SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

98%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

47,697 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

79,842 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

This desktop pairing combines Intel's 20-core Arrow Lake processor with NVIDIA's flagship Blackwell GPU, creating a system that ranks in the 91st percentile overall. The CPU holds a 90th percentile position among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 92nd percentile among all graphics cards. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which represents the current generation of Intel desktop sockets. This Arrow Lake-S processor is built on a 3 nm process node from TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The platform supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, providing 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This is not an ECC memory configuration, so users building workstations that require error-correcting memory will need to look elsewhere.

The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself, which is sufficient for a single high-bandwidth GPU like the RTX 5090 that uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The platform does not support overclocking through a multiplier unlock, as the multiplier is locked on this chip. The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units, providing a basic display output capability that can serve as a fallback if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

The CPU's thermal design power is 35 watts, which is remarkably low for a 20-core processor. This low TDP means the 265T can be cooled by modest air coolers, making it suitable for compact builds where cooling space is limited. However, the RTX 5090 GPU has a 575 W TDP and the suggested power supply is 950 W, so the overall system power requirements are substantial. A sensible next upgrade path would involve adding more DDR5 memory if the current configuration is below capacity, as the dual-channel memory bus can benefit from populated slots. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide headroom for future storage upgrades with Gen 5 NVMe drives, and the platform supports modern connectivity standards through the GPU's display outputs.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using the GB202 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The GPU contains 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, with a transistor density of 122.9 million per square millimeter. The memory subsystem is substantial: 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, delivering 1.79 TB/s of memory bandwidth. This is a dual-slot card measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, requiring significant case space.

The GPU clock speeds are a base of 2017 MHz and a boost of 2407 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz or 28 Gbps effective. The compute configuration includes 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, and 176 raster operation units. The RT cores number 170, and the tensor cores total 680, which positions this card for both real-time ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. The pixel rate is 423.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 104.8 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 104.8 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio.

Benchmark results show the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score at 18,355, which represents the card's performance in modern DirectX 12 workloads. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 334,370, and the Vulkan score is 376,728. The PassMark G3D score is 39,650, with a GPU compute score of 26,756. The GPU sits in the 92nd percentile among all graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 79,842. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB with a delta of 0.3%, the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB at 0.6%, the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT at 1.1%, and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X at -1.4%. These deltas indicate that the RTX 5090 is statistically comparable to these professional and mobile workstation cards in aggregate benchmark scores, though the 32 GB VRAM and Blackwell architecture give it distinct capabilities in memory-heavy tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 31,558, with a single-core score of 4,455. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 13,254 and single-core is 1,871. The Cinebench R15 results show 3,180 multi-core and 449 single-core. PassMark multi-thread score is 37,084, with single-thread at 4,338. The CPU's average benchmark score is 47,697, placing it in the 90th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 with a delta of 0.4%, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D at -0.4%, the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 at -0.5%, and the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H at 0.5%. This means the 265T is essentially neck-and-neck with the Ryzen 9 7900X3D, which is notable given the 7900X3D's reputation as a gaming-focused processor.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 18,355 and PassMark G3D score of 39,650 place it in the 92nd percentile. The combined picture shows a system that is balanced at the top end of performance, with both components ranking in the 90th percentile or above. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 370,158 and encryption score of 29,687 indicate strong throughput for data-intensive tasks. The floating-point math score of 129,817 and integer math score of 104,943 show well-rounded arithmetic performance. The extended instructions score of 28,609 and find prime numbers score of 322 round out the compute profile.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 90th percentile and GPU's 92nd percentile are closely aligned, suggesting that neither component will consistently dominate the other in mixed workloads. However, the performance characteristics differ significantly by workload type. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,338 in PassMark and Cinebench R23 single-core of 4,455 indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for lightly-threaded tasks like gaming. The GPU's massive compute resources, including 21,760 shading units and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32, will be the limiting factor in resolution-scaling scenarios where pixel throughput matters.

For high-refresh gaming at lower resolutions, the CPU is likely to become the bottleneck in many titles because the GPU can render frames faster than the CPU can feed it draw calls. The CPU's 20 threads and 5.30 GHz boost clock help mitigate this, but the 35 W TDP limits sustained multi-core performance under heavy loads. In contrast, at higher resolutions with more demanding graphics settings, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the CPU has ample headroom to keep up with the RTX 5090's frame output. The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s for the CPU versus 1.79 TB/s for the GPU highlights the different performance envelopes of each component. The estimated FPS scaling from the benchmark scores suggests that the GPU's 92nd percentile position will dominate in GPU-bound scenarios, while the CPU's 90th percentile position will be sufficient for most CPU-bound workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5090's 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 32 GB of GDDR7 memory provide ample headroom for high-refresh gaming at 1440p and 4K. The CPU's 90th percentile single-thread performance (4,338 PassMark single-thread) will support high frame rates in esports titles, though the 35 W TDP may limit sustained all-core boost behavior in CPU-heavy scenes.

Streaming: The GPU's 680 tensor cores and 170 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated encoding and AI-based stream enhancement features. The CPU's 20 threads provide sufficient background processing capacity for encoding, chat, and overlay software simultaneously, with the PassMark multi-thread score of 37,084 indicating strong multitasking ability.

Video editing: The GPU's 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth accelerate timeline scrubbing and effect rendering in modern NLEs. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,558 supports fast export times, while the PassMark data compression score of 370,158 aids in handling large media files. The combination of both components' 90th+ percentile positions makes this a capable editing workstation.

3D rendering: The CPU's 20 cores and 20 threads deliver solid CPU-based rendering performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score. The GPU's 21,760 shading units and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 provide substantial GPU-accelerated rendering throughput for both real-time and offline renderers. The 5 nm GPU process and 3 nm CPU process both contribute to efficient sustained rendering performance.

Software development: The CPU's 20 threads handle parallel compilation workloads effectively, with the PassMark integer math score of 104,943 indicating strong integer performance. The GPU's compute capabilities accelerate machine learning training and inference tasks, though developers focused purely on CPU-bound builds will find the 90th percentile CPU performance adequate for most workflows.

Student and office work: The CPU's 35 W TDP makes this an energy-efficient platform for everyday tasks, while the Arc Xe-LPG integrated graphics provide a fallback display solution. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,338 ensures responsive application performance for office suites and web browsing, though the RTX 5090 is substantially overkill for these workloads and will remain largely idle.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 91, meaning this system outperforms roughly 91% of all recorded desktop configurations in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T has an average benchmark score of 47,697, which is 0.4% lower than the Ryzen 9 7900X3D's score of 47,908. This places the two processors within statistical noise of each other.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It does not support ECC memory.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5090 have?

A: The RTX 5090 has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing 1.79 TB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 5090 is 950 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 575 W with a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: What is the GPU's performance relative to the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT?

A: The RTX 5090 has an average benchmark score of 79,842, which is 1.1% higher than the RX 6850M XT's score of 78,940. The RTX 5090 also sits in the 92nd percentile versus the 6850M XT's lower position.

Q: Does the CPU have an unlocked multiplier for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, meaning the 265T cannot be overclocked through multiplier adjustment. The 5.30 GHz boost clock is the maximum rated frequency.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need top-tier GPU performance without sacrificing CPU capability. Gamers seeking maximum frame rates at 4K resolution will benefit from the RTX 5090's 92nd percentile GPU performance, while the CPU's 90th percentile position ensures that CPU-bound scenarios won't leave significant performance on the table. Content creators working with large video files, 3D scenes, or machine learning models will leverage the 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth for GPU-accelerated workflows.

Software developers building large codebases will appreciate the 20 threads for parallel compilation. Students in engineering or data science programs can use the system for both coursework and research projects, though the power requirements may be excessive for dorm-room use. Small business workstations that need to handle GPU-accelerated rendering or data processing will find the combination of 90th+ percentile CPU and GPU performance sufficient for demanding professional applications. The 35 W CPU TDP is notable for energy-conscious users who want a powerful system without high idle power draw, though the GPU's 575 W TDP dominates the system's power profile during load.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. The CPU is a 20-core, 20-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Arrow Lake architecture, while the GPU is the flagship Blackwell 2.0 card with 32 GB of GDDR7 memory. The system ranks in the 91st combined percentile, with the CPU at the 90th percentile and the GPU at the 92nd percentile. This places the build in the upper tier of desktop configurations, suitable for high-end gaming, content creation, and professional compute workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score of 47,697 and the GPU's 79,842 combine to create a system that is well-matched in performance class, with neither component significantly outperforming the other on a percentile basis.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T features 20 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The processor is built on the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically Arrow Lake-S, using a 3 nm process from TSMC. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG with 64 execution units.

The benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,558 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 37,084. Single-thread performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,455 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4,338. The PassMark data compression score of 370,158 indicates excellent throughput for compressed data workloads, while the encryption score of 29,687 shows capable cryptographic performance. The floating-point math score of 129,817 and integer math score of 104,943 demonstrate balanced arithmetic capability. The extended instructions score of 28,609 suggests good SIMD performance for vectorized code.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 47,697 places it in the 90th percentile, with nearest rivals being the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 (0.4% faster), Intel Core Ultra X9 378H (0.5% faster), AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D (0.4% slower), and AMD Ryzen 9 3900 (0.5% slower). This grouping shows that the 265T performs within a narrow band of high-end processors from both AMD and Intel. The 35 W TDP is exceptionally low for a 20-core processor, which means this CPU can maintain its performance in thermally constrained environments where higher-TDP chips would throttle. However, this also implies that the sustained multi-core performance may be lower than what the core count suggests, as power limits can cap all-core boost frequencies during extended workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds