabled. The GPU's 76 RT cores and 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 provide capability, but the 50th percentile suggests it will not deliver top-tier frame rates.

In CPU-bound workloads like rendering, video encoding, or software compilation, the CPU is the dominant component. The 20 cores and 31558 Cinebench R23 multi-core score will process these tasks efficiently, and the GPU's role is secondary. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth can assist with GPU-accelerated rendering, but the CPU's 90th percentile means it will complete CPU-only tasks faster than the GPU can accelerate them in many cases.

The FPS scaling between resolutions would follow a typical pattern: at 1080p, the CPU has more headroom, so the GPU becomes the bottleneck at its 50th percentile; at 1440p and 4K, the GPU's workload increases, and its median performance will further limit frame rates. Because no measured FPS data exists, the exact bottleneck magnitude is unknown, but the percentile gap — 90th CPU versus 50th GPU — is clear evidence that the GPU is the weaker link. For workloads that rely on the CPU alone, the system performs at a top-10% level; for workloads that rely on the GPU, the system performs at a median level. This split means users should match their expectations to the workload: CPU-heavy tasks will feel high-end, while GPU-heavy tasks will feel average.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds