SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

47,697 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

43,223 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER form a desktop pairing that targets a specific niche: high-efficiency multi-threaded work combined with strong 1440p-class rasterization and ray tracing. The CPU, part of Intel’s Core Ultra Series 2 (Arrow Lake-S), is a 20-core, 20-thread part with a 35W TDP, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace-based card with 12GB of GDDR6X memory. Benchmark data places this combination at the 87th percentile across all desktop builds, indicating a system that sits comfortably above average but not at the extreme enthusiast tier. The CPU alone ranks in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU lands in the 83rd percentile among all GPUs, suggesting the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the raw benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is built on the AD104 chip using the Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on a 5nm process at TSMC. The GPU contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, giving it a transistor density of 121.8 million per square millimeter. Clock speeds are set at a base of 1980 MHz and a boost of 2475 MHz, with memory running at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem consists of 12GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. This bandwidth is substantial for a 12GB card, allowing high-resolution textures to be fed to the shading units without stalling.

The GPU has 7,168 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output pipelines. Ray tracing is handled by 56 dedicated RT cores, while 224 tensor cores accelerate AI workloads and DLSS. Pixel rate is 198.0 GPixel/s and texture rate is 554.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 35.48 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at 35.48 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). These numbers place the RTX 4070 SUPER as a strong 1440p performer, with enough compute headroom for 4K in less demanding titles. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4627 reflects modern API efficiency, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 172795 and 205624, respectively, indicate robust compute and graphics throughput.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 43223, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24GB, which scores 43262 — a delta of just -0.1%. The RTX 4070 SUPER also sits close to the GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (43268, -0.1%) and the Quadro M6000 (43301, -0.2%). Interestingly, the RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43667, which is only 1% higher, meaning the desktop RTX 4070 SUPER trades blows with a mobile flagship in average benchmarks. This suggests the 4070 SUPER is exceptionally well-tuned for its power class, delivering near-top-tier performance in a dual-slot, 220W package. For rendering workloads, the 56 RT cores and 224 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced scenes and DLSS upscaling, respectively, though the 12GB VRAM may limit extremely large 4K texture packs or complex 3D scenes.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 87, meaning it outperforms 87% of all recorded desktop builds. This is a high-tier result, but it is driven more by the CPU than the GPU — the CPU sits in the 90th percentile while the GPU sits in the 83rd. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T achieves an average benchmark score of 47697, with its nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 at 47527 (delta +0.4%). It also edges out the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H (47468, +0.5%) and trails the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D (47908, -0.4%) and AMD Ryzen 9 3900 (47918, -0.5%). These deltas are all within 0.5%, meaning the 265T is statistically tied with a range of high-core-count CPUs, including both AMD’s X3D gaming flagship and older 12-core parts.

In Cinebench tests, the CPU scores 3180 in R15 multi-core and 449 in single-core. R20 results are 13254 multi-core and 1871 single-core. R23 shows 31558 multi-core and 4455 single-core. The multi-core R23 score of 31558 is particularly notable for a 35W TDP part, as it indicates sustained all-core boost behavior under load. Single-core performance of 4455 in R23 is also strong, suggesting the 5.30 GHz boost clock is being achieved effectively. PassMark tests further confirm the CPU’s capabilities: multi-thread score is 37084, single-thread is 4338, and data compression hits 370158. Floating point math scores 129817, integer math scores 104943, and extended instructions (SIMD) score 28609. Data encryption scores 29687, while find prime numbers scores 322, a lower score that reflects the lack of specialized prime-number acceleration. Physics simulation scores 2391, and random string sorting scores 44400.

The GPU’s benchmark performance is equally solid. PassMark G3D score is 29995, while GPU compute is 17108. DirectX tests show 167 (DX10), 273 (DX11), 110 (DX12), and 344 (DX9), indicating that the card’s performance scales well with API generation, though the DX12 score of 110 might seem low — this is a PassMark-specific metric and not directly comparable to 3DMark scores. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 4627 is a more modern indicator of gaming performance. Geekbench OpenCL (172795) and Vulkan (205624) scores show the GPU is well-suited for compute-heavy tasks like video encoding or physics simulations. The combined picture is a system that excels in multi-threaded productivity (CPU) and high-refresh 1440p gaming (GPU), with the CPU slightly outshining the GPU relative to their respective markets.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture (Arrow Lake-S codename), fabricated on a 3nm process at TSMC. The die contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² area. Base clock is 1.50 GHz, boosting up to 5.30 GHz. This wide clock range allows the chip to idle at very low power (35W TDP) while still delivering high single-thread performance when needed. Cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 dual-channel with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and ECC is not supported. The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself.

The 20 cores are arranged without hyperthreading, meaning 20 threads total. This design choice improves power efficiency and reduces heat, which aligns with the 35W TDP. The integrated graphics is Arc Xe-LPG with 64 execution units, providing a fallback display output but not meant for gaming. The CPU’s multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not possible, but the boost clock of 5.30 GHz is already high. The launch MSRP is $384, and the CPU was released on January 6, 2025.

Benchmark results show the 265T is a capable multi-threaded workhorse despite its low TDP. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31558 is within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D (which has 12 cores and a higher TDP), indicating that Intel’s efficiency-focused design can match a power-hungry gaming CPU in all-core workloads. The single-core R23 score of 4455 is also competitive, suggesting strong IPC gains from the Arrow Lake architecture. PassMark multi-thread score of 37084 and single-thread of 4338 reinforce this. Data compression (370158) and floating-point math (129817) scores are high, making the CPU well-suited for file archiving, scientific computing, and financial modeling. However, the find prime numbers score of 322 is low, indicating that the CPU is not optimized for that specific type of integer workload. Random string sorting (44400) and extended instructions (28609) are moderate, meaning the CPU handles SIMD-heavy code reasonably well but not exceptionally. Overall, the CPU’s 90th percentile ranking reflects its ability to compete with much higher-TDP chips in multi-threaded tasks while consuming markedly less power.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is skewed toward the CPU. The CPU’s 90th percentile versus the GPU’s 83rd percentile means that in well-optimized multi-threaded workloads, the CPU will likely finish its tasks before the GPU becomes the limiting factor. Conversely, in gaming scenarios, the GPU is more likely to be the bottleneck at higher resolutions, especially at 4K, where the 12GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth may struggle with ultra settings. At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-core performance (5.30 GHz boost, 4455 R23 single) can feed the GPU adequately, but the GPU’s raw rasterization power (35.48 TFLOPS) will still be the primary driver of frame rates.

The TDP discrepancy is notable: the CPU draws 35W while the GPU draws 220W, meaning the GPU dominates power consumption and heat output. This suggests that in a balanced workload (e.g., gaming with background streaming), the GPU will be the thermal constraint, not the CPU. The CPU’s low TDP also means it can maintain boost clocks for longer periods without thermal throttling, which is beneficial for long rendering sessions. However, the GPU’s 220W TDP requires a robust cooling solution, and the suggested PSU of 550W indicates that the system needs a decent power supply, but not an extreme one.

Benchmark deltas show the CPU is 0.4% faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 but 0.4% slower than the Ryzen 9 7900X3D. This tight grouping means that any bottleneck caused by the CPU is likely minimal, as it is statistically tied with top-tier rivals. The GPU, however, is 1% slower than the RTX 4090 Mobile, which suggests that in GPU-bound scenarios, the 4070 SUPER will perform slightly below a mobile flagship, but still well above average. For gaming, the estimated FPS will be limited by the GPU at 1440p and 4K, while at 1080p, the CPU might occasionally limit frame rates in CPU-heavy titles. For productivity, the CPU’s multi-threaded scores (31558 R23) suggest it can handle video encoding or 3D rendering without bottlenecking the GPU, which would only be used for GPU-accelerated effects.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T uses Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 (Arrow Lake). This means future upgrades within the same platform are limited to other Arrow Lake-S parts, though the socket is new enough that higher-end SKUs may exist. Memory support is DDR5 dual-channel, with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s — this is a solid baseline, but users wanting more bandwidth would need to overclock memory (if the motherboard allows) or choose a different platform. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is sufficient for a single high-end GPU and one or two NVMe SSDs. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible and will not bottleneck the RTX 4070 SUPER.

The GPU’s TDP is 220W, and the suggested PSU is 550W. This leaves headroom for a modest overclock or additional drives, but not for a second GPU. The CPU’s 35W TDP is negligible in the power budget, so the PSU headroom is effectively determined by the GPU. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU (if the PSU allows) or adding more DDR5 memory, as the CPU’s 20 cores are unlikely to be the limiting factor in most tasks. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics (64EU) provides a fallback if the discrete GPU fails, but it is not suitable for gaming. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support is future-proof, but current GPUs like the RTX 4070 SUPER only use Gen 4, so no immediate benefit. For users considering an upgrade, the CPU is already near the top of its class, so the GPU would be the more impactful change, provided the 550W PSU is replaced if a more powerful card is chosen.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance for productivity while also wanting a capable GPU for gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks. The 90th percentile CPU makes it ideal for content creators who edit video, render 3D scenes, or compile large codebases. The 20 cores and 30MB L3 cache handle multi-threaded workloads efficiently at a 35W TDP, which is beneficial for small form factor builds or offices where heat and noise are concerns. The GPU’s 83rd percentile and 12GB VRAM suit 1440p gaming at high settings, as well as tasks like machine learning inference or photo editing that benefit from CUDA acceleration.

Students in engineering or computer science programs would find this system capable of running simulations (PassMark physics 2391) and compiling code (integer math 104943). Small business workstations that run database queries (data compression 370158) or financial models (floating point 129817) would also benefit. However, the GPU’s 12GB VRAM may be limiting for 4K texture-heavy workloads or large neural network training, so this build is not ideal for professional 3D artists working with massive scenes or AI researchers training large models. Gamers targeting 1440p at 144Hz will find the GPU sufficient for most titles at high settings, but 4K ultra settings may require lowering some options. The CPU’s single-core performance (4455 R23) ensures that even older games that rely on single-thread performance will run smoothly.

Usage Scenarios

  • High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4070 SUPER’s 35.48 TFLOPS and 12GB GDDR6X should drive 1440p monitors at high refresh rates in most titles, with the CPU’s 5.30 GHz boost ensuring minimal frame drops in CPU-heavy scenes. Estimated 1440p ultra FPS would be in the 80-120 range for AAA games, based on the GPU’s 83rd percentile ranking.
  • Streaming: The 224 tensor cores handle NVENC encoding, while the CPU’s 20 cores can manage streaming software without impacting game performance, given its 31558 R23 multi-core score. This setup is well-suited for single-PC streaming at 1080p60.
  • Video editing: The CPU’s multi-threaded scores (37084 PassMark) handle timeline scrubbing and export, while the GPU accelerates effects and color grading via CUDA, with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth for fast previews.
  • 3D rendering: The CPU’s 20 cores will render CPU-based scenes efficiently (31558 R23), while the GPU’s RT cores and 35.48 TFLOPS accelerate GPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles or Octane, though 12GB VRAM may limit scene complexity.
  • Software development: The CPU’s integer math (104943) and data compression (370158) scores make compilation and version control fast, while the GPU is largely irrelevant for this task, meaning the 35W CPU keeps power costs low.
  • Student and office work: The CPU’s low 35W TDP and integrated graphics provide a quiet, efficient system for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet analysis, with the GPU only activating when needed for more demanding tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T (20-core, 35W) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (220W, 12GB). The CPU is from the Core Ultra Series 2 (Arrow Lake) and ranks in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is from the GeForce 40-series (Ada Lovelace) and ranks in the 83rd percentile. The combined percentile is 87, placing this build in the upper tier of desktop systems, but with a clear emphasis on CPU performance over GPU raw power. The CPU’s efficiency (35W TDP) and the GPU’s mid-range nature make this a balanced system for 1440p gaming and productivity, rather than a 4K or extreme enthusiast machine. The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is high-midrange, suitable for users who prioritize multi-threaded workloads but still want a competent gaming experience.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and how does it affect cooling?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T has a TDP of 35W, which is very low for a 20-core processor. This means a capable air cooler is sufficient, and the system will run quietly under load, making it suitable for small form factor builds.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4070 SUPER have, and is it enough for 4K?

A: The GPU has 12GB of GDDR6X memory. For 4K gaming, this is sufficient for most current titles at high settings, but ultra textures in some games may exceed 12GB, so reducing texture quality is recommended.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, which is standard for consumer platforms.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The launch MSRP of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T is $384.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is marked as end-of-life, with its successor being the GeForce 50 series. The predecessor is the GeForce 30 series.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 47697, which is 0.4% lower than the Ryzen 9 7900X3D’s 47908. This means the 265T is statistically tied with AMD’s gaming-focused chip, despite having a much lower TDP (35W vs. likely higher).

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550W. The CPU’s 35W TDP adds negligible load, so a 550W power supply is sufficient for the entire system, with some headroom for drives and peripherals.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK indicates that `measuredFpsUltraByGame` is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not empirical results.

Based on the GPU’s 83rd percentile and 35.48 TFLOPS, the RTX 4070 SUPER is expected to handle 1440p ultra settings well in most games. At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-core performance (4455 R23) will prevent bottlenecks, and the GPU will likely push frame rates above 120 FPS in esports titles. At 1440p ultra, AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Red Dead Redemption 2 would likely average 70-90 FPS, while more optimized titles like Call of Duty or Fortnite could exceed 120 FPS. At 4K, the 12GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth will become limiting, and users may need to lower settings to high or medium to maintain 60 FPS. Ray tracing will significantly impact performance, but the 56 RT cores and DLSS (via tensor cores) can help mitigate the hit, with DLSS Quality mode potentially restoring frame rates to playable levels. The CPU’s 20 cores ensure that background tasks like Discord or streaming won’t cause stutters, and the 5.30 GHz boost clock handles single-threaded game logic smoothly. For competitive shooters at 1080p, the system is likely capable of 200+ FPS, making it a strong choice for high-refresh monitors.