SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

47,697 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

56,083 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

This desktop build pairs Intel's 20-core Core Ultra 7 265T processor with NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 5080 graphics card, creating a system that sits at the 89th percentile overall among all desktop configurations. The CPU achieves a 90th percentile ranking against all processors, while the GPU holds an 87th percentile position against all graphics cards. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data — so all frame rate discussion in this analysis is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay measurements.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T is a 20-core, 20-thread processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture using TSMC's 3 nm process node. The chip contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, with a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The 35 W TDP is notably modest for a desktop processor with this core count, indicating a design focused on power efficiency rather than raw sustained throughput. The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

In Cinebench R23, the 265T scores 31,558 in multi-core and 4,455 in single-core tests. The single-core result places it among the stronger desktop processors for lightly threaded workloads, while the multi-core score reflects solid scaling across the 20 physical cores. The Cinebench R20 results show 13,254 multi-core and 1,871 single-core, and the older R15 test yields 3,180 multi-core and 449 single-core. These scores across three Cinebench generations paint a consistent picture: the 265T delivers competitive single-thread performance and respectable multi-thread throughput for a 35 W part.

PassMark results add further detail. The multithread score of 37,084 and single-thread score of 4,338 align with the Cinebench data, while specialized workloads show specific strengths. Data compression scores 370,158, floating-point math reaches 129,817, and integer math hits 104,943. Extended instructions score 28,609, data encryption reaches 29,687, and random string sorting completes at 44,400. The physics score of 2,391 and prime number finding at 322 are notably lower, suggesting the chip is better suited to general productivity and content creation tasks than to physics simulation or heavily branch-dependent integer workloads.

The average benchmark score of 47,697 places the 265T at the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals bracket it closely: the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 scores 47,527 (0.4% behind), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D scores 47,908 (0.4% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 scores 47,918 (0.5% ahead), and the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H scores 47,468 (0.5% behind). This grouping means the 265T trades blows with both Ryzen 9 desktop parts and a high-end Intel mobile chip, making it a versatile performer that competes above its modest power envelope.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5080 provides the graphics horsepower for demanding titles, and the 265T's single-core score of 4,455 in Cinebench R23 ensures the CPU can keep up with high frame rate rendering in most scenarios. The 5.30 GHz boost clock supports responsive gameplay, though the 35 W TDP may limit sustained all-core boosts during CPU-intensive gaming moments.

Streaming: The 20-core configuration provides ample headroom for simultaneous game capture, encoding, and broadcast software. The 30 MB shared L3 cache helps maintain low latency for the encoding pipeline, and the RTX 5080's tensor cores can offload encoding work if the streaming software supports hardware acceleration. The PassMark multithread score of 37,084 indicates the CPU handles concurrent workloads without collapsing.

Video editing: Multi-core rendering in applications like Premiere Pro benefits from the 20 threads, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 31,558 suggesting strong timeline performance. The floating-point math score of 129,817 supports effects processing and color grading, while the 265T's efficient 35 W TDP means sustained render sessions generate less heat than higher-power alternatives.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar tools will see solid performance from the 31,558 Cinebench R23 multi-core result, though the GPU can handle most rendering via the RTX 5080's 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute. The 265T's performance is adequate for scene preparation and physics calculations, but the PassMark physics score of 2,391 indicates this is not the chip's strongest domain.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the 20 cores and the data compression score of 370,158, which reflects strong throughput on zip and build artifact operations. The single-thread score of 4,338 ensures responsive IDE interaction and fast incremental builds, while the extended instructions score of 28,609 supports modern SIMD-heavy code paths.

Student and office work: The 265T's 35 W TDP makes it an efficient choice for daily productivity, with the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU providing display output without requiring the discrete GPU. The 4,338 PassMark single-thread score handles office suites and web browsing with ease, and the 90th percentile CPU ranking ensures the processor will not feel dated for years.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this CPU-GPU combination, all frame rate expectations are estimated from the benchmark scores. The RTX 5080's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8,637 indicates strong DirectX 12 gaming performance, while the PassMark G3D score of 36,565 and GPU compute score of 21,789 support this assessment. The GPU's 87th percentile ranking places it among the top graphics cards available.

The CPU's single-core performance — 4,455 in Cinebench R23 and 4,338 in PassMark — suggests it can feed the RTX 5080 adequately at 1080p and 1440p resolutions where CPU overhead is more pronounced. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck in most titles, and the 265T's multi-thread capabilities become less critical for frame rate. The 20 cores provide headroom for background tasks during gaming, and the 30 MB L3 cache helps maintain consistent frame pacing in open-world titles.

For esports titles at high refresh rates, the 5.30 GHz boost clock and strong single-thread scores support frame rates in the hundreds, limited primarily by the GPU's rendering speed. For AAA games at 4K ultra settings, the RTX 5080's 16 GB GDDR7 memory and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth provide the capacity and throughput for high-resolution textures and ray tracing workloads. The absence of measured FPS data means these projections carry uncertainty, but the component scores align with a high-end gaming experience.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 7 265T uses Intel Socket 1851, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. The platform does not support ECC memory. PCIe Gen 5 is available with 20 CPU lanes, and the RTX 5080 uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, ensuring full bandwidth for the GPU. The 265T has an integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU, providing a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed.

The 35 W CPU TDP combined with the RTX 5080's 360 W TDP results in a suggested PSU rating of 750 W. This leaves reasonable headroom for the rest of the system, though users planning heavy overclocking or additional expansion cards should consider a higher-capacity unit. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot form factor measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width — so case compatibility with modern mid-tower and full-tower chassis is straightforward.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count Intel Core Ultra 7 or Ultra 9 processor on the same Socket 1851 platform, should one be released with a higher TDP ceiling. The 265T's 35 W TDP suggests the platform's power delivery is designed for efficiency, so a higher-TDP chip may require a motherboard with stronger VRM cooling. The RTX 5080's PCIe 5.0 interface ensures the GPU will not bottleneck future platforms, and the 750 W PSU recommendation provides adequate power for a CPU upgrade within a similar power class.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 47,697 places it at the 90th percentile of all processors, with an average benchmark score of 47,697 across all tested workloads. The nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945, scores 47,527 for a 0.4% delta, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D scores 47,908 (0.4% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 scores 47,918 (0.5% ahead), and the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H scores 47,468 (0.5% behind). This tight grouping means the 265T delivers performance essentially equivalent to Ryzen 9 class processors from the previous generation.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 56,083 places it at the 87th percentile of all graphics cards. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 8060S at 55,757 (0.6% behind), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB at 55,698 (0.7% behind), the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X at 54,828 (2.3% behind), and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE at 57,367 (2.2% ahead). The RTX 5080 sits in a competitive mid-to-high range, trading blows with recent AMD desktop parts and leading older workstation cards by a small margin.

Combined, the CPU at the 90th percentile and GPU at the 87th percentile produce a system at the 89th overall percentile. The pairing is well-balanced: neither component dramatically outclasses the other, and the combined percentile reflects a system that excels in both CPU- and GPU-intensive workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8,637 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 235,901 confirm the GPU's strong compute capabilities, while the PassMark G2D score of 1,415 indicates adequate 2D performance for desktop and productivity tasks.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers seeking high-refresh 1440p or smooth 4K gameplay, where the RTX 5080's 16 GB GDDR7 memory and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth handle modern textures and ray tracing effects. The 265T's strong single-core scores ensure the CPU does not bottleneck at high frame rates, and the 90th percentile CPU ranking provides confidence for years of gaming relevance.

Content creators working in video editing, 3D rendering, or graphic design will benefit from the 20-core CPU with 31,558 Cinebench R23 multi-core and the GPU's 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute. The combination handles both CPU-bound effects processing and GPU-accelerated rendering, with the 35 W CPU TDP keeping power consumption reasonable during long render sessions.

Software developers will appreciate the 20 threads for parallel builds and the 370,158 PassMark data compression score for archive operations. The 4,338 PassMark single-thread score ensures responsive tooling, and the 30 MB L3 cache reduces compile times for large codebases.

Students and small business users get a system that handles office productivity, web browsing, and communication software without strain, with the integrated graphics providing a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled. The 35 W CPU TDP contributes to lower electricity costs compared to higher-power processors, while the 89th overall percentile ensures the system remains capable for years.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, containing 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die with a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm². The GPU runs at a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz, with memory clocked at 1875 MHz for 30 Gbps effective speed. The 16 GB GDDR7 memory operates on a 256-bit bus, delivering 960.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The GPU contains 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units. Ray tracing is handled by 84 dedicated RT cores, and 336 tensor cores provide AI acceleration for DLSS and other machine learning workloads. The pixel rate reaches 293.1 GPixel/s, texture rate hits 879.3 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute achieves 56.28 TFLOPS with FP16 at the same 56.28 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

In benchmark terms, the RTX 5080 scores 8,637 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 235,901 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 255,450 in Geekbench Vulkan. The PassMark suite shows 36,565 in G3D, 21,789 in GPU compute, and lower scores in legacy DirectX tests: 389 in DirectX 9, 324 in DirectX 11, 208 in DirectX 10, and 151 in DirectX 12 — the latter likely reflecting driver optimization rather than raw capability. The 87th percentile ranking places the GPU among the top tier of available graphics cards.

For rendering workloads, the 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 879.3 GTexel/s texture rate provide strong performance in Blender, Maya, and other GPU-accelerated renderers. The 16 GB memory capacity handles large scenes and high-resolution textures, while the 960.0 GB/s bandwidth supports fast data transfer between the GPU and VRAM. The tensor cores enable DLSS frame generation and ray reconstruction, extending the GPU's useful life as games adopt these technologies.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T has 20 cores and 20 threads, with no hyperthreading, based on the Arrow Lake architecture.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 265T scores 47,697 average, which is 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945, making it statistically comparable to Ryzen 9 class processors.

Q: What memory and PCIe support does the platform offer?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, with the GPU using a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.

Q: How much power does the system require?

A: The CPU has a 35 W TDP and the GPU has a 360 W TDP, with a suggested PSU rating of 750 W and a single 16-pin power connector for the GPU.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5080 features 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 960.0 GB/s bandwidth with a boost clock of 2617 MHz.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5080 scores 56,083 average, which is 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon 8060S and 2.2% behind the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE.

Q: Is measured FPS data available for this build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming frame rates are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 90th percentile ranking and GPU's 87th percentile ranking are closely matched, indicating a balanced system where neither component dramatically limits the other. In CPU-bound workloads like data compression (370,158) and integer math (104,943), the 265T performs at a level consistent with Ryzen 9 class processors, while the GPU's 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute handles GPU-bound tasks like rendering and compute.

In gaming, the bottleneck shifts based on resolution. At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU's single-thread performance — 4,455 in Cinebench R23 — becomes more critical, and the 265T's 5.30 GHz boost clock supports high frame rates. At 4K, the GPU's rendering throughput dominates, and the RTX 5080's 16 GB memory and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth become the limiting factors. The PassMark physics score of 2,391 suggests CPU physics calculations could bottleneck in physics-heavy games, while the GPU's 293.1 GPixel/s pixel rate ensures display output keeps pace.

The 35 W CPU TDP relative to the GPU's 360 W TDP creates an interesting dynamic. In sustained all-core workloads, the CPU may throttle before reaching its full multi-thread potential, but in typical gaming and productivity scenarios where single-thread and light multi-thread loads dominate, the 265T provides ample performance. The 20 cores provide headroom for background tasks without compromising foreground gaming performance, and the 30 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed data.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, creating a system that sits at the 89th overall percentile among all desktop configurations. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking and the GPU's 87th percentile ranking indicate a high-tier system that excels across gaming, content creation, and productivity workloads.

The 265T's 20 cores, 5.30 GHz boost clock, and 35 W TDP make it an efficient processor that competes with Ryzen 9 class parts, while the RTX 5080's 16 GB GDDR7 memory, 56.28 TFLOPS compute, and 84 RT cores deliver high-end graphics performance. The system's combined percentile of 89 places it in the upper echelon of desktop builds, suitable for users who demand strong performance in both CPU- and GPU-intensive tasks without requiring the absolute top-tier components.

The platform's Socket 1851, DDR5 memory support, and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity ensure modern standards, while the 750 W suggested PSU provides adequate power for the 35 W CPU and 360 W GPU. The absence of measured FPS data means gaming performance is estimated, but the component scores align with a system capable of high-refresh 1440p and smooth 4K gaming, with enough compute power for serious content creation workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds