SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

47,697 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation pairing presents an unusual balance profile. The CPU sits at the 90th percentile among all processors, while the GPU commands the 98th percentile among all graphics cards. This 8-point gap in percentile positioning suggests the GPU is the stronger component in absolute terms, but the data requires closer examination to determine which component actually governs performance in typical workloads.

The CPU's 35W TDP against the GPU's 250W TDP creates a significant power asymmetry. In gaming scenarios, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's compute advantage will likely dominate frame production, especially at higher resolutions where the GPU's 32 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth become fully utilized. The CPU's 20 cores and 20 threads at a 1.50 GHz base clock with 5.30 GHz boost provide ample headroom for feeding the GPU, but the 35W envelope means sustained all-core workloads will see clocks settle well below the boost ceiling.

Benchmark data reveals where the CPU's strengths lie. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,558 against a single-core score of 4,455 indicates a 7.1x scaling factor from single to multi-threaded performance. This scaling is modest for a 20-thread processor, suggesting power constraints limit multi-core throughput. The PassMark multi-thread score of 37,084 versus the single-thread score of 4,338 shows similar behavior—an 8.5x scaling across 20 threads that falls short of ideal linear scaling.

The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 and Vulkan score of 194,041 place it within 0.5% of the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB and 1.3% above the A100 SXM4 40 GB. These results indicate the GPU can sustain massive parallel workloads without bottlenecking. For ray tracing, the 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware that offloads work from the shading units, which is particularly relevant for rendering applications.

The bottleneck analysis shifts depending on workload type. In lightly threaded tasks like single-core Cinebench R15 (449 points), the CPU's 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures responsiveness, but the GPU sits largely idle. In heavily threaded compute tasks, the GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 1,020.0 GTexel/s texture rate will far outpace the CPU's ability to feed geometry data, making the CPU the limiting factor in pure compute throughput. For gaming, the balance likely favors GPU-bound performance at 1440p and 4K, while 1080p high-refresh scenarios could expose CPU limitations given the power-constrained core clocks.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T achieves an average benchmark score of 47,697 across all tested workloads, placing it at the 90th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945, scores 47,527, a 0.4% delta, meaning the 265T holds a razor-thin edge. Against the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D, the 265T trails by 0.4% (47,908 versus 47,697), and against the AMD Ryzen 9 3900, it is 0.5% behind (47,918). The Intel Core Ultra X9 378H sits 0.5% behind the 265T with a score of 47,468. This clustering within 1% of four different rivals indicates the 265T delivers performance squarely in the upper-midrange desktop tier, competitive with both prior-generation flagship parts and current high-end mobile silicon.

Individual benchmark results paint a detailed picture. Cinebench R23 multi-core yields 31,558 points, while R20 multi-core scores 13,254 and R15 multi-core scores 3,180. The single-core progression from R15 (449) through R20 (1,871) to R23 (4,455) shows consistent scaling across Cinebench versions. PassMark tests reveal specialized strengths: data compression scores 370,158, floating-point math reaches 129,817, integer math hits 104,943, and extended instructions score 28,609. The PassMark physics test at 2,391 indicates moderate performance in physics simulation workloads, while random string sorting at 44,400 and data encryption at 29,687 round out the productivity-oriented metrics.

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation achieves an average benchmark score of 184,664 across its tested workloads, placing it at the 98th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, scores 183,725, a 0.5% delta in the RTX 5000's favor. The A100 SXM4 40 GB leads by 1.3% with a score of 187,147, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell trails by 1.4% (182,109) and the GeForce RTX 4090 D trails by 3.7% (178,050). The Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 and Vulkan score of 194,041 show a 10.7% advantage for Vulkan, indicating strong driver optimization for modern graphics APIs.

Combined, this CPU-GPU pairing achieves a 94th percentile combined score, reflecting a system that outperforms the vast majority of desktop configurations. The GPU's 98th percentile positioning drives this combined ranking, while the CPU's 90th percentile provides solid supporting performance without dragging the overall tier down significantly.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform with the Arrow Lake architecture, built on TSMC's 3 nm process node with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. This is a current-generation desktop platform with active production status, released on January 6, 2025, with a launch MSRP of $384. The CPU supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth, though ECC memory is not supported. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU provides high-bandwidth connectivity for modern storage and expansion cards.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which means it will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds even when installed in a PCIe 5.0 slot. While PCIe 4.0 x16 offers 32 GB/s bidirectional bandwidth, the GPU's 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is self-contained, so the PCIe interface is unlikely to bottleneck most workloads. The GPU requires a 600 W suggested PSU and draws 250 W TDP via a single 16-pin power connector. It occupies a dual-slot form factor at 267 mm length and 112 mm height, with four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

For a sensible next upgrade, the platform offers headroom in both directions. The CPU's 35W TDP means the motherboard's power delivery sees minimal stress, leaving ample room for a higher-TDP Arrow Lake processor if more CPU throughput is needed. However, the 265T's performance already sits within 0.5% of the Ryzen 9 7900X3D, so CPU upgrades would yield diminishing returns. The GPU side offers more meaningful upgrade potential: the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 250W TDP against the 600W PSU suggestion leaves substantial power headroom, allowing installation of higher-power workstation or consumer GPUs without a PSU replacement. Memory can scale through DDR5 capacity and speed upgrades within the dual-channel constraint, and the 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes support multiple high-speed NVMe drives.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need workstation-grade GPU compute combined with efficient desktop CPU performance. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 32 GB VRAM and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput make it suitable for 3D rendering, scientific computing, and machine learning inference tasks that require large memory footprints. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking ensures it can handle compilation, simulation setup, and data preprocessing without becoming the primary bottleneck in most workflows.

Gamers at 1440p and 4K resolutions will benefit most from this pairing, as the GPU's 98th percentile performance will dominate frame rendering at these resolutions. The CPU's 90th percentile single-thread performance (4,455 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures it can maintain high frame rates without becoming the limiting factor at lower resolutions, though the 35W TDP may cap sustained all-core gaming performance in CPU-intensive titles.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D modeling, and visual effects will find the combination of 20 CPU cores and 12800 GPU shading units well-matched. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 370,158 and floating-point math score of 129,817 indicate strong performance in media encoding and transformation tasks, while the GPU's 400 tensor cores accelerate AI-accelerated effects and denoising. Software developers building and testing applications will appreciate the CPU's compilation throughput (Cinebench R23 multi-core 31,558) and the GPU's compute capability for CUDA-accelerated testing and simulation.

Students and small business workstations represent a secondary audience. The 35W CPU TDP enables compact, quiet cooling solutions, while the GPU's dual-slot form factor fits standard workstation cases. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor productivity setups, and the 32 GB VRAM handles large datasets, spreadsheets, and visualization workloads without memory pressure.

# FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is locked, and the CPU does not feature an unlocked multiplier for enthusiast overclocking. Performance is defined by the 1.50 GHz base clock and 5.30 GHz boost clock.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported on this platform.

Q: How does the RTX 5000 Ada Generation compare to the A100 SXM4 80 GB?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada scores 184,664 on average versus the A100 SXM4 80 GB's 183,725, a 0.5% advantage for the RTX 5000. Both GPUs sit at the 98th percentile, but the RTX 5000 has 32 GB VRAM compared to the A100's 80 GB.

Q: What is the PCIe version and lane configuration for the CPU?

A: The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds in a Gen 5 slot.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 600 W. The GPU draws 250 W TDP via a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: What is the release date and launch price of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T was released on January 6, 2025, with a launch MSRP of $384.

Q: Does the RTX 5000 Ada Generation support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with Geekbench Vulkan scoring 194,041 versus OpenCL at 175,286.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is built on the AD102 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 125.3 million per mm². It features 12,800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, and 176 raster output units. The GPU operates at a 1,155 MHz base clock and 2,550 MHz boost clock, with memory clocked at 2,250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration consists of 32 GB of GDDR6 across a 256-bit bus, yielding 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. This capacity and bandwidth combination supports large datasets and high-resolution textures without spilling to system memory. The 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate and 1,020.0 GTexel/s texture rate indicate strong fill-rate capabilities for high-resolution rendering.

Compute throughput measures 65.28 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), meaning the GPU can process single-precision and half-precision workloads at equal speed—a key differentiator from GPUs with reduced FP16 throughput. The 100 RT cores provide dedicated ray-tracing hardware, while 400 tensor cores accelerate AI workloads including DLSS, neural rendering, and machine learning inference.

Benchmark results place this GPU at the 98th percentile. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 and Vulkan score of 194,041 demonstrate strong compute performance across different APIs. The Vulkan advantage of 10.7% suggests the driver stack is well-optimized for modern graphics workloads. Compared to the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, the RTX 5000 Ada leads by 0.5%, and against the GeForce RTX 4090 D, it leads by 3.7%. For rendering workloads, the combination of high FP32 throughput, large VRAM, and dedicated RT/tensor hardware makes this GPU suitable for production rendering, real-time visualization, and AI-accelerated content creation.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T features 20 cores and 20 threads using the Arrow Lake architecture on TSMC's 3 nm process. The chip contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. Clock speeds range from 1.50 GHz base to 5.30 GHz boost, with a 35W TDP that emphasizes efficiency over raw sustained throughput. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3.

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory at 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. It provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU and includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. The 3 nm process and 35W TDP make this an efficiency-focused desktop processor, released January 6, 2025, with a launch MSRP of $384.

Benchmark results show the CPU at the 90th percentile with an average score of 47,697. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 31,558, while single-core scores 4,455—a 7.1x scaling factor. PassMark multi-thread scores 37,084 with single-thread at 4,338. The PassMark data compression score of 370,158 indicates strong throughput for data-intensive tasks, while floating-point math at 129,817 and integer math at 104,943 show balanced ALU/FPU performance. The extended instructions score of 28,609 and encryption score of 29,687 suggest capable SIMD and cryptographic processing.

The 20-thread configuration without hyper-threading means each core handles one thread, which can reduce contention in heavily threaded workloads compared to hyper-threaded designs. The nearest rivals—AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 (0.4% behind), Ryzen 9 7900X3D (0.4% ahead), Ryzen 9 3900 (0.5% ahead), and Intel Core Ultra X9 378H (0.5% behind)—confirm the 265T sits in a competitive band. For real workloads, this translates to strong multi-threaded productivity performance with the caveat that the 35W TDP limits sustained all-core boosts compared to higher-TDP competitors.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation in a desktop form factor. The CPU represents Intel's efficiency-focused Arrow Lake desktop silicon, while the GPU is a workstation-class Ada Lovelace part. The combined percentile ranking of 94 places this configuration in the top 6% of all desktop systems, driven primarily by the GPU's 98th percentile performance.

The CPU's 90th percentile ranking and the GPU's 98th percentile ranking create a system where the GPU is the dominant performance component. This is typical for workstation-oriented builds where GPU compute takes precedence over CPU throughput. The 35W CPU TDP and 250W GPU TDP combine for a total package that remains within the 600W suggested PSU's capacity, allowing for additional peripherals and storage.

This pairing targets professional workloads—3D rendering, scientific simulation, AI inference—where the GPU's 32 GB VRAM and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are primary requirements. The CPU provides sufficient single-thread performance (4,455 Cinebench R23 single-core) for responsive system operation and sufficient multi-thread throughput (31,558 Cinebench R23 multi-core) for preprocessing and compilation tasks. The overall tier is high-end desktop with a workstation emphasis, suitable for users who need data-center-class GPU performance in a local desktop package.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination—the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS discussion is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximate rather than measured results.

Based on the GPU's 98th percentile ranking and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, this system should deliver high frame rates at 1440p and 4K resolutions in most modern titles. The 32 GB VRAM ensures texture-heavy games and high-resolution asset packs load without memory limitations. The 100 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for ray-traced effects, while 400 tensor cores enable DLSS-style upscaling where supported.

The CPU's 5.30 GHz boost clock and 4,455 Cinebench R23 single-core score support high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, though the 35W TDP may cause clock throttling during extended gaming sessions. At 1080p with high refresh rates, the CPU could become the limiting factor in esports titles, while at 1440p and 4K, the GPU's 98th percentile performance will dominate frame rendering. The Vulkan score of 194,041 suggests strong performance in Vulkan-based titles, while DirectX 12 Ultimate compatibility ensures modern game features are supported.

The 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate support high-resolution rendering without fill-rate bottlenecks. For ultra-quality settings at 1440p and 4K, this system should maintain playable frame rates in most titles, though exact figures require measured testing. At 1080p, the system may be CPU-limited in some scenarios, but overall gaming performance should rank in the top few percent of desktop systems.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 98th percentile ranking and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput support high frame rates at 1440p and 4K, while the CPU's 5.30 GHz boost clock and 4,455 single-core Cinebench score handle game logic and physics. At 1080p, the 35W CPU TDP may limit sustained frame rates in CPU-intensive titles, but the GPU will still deliver strong performance.

Streaming: The GPU's 400 tensor cores and 32 GB VRAM enable hardware-accelerated encoding and AI-enhanced streaming features. The CPU's 20 cores handle encoding overhead and game processing simultaneously, though the 35W TDP may constrain simultaneous gaming and streaming workloads.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,558 and PassMark data compression of 370,158 support fast timeline rendering and export. The GPU's 32 GB VRAM handles large video projects and effects stacks, with 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 accelerating effects processing and color grading.

3D rendering: The GPU's 100 RT cores and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput accelerate ray-traced and rasterized rendering. The 32 GB VRAM accommodates complex scenes and high-resolution textures without out-of-core rendering, while the CPU's 20 cores handle scene preparation and geometry processing.

Software development: The CPU's 20 threads and 37,084 PassMark multi-thread score support fast code compilation, while the GPU's compute capability enables CUDA-accelerated testing and simulation. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth and 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide fast I/O for large codebases.

Student and office work: The 35W CPU TDP enables quiet, efficient operation for daily productivity tasks. The GPU's 32 GB VRAM handles large spreadsheets, data visualization, and multi-monitor setups with four DisplayPort outputs, while the CPU's single-thread performance ensures responsive application switching.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds