SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

47,697 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation pairing represents a high-tier desktop workstation configuration, sitting at the 93rd percentile overall among all builds. The CPU holds the 90th percentile among all processors, while the GPU is even stronger at the 95th percentile among all graphics cards. This is a system designed for professional content creation, serious multitasking, and workstation-grade rendering, rather than a mainstream gaming rig. The data indicates a machine that will handle heavy CPU workloads like compilation and video encoding, while the GPU excels in compute-heavy tasks like 3D rendering and AI inference.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture and manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 family and uses the Intel Socket 1851. The chip has a modest 35 W TDP, yet offers a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, indicating a design that prioritizes power efficiency in sustained workloads while still providing high peak performance for bursty tasks. The CPU features a hybrid cache layout: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark results show a processor with strong single-core and multi-core capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 31,558 points in multi-core and 4,455 points in single-core. The single-core result places it among the top tier of desktop chips, which is critical for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The multi-core score of 31,558 is robust, indicating that the 20 physical cores (with no hyperthreading, as threads equal cores) are well-utilized in parallel workloads. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 13,254 multi-core and 1,871 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 3,180 multi-core and 449 single-core.

The PassMark results provide further insight into specific workload characteristics. The CPU achieves 37,084 in PassMark multithread tests and 4,338 in single-thread tests. Notably, the floating-point math score of 129,817 far exceeds the integer math score of 104,943, suggesting strong performance in scientific and engineering calculations that rely on FPU throughput. The data compression score of 370,158 is very high, while data encryption scores 29,687, indicating solid cryptographic performance. The extended instructions score of 28,609 and random string sorting at 44,400 further demonstrate versatility across different task types. The physics score of 2,391 is lower relative to the multi-threaded tests, which is typical for CPUs that prioritize other execution units.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T averages 47,697 points in the aggregate benchmark score. This places it 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 (47,527 points) and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H (47,468 points). It trails the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D by 0.4% (47,908 points) and the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 by 0.5% (47,918 points). These deltas are minuscule, meaning the Ultra 7 265T is effectively performance-equivalent to these high-end rivals in overall CPU throughput, despite its drastically lower 35 W TDP.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system that is GPU-dominated, with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation scoring significantly higher relative to its own field than the CPU does. The GPU achieves an average benchmark score of 135,218, placing it at the 95th percentile among all GPUs. In Geekbench compute tests, it scores 146,593 in OpenCL and 123,842 in Vulkan. These are strong numbers that reflect the card's workstation heritage and compute emphasis.

The GPU sits in a tight competitive cluster. It is statistically tied with the NVIDIA A10M (135,230, 0% delta), the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 (135,396, -0.1%), and the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo (135,774, -0.4%). It trails the AMD Radeon PRO V620 by 0.9% (136,472). This indicates that the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is right at the top of its performance class, with no single rival holding a meaningful advantage in raw compute scores.

The CPU's 90th percentile and the GPU's 95th percentile combine to yield an overall build percentile of 93. The gap between the two components suggests that in many workloads, the GPU will be the primary performance driver, especially in tasks like rendering, simulation, and AI. The CPU is still a high-end part, but it is not the limiting factor in this pairing; the GPU is the standout component.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a system that is well-balanced for workstation tasks, but with a clear performance hierarchy. The GPU operates at the 95th percentile, five points higher than the CPU's 90th percentile. This five-point gap indicates that in GPU-intensive workloads, the graphics card will be the performance ceiling, while the CPU will be the ceiling in CPU-bound scenarios. However, the CPU's aggregate score of 47,697 is competitive with top-tier rivals, meaning it will not bottleneck the GPU in most real-world applications.

The FPS scaling data is absent for this pairing, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. However, based on the percentile positions, the system is more likely to be GPU-limited at higher resolutions and quality settings, where the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's compute power is fully exercised. At lower resolutions, the CPU's single-core performance (4,455 in Cinebench R23) will become more relevant, potentially capping frame rates in lighter games. The CPU's 20 cores and 30 MB of L3 cache provide ample headroom for background tasks while gaming, reducing the likelihood of CPU-related stutters.

The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s (dual-channel DDR5) is sufficient for the CPU, but it is not a differentiator. The GPU, with its 360.0 GB/s bandwidth on a 160-bit bus, is well-provisioned for its 20 GB frame buffer. The 35 W TDP of the CPU compared to the 130 W TDP of the GPU reinforces that the GPU is the dominant power consumer and likely the performance driver in sustained workloads. The system is not bottlenecked in the traditional sense; it is a pairing where both components are high-end, but the GPU has a slight performance advantage that will show in compute-heavy tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The GPU's 95th percentile and the CPU's strong single-core score of 4,455 in Cinebench R23 suggest that this system is capable of high-refresh gaming at 1080p and 1440p, where frame rates are often CPU-limited. The GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 compute provides ample rasterization power. However, without measured FPS data, exact frame rates are estimates; the hardware is clearly above the threshold for smooth 144Hz gaming in most titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 physical cores and high multithreaded score of 31,558 in Cinebench R23 make it an excellent choice for streaming while gaming. The extra cores can handle encoding (via software x264) or be offloaded to the GPU's NVENC (the RTX 4000 Ada has 192 tensor cores and 48 RT cores, indicating robust media capabilities). The PassMark data compression score of 370,158 also suggests strong throughput for real-time encoding tasks.

Video Editing: The combination of a high single-core score (4,455 in Cinebench R23) and a strong multi-core score (31,558) is ideal for video editing, where timelines benefit from fast single-threaded playback and exports scale with multi-core performance. The GPU's 20 GB of VRAM and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 4K and even 8K video timelines, and the 95th percentile GPU score ensures fast effects processing and rendering.

3D Rendering: This is where the system shines. The GPU's 95th percentile ranking and its 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, combined with 48 RT cores for ray tracing, make it a formidable renderer. The CPU's 20 cores will handle viewport physics and simulation tasks. The aggregate GPU score of 135,218 is competitive with top workstation cards, meaning render times will be short for most projects.

Software Development: The CPU's 20 cores and 30 MB L3 cache are excellent for compiling large codebases. The PassMark integer math score of 104,943 and extended instructions score of 28,609 indicate strong throughput for code compilation and execution. The GPU is less relevant here, but the system's overall balance means it can handle running virtual machines, emulators, and multiple containers simultaneously without slow down.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for standard office tasks, but the CPU's 35 W TDP means it will be quiet and cool. The single-core performance ensures snappy spreadsheet and browser performance. The 90th percentile CPU ranking means it will handle any academic workload, from data analysis with large datasets to running scientific simulations, with ease.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined build sits at the 93rd percentile among all systems, indicating a top-tier configuration.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T trails the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D by a mere 0.4% in average benchmark score (47,697 vs 47,908), making them statistically equivalent in overall performance.

Q: What is the GPU's aggregate benchmark score, and how does it rank?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation scores 135,218 on average, placing it at the 95th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T does not support ECC memory, as indicated in the specifications.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory type?

A: The GPU features 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the process node for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is manufactured on a 3 nm TSMC process, while the GPU uses a 5 nm TSMC process.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination of Intel Core Ultra 7 265T and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation. Therefore, all frame rate figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores and percentile positions. The GPU's 95th percentile ranking and 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 compute strongly suggest that at 1080p and 1440p with ultra settings, this system will deliver high frame rates in most titles, likely exceeding 100 FPS in esports and modern AAA games. At 4K, the 20 GB VRAM and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth will allow for high-resolution textures, but frame rates will depend more on the GPU's rasterization throughput.

Given the CPU's single-core score of 4,455 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's compute prowess, the system is well-suited for high-refresh competitive gaming at 1080p. At 1440p, the GPU will start to become the limiting factor, but the 95th percentile ensures it remains capable. At 4K, the system will still be playable, but the frame rates will be lower than at lower resolutions. The lack of measured data means these are expectations, not guarantees; the hardware's specifications point to a system that is firmly in the high-end gaming segment, but professional workstation cards like the RTX 4000 Ada are not optimized for gaming drivers, so real-world gaming performance could vary.

Who Should Build It

This system is targeted at content creators and professionals who need a balance of high CPU throughput and exceptional GPU compute power. The 93rd overall percentile indicates it is not for casual users; it is a workstation-class machine. Gamers who demand maximum settings at 1440p or 4K will find the GPU's 95th percentile ranking compelling, though the card's workstation drivers may not be tuned for day-one game optimizations. Video editors and 3D renderers will benefit most from the 20-core CPU and the GPU's 20 GB VRAM, which can handle large scenes and long timelines. Software developers compiling large projects will appreciate the 20 threads and 30 MB of L3 cache. Students and small business owners running heavy simulations or data analysis will find the system more than adequate, though it is priced and positioned beyond entry-level needs.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T, a 20-core Arrow Lake processor, with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation, a workstation-class GPU. The system achieves a combined percentile of 93, placing it in the top 7% of all configurations. The CPU's 90th percentile and the GPU's 95th percentile together define a machine that is exceptional for compute-heavy workloads, with the GPU providing the majority of the raw performance advantage. This is not a value-oriented or budget build; it is a high-end professional tool.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation GPU based on the AD104 chip and Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm TSMC process. It features 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines. The card is equipped with 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-assisted workflows. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1500 MHz with a boost clock of 2175 MHz, and its memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The 20 GB of GDDR6 memory is arranged on a 160-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s.

The GPU's compute capabilities are substantial: it delivers 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and the same 26.73 TFLOPS for FP16 (1:1 ratio), which is important for AI inference where FP16 is often used. The pixel rate is 139.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 417.6 GTexel/s. The card has a TDP of 130 W, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 300 W. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and supports 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, making it suitable for multi-monitor professional setups. In terms of API support, it is DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 compliant.

Benchmark results show the GPU scoring 146,593 in Geekbench OpenCL and 123,842 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average score of 135,218. This places it at the 95th percentile among all GPUs, making it a top-tier performer. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA A10M, scores 135,230 (0% delta), indicating they are performance twins. The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 trails by 0.1%, and the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo by 0.4%, while the AMD Radeon PRO V620 leads by 0.9%. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is thus at the very top of its class, with the 20 GB VRAM being a key differentiator for large datasets and high-resolution textures in rendering and simulation workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds